Loading…

A Comparative Study on Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization Algorithms Estimating Surface Duct

The problem of atmospheric duct inversion is usually solved as a single objective optimization problem. Based on ground-based Global Positioning System (GPS) phase delay and propagation loss, this paper develops a multi-objective method including the effect of source frequency and receiving antenna...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2018-12, Vol.18 (12), p.4428
Main Authors: Liao, Qixiang, Sheng, Zheng, Shi, Hanqing, Zhang, Lei, Zhou, Lesong, Ge, Wei, Long, Zhiyong
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-b5628fdc600e7122d33cc02be34943f8c5680c023cbfa759ed6ab6b48dc4af0f3
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 12
container_start_page 4428
container_title Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
container_volume 18
creator Liao, Qixiang
Sheng, Zheng
Shi, Hanqing
Zhang, Lei
Zhou, Lesong
Ge, Wei
Long, Zhiyong
description The problem of atmospheric duct inversion is usually solved as a single objective optimization problem. Based on ground-based Global Positioning System (GPS) phase delay and propagation loss, this paper develops a multi-objective method including the effect of source frequency and receiving antenna height. The diversity and convergence of solution sets are evaluated for seven multi-objective evolutionary algorithms with three performance metrics: Hypervolume (HV), Inverted Generational Distance (IGD), and the averaged Hausdorff distance (Δ₂). The inversion results are compared with the simulation results, and the experimental comparison is conducted on three groups of test situations. The results demonstrate that the ranking of algorithm performance varies because of the different methods used to calculate performance metrics. Moreover, when the algorithms show overwhelming performance using performance metrics, the inversion result is not more close to the real value. In the comparison of computational experiments, it was found that, as the retrieved parameter dimension increases, the inversion result becomes more unstable. When the observed data are sufficient, the inversion result seems to be improved.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/s18124428
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9d90f6475c76489e9472a78aaf21d5dd</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_9d90f6475c76489e9472a78aaf21d5dd</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2158249619</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-b5628fdc600e7122d33cc02be34943f8c5680c023cbfa759ed6ab6b48dc4af0f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc1OGzEUhS1EVSjtghdAXtLFtP4bj71BikJokUAsoGvL45_gaGYcbE-k9OkZCESw8tW5nz5f6QBwitEvSiX6nbHAhDEiDsAxZoRVghB0-GE-At9yXiFEKKXiKziiqK4FluIYmBmcx36tky5h4-B9Ge0WxgEuNrEbS4iDTlt4O3YlVLFdOfNK3a1L6MN__bKHs24ZUyiPfYaLPOVTOizh_Zi8Ng5ejqZ8B1-87rL78faegH9Xi4f53-rm7s_1fHZTGcZwqdqaE-Gt4Qi5BhNiKTUGkdZRJhn1wtRcoCmgpvW6qaWzXLe8ZcIapj3y9ARc77w26pVap-mWtFVRB_UaxLRUOpVgOqeklchz1tSm4UxIJ1lDdCO09gTb2trJdbFzrce2d9a4oSTdfZJ-3gzhUS3jRnGKRIOaSXD-JkjxaXS5qD5k47pODy6OWRFcC8Ikx3JCf-5Qk2LOyfn9Nxipl4LVvuCJPft41558b5Q-A1_5oqU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2158249619</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparative Study on Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization Algorithms Estimating Surface Duct</title><source>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Liao, Qixiang ; Sheng, Zheng ; Shi, Hanqing ; Zhang, Lei ; Zhou, Lesong ; Ge, Wei ; Long, Zhiyong</creator><creatorcontrib>Liao, Qixiang ; Sheng, Zheng ; Shi, Hanqing ; Zhang, Lei ; Zhou, Lesong ; Ge, Wei ; Long, Zhiyong</creatorcontrib><description>The problem of atmospheric duct inversion is usually solved as a single objective optimization problem. Based on ground-based Global Positioning System (GPS) phase delay and propagation loss, this paper develops a multi-objective method including the effect of source frequency and receiving antenna height. The diversity and convergence of solution sets are evaluated for seven multi-objective evolutionary algorithms with three performance metrics: Hypervolume (HV), Inverted Generational Distance (IGD), and the averaged Hausdorff distance (Δ₂). The inversion results are compared with the simulation results, and the experimental comparison is conducted on three groups of test situations. The results demonstrate that the ranking of algorithm performance varies because of the different methods used to calculate performance metrics. Moreover, when the algorithms show overwhelming performance using performance metrics, the inversion result is not more close to the real value. In the comparison of computational experiments, it was found that, as the retrieved parameter dimension increases, the inversion result becomes more unstable. When the observed data are sufficient, the inversion result seems to be improved.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1424-8220</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1424-8220</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/s18124428</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30558198</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI</publisher><subject>atmospheric duct ; GPS, hypervolume ; inverted generational distance ; multi-objective optimization algorithm</subject><ispartof>Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2018-12, Vol.18 (12), p.4428</ispartof><rights>2018 by the authors. 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-b5628fdc600e7122d33cc02be34943f8c5680c023cbfa759ed6ab6b48dc4af0f3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-2197-2170</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6308707/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6308707/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,37013,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30558198$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liao, Qixiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheng, Zheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Hanqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Lesong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ge, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Zhiyong</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparative Study on Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization Algorithms Estimating Surface Duct</title><title>Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)</title><addtitle>Sensors (Basel)</addtitle><description>The problem of atmospheric duct