A Comparison of Volumetric Reconstruction Methods of Archaeological Deposits Using Point-Cloud Data from Ahuahu, Aotearoa New Zealand

• Published in: Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2021-10, Vol.13 (19), p.4015
• Main Authors: Emmitt, Joshua, Pillay, Patricia, Barrett, Matthew, Middleton, Stacey, Mackrell, Timothy, Floyd, Bruce, Ladefoged, Thegn N.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: 3D data; Archaeology; artefact density; CAD; Computational geometry; Computer aided design; Construction industry; Convexity; Data acquisition; Data analysis; Data collection; Deposits; Digitization; Evaluation; Hulls; Lidar; Localization; Mercury; Photogrammetry; Remote sensing; simultaneous localization and mapping; Three dimensional analysis; Three dimensional models; total station recording; Visualization; volumetric analysis
• ISSN: 2072-4292; 2072-4292
• DOI: 10.3390/rs13194015

Collection of 3D data in archaeology is a long-standing practice. Traditionally, the focus of these data has been visualization as opposed to analysis. Three-dimensional data are often recorded during archaeological excavations, with the provenience of deposits, features, and artefacts documented by a variety of methods. Simple analysis of 3D data includes calculating the volumes of bound entities, such as deposits and features, and determining the spatial relationships of artifacts within these. The construction of these volumes presents challenges that originate in computer-aided design (CAD) but have implications for how data are used in archaeological analysis. We evaluate 3D construction processes using data from Waitetoke, Ahuahu Great Mercury Island, Aotearoa, New Zealand. Point clouds created with data collected by total station, photogrammetry, and terrestrial LiDAR using simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) are compared, as well as different methods for generating surface area and volumes with triangulated meshes and convex hulls. The differences between methods are evaluated and assessed in relation to analyzing artifact densities within deposits. While each method of 3D data acquisition and modeling has advantages in terms of accuracy and precision, other factors such as data collection and processing times must be considered when deciding on the most suitable.