Loading…

A randomized, double-masked, parallel-group, comparative study to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of 1% azithromycin-0.1% dexamethasone combination compared to 1% azithromycin alone, dexamethasone 0.1% alone, and vehicle in the treatment of subjects with blepharitis

Kamran Hosseini,1 Richard L Lindstrom,2,3 Gary Foulks,4 Kelly K Nichols5 1InSite Vision, Alameda, CA, 2Minnesota Eye Consultants, 3Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Neurosciences, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, 4Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, School of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) N.Z.), 2016-08, Vol.2016 (Issue 1), p.1495-1503
Main Authors: Hosseini K, Lindstrom RL, Foulks G, Nichols KK
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 1503
container_issue Issue 1
container_start_page 1495
container_title Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)
container_volume 2016
creator Hosseini K
Lindstrom RL
Foulks G
Nichols KK
description Kamran Hosseini,1 Richard L Lindstrom,2,3 Gary Foulks,4 Kelly K Nichols5 1InSite Vision, Alameda, CA, 2Minnesota Eye Consultants, 3Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Neurosciences, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, 4Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, 5School of Optometry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA Purpose: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of a 1% azithromycin-0.1% dexamethasone combination in DuraSite ("combination") compared to 0.1% dexamethasone in DuraSite, 1% azithromycin in DuraSite, and vehicle in the treatment of subjects with blepharitis.Materials and methods: This was a Phase III, double-masked, vehicle-controlled, four-arm study in which 907 subjects with blepharitis were randomized to combination (n=305), 0.1% dexamethasone (n=298), 1% azithromycin (n=155), or vehicle (n=149). Ten study visits were scheduled: screening visit, days 1 and 4 (dosing phase) and 15, and months 1-6 (follow-up phase). On day 1, subjects applied one drop of the study drug to the eyelid of the inflamed eye(s) twice daily, and continued with twice-daily dosing for 14 days. After completing 14 days of dosing, subjects were followed for 6 months for efficacy and safety.Results: A total of 57 subjects (6.3%) had complete clinical resolution at day 15: 25 (8.2%), 17 (5.7%), 8 (5.2%), and 7 (4.7%) subjects in the combination-, 0.1% dexamethasone-, 1% azithromycin-, and vehicle-treatment groups, respectively. The combination was superior to 1% azithromycin and vehicle alone, but not to 0.1% dexamethasone alone. Mean composite (total) clinical sign and symptom scores improved in all four treatment groups during the posttreatment evaluation phase for the intent-to-treat population, but outcomes were superior when a drop containing 0.1% dexamethasone was utilized. Clinical response was noted as early as day 4, and persisted as long as 6 months. Most adverse events were considered mild in severity and not related to the study drug.Conclusion: A higher percentage of subjects in the combination group achieved complete clinical resolution of the signs and symptoms of blepharitis at day 15 than with 1% azithromycin and vehicle, but outcomes were similar to treatment with 0.1% dexamethasone alone. The combination was well tolerated. Keywords: blepharitis, dexamethasone, azithromycin, eyelid inflammation
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>doaj</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a01d9c0fb50c4a5685986f2d35951ed0</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_a01d9c0fb50c4a5685986f2d35951ed0</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>oai_doaj_org_article_a01d9c0fb50c4a5685986f2d35951ed0</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a01d9c0fb50c4a5685986f2d35951ed03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqtj01PwzAMhosEEuPjxg_whduK0m3duiNCILhzr9zEWTPyUSXpoPv1JNNOnDlZfv36fezLYlZVm01Zr5rldXETwp6x9YI1m9nFwzN4tMIZdSQxB-HGTlNpMHzldkCPWpMud96Nwxy4M1mK6kAQ4igmiA7ogHrESBB7Aq6VVRw1kJSp8glSOgSUFCdwEqpHwKOKvXdm4sqW7Ckpgn7QUOwxOEsZ0imbIM6egSQy588qoE7u-Z_lU955kskH6hXXBMmfz4ueMBqyMd8Sxm5PPAb4TqmQ_h569CqqcFdcSdSB7s_1tvh4e_18eS-Fw307eGXQT61D1Z4E53ct-pg5LbJKbDmTXc34Cut1U2-btVyIZb2tKxJs-Z9Zv2vQnn8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A