Loading…
A Comparative Study on Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization Algorithms Estimating Surface Duct
The problem of atmospheric duct inversion is usually solved as a single objective optimization problem. Based on ground-based Global Positioning System (GPS) phase delay and propagation loss, this paper develops a multi-objective method including the effect of source frequency and receiving antenna...
Saved in:
Published in: | Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2018-12, Vol.18 (12), p.4428 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-b5628fdc600e7122d33cc02be34943f8c5680c023cbfa759ed6ab6b48dc4af0f3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 4428 |
container_title | Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Liao, Qixiang Sheng, Zheng Shi, Hanqing Zhang, Lei Zhou, Lesong Ge, Wei Long, Zhiyong |
description | The problem of atmospheric duct inversion is usually solved as a single objective optimization problem. Based on ground-based Global Positioning System (GPS) phase delay and propagation loss, this paper develops a multi-objective method including the effect of source frequency and receiving antenna height. The diversity and convergence of solution sets are evaluated for seven multi-objective evolutionary algorithms with three performance metrics: Hypervolume (HV), Inverted Generational Distance (IGD), and the averaged Hausdorff distance (Δ₂). The inversion results are compared with the simulation results, and the experimental comparison is conducted on three groups of test situations. The results demonstrate that the ranking of algorithm performance varies because of the different methods used to calculate performance metrics. Moreover, when the algorithms show overwhelming performance using performance metrics, the inversion result is not more close to the real value. In the comparison of computational experiments, it was found that, as the retrieved parameter dimension increases, the inversion result becomes more unstable. When the observed data are sufficient, the inversion result seems to be improved. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/s18124428 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9d90f6475c76489e9472a78aaf21d5dd</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_9d90f6475c76489e9472a78aaf21d5dd</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2158249619</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-b5628fdc600e7122d33cc02be34943f8c5680c023cbfa759ed6ab6b48dc4af0f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc1OGzEUhS1EVSjtghdAXtLFtP4bj71BikJokUAsoGvL45_gaGYcbE-k9OkZCESw8tW5nz5f6QBwitEvSiX6nbHAhDEiDsAxZoRVghB0-GE-At9yXiFEKKXiKziiqK4FluIYmBmcx36tky5h4-B9Ge0WxgEuNrEbS4iDTlt4O3YlVLFdOfNK3a1L6MN__bKHs24ZUyiPfYaLPOVTOizh_Zi8Ng5ejqZ8B1-87rL78faegH9Xi4f53-rm7s_1fHZTGcZwqdqaE-Gt4Qi5BhNiKTUGkdZRJhn1wtRcoCmgpvW6qaWzXLe8ZcIapj3y9ARc77w26pVap-mWtFVRB_UaxLRUOpVgOqeklchz1tSm4UxIJ1lDdCO09gTb2trJdbFzrce2d9a4oSTdfZJ-3gzhUS3jRnGKRIOaSXD-JkjxaXS5qD5k47pODy6OWRFcC8Ikx3JCf-5Qk2LOyfn9Nxipl4LVvuCJPft41558b5Q-A1_5oqU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2158249619</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparative Study on Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization Algorithms Estimating Surface Duct</title><source>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Liao, Qixiang ; Sheng, Zheng ; Shi, Hanqing ; Zhang, Lei ; Zhou, Lesong ; Ge, Wei ; Long, Zhiyong</creator><creatorcontrib>Liao, Qixiang ; Sheng, Zheng ; Shi, Hanqing ; Zhang, Lei ; Zhou, Lesong ; Ge, Wei ; Long, Zhiyong</creatorcontrib><description>The problem of atmospheric duct inversion is usually solved as a single objective optimization problem. Based on ground-based Global Positioning System (GPS) phase delay and propagation loss, this paper develops a multi-objective method including the effect of source frequency and receiving antenna height. The diversity and convergence of solution sets are evaluated for seven multi-objective evolutionary algorithms with three performance metrics: Hypervolume (HV), Inverted Generational Distance (IGD), and the averaged Hausdorff distance (Δ₂). The inversion results are compared with the simulation results, and the experimental comparison is conducted on three groups of test situations. The results demonstrate that the ranking of algorithm performance varies because of the different methods used to calculate performance metrics. Moreover, when the algorithms show overwhelming performance using performance metrics, the inversion result is not more close to the real value. In the comparison of computational experiments, it was found that, as the retrieved parameter dimension increases, the inversion result becomes more unstable. When the observed data are sufficient, the inversion result seems to be improved.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1424-8220</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1424-8220</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/s18124428</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30558198</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI</publisher><subject>atmospheric duct ; GPS, hypervolume ; inverted generational distance ; multi-objective optimization algorithm</subject><ispartof>Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2018-12, Vol.18 (12), p.4428</ispartof><rights>2018 by the authors. 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-b5628fdc600e7122d33cc02be34943f8c5680c023cbfa759ed6ab6b48dc4af0f3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-2197-2170</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6308707/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6308707/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,37013,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30558198$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liao, Qixiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheng, Zheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Hanqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Lesong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ge, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Zhiyong</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparative Study on Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization Algorithms Estimating Surface Duct</title><title>Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)</title><addtitle>Sensors (Basel)</addtitle><description>The problem of atmospheric duct inversion is usually solved as a single objective optimization problem. Based on ground-based Global Positioning System (GPS) phase delay and propagation loss, this paper develops a multi-objective method including the effect of source frequency and receiving antenna height. The diversity and convergence of solution sets are evaluated for seven multi-objective evolutionary algorithms with three performance metrics: Hypervolume (HV), Inverted Generational Distance (IGD), and the averaged Hausdorff distance (Δ₂). The inversion results are compared with the simulation results, and the experimental comparison is conducted on three groups of test situations. The results demonstrate that the ranking of algorithm performance varies because of the different methods used to calculate performance metrics. Moreover, when the algorithms show overwhelming performance using performance metrics, the inversion result is not more close to the real value. In the comparison of computational experiments, it was found that, as the retrieved parameter dimension increases, the inversion result becomes more unstable. When the observed data are sufficient, the inversion result seems to be improved.</description><subject>atmospheric duct</subject><subject>GPS, hypervolume</subject><subject>inverted generational distance</subject><subject>multi-objective optimization algorithm</subject><issn>1424-8220</issn><issn>1424-8220</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkc1OGzEUhS1EVSjtghdAXtLFtP4bj71BikJokUAsoGvL45_gaGYcbE-k9OkZCESw8tW5nz5f6QBwitEvSiX6nbHAhDEiDsAxZoRVghB0-GE-At9yXiFEKKXiKziiqK4FluIYmBmcx36tky5h4-B9Ge0WxgEuNrEbS4iDTlt4O3YlVLFdOfNK3a1L6MN__bKHs24ZUyiPfYaLPOVTOizh_Zi8Ng5ejqZ8B1-87rL78faegH9Xi4f53-rm7s_1fHZTGcZwqdqaE-Gt4Qi5BhNiKTUGkdZRJhn1wtRcoCmgpvW6qaWzXLe8ZcIapj3y9ARc77w26pVap-mWtFVRB_UaxLRUOpVgOqeklchz1tSm4UxIJ1lDdCO09gTb2trJdbFzrce2d9a4oSTdfZJ-3gzhUS3jRnGKRIOaSXD-JkjxaXS5qD5k47pODy6OWRFcC8Ikx3JCf-5Qk2LOyfn9Nxipl4LVvuCJPft41558b5Q-A1_5oqU</recordid><startdate>20181214</startdate><enddate>20181214</enddate><creator>Liao, Qixiang</creator><creator>Sheng, Zheng</creator><creator>Shi, Hanqing</creator><creator>Zhang, Lei</creator><creator>Zhou, Lesong</creator><creator>Ge, Wei</creator><creator>Long, Zhiyong</creator><general>MDPI</general><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2197-2170</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181214</creationdate><title>A Comparative Study on Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization Algorithms Estimating Surface Duct</title><author>Liao, Qixiang ; Sheng, Zheng ; Shi, Hanqing ; Zhang, Lei ; Zhou, Lesong ; Ge, Wei ; Long, Zhiyong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-b5628fdc600e7122d33cc02be34943f8c5680c023cbfa759ed6ab6b48dc4af0f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>atmospheric duct</topic><topic>GPS, hypervolume</topic><topic>inverted generational distance</topic><topic>multi-objective optimization algorithm</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liao, Qixiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheng, Zheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Hanqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Lesong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ge, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Zhiyong</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liao, Qixiang</au><au>Sheng, Zheng</au><au>Shi, Hanqing</au><au>Zhang, Lei</au><au>Zhou, Lesong</au><au>Ge, Wei</au><au>Long, Zhiyong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comparative Study on Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization Algorithms Estimating Surface Duct</atitle><jtitle>Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle><addtitle>Sensors (Basel)</addtitle><date>2018-12-14</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>4428</spage><pages>4428-</pages><issn>1424-8220</issn><eissn>1424-8220</eissn><abstract>The problem of atmospheric duct inversion is usually solved as a single objective optimization problem. Based on ground-based Global Positioning System (GPS) phase delay and propagation loss, this paper develops a multi-objective method including the effect of source frequency and receiving antenna height. The diversity and convergence of solution sets are evaluated for seven multi-objective evolutionary algorithms with three performance metrics: Hypervolume (HV), Inverted Generational Distance (IGD), and the averaged Hausdorff distance (Δ₂). The inversion results are compared with the simulation results, and the experimental comparison is conducted on three groups of test situations. The results demonstrate that the ranking of algorithm performance varies because of the different methods used to calculate performance metrics. Moreover, when the algorithms show overwhelming performance using performance metrics, the inversion result is not more close to the real value. In the comparison of computational experiments, it was found that, as the retrieved parameter dimension increases, the inversion result becomes more unstable. When the observed data are sufficient, the inversion result seems to be improved.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI</pub><pmid>30558198</pmid><doi>10.3390/s18124428</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2197-2170</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1424-8220 |
ispartof | Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2018-12, Vol.18 (12), p.4428 |
issn | 1424-8220 1424-8220 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9d90f6475c76489e9472a78aaf21d5dd |
source | ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central |
subjects | atmospheric duct GPS, hypervolume inverted generational distance multi-objective optimization algorithm |
title | A Comparative Study on Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization Algorithms Estimating Surface Duct |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T05%3A47%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparative%20Study%20on%20Evolutionary%20Multi-objective%20Optimization%20Algorithms%20Estimating%20Surface%20Duct&rft.jtitle=Sensors%20(Basel,%20Switzerland)&rft.au=Liao,%20Qixiang&rft.date=2018-12-14&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=4428&rft.pages=4428-&rft.issn=1424-8220&rft.eissn=1424-8220&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/s18124428&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2158249619%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-b5628fdc600e7122d33cc02be34943f8c5680c023cbfa759ed6ab6b48dc4af0f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2158249619&rft_id=info:pmid/30558198&rfr_iscdi=true |