Loading…

Eye movements during listening reveal spontaneous grammatical processing

Recent research using eye-tracking typically relies on constrained visual contexts in particular goal-oriented contexts, viewing a small array of objects on a computer screen and performing some overt decision or identification. Eyetracking paradigms that use pictures as a measure of word or sentenc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in psychology 2014-05, Vol.5, p.410-410
Main Authors: Huette, Stephanie, Winter, Bodo, Matlock, Teenie, Ardell, David H, Spivey, Michael
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-8d61fc11584029af278f36ada72e0a8ae9a496d14e73509931260eed1db996183
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-8d61fc11584029af278f36ada72e0a8ae9a496d14e73509931260eed1db996183
container_end_page 410
container_issue
container_start_page 410
container_title Frontiers in psychology
container_volume 5
creator Huette, Stephanie
Winter, Bodo
Matlock, Teenie
Ardell, David H
Spivey, Michael
description Recent research using eye-tracking typically relies on constrained visual contexts in particular goal-oriented contexts, viewing a small array of objects on a computer screen and performing some overt decision or identification. Eyetracking paradigms that use pictures as a measure of word or sentence comprehension are sometimes touted as ecologically invalid because pictures and explicit tasks are not always present during language comprehension. This study compared the comprehension of sentences with two different grammatical forms: the past progressive (e.g., was walking), which emphasizes the ongoing nature of actions, and the simple past (e.g., walked), which emphasizes the end-state of an action. The results showed that the distribution and timing of eye movements mirrors the underlying conceptual structure of this linguistic difference in the absence of any visual stimuli or task constraint: Fixations were shorter and saccades were more dispersed across the screen, as if thinking about more dynamic events when listening to the past progressive stories. Thus, eye movement data suggest that visual inputs or an explicit task are unnecessary to solicit analog representations of features such as movement, that could be a key perceptual component to grammatical comprehension.
doi_str_mv 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00410
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9f8311594d724e9f9983909e96680d76</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_9f8311594d724e9f9983909e96680d76</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>1534096334</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-8d61fc11584029af278f36ada72e0a8ae9a496d14e73509931260eed1db996183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUU1P4zAQtVasFtTtfU8oRy7tjj_qeC5ICPElIXFhz5YbT0JQEgc7rdR_j9uyCOYyo5k3b57mMfaHw1JKg3_rMe2apQCulgCKww92xrVWCw6lOflSn7J5Sq-QQ4EAEL_YqVAISq3gjN3f7Kjow5Z6GqZU-E1sh6bo2jTRsK8ibcl1RRrDMLmBwiYVTXR976a2yv0xhopSysjf7GftukTzjzxj_25vnq_vF49Pdw_XV4-LSmkxLYzXvK44X5ksBl0tSlNL7bwrBYEzjtAp1J4rKuUKECUXGog892tEzY2csYcjrw_u1Y6x7V3c2eBae2iE2FgXs7iOLNZG5kuofCkUYY1oJAISam3AlzpzXR65xs26J1_lF0TXfSP9PhnaF9uErVUgpRB7MRcfBDG8bShNtm9TRV13fJXlK6kAtZQqQ-EIrWJIKVL9eYaD3ftpD37avZ_24GdeOf8q73Phv3vyHZAtnLM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1534096334</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Eye movements during listening reveal spontaneous grammatical processing</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Huette, Stephanie ; Winter, Bodo ; Matlock, Teenie ; Ardell, David H ; Spivey, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Huette, Stephanie ; Winter, Bodo ; Matlock, Teenie ; Ardell, David H ; Spivey, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>Recent research using eye-tracking typically relies on constrained visual contexts in particular goal-oriented contexts, viewing a small array of objects on a computer screen and performing some overt decision or identification. Eyetracking paradigms that use pictures as a measure of word or sentence comprehension are sometimes touted as ecologically invalid because pictures and explicit tasks are not always present during language comprehension. This study compared the comprehension of sentences with two different grammatical forms: the past progressive (e.g., was walking), which emphasizes the ongoing nature of actions, and the simple past (e.g., walked), which emphasizes the end-state of an action. The results showed that the distribution and timing of eye movements mirrors the underlying conceptual structure of this linguistic difference in the absence of any visual stimuli or task constraint: Fixations were shorter and saccades were more dispersed across the screen, as if thinking about more dynamic events when listening to the past progressive stories. Thus, eye movement data suggest that visual inputs or an explicit task are unnecessary to solicit analog representations of features such as movement, that could be a key perceptual component to grammatical comprehension.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1664-1078</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1664-1078</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00410</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24904450</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Frontiers Media S.A</publisher><subject>Embodied Cognition ; Eye Movements ; Language ; Linguistic theory ; perceptual simulation ; Psychology</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in psychology, 2014-05, Vol.5, p.410-410</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 Huette, Winter, Matlock, Ardell and Spivey. 