randomized, double-masked, parallel-group, comparative study to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of 1% azithromycin-0.1% dexamethasone combination compared to 1% azithromycin alone, dexamethasone 0.1% alone, and vehicle in the treatment of subjects with blepharitis</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis_OA刊</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Hosseini K ; Lindstrom RL ; Foulks G ; Nichols KK</creator><creatorcontrib>Hosseini K ; Lindstrom RL ; Foulks G ; Nichols KK</creatorcontrib><description>Kamran Hosseini,1 Richard L Lindstrom,2,3 Gary Foulks,4 Kelly K Nichols5 1InSite Vision, Alameda, CA, 2Minnesota Eye Consultants, 3Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Neurosciences, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, 4Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, 5School of Optometry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA Purpose: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of a 1% azithromycin-0.1% dexamethasone combination in DuraSite ("combination") compared to 0.1% dexamethasone in DuraSite, 1% azithromycin in DuraSite, and vehicle in the treatment of subjects with blepharitis.Materials and methods: This was a Phase III, double-masked, vehicle-controlled, four-arm study in which 907 subjects with blepharitis were randomized to combination (n=305), 0.1% dexamethasone (n=298), 1% azithromycin (n=155), or vehicle (n=149). Ten study visits were scheduled: screening visit, days 1 and 4 (dosing phase) and 15, and months 1-6 (follow-up phase). On day 1, subjects applied one drop of the study drug to the eyelid of the inflamed eye(s) twice daily, and continued with twice-daily dosing for 14 days. After completing 14 days of dosing, subjects were followed for 6 months for efficacy and safety.Results: A total of 57 subjects (6.3%) had complete clinical resolution at day 15: 25 (8.2%), 17 (5.7%), 8 (5.2%), and 7 (4.7%) subjects in the combination-, 0.1% dexamethasone-, 1% azithromycin-, and vehicle-treatment groups, respectively. The combination was superior to 1% azithromycin and vehicle alone, but not to 0.1% dexamethasone alone. Mean composite (total) clinical sign and symptom scores improved in all four treatment groups during the posttreatment evaluation phase for the intent-to-treat population, but outcomes were superior when a drop containing 0.1% dexamethasone was utilized. Clinical response was noted as early as day 4, and persisted as long as 6 months. Most adverse events were considered mild in severity and not related to the study drug.Conclusion: A higher percentage of subjects in the combination group achieved complete clinical resolution of the signs and symptoms of blepharitis at day 15 than with 1% azithromycin and vehicle, but outcomes were similar to treatment with 0.1% dexamethasone alone. The combination was well tolerated. Keywords: blepharitis, dexamethasone, azithromycin, eyelid inflammation</description><identifier>ISSN: 1177-5483</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dove Medical Press</publisher><subject>azithromycin ; blepharitis ; dexamethasone ; DuraSite</subject><ispartof>Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2016-08, Vol.2016 (Issue 1), p.1495-1503</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hosseini K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindstrom RL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foulks G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nichols KK</creatorcontrib><title>A randomized, double-masked, parallel-group, comparative study to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of 1% azithromycin-0.1% dexamethasone combination compared to 1% azithromycin alone, dexamethasone 0.1% alone, and vehicle in the treatment of subjects with blepharitis</title><title>Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)</title><description>Kamran Hosseini,1 Richard L Lindstrom,2,3 Gary Foulks,4 Kelly K Nichols5 1InSite Vision, Alameda, CA, 2Minnesota Eye Consultants, 3Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Neurosciences, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, 4Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, 5School of Optometry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA