Loading…
Multiple-breed genomic evaluation by principal component analysis in small size populations
In this study, the effects of breed composition and predictor dimensionality on the accuracy of direct genomic values (DGV) in a multiple breed (MB) cattle population were investigated. A total of 3559 bulls of three breeds were genotyped at 54 001 single nucleotide polymorphisms: 2093 Holstein (H),...
Saved in:
Published in: | Animal (Cambridge, England) England), 2015-05, Vol.9 (5), p.738-749 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c577t-56c11058ed2672b79d55052d3ef5fbee4215d983c6be9762453135c45b7612593 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c577t-56c11058ed2672b79d55052d3ef5fbee4215d983c6be9762453135c45b7612593 |
container_end_page | 749 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 738 |
container_title | Animal (Cambridge, England) |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Gaspa, G. Jorjani, H. Dimauro, C. Cellesi, M. Ajmone-Marsan, P. Stella, A. Macciotta, N. P. P. |
description | In this study, the effects of breed composition and predictor dimensionality on the accuracy of direct genomic values (DGV) in a multiple breed (MB) cattle population were investigated. A total of 3559 bulls of three breeds were genotyped at 54 001 single nucleotide polymorphisms: 2093 Holstein (H), 749 Brown Swiss (B) and 717 Simmental (S). DGV were calculated using a principal component (PC) approach for either single (SB) or MB scenarios. Moreover, DGV were computed using all SNP genotypes simultaneously with SNPBLUP model as comparison. A total of seven data sets were used: three with a SB each, three with different pairs of breeds (HB, HS and BS), and one with all the three breeds together (HBS), respectively. Editing was performed separately for each scenario. Reference populations differed in breed composition, whereas the validation bulls were the same for all scenarios. The number of SNPs retained after data editing ranged from 36 521 to 41 360. PCs were extracted from actual genotypes. The total number of retained PCs ranged from 4029 to 7284 in Brown Swiss and HBS respectively, reducing the number of predictors by about 85% (from 82% to 89%). In all, three traits were considered: milk, fat and protein yield. Correlations between deregressed proofs and DGV were used to assess prediction accuracy in validation animals. In the SB scenarios, average DGV accuracy did not substantially change when either SNPBLUP or PC were used. Improvement of DGV accuracy were observed for some traits in Brown Swiss, only when MB reference populations and PC approach were used instead of SB-SNPBLUP (+10% HBS, +16%HB for milk yield and +3% HBS and +7% HB for protein yield, respectively). With the exclusion of the abovementioned cases, similar accuracies were observed using MB reference population, under the PC or SNPBLUP models. Random variation owing to sampling effect or size and composition of the reference population may explain the difficulty in finding a defined pattern in the results. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1751731114002973 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a05299cde6b94d988a8895602bdfef1a</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1751731114002973</cupid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_a05299cde6b94d988a8895602bdfef1a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>1674689965</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c577t-56c11058ed2672b79d55052d3ef5fbee4215d983c6be9762453135c45b7612593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks2L1TAQwIso7rr6B3jRghcv1Uyaj-Yoi6sLKx7WBcFDSNLpI4-0qUmrvP3r7ds-H34gSA4Tht_8ZhimKJ4CeQUE5OtrkBxkDQCMEKpkfa843acqWdPP949_gJPiUc5bQrgCxh4WJ5Szhi7vtPjyYQ6THwNWNiG25QaH2HtX4jcTZjP5OJR2V47JD86PJpQu9mMccJhKM5iwyz6Xfihzb0Ios7_FcozjHO4K8-PiQWdCxieHeFbcXLz9dP6-uvr47vL8zVXluJRTxYUDILzBlgpJrVQt54TTtsaOdxaRUeCtamonLCopKOM11NwxbqUAylV9Vlyu3jaarV5m7U3a6Wi8vkvEtNEmTd4F1GYRK-VaFFaxRdqYplFcEGrbDjswi6taXfk7jrP9zZbDbE3aB51RCwHNvvfLlR9T_DpjnnTvs8MQzIBxzhpEQxgnUrD_QCUTjVKCL-iLP9BtnNOy8JUCCVTRhYKVcinmnLA7TgtE7w9E_3UgS82zg3m2PbbHip8XsQDPV6AzUZtN8lnfXFMCghAAWqs9UR_amt4m327wl-n-2fgHtsfNYA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1674171292</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multiple-breed genomic evaluation by principal component analysis in small size populations</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Gaspa, G. ; Jorjani, H. ; Dimauro, C. ; Cellesi, M. ; Ajmone-Marsan, P. ; Stella, A. ; Macciotta, N. P. P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gaspa, G. ; Jorjani, H. ; Dimauro, C. ; Cellesi, M. ; Ajmone-Marsan, P. ; Stella, A. ; Macciotta, N. P. P. ; Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, the effects of breed composition and predictor dimensionality on the accuracy of direct genomic values (DGV) in a multiple breed (MB) cattle population were investigated. A total of 3559 bulls of three breeds were genotyped at 54 001 single nucleotide polymorphisms: 2093 Holstein (H), 749 Brown Swiss (B) and 717 Simmental (S). DGV were calculated using a principal component (PC) approach for either single (SB) or MB scenarios. Moreover, DGV were computed using all SNP genotypes simultaneously with SNPBLUP model as comparison. A total of seven data sets were used: three with a SB each, three with different pairs of breeds (HB, HS and BS), and one with all the three breeds together (HBS), respectively. Editing was performed separately for each scenario. Reference populations differed in breed composition, whereas the validation bulls were the same for all scenarios. The number of SNPs retained after data editing ranged from 36 521 to 41 360. PCs were extracted from actual genotypes. The total number of retained PCs ranged from 4029 to 7284 in Brown Swiss and HBS respectively, reducing the number of predictors by about 85% (from 82% to 89%). In all, three traits were considered: milk, fat and protein yield. Correlations between deregressed proofs and DGV were used to assess prediction accuracy in validation animals. In the SB scenarios, average DGV accuