Loading…
Characterizing bumble bee (Bombus) communities in the United States and assessing a conservation monitoring method
Aim Bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombus) are economically and ecologically important pollinators in agroecosystems and wildland habitats. In the Nearctic region, there are approximately 41 species, of which the IUCN lists twelve species as vulnerable, endangered, or critically endangered. We co...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ecology and evolution 2019-02, Vol.9 (3), p.1061-1069 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5093-d42275514bb4b84bd7d1bd9cd6a497514d9e2b9c494eb88350c309d76dbdfe993 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5093-d42275514bb4b84bd7d1bd9cd6a497514d9e2b9c494eb88350c309d76dbdfe993 |
container_end_page | 1069 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1061 |
container_title | Ecology and evolution |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Strange, James P. Tripodi, Amber D. |
description | Aim
Bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombus) are economically and ecologically important pollinators in agroecosystems and wildland habitats. In the Nearctic region, there are approximately 41 species, of which the IUCN lists twelve species as vulnerable, endangered, or critically endangered. We conducted a standardized faunal survey to inform ongoing conservation efforts including petitions under review for the Endangered Species Act. Furthermore, we test the appropriateness of a methodology for accurately sampling bumble bee communities.
Location
The United States of America, including 31 sites in 15 states.
Methods
We surveyed 15 states in the summer of 2015 to assess community composition and relative species abundance at agricultural and seminatural sites throughout the United States. We collected approximately 100 bees, using aerial nets, from each of 31 sites and identified specimens to species, totaling 3,252 bees. We assessed our survey methodology to understand whether it accurately sampled the potential community of bumble bees at each site for utility in future monitoring efforts.
Results
Average site species richness was 5.1 ± 2.05, and we detected 30 of the 41 species documented historically within the contiguous United States. Sampling a site beyond 100 bees rarely added additional species detections, whereas adding additional sampling sites within an ecoregion frequently increased the species richness for the ecoregion. Thirteen of the 30 species we detected each accounted for |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ece3.4783 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9e627d7ba9f1475eb82f78b0155370f0</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_9e627d7ba9f1475eb82f78b0155370f0</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2186143396</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5093-d42275514bb4b84bd7d1bd9cd6a497514d9e2b9c494eb88350c309d76dbdfe993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1ks1rHCEYh4fS0IQ0h_4DReglOWzi-DGOl0K7bNtAIIc2Z_HjnV2XGU3VSUn_-rrZNCSFelFfHx9e9Nc071p83mJMLsACPWeip6-aI4IZXwjB-9fP1ofNSc5bXEeHCcPiTXNIcY95y_BRk5YbnbQtkPxvH9bIzJMZARkAdPo5TmbOZ8jGaZqDLx4y8gGVDaCbugWHvhddalEHh3TOkPNOoeuFkCHd6eJjQFOsbEy7kwnKJrq3zcGgxwwnj_Nxc_Nl9WP5bXF1_fVy-elqYTmWdOEYIYLXLo1hpmfGCdcaJ63rNJOi1p0EYqRlkoHpe8qxpVg60TnjBpCSHjeXe6-Leqtuk590uldRe_VQiGmtdCrejqAkdEQ4YbQcWiZ49ZFB9Aa3nFOBB1xdH_eu29lM4CyEkvT4QvryJPiNWsc71VHBOsar4PRRkOLPGXJRk88WxlEHiHNWpO27llEqu4p--AfdxjmF-lSVEpIQXP-uUmd7yqaYc4LhqZkWq10w1C4YaheMyr5_3v0T-TcGFbjYA7_8CPf_N6nVckUflH8AuKrCuQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2179220051</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characterizing bumble bee (Bombus) communities in the United States and assessing a conservation monitoring method</title><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Strange, James P. ; Tripodi, Amber D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Strange, James P. ; Tripodi, Amber D.</creatorcontrib><description>Aim
Bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombus) are economically and ecologically important pollinators in agroecosystems and wildland habitats. In the Nearctic region, there are approximately 41 species, of which the IUCN lists twelve species as vulnerable, endangered, or critically endangered. We conducted a standardized faunal survey to inform ongoing conservation efforts including petitions under review for the Endangered Species Act. Furthermore, we test the appropriateness of a methodology for accurately sampling bumble bee communities.
Location
The United States of America, including 31 sites in 15 states.
Methods
We surveyed 15 states in the summer of 2015 to assess community composition and relative species abundance at agricultural and seminatural sites throughout the United States. We collected approximately 100 bees, using aerial nets, from each of 31 sites and identified specimens to species, totaling 3,252 bees. We assessed our survey methodology to understand whether it accurately sampled the potential community of bumble bees at each site for utility in future monitoring efforts.
Results
Average site species richness was 5.1 ± 2.05, and we detected 30 of the 41 species documented historically within the contiguous United States. Sampling a site beyond 100 bees rarely added additional species detections, whereas adding additional sampling sites within an ecoregion frequently increased the species richness for the ecoregion. Thirteen of the 30 species we detected each accounted for <1% of the total fauna, and two species accounted for 49.02% of all bees captured. Species richness and evenness increased with increasing latitude across communities.