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-8d61fc11584029af278f36ada72e0a8ae9a496d14e73509931260eed1db996183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-8d61fc11584029af278f36ada72e0a8ae9a496d14e73509931260eed1db996183</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4033228/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4033228/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24904450$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huette, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winter, Bodo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matlock, Teenie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ardell, David H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spivey, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Eye movements during listening reveal spontaneous grammatical processing</title><title>Frontiers in psychology</title><addtitle>Front Psychol</addtitle><description>Recent research using eye-tracking typically relies on constrained visual contexts in particular goal-oriented contexts, viewing a small array of objects on a computer screen and performing some overt decision or identification. Eyetracking paradigms that use pictures as a measure of word or sentence comprehension are sometimes touted as ecologically invalid because pictures and explicit tasks are not always present during language comprehension. This study compared the comprehension of sentences with two different grammatical forms: the past progressive (e.g., was walking), which emphasizes the ongoing nature of actions, and the simple past (e.g., walked), which emphasizes the end-state of an action. The results showed that the distribution and timing of eye movements mirrors the underlying conceptual structure of this linguistic difference in the absence of any visual stimuli or task constraint: Fixations were shorter and saccades were more dispersed across the screen, as if thinking about more dynamic events when listening to the past progressive stories. Thus, eye movement data suggest that visual inputs or an explicit task are unnecessary to solicit analog representations of features such as movement, that could be a key perceptual component to grammatical comprehension.</description><subject>Embodied Cognition</subject><subject>Eye Movements</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Linguistic theory</subject><subject>perceptual simulation</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><issn>1664-1078</issn><issn>1664-1078</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUU1P4zAQtVasFtTtfU8oRy7tjj_qeC5ICPElIXFhz5YbT0JQEgc7rdR_j9uyCOYyo5k3b57mMfaHw1JKg3_rMe2apQCulgCKww92xrVWCw6lOflSn7J5Sq-QQ4EAEL_YqVAISq3gjN3f7Kjow5Z6GqZU-E1sh6bo2jTRsK8ibcl1RRrDMLmBwiYVTXR976a2yv0xhopSysjf7GftukTzjzxj_25vnq_vF49Pdw_XV4-LSmkxLYzXvK44X5ksBl0tSlNL7bwrBYEzjtAp1J4rKuUKECUXGog892tEzY2csYcjrw_u1Y6x7V3c2eBae2iE2FgXs7iOLNZG5kuofCkUYY1oJAISam3AlzpzXR65xs26J1_lF0TXfSP9PhnaF9uErVUgpRB7MRcfBDG8bShNtm9TRV13fJXlK6kAtZQqQ-EIrWJIKVL9eYaD3ftpD37avZ_24GdeOf8q73Phv3vyHZAtnLM</recordid><startdate>20140521</startdate><enddate>20140521</enddate><creator>Huette, Stephanie</creator><creator>Winter, Bodo</creator><creator>Matlock, Teenie</creator><creator>Ardell, David H</creator><creator>Spivey, Michael</creator><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140521</creationdate><title>Eye movements during listening reveal spontaneous grammatical processing</title><author>Huette, Stephanie ; Winter, Bodo ; Matlock, Teenie ; Ardell, David H ; Spivey, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-8d61fc11584029af278f36ada72e0a8ae9a496d14e73509931260eed1db996183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Embodied Cognition</topic><topic>Eye Movements</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Linguistic theory</topic><topic>perceptual simulation</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huette, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winter, Bodo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matlock, Teenie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ardell, David H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spivey, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huette, Stephanie</au><au>Winter, Bodo</au><au>Matlock, Teenie</au><au>Ardell, David H</au><au>Spivey, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Eye movements during listening reveal spontaneous grammatical processing</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Front Psychol</addtitle><date>2014-05-21</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>5</volume><spage>410</spage><epage>410</epage><pages>410-410</pages><issn>1664-1078</issn><eissn>1664-1078</eissn><abstract>Recent research using eye-tracking typically relies on constrained visual contexts in particular goal-oriented contexts, viewing a small array of objects on a computer screen and performing some overt decision or identification. Eyetracking paradigms that use pictures as a measure of word or sentence comprehension are sometimes touted as ecologically invalid because pictures and explicit tasks are not always present during language comprehension. This study compared the comprehension of sentences with two different grammatical forms: the past progressive (e.g., was walking), which emphasizes the ongoing nature of actions, and the simple past (e.g., walked), which emphasizes the end-state of an action. The results showed that the distribution and timing of eye movements mirrors the underlying conceptual structure of this linguistic difference in the absence of any visual stimuli or task constraint: Fixations were shorter and saccades were more dispersed across the screen, as if thinking about more dynamic events when listening to the past progressive stories. Thus, eye movement data suggest that visual inputs or an explicit task are unnecessary to solicit analog representations of features such as movement, that could be a key perceptual component to grammatical comprehension.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Frontiers Media S.A</pub><pmid>24904450</pmid><doi>10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00410</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1664-1078
ispartof Frontiers in psychology, 2014-05, Vol.5, p.410-410
issn 1664-1078
1664-1078
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9f8311594d724e9f9983909e96680d76
source PubMed Central
subjects Embodied Cognition
Eye Movements
Language
Linguistic theory
perceptual simulation
Psychology
title Eye movements during listening reveal spontaneous grammatical processing
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T14%3A34%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Eye%20movements%20during%20listening%20reveal%20spontaneous%20grammatical%20processing&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20psychology&rft.au=Huette,%20Stephanie&rft.date=2014-05-21&rft.volume=5&rft.spage=410&rft.epage=410&rft.pages=410-410&rft.issn=1664-1078&rft.eissn=1664-1078&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00410&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E1534096334%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-8d61fc11584029af278f36ada72e0a8ae9a496d14e73509931260eed1db996183%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1534096334&rft_id=info:pmid/24904450&rfr_iscdi=true