Establishment of a combat damage control surgery training platform for explosive combined thoraco-abdominal injuries

• Published in: Chinese journal of traumatology 2022-07, Vol.25 (4), p.193-200
• Main Authors: Du, Wen-Qiong, Jiang, Ren-Qing, Zong, Zhao-Wen, Zhang, Lin, Ye, Zhao, Zhong, Xin, Jia, Yi-Jun
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Damage control surgery; Explosions; Original; Simulation training; Test; Warfare
• ISSN: 1008-1275; 1008-1275
• DOI: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2022.03.003

It is challenging to prepare military surgeons with the skills of combat damage control surgery (CDCS). The current study aimed to establish a damage control surgery (DCS) training platform for explosive combined thoraco-abdominal injuries. The training platform established in this study consisted of 3 main components: (1) A 50 m × 50 m square yard was constructed as the explosion site. Safety was assessed through cameras. (2) Sixteen pigs were injured by an explosion of trinitrotoluene attached with steel balls and were randomly divided into the DCS group (accepted DCS) and the control group (have not accepted DCS). The mortality rate was observed. (3) The literature was reviewed to identify the key factors for assessing CDCS, and testing standards for CDCS were then established. Expert questionnaires were employed to evaluate the scientificity and feasibility of the testing standards. Then, a 5-day training course with incorporated tests was used to test the effect of the established platform. In total, 30 teams attended the first training course. The scores that the trainees received before and after the training were compared. SPSS11.0 was employed to analyze the results. The high-speed video playback confirmed the safety of the explosion site as no explosion fragments projected beyond the wall. No pig died within 24 h when DCS was performed, while 7 pigs died in the control group. After a literature review, assessment criteria for CDCS were established that had a total score of 100 points and had 4 major parts: leadership and team cooperation, resuscitation, surgical procedure, and final outcome. Expert questionnaire results showed that the scientific score was 8.6 ± 1.25, and the feasibility score was 8.74 ± 1.19. When compared with the basic level, the trainees’ score improved significantly after training. The platform established in this study was useful for CDCS training.