Main Conclusions
Species diversity and evenness in bumble bees increases in northern latitudes and increasing elevation in the United States; however, a few common species tend to dominate communities while many species occur only in low numbers. The results of this survey effort can inform current conservation evaluations and planning.
Bumble bee communities vary across the United State and several species are considered to be at risk. We assessed the community structure and evaluated a sampling technique at 31 sites in 15 states in 2015. We suggest that sampling methods were adequate to assess community structure and provide much needed baseline data for further monitoring efforts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-7758</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-7758</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4783</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30805140</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Agricultural ecosystems ; Bees ; Biodiversity ; Bombus ; bumble bees ; Communities ; Community composition ; community structure ; Conservation ; conservation monitoring ; Ecological monitoring ; Elevation ; Endangered & extinct species ; Endangered species ; Historical account ; national survey ; Original Research ; pollinator diversity ; Pollinators ; Sampling ; Species diversity ; Species richness ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Ecology and evolution, 2019-02, Vol.9 (3), p.1061-1069</ispartof><rights>2019 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5093-d42275514bb4b84bd7d1bd9cd6a497514d9e2b9c494eb88350c309d76dbdfe993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5093-d42275514bb4b84bd7d1bd9cd6a497514d9e2b9c494eb88350c309d76dbdfe993</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7368-6638 ; 0000-0002-9612-6868</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2179220051/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2179220051?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,11562,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,46052,46476,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30805140$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Strange, James P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tripodi, Amber D.</creatorcontrib><title>Characterizing bumble bee (Bombus) communities in the United States and assessing a conservation monitoring method</title><title>Ecology and evolution</title><addtitle>Ecol Evol</addtitle><description>Aim
Bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombus) are economically and ecologically important pollinators in agroecosystems and wildland habitats. In the Nearctic region, there are approximately 41 species, of which the IUCN lists twelve species as vulnerable, endangered, or critically endangered. We conducted a standardized faunal survey to inform ongoing conservation efforts including petitions under review for the Endangered Species Act. Furthermore, we test the appropriateness of a methodology for accurately sampling bumble bee communities.
Location
The United States of America, including 31 sites in 15 states.
Methods
We surveyed 15 states in the summer of 2015 to assess community composition and relative species abundance at agricultural and seminatural sites throughout the United States. We collected approximately 100 bees, using aerial nets, from each of 31 sites and identified specimens to species, totaling 3,252 bees. We assessed our survey methodology to understand whether it accurately sampled the potential community of bumble bees at each site for utility in future monitoring efforts.
Results
Average site species richness was 5.1 ± 2.05, and we detected 30 of the 41 species documented historically within the contiguous United States. Sampling a site beyond 100 bees rarely added additional species detections, whereas adding additional sampling sites within an ecoregion frequently increased the species richness for the ecoregion. Thirteen of the 30 species we detected each accounted for <1% of the total fauna, and two species accounted for 49.02% of all bees captured. Species richness and evenness increased with increasing latitude across communities.
Main Conclusions
Species diversity and evenness in bumble bees increases in northern latitudes and increasing elevation in the United States; however, a few common species tend to dominate communities while many species occur only in low numbers. The results of this survey effort can inform current conservation evaluations and planning.
Bumble bee communities vary across the United State and several species are considered to be at risk. We assessed the community structure and evaluated a sampling technique at 31 sites in 15 states in 2015. We suggest that sampling methods were adequate to assess community structure and provide much needed baseline data for further monitoring efforts.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Agricultural ecosystems</subject><subject>Bees</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Bombus</subject><subject>bumble bees</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Community composition</subject><subject>community structure</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>conservation monitoring</subject><subject>Ecological monitoring</subject><subject>Elevation</subject><subject>Endangered & extinct species</subject><subject>Endangered species</subject><subject>Historical account</subject><subject>national survey</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>pollinator diversity</subject><subject>Pollinators</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>2045-7758</issn><issn>2045-7758</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1ks1rHCEYh4fS0IQ0h_4DReglOWzi-DGOl0K7bNtAIIc2Z_HjnV2XGU3VSUn_-rrZNCSFelFfHx9e9Nc071p83mJMLsACPWeip6-aI4IZXwjB-9fP1ofNSc5bXEeHCcPiTXNIcY95y_BRk5YbnbQtkPxvH9bIzJMZARkAdPo5TmbOZ8jGaZqDLx4y8gGVDaCbugWHvhddalEHh3TOkPNOoeuFkCHd6eJjQFOsbEy7kwnKJrq3zcGgxwwnj_Nxc_Nl9WP5bXF1_fVy-elqYTmWdOEYIYLXLo1hpmfGCdcaJ63rNJOi1p0EYqRlkoHpe8qxpVg60TnjBpCSHjeXe6-Leqtuk590uldRe_VQiGmtdCrejqAkdEQ4YbQcWiZ49ZFB9Aa3nFOBB1xdH_eu29lM4CyEkvT4QvryJPiNWsc71VHBOsar4PRRkOLPGXJRk88WxlEHiHNWpO27llEqu4p--AfdxjmF-lSVEpIQXP-uUmd7yqaYc4LhqZkWq10w1C4YaheMyr5_3v0T-TcGFbjYA7_8CPf_N6nVckUflH8AuKrCuQ</recordid><startdate>201902</startdate><enddate>201902</enddate><creator>Strange, James P.