Purpose: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of a 1% azithromycin-0.1% dexamethasone combination in DuraSite ("combination") compared to 0.1% dexamethasone in DuraSite, 1% azithromycin in DuraSite, and vehicle in the treatment of subjects with blepharitis.Materials and methods: This was a Phase III, double-masked, vehicle-controlled, four-arm study in which 907 subjects with blepharitis were randomized to combination (n=305), 0.1% dexamethasone (n=298), 1% azithromycin (n=155), or vehicle (n=149). Ten study visits were scheduled: screening visit, days 1 and 4 (dosing phase) and 15, and months 1-6 (follow-up phase). On day 1, subjects applied one drop of the study drug to the eyelid of the inflamed eye(s) twice daily, and continued with twice-daily dosing for 14 days. After completing 14 days of dosing, subjects were followed for 6 months for efficacy and safety.Results: A total of 57 subjects (6.3%) had complete clinical resolution at day 15: 25 (8.2%), 17 (5.7%), 8 (5.2%), and 7 (4.7%) subjects in the combination-, 0.1% dexamethasone-, 1% azithromycin-, and vehicle-treatment groups, respectively. The combination was superior to 1% azithromycin and vehicle alone, but not to 0.1% dexamethasone alone. Mean composite (total) clinical sign and symptom scores improved in all four treatment groups during the posttreatment evaluation phase for the intent-to-treat population, but outcomes were superior when a drop containing 0.1% dexamethasone was utilized. Clinical response was noted as early as day 4, and persisted as long as 6 months. Most adverse events were considered mild in severity and not related to the study drug.Conclusion: A higher percentage of subjects in the combination group achieved complete clinical resolution of the signs and symptoms of blepharitis at day 15 than with 1% azithromycin and vehicle, but outcomes were similar to treatment with 0.1% dexamethasone alone. The combination was well tolerated. Keywords: blepharitis, dexamethasone, azithromycin, eyelid inflammation</description><subject>azithromycin</subject><subject>blepharitis</subject><subject>dexamethasone</subject><subject>DuraSite</subject><issn>1177-5483</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqtj01PwzAMhosEEuPjxg_whduK0m3duiNCILhzr9zEWTPyUSXpoPv1JNNOnDlZfv36fezLYlZVm01Zr5rldXETwp6x9YI1m9nFwzN4tMIZdSQxB-HGTlNpMHzldkCPWpMud96Nwxy4M1mK6kAQ4igmiA7ogHrESBB7Aq6VVRw1kJSp8glSOgSUFCdwEqpHwKOKvXdm4sqW7Ckpgn7QUOwxOEsZ0imbIM6egSQy588qoE7u-Z_lU955kskH6hXXBMmfz4ueMBqyMd8Sxm5PPAb4TqmQ_h569CqqcFdcSdSB7s_1tvh4e_18eS-Fw307eGXQT61D1Z4E53ct-pg5LbJKbDmTXc34Cut1U2-btVyIZb2tKxJs-Z9Zv2vQnn8</recordid><startdate>20160801</startdate><enddate>20160801</enddate><creator>Hosseini K</creator><creator>Lindstrom RL</creator><creator>Foulks G</creator><creator>Nichols KK</creator><general>Dove Medical Press</general><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160801</creationdate><title>A randomized, double-masked, parallel-group, comparative study to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of 1% azithromycin-0.1% dexamethasone combination compared to 1% azithromycin alone, dexamethasone 0.1% alone, and vehicle in the treatment of subjects with blepharitis</title><author>Hosseini K ; Lindstrom RL ; Foulks G ; Nichols KK</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a01d9c0fb50c4a5685986f2d35951ed03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>azithromycin</topic><topic>blepharitis</topic><topic>dexamethasone</topic><topic>DuraSite</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hosseini K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindstrom RL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foulks G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nichols KK</creatorcontrib><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hosseini K</au><au>Lindstrom RL</au><au>Foulks G</au><au>Nichols KK</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A randomized, double-masked, parallel-group, comparative study to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of 1% azithromycin-0.1% dexamethasone combination compared to 1% azithromycin alone, dexamethasone 0.1% alone, and vehicle in the treatment of subjects with blepharitis</atitle><jtitle>Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)</jtitle><date>2016-08-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>2016</volume><issue>Issue 