inversion is usually solved as a single objective optimization problem. Based on ground-based Global Positioning System (GPS) phase delay and propagation loss, this paper develops a multi-objective method including the effect of source frequency and receiving antenna height. The diversity and convergence of solution sets are evaluated for seven multi-objective evolutionary algorithms with three performance metrics: Hypervolume (HV), Inverted Generational Distance (IGD), and the averaged Hausdorff distance (Δ₂). The inversion results are compared with the simulation results, and the experimental comparison is conducted on three groups of test situations. The results demonstrate that the ranking of algorithm performance varies because of the different methods used to calculate performance metrics. Moreover, when the algorithms show overwhelming performance using performance metrics, the inversion result is not more close to the real value. In the comparison of computational experiments, it was found that, as the retrieved parameter dimension increases, the inversion result becomes more unstable. When the observed data are sufficient, the inversion result seems to be improved.</description><subject>atmospheric duct</subject><subject>GPS, hypervolume</subject><subject>inverted generational distance</subject><subject>multi-objective optimization algorithm</subject><issn>1424-8220</issn><issn>1424-8220</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkc1OGzEUhS1EVSjtghdAXtLFtP4bj71BikJokUAsoGvL45_gaGYcbE-k9OkZCESw8tW5nz5f6QBwitEvSiX6nbHAhDEiDsAxZoRVghB0-GE-At9yXiFEKKXiKziiqK4FluIYmBmcx36tky5h4-B9Ge0WxgEuNrEbS4iDTlt4O3YlVLFdOfNK3a1L6MN__bKHs24ZUyiPfYaLPOVTOizh_Zi8Ng5ejqZ8B1-87rL78faegH9Xi4f53-rm7s_1fHZTGcZwqdqaE-Gt4Qi5BhNiKTUGkdZRJhn1wtRcoCmgpvW6qaWzXLe8ZcIapj3y9ARc77w26pVap-mWtFVRB_UaxLRUOpVgOqeklchz1tSm4UxIJ1lDdCO09gTb2trJdbFzrce2d9a4oSTdfZJ-3gzhUS3jRnGKRIOaSXD-JkjxaXS5qD5k47pODy6OWRFcC8Ikx3JCf-5Qk2LOyfn9Nxipl4LVvuCJPft41558b5Q-A1_5oqU</recordid><startdate>20181214</startdate><enddate>20181214</enddate><creator>Liao, Qixiang</creator><creator>Sheng, Zheng</creator><creator>Shi, Hanqing</creator><creator>Zhang, Lei</creator><creator>Zhou, Lesong</creator><creator>Ge, Wei</creator><creator>Long, Zhiyong</creator><general>MDPI</general><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2197-2170</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181214</creationdate><title>A Comparative Study on Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization Algorithms Estimating Surface Duct</title><author>Liao, Qixiang ; Sheng, Zheng ; Shi, Hanqing ; Zhang, Lei ; Zhou, Lesong ; Ge, Wei ; Long, Zhiyong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-b5628fdc600e7122d33cc02be34943f8c5680c023cbfa759ed6ab6b48dc4af0f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>atmospheric duct</topic><topic>GPS, hypervolume</topic><topic>inverted generational distance</topic><topic>multi-objective optimization algorithm</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liao, Qixiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheng, Zheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Hanqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Lesong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ge, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Zhiyong</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liao, Qixiang</au><au>Sheng, Zheng</au><au>Shi, Hanqing</au><au>Zhang, Lei</au><au>Zhou, Lesong</au><au>Ge, Wei</au><au>Long, Zhiyong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comparative Study on Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization Algorithms Estimating Surface Duct</atitle><jtitle>Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle><addtitle>Sensors (Basel)</addtitle><date>2018-12-14</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>4428</spage><pages>4428-</pages><issn>1424-8220</issn><eissn>1424-8220</eissn><abstract>The problem of atmospheric duct inversion is usually solved as a single objective optimization problem. Based on ground-based Global Positioning System (GPS) phase delay and propagation loss, this paper develops a multi-objective method including the effect of source frequency and receiving antenna height. The diversity and convergence of solution sets are evaluated for seven multi-objective evolutionary algorithms with three performance metrics: Hypervolume (HV), Inverted Generational Distance (IGD), and the averaged Hausdorff distance (Δ₂). The inversion results are compared with the simulation results, and the experimental comparison is conducted on three groups of test situations. The results demonstrate that the ranking of algorithm performance varies because of the different methods used to calculate performance metrics. Moreover, when the algorithms show overwhelming performance using performance metrics, the inversion result is not more close to the real value. In the comparison of computational experiments, it was found that, as the retrieved parameter dimension increases, the inversion result becomes more unstable. When the observed data are sufficient, the inversion result seems to be improved.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI</pub><pmid>30558198</pmid><doi>10.3390/s18124428</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2197-2170</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1424-8220
ispartof Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2018-12, Vol.18 (12), p.4428
issn 1424-8220
1424-8220
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9d90f6475c76489e9472a78aaf21d5dd
source ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects atmospheric duct
GPS, hypervolume
inverted generational distance
multi-objective optimization algorithm
title A Comparative Study on Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization Algorithms Estimating Surface Duct
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T05%3A47%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparative%20Study%20on%20Evolutionary%20Multi-objective%20Optimization%20Algorithms%20Estimating%20Surface%20Duct&rft.jtitle=Sensors%20(Basel,%20Switzerland)&rft.au=Liao,%20Qixiang&rft.date=2018-12-14&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=4428&rft.pages=4428-&rft.issn=1424-8220&rft.eissn=1424-8220&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/s18124428&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2158249619%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-b5628fdc600e7122d33cc02be34943f8c5680c023cbfa759ed6ab6b48dc4af0f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2158249619&rft_id=info:pmid/30558198&rfr_iscdi=true