</creator><creator>Tripodi, Amber D.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7368-6638</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9612-6868</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201902</creationdate><title>Characterizing bumble bee (Bombus) communities in the United States and assessing a conservation monitoring method</title><author>Strange, James P. ; Tripodi, Amber D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5093-d42275514bb4b84bd7d1bd9cd6a497514d9e2b9c494eb88350c309d76dbdfe993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Agricultural ecosystems</topic><topic>Bees</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Bombus</topic><topic>bumble bees</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Community composition</topic><topic>community structure</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>conservation monitoring</topic><topic>Ecological monitoring</topic><topic>Elevation</topic><topic>Endangered & extinct species</topic><topic>Endangered species</topic><topic>Historical account</topic><topic>national survey</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>pollinator diversity</topic><topic>Pollinators</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Strange, James P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tripodi, Amber D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Free Backfiles(OpenAccess)</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Ecology and evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Strange, James P.</au><au>Tripodi, Amber D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Characterizing bumble bee (Bombus) communities in the United States and assessing a conservation monitoring method</atitle><jtitle>Ecology and evolution</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Evol</addtitle><date>2019-02</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1061</spage><epage>1069</epage><pages>1061-1069</pages><issn>2045-7758</issn><eissn>2045-7758</eissn><abstract>Aim
Bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombus) are economically and ecologically important pollinators in agroecosystems and wildland habitats. In the Nearctic region, there are approximately 41 species, of which the IUCN lists twelve species as vulnerable, endangered, or critically endangered. We conducted a standardized faunal survey to inform ongoing conservation efforts including petitions under review for the Endangered Species Act. Furthermore, we test the appropriateness of a methodology for accurately sampling bumble bee communities.
Location
The United States of America, including 31 sites in 15 states.
Methods
We surveyed 15 states in the summer of 2015 to assess community composition and relative species abundance at agricultural and seminatural sites throughout the United States. We collected approximately 100 bees, using aerial nets, from each of 31 sites and identified specimens to species, totaling 3,252 bees. We assessed our survey methodology to understand whether it accurately sampled the potential community of bumble bees at each site for utility in future monitoring efforts.
Results
Average site species richness was 5.1 ± 2.05, and we detected 30 of the 41 species documented historically within the contiguous United States. Sampling a site beyond 100 bees rarely added additional species detections, whereas adding additional sampling sites within an ecoregion frequently increased the species richness for the ecoregion. Thirteen of the 30 species we detected each accounted for <1% of the total fauna, and two species accounted for 49.02% of all bees captured. Species richness and evenness increased with increasing latitude across communities.
Main Conclusions
Species diversity and evenness in bumble bees increases in northern latitudes and increasing elevation in the United States; however, a few common species tend to dominate communities while many species occur only in low numbers. The results of this survey effort can inform current conservation evaluations and planning.
Bumble bee communities vary across the United State and several species are considered to be at risk. We assessed the community structure and evaluated a sampling technique at 31 sites in 15 states in 2015. We suggest that sampling methods were adequate to assess community structure and provide much needed baseline data for further monitoring efforts.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>30805140</pmid><doi>10.1002/ece3.4783</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7368-6638</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9612-6868</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2045-7758 |
ispartof | Ecology and evolution, 2019-02, Vol.9 (3), p.1061-1069 |
issn | 2045-7758 2045-7758 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9e627d7ba9f1475eb82f78b0155370f0 |
source | Wiley Online Library Open Access; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); PubMed Central |
subjects | Abundance Agricultural ecosystems Bees Biodiversity Bombus bumble bees Communities Community composition community structure Conservation conservation monitoring Ecological monitoring Elevation Endangered & extinct species Endangered species Historical account national survey Original Research pollinator diversity Pollinators Sampling Species diversity Species richness Wildlife conservation |
title | Characterizing bumble bee (Bombus) communities in the United States and assessing a conservation monitoring method |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T18%3A02%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characterizing%20bumble%20bee%20(Bombus)%20communities%20in%20the%20United%20States%20and%20assessing%20a%20conservation%20monitoring%20method&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20and%20evolution&rft.au=Strange,%20James%20P.&rft.date=2019-02&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1061&rft.epage=1069&rft.pages=1061-1069&rft.issn=2045-7758&rft.eissn=2045-7758&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ece3.4783&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2186143396%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5093-d42275514bb4b84bd7d1bd9cd6a497514d9e2b9c494eb88350c309d76dbdfe993%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2179220051&rft_id=info:pmid/30805140&rfr_iscdi=true |