1</issue><spage>1495</spage><epage>1503</epage><pages>1495-1503</pages><issn>1177-5483</issn><abstract>Kamran Hosseini,1 Richard L Lindstrom,2,3 Gary Foulks,4 Kelly K Nichols5 1InSite Vision, Alameda, CA, 2Minnesota Eye Consultants, 3Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Neurosciences, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, 4Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, 5School of Optometry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA Purpose: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of a 1% azithromycin-0.1% dexamethasone combination in DuraSite ("combination") compared to 0.1% dexamethasone in DuraSite, 1% azithromycin in DuraSite, and vehicle in the treatment of subjects with blepharitis.Materials and methods: This was a Phase III, double-masked, vehicle-controlled, four-arm study in which 907 subjects with blepharitis were randomized to combination (n=305), 0.1% dexamethasone (n=298), 1% azithromycin (n=155), or vehicle (n=149). Ten study visits were scheduled: screening visit, days 1 and 4 (dosing phase) and 15, and months 1-6 (follow-up phase). On day 1, subjects applied one drop of the study drug to the eyelid of the inflamed eye(s) twice daily, and continued with twice-daily dosing for 14 days. After completing 14 days of dosing, subjects were followed for 6 months for efficacy and safety.Results: A total of 57 subjects (6.3%) had complete clinical resolution at day 15: 25 (8.2%), 17 (5.7%), 8 (5.2%), and 7 (4.7%) subjects in the combination-, 0.1% dexamethasone-, 1% azithromycin-, and vehicle-treatment groups, respectively. The combination was superior to 1% azithromycin and vehicle alone, but not to 0.1% dexamethasone alone. Mean composite (total) clinical sign and symptom scores improved in all four treatment groups during the posttreatment evaluation phase for the intent-to-treat population, but outcomes were superior when a drop containing 0.1% dexamethasone was utilized. Clinical response was noted as early as day 4, and persisted as long as 6 months. Most adverse events were considered mild in severity and not related to the study drug.Conclusion: A higher percentage of subjects in the combination group achieved complete clinical resolution of the signs and symptoms of blepharitis at day 15 than with 1% azithromycin and vehicle, but outcomes were similar to treatment with 0.1% dexamethasone alone. The combination was well tolerated. Keywords: blepharitis, dexamethasone, azithromycin, eyelid inflammation</abstract><pub>Dove Medical Press</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1177-5483
ispartof Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2016-08, Vol.2016 (Issue 1), p.1495-1503
issn 1177-5483
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a01d9c0fb50c4a5685986f2d35951ed0
source Open Access: PubMed Central; Taylor & Francis_OA刊; Publicly Available Content Database
subjects azithromycin
blepharitis
dexamethasone
DuraSite
title A randomized, double-masked, parallel-group, comparative study to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of 1% azithromycin-0.1% dexamethasone combination compared to 1% azithromycin alone, dexamethasone 0.1% alone, and vehicle in the treatment of subjects with blepharitis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T05%3A38%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-doaj&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20randomized,%20double-masked,%20parallel-group,%20comparative%20study%20to%20evaluate%20the%20clinical%20efficacy%20and%20safety%20of%201%25%20azithromycin-0.1%25%20dexamethasone%20combination%20compared%20to%201%25%20azithromycin%20alone,%20dexamethasone%200.1%25%20alone,%20and%20vehicle%20in%20the%20treatment%20of%20subjects%20with%20blepharitis&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20ophthalmology%20(Auckland,%20N.Z.)&rft.au=Hosseini%20K&rft.date=2016-08-01&rft.volume=2016&rft.issue=Issue%201&rft.spage=1495&rft.epage=1503&rft.pages=1495-1503&rft.issn=1177-5483&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdoaj%3Eoai_doaj_org_article_a01d9c0fb50c4a5685986f2d35951ed0%3C/doaj%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a01d9c0fb50c4a5685986f2d35951ed03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true