Changes of collective orientation through a medical student's anaesthesia simulation course - simulation-based training study with non-technical skills debriefing versus medical debriefing

• Published in: BMC medical education 2019-09, Vol.19 (1), p.337-337, Article 337
• Main Authors: Eismann, Hendrik, Palmaers, Thomas, Tsvetanov, Svetlozar, Hagemann, Vera, Flentje, Markus
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Administrative Organization; Anesthesia; Anesthesiology; Anesthesiology - education; Behavioral Objectives; Collective orientation; Course Objectives; Curriculum; Decision Making; Drugs and athletes; Education; Educational aspects; Health care; Health care teams; Humans; Integrated approach; Intensive care; Interprofessional Relations; Learning; Logical Thinking; Medical schools; Medical Services; Medical student; Medical students; Nurses; Patient Simulation; Simulation; Simulation Training - methods; Skills; Students; Students, Medical; Study and teaching; Task Performance and Analysis; Teachers; Teaching Methods; TeamGAINS; Teamwork; Training
• ISSN: 1472-6920; 1472-6920
• DOI: 10.1186/s12909-019-1765-x

Non-technical skills (NTS) are known to have a positive impact on quality of medical care. The team performance enhancing behaviour, as an example for NTS, is termed "Collective Orientation" (CO). In this study, we investigated the effect of a simulator-based anaesthesia training upon student's CO in relation to medical and TeamGAINS (guided team self-correction, advocacy-inquiry and systemic-constructivist techniques) debriefing. We hypothesized (a) the scale collective orientation, as demonstrated in other team setting, is applicable to fourth year German medical students, (b) collective orientation increases by a four-hour anaesthesia simulation course, (c) the change in collective orientation can be influenced by type of debriefing. All classes of an anaesthesia module (4th year medical students) were randomized into two groups. Students took part in a four-hour simulation course with team scenarios, supported by a simulated nurse. In group one the trainer focused on a debriefing on medical problems and in group two, a debriefing according to the specifications of the TeamGAINS concept was conducted. The primary outcome was the mean difference between the collective orientation measured (via questionnaires) immediately before (T1) and after (T2) training. Cronbach's alpha for all scales and measurement points was higher than 0.72. The scale "affiliation" decreases in the group medical debriefing MD = 0.1 (p = 0.008; r = 0.31) and was unchanged in the group TeamGAINS. "Dominance" increases in both groups. The values were MD = 0.19 (p = 0.003; r = 0.25) for medical debriefing and MD = 0.22 (p = 0.01; r = 0.40) for TeamGAINS debriefing. The collective orientation questionnaire can be applied to fourth year medical students. Simulation courses influence the attitude towards teamwork. The influence is negatively to the subscale "affiliation" by a "medical debriefing" and independently regardless of the nature of the debriefing for the subscale "dominance". We recommend a debriefing for medical students using the TeamGAINS approach to clarify the connection between the individual performance and non-technical skills. Anaesthesia simulation courses have the potential being a part of a longitudinal education curriculum for teaching non-technical skills.