Loading…

Characterizing bumble bee (Bombus) communities in the United States and assessing a conservation monitoring method

Aim Bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombus) are economically and ecologically important pollinators in agroecosystems and wildland habitats. In the Nearctic region, there are approximately 41 species, of which the IUCN lists twelve species as vulnerable, endangered, or critically endangered. We co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecology and evolution 2019-02, Vol.9 (3), p.1061-1069
Main Authors: Strange, James P., Tripodi, Amber D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5093-d42275514bb4b84bd7d1bd9cd6a497514d9e2b9c494eb88350c309d76dbdfe993
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5093-d42275514bb4b84bd7d1bd9cd6a497514d9e2b9c494eb88350c309d76dbdfe993
container_end_page 1069
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1061
container_title Ecology and evolution
container_volume 9
creator Strange, James P.
Tripodi, Amber D.
description Aim Bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombus) are economically and ecologically important pollinators in agroecosystems and wildland habitats. In the Nearctic region, there are approximately 41 species, of which the IUCN lists twelve species as vulnerable, endangered, or critically endangered. We conducted a standardized faunal survey to inform ongoing conservation efforts including petitions under review for the Endangered Species Act. Furthermore, we test the appropriateness of a methodology for accurately sampling bumble bee communities. Location The United States of America, including 31 sites in 15 states. Methods We surveyed 15 states in the summer of 2015 to assess community composition and relative species abundance at agricultural and seminatural sites throughout the United States. We collected approximately 100 bees, using aerial nets, from each of 31 sites and identified specimens to species, totaling 3,252 bees. We assessed our survey methodology to understand whether it accurately sampled the potential community of bumble bees at each site for utility in future monitoring efforts. Results Average site species richness was 5.1 ± 2.05, and we detected 30 of the 41 species documented historically within the contiguous United States. Sampling a site beyond 100 bees rarely added additional species detections, whereas adding additional sampling sites within an ecoregion frequently increased the species richness for the ecoregion. Thirteen of the 30 species we detected each accounted for
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ece3.4783
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9e627d7ba9f1475eb82f78b0155370f0</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_9e627d7ba9f1475eb82f78b0155370f0</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2186143396</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5093-d42275514bb4b84bd7d1bd9cd6a497514d9e2b9c494eb88350c309d76dbdfe993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1ks1rHCEYh4fS0IQ0h_4DReglOWzi-DGOl0K7bNtAIIc2Z_HjnV2XGU3VSUn_-rrZNCSFelFfHx9e9Nc071p83mJMLsACPWeip6-aI4IZXwjB-9fP1ofNSc5bXEeHCcPiTXNIcY95y_BRk5YbnbQtkPxvH9bIzJMZARkAdPo5TmbOZ8jGaZqDLx4y8gGVDaCbugWHvhddalEHh3TOkPNOoeuFkCHd6eJjQFOsbEy7kwnKJrq3zcGgxwwnj_Nxc_Nl9WP5bXF1_fVy-elqYTmWdOEYIYLXLo1hpmfGCdcaJ63rNJOi1p0EYqRlkoHpe8qxpVg60TnjBpCSHjeXe6-Leqtuk590uldRe_VQiGmtdCrejqAkdEQ4YbQcWiZ49ZFB9Aa3nFOBB1xdH_eu29lM4CyEkvT4QvryJPiNWsc71VHBOsar4PRRkOLPGXJRk88WxlEHiHNWpO27llEqu4p--AfdxjmF-lSVEpIQXP-uUmd7yqaYc4LhqZkWq10w1C4YaheMyr5_3v0T-TcGFbjYA7_8CPf_N6nVckUflH8AuKrCuQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2179220051</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characterizing bumble bee (Bombus) communities in the United States and assessing a conservation monitoring method</title><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Strange, James P. ; Tripodi, Amber D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Strange, James P. ; Tripodi, Amber D.</creatorcontrib><description>Aim Bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombus) are economically and ecologically important pollinators in agroecosystems and wildland habitats. In the Nearctic region, there are approximately 41 species, of which the IUCN lists twelve species as vulnerable, endangered, or critically endangered. We conducted a standardized faunal survey to inform ongoing conservation efforts including petitions under review for the Endangered Species Act. Furthermore, we test the appropriateness of a methodology for accurately sampling bumble bee communities. Location The United States of America, including 31 sites in 15 states. Methods We surveyed 15 states in the summer of 2015 to assess community composition and relative species abundance at agricultural and seminatural sites throughout the United States. We collected approximately 100 bees, using aerial nets, from each of 31 sites and identified specimens to species, totaling 3,252 bees. We assessed our survey methodology to understand whether it accurately sampled the potential community of bumble bees at each site for utility in future monitoring efforts. Results Average site species richness was 5.1 ± 2.05, and we detected 30 of the 41 species documented historically within the contiguous United States. Sampling a site beyond 100 bees rarely added additional species detections, whereas adding additional sampling sites within an ecoregion frequently increased the species richness for the ecoregion. Thirteen of the 30 species we detected each accounted for &lt;1% of the total fauna, and two species accounted for 49.02% of all bees captured. Species richness and evenness increased with increasing latitude across communities. Main Conclusions Species diversity and evenness in bumble bees increases in northern latitudes and increasing elevation in the United States; however, a few common species tend to dominate communities while many species occur only in low numbers. The results of this survey effort can inform current conservation evaluations and planning. Bumble bee communities vary across the United State and several species are considered to be at risk. We assessed the community structure and evaluated a sampling technique at 31 sites in 15 states in 2015. We suggest that sampling methods were adequate to assess community structure and provide much needed baseline data for further monitoring efforts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-7758</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-7758</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4783</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30805140</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Agricultural ecosystems ; Bees ; Biodiversity ; Bombus ; bumble bees ; Communities ; Community composition ; community structure ; Conservation ; conservation monitoring ; Ecological monitoring ; Elevation ; Endangered &amp; extinct species ; Endangered species ; Historical account ; national survey ; Original Research ; pollinator diversity ; Pollinators ; Sampling ; Species diversity ; Species richness ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Ecology and evolution, 2019-02, Vol.9 (3), p.1061-1069</ispartof><rights>2019 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5093-d42275514bb4b84bd7d1bd9cd6a497514d9e2b9c494eb88350c309d76dbdfe993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5093-d42275514bb4b84bd7d1bd9cd6a497514d9e2b9c494eb88350c309d76dbdfe993</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7368-6638 ; 0000-0002-9612-6868</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2179220051/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2179220051?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,11562,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,46052,46476,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30805140$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Strange, James P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tripodi, Amber D.</creatorcontrib><title>Characterizing bumble bee (Bombus) communities in the United States and assessing a conservation monitoring method</title><title>Ecology and evolution</title><addtitle>Ecol Evol</addtitle><description>Aim Bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombus) are economically and ecologically important pollinators in agroecosystems and wildland habitats. In the Nearctic region, there are approximately 41 species, of which the IUCN lists twelve species as vulnerable, endangered, or critically endangered. We conducted a standardized faunal survey to inform ongoing conservation efforts including petitions under review for the Endangered Species Act. Furthermore, we test the appropriateness of a methodology for accurately sampling bumble bee communities. Location The United States of America, including 31 sites in 15 states. Methods We surveyed 15 states in the summer of 2015 to assess community composition and relative species abundance at agricultural and seminatural sites throughout the United States. We collected approximately 100 bees, using aerial nets, from each of 31 sites and identified specimens to species, totaling 3,252 bees. We assessed our survey methodology to understand whether it accurately sampled the potential community of bumble bees at each site for utility in future monitoring efforts. Results Average site species richness was 5.1 ± 2.05, and we detected 30 of the 41 species documented historically within the contiguous United States. Sampling a site beyond 100 bees rarely added additional species detections, whereas adding additional sampling sites within an ecoregion frequently increased the species richness for the ecoregion. Thirteen of the 30 species we detected each accounted for &lt;1% of the total fauna, and two species accounted for 49.02% of all bees captured. Species richness and evenness increased with increasing latitude across communities. Main Conclusions Species diversity and evenness in bumble bees increases in northern latitudes and increasing elevation in the United States; however, a few common species tend to dominate communities while many species occur only in low numbers. The results of this survey effort can inform current conservation evaluations and planning. Bumble bee communities vary across the United State and several species are considered to be at risk. We assessed the community structure and evaluated a sampling technique at 31 sites in 15 states in 2015. We suggest that sampling methods were adequate to assess community structure and provide much needed baseline data for further monitoring efforts.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Agricultural ecosystems</subject><subject>Bees</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Bombus</subject><subject>bumble bees</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Community composition</subject><subject>community structure</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>conservation monitoring</subject><subject>Ecological monitoring</subject><subject>Elevation</subject><subject>Endangered &amp; extinct species</subject><subject>Endangered species</subject><subject>Historical account</subject><subject>national survey</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>pollinator diversity</subject><subject>Pollinators</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>2045-7758</issn><issn>2045-7758</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1ks1rHCEYh4fS0IQ0h_4DReglOWzi-DGOl0K7bNtAIIc2Z_HjnV2XGU3VSUn_-rrZNCSFelFfHx9e9Nc071p83mJMLsACPWeip6-aI4IZXwjB-9fP1ofNSc5bXEeHCcPiTXNIcY95y_BRk5YbnbQtkPxvH9bIzJMZARkAdPo5TmbOZ8jGaZqDLx4y8gGVDaCbugWHvhddalEHh3TOkPNOoeuFkCHd6eJjQFOsbEy7kwnKJrq3zcGgxwwnj_Nxc_Nl9WP5bXF1_fVy-elqYTmWdOEYIYLXLo1hpmfGCdcaJ63rNJOi1p0EYqRlkoHpe8qxpVg60TnjBpCSHjeXe6-Leqtuk590uldRe_VQiGmtdCrejqAkdEQ4YbQcWiZ49ZFB9Aa3nFOBB1xdH_eu29lM4CyEkvT4QvryJPiNWsc71VHBOsar4PRRkOLPGXJRk88WxlEHiHNWpO27llEqu4p--AfdxjmF-lSVEpIQXP-uUmd7yqaYc4LhqZkWq10w1C4YaheMyr5_3v0T-TcGFbjYA7_8CPf_N6nVckUflH8AuKrCuQ</recordid><startdate>201902</startdate><enddate>201902</enddate><creator>Strange, James P.</creator><creator>Tripodi, Amber D.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7368-6638</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9612-6868</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201902</creationdate><title>Characterizing bumble bee (Bombus) communities in the United States and assessing a conservation monitoring method</title><author>Strange, James P. ; Tripodi, Amber D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5093-d42275514bb4b84bd7d1bd9cd6a497514d9e2b9c494eb88350c309d76dbdfe993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Agricultural ecosystems</topic><topic>Bees</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Bombus</topic><topic>bumble bees</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Community composition</topic><topic>community structure</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>conservation monitoring</topic><topic>Ecological monitoring</topic><topic>Elevation</topic><topic>Endangered &amp; extinct species</topic><topic>Endangered species</topic><topic>Historical account</topic><topic>national survey</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>pollinator diversity</topic><topic>Pollinators</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Strange, James P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tripodi, Amber D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Free Backfiles(OpenAccess)</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Ecology and evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Strange, James P.</au><au>Tripodi, Amber D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Characterizing bumble bee (Bombus) communities in the United States and assessing a conservation monitoring method</atitle><jtitle>Ecology and evolution</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Evol</addtitle><date>2019-02</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1061</spage><epage>1069</epage><pages>1061-1069</pages><issn>2045-7758</issn><eissn>2045-7758</eissn><abstract>Aim Bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombus) are economically and ecologically important pollinators in agroecosystems and wildland habitats. In the Nearctic region, there are approximately 41 species, of which the IUCN lists twelve species as vulnerable, endangered, or critically endangered. We conducted a standardized faunal survey to inform ongoing conservation efforts including petitions under review for the Endangered Species Act. Furthermore, we test the appropriateness of a methodology for accurately sampling bumble bee communities. Location The United States of America, including 31 sites in 15 states. Methods We surveyed 15 states in the summer of 2015 to assess community composition and relative species abundance at agricultural and seminatural sites throughout the United States. We collected approximately 100 bees, using aerial nets, from each of 31 sites and identified specimens to species, totaling 3,252 bees. We assessed our survey methodology to understand whether it accurately sampled the potential community of bumble bees at each site for utility in future monitoring efforts. Results Average site species richness was 5.1 ± 2.05, and we detected 30 of the 41 species documented historically within the contiguous United States. Sampling a site beyond 100 bees rarely added additional species detections, whereas adding additional sampling sites within an ecoregion frequently increased the species richness for the ecoregion. Thirteen of the 30 species we detected each accounted for &lt;1% of the total fauna, and two species accounted for 49.02% of all bees captured. Species richness and evenness increased with increasing latitude across communities. Main Conclusions Species diversity and evenness in bumble bees increases in northern latitudes and increasing elevation in the United States; however, a few common species tend to dominate communities while many species occur only in low numbers. The results of this survey effort can inform current conservation evaluations and planning. Bumble bee communities vary across the United State and several species are considered to be at risk. We assessed the community structure and evaluated a sampling technique at 31 sites in 15 states in 2015. We suggest that sampling methods were adequate to assess community structure and provide much needed baseline data for further monitoring efforts.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>30805140</pmid><doi>10.1002/ece3.4783</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7368-6638</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9612-6868</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2045-7758
ispartof Ecology and evolution, 2019-02, Vol.9 (3), p.1061-1069
issn 2045-7758
2045-7758
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9e627d7ba9f1475eb82f78b0155370f0
source Wiley Online Library Open Access; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); PubMed Central
subjects Abundance
Agricultural ecosystems
Bees
Biodiversity
Bombus
bumble bees
Communities
Community composition
community structure
Conservation
conservation monitoring
Ecological monitoring
Elevation
Endangered & extinct species
Endangered species
Historical account
national survey
Original Research
pollinator diversity
Pollinators
Sampling
Species diversity
Species richness
Wildlife conservation
title Characterizing bumble bee (Bombus) communities in the United States and assessing a conservation monitoring method
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T18%3A02%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characterizing%20bumble%20bee%20(Bombus)%20communities%20in%20the%20United%20States%20and%20assessing%20a%20conservation%20monitoring%20method&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20and%20evolution&rft.au=Strange,%20James%20P.&rft.date=2019-02&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1061&rft.epage=1069&rft.pages=1061-1069&rft.issn=2045-7758&rft.eissn=2045-7758&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ece3.4783&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2186143396%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5093-d42275514bb4b84bd7d1bd9cd6a497514d9e2b9c494eb88350c309d76dbdfe993%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2179220051&rft_id=info:pmid/30805140&rfr_iscdi=true