Loading…

A new laryngeal mask supraglottic airway device with integrated balloon line: a descriptive and comparative bench study

Laryngeal masks are invasive devices for airway management placed in the supraglottic position. The Shiley™ laryngeal mask (Shiley™ LM) features an integrated inflation tube and airway shaft to facilitate product insertion and reduce the chance of tube occlusion when patients bite down. This study c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.) N.Z.), 2016-01, Vol.9, p.383-388
Main Authors: Zhou, YingHai, Jew, Korinne
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-e47075f47cb82ef231af44293b9342a1711cf7d01eef5c3abad8a7a02277ac643
cites
container_end_page 388
container_issue
container_start_page 383
container_title Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.)
container_volume 9
creator Zhou, YingHai
Jew, Korinne
description Laryngeal masks are invasive devices for airway management placed in the supraglottic position. The Shiley™ laryngeal mask (Shiley™ LM) features an integrated inflation tube and airway shaft to facilitate product insertion and reduce the chance of tube occlusion when patients bite down. This study compared the Shiley LM to two other disposable laryngeal mask devices, the Ambu AuraStraight™ and the LMA Unique™. Overall device design, tensile strength, flexibility of various structures, and sealing performance were measured. The Shiley LM is structurally stronger and its shaft is more resistant to compression than the other devices. The Shiley LM is generally less flexible than the other devices, but this relationship varies with device size. Sealing performance of the devices was similar in a bench assay. The results of this bench study demonstrate that the new Shiley LM resembles other commercially available laryngeal mask devices, though it exhibits greater tensile strength and lower flexibility.
doi_str_mv 10.2147/MDER.S112185
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9e2b66920c7c49dc81097535074d8809</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A503296717</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_9e2b66920c7c49dc81097535074d8809</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A503296717</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-e47075f47cb82ef231af44293b9342a1711cf7d01eef5c3abad8a7a02277ac643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdks1vEzEQxVcIRKvSG2dkCQlxIMUfu_GaA1JUClQqQuLjbM16Zzcujh1sb6L89zgkVC2-2B7_9DTP86rqOaMXnNXy7ZcPV98uvjPGWds8qk4Zk2pW6vTxvfNJdZ7SLS1LCNYK9rQ64bKthWjUabVdEI9b4iDu_IjgyArSL5KmdYTRhZytIWDjFnakx401SLY2L4n1GccIGXvSgXMheOKsx3cECpZMtOtsN0jA98SE1RoKur936M2SpDz1u2fVkwFcwvPjflb9_Hj14_Lz7Obrp-vLxc3MNFTlGZb-ZTPU0nQtx4ELBkNdcyU6JWoOTDJmBtlThjg0RkAHfQsSKOdSgpnX4qy6Puj2AW71OtpVcaoDWP23EOKoIRaXDrVC3s3nilMjTa160zKqZCMaKuu-bakqWu8PWuupW2Fv0OcI7oHowxdvl3oMG12stFLOi8Dro0AMvydMWa9sMugceAxT0mU6SoqmbXhBX_6H3oYp-vJVmnOu5lIIunf36kCNUAwsy_zyMgU3ZRt80ouGij3KZAHfHEATQ0oRh7uuGdX7JOl9kvQxSQV_cd_pHfwvN-IPKjnD1A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2229673304</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A new laryngeal mask supraglottic airway device with integrated balloon line: a descriptive and comparative bench study</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis_OA刊</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Zhou, YingHai ; Jew, Korinne</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhou, YingHai ; Jew, Korinne</creatorcontrib><description>Laryngeal masks are invasive devices for airway management placed in the supraglottic position. The Shiley™ laryngeal mask (Shiley™ LM) features an integrated inflation tube and airway shaft to facilitate product insertion and reduce the chance of tube occlusion when patients bite down. This study compared the Shiley LM to two other disposable laryngeal mask devices, the Ambu AuraStraight™ and the LMA Unique™. Overall device design, tensile strength, flexibility of various structures, and sealing performance were measured. The Shiley LM is structurally stronger and its shaft is more resistant to compression than the other devices. The Shiley LM is generally less flexible than the other devices, but this relationship varies with device size. Sealing performance of the devices was similar in a bench assay. The results of this bench study demonstrate that the new Shiley LM resembles other commercially available laryngeal mask devices, though it exhibits greater tensile strength and lower flexibility.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1179-1470</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1179-1470</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2147/MDER.S112185</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27843359</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Zealand: Dove Medical Press Limited</publisher><subject>Airway management ; Comparative analysis ; Design ; Flexibility ; Intensive care ; laryngeal mask ; Medical research ; Medicine, Experimental ; Original Research ; Patients ; Performance evaluation ; supraglottic airway ; supralaryngeal device ; Tensile strength</subject><ispartof>Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.), 2016-01, Vol.9, p.383-388</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Dove Medical Press Limited</rights><rights>2016. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2016 Zhou and Jew. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-e47075f47cb82ef231af44293b9342a1711cf7d01eef5c3abad8a7a02277ac643</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2229673304/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2229673304?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,53766,53768,75096</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27843359$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhou, YingHai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jew, Korinne</creatorcontrib><title>A new laryngeal mask supraglottic airway device with integrated balloon line: a descriptive and comparative bench study</title><title>Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.)</title><addtitle>Med Devices (Auckl)</addtitle><description>Laryngeal masks are invasive devices for airway management placed in the supraglottic position. The Shiley™ laryngeal mask (Shiley™ LM) features an integrated inflation tube and airway shaft to facilitate product insertion and reduce the chance of tube occlusion when patients bite down. This study compared the Shiley LM to two other disposable laryngeal mask devices, the Ambu AuraStraight™ and the LMA Unique™. Overall device design, tensile strength, flexibility of various structures, and sealing performance were measured. The Shiley LM is structurally stronger and its shaft is more resistant to compression than the other devices. The Shiley LM is generally less flexible than the other devices, but this relationship varies with device size. Sealing performance of the devices was similar in a bench assay. The results of this bench study demonstrate that the new Shiley LM resembles other commercially available laryngeal mask devices, though it exhibits greater tensile strength and lower flexibility.</description><subject>Airway management</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Flexibility</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>laryngeal mask</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>supraglottic airway</subject><subject>supralaryngeal device</subject><subject>Tensile strength</subject><issn>1179-1470</issn><issn>1179-1470</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdks1vEzEQxVcIRKvSG2dkCQlxIMUfu_GaA1JUClQqQuLjbM16Zzcujh1sb6L89zgkVC2-2B7_9DTP86rqOaMXnNXy7ZcPV98uvjPGWds8qk4Zk2pW6vTxvfNJdZ7SLS1LCNYK9rQ64bKthWjUabVdEI9b4iDu_IjgyArSL5KmdYTRhZytIWDjFnakx401SLY2L4n1GccIGXvSgXMheOKsx3cECpZMtOtsN0jA98SE1RoKur936M2SpDz1u2fVkwFcwvPjflb9_Hj14_Lz7Obrp-vLxc3MNFTlGZb-ZTPU0nQtx4ELBkNdcyU6JWoOTDJmBtlThjg0RkAHfQsSKOdSgpnX4qy6Puj2AW71OtpVcaoDWP23EOKoIRaXDrVC3s3nilMjTa160zKqZCMaKuu-bakqWu8PWuupW2Fv0OcI7oHowxdvl3oMG12stFLOi8Dro0AMvydMWa9sMugceAxT0mU6SoqmbXhBX_6H3oYp-vJVmnOu5lIIunf36kCNUAwsy_zyMgU3ZRt80ouGij3KZAHfHEATQ0oRh7uuGdX7JOl9kvQxSQV_cd_pHfwvN-IPKjnD1A</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Zhou, YingHai</creator><creator>Jew, Korinne</creator><general>Dove Medical Press Limited</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><general>Dove Medical Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>A new laryngeal mask supraglottic airway device with integrated balloon line: a descriptive and comparative bench study</title><author>Zhou, YingHai ; Jew, Korinne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-e47075f47cb82ef231af44293b9342a1711cf7d01eef5c3abad8a7a02277ac643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Airway management</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Flexibility</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>laryngeal mask</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>supraglottic airway</topic><topic>supralaryngeal device</topic><topic>Tensile strength</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhou, YingHai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jew, Korinne</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhou, YingHai</au><au>Jew, Korinne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A new laryngeal mask supraglottic airway device with integrated balloon line: a descriptive and comparative bench study</atitle><jtitle>Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.)</jtitle><addtitle>Med Devices (Auckl)</addtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>9</volume><spage>383</spage><epage>388</epage><pages>383-388</pages><issn>1179-1470</issn><eissn>1179-1470</eissn><abstract>Laryngeal masks are invasive devices for airway management placed in the supraglottic position. The Shiley™ laryngeal mask (Shiley™ LM) features an integrated inflation tube and airway shaft to facilitate product insertion and reduce the chance of tube occlusion when patients bite down. This study compared the Shiley LM to two other disposable laryngeal mask devices, the Ambu AuraStraight™ and the LMA Unique™. Overall device design, tensile strength, flexibility of various structures, and sealing performance were measured. The Shiley LM is structurally stronger and its shaft is more resistant to compression than the other devices. The Shiley LM is generally less flexible than the other devices, but this relationship varies with device size. Sealing performance of the devices was similar in a bench assay. The results of this bench study demonstrate that the new Shiley LM resembles other commercially available laryngeal mask devices, though it exhibits greater tensile strength and lower flexibility.</abstract><cop>New Zealand</cop><pub>Dove Medical Press Limited</pub><pmid>27843359</pmid><doi>10.2147/MDER.S112185</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1179-1470
ispartof Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.), 2016-01, Vol.9, p.383-388
issn 1179-1470
1179-1470
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9e2b66920c7c49dc81097535074d8809
source Taylor & Francis_OA刊; Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Airway management
Comparative analysis
Design
Flexibility
Intensive care
laryngeal mask
Medical research
Medicine, Experimental
Original Research
Patients
Performance evaluation
supraglottic airway
supralaryngeal device
Tensile strength
title A new laryngeal mask supraglottic airway device with integrated balloon line: a descriptive and comparative bench study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T19%3A51%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20new%20laryngeal%20mask%20supraglottic%20airway%20device%20with%20integrated%20balloon%20line:%20a%20descriptive%20and%20comparative%20bench%20study&rft.jtitle=Medical%20devices%20(Auckland,%20N.Z.)&rft.au=Zhou,%20YingHai&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=9&rft.spage=383&rft.epage=388&rft.pages=383-388&rft.issn=1179-1470&rft.eissn=1179-1470&rft_id=info:doi/10.2147/MDER.S112185&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA503296717%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-e47075f47cb82ef231af44293b9342a1711cf7d01eef5c3abad8a7a02277ac643%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2229673304&rft_id=info:pmid/27843359&rft_galeid=A503296717&rfr_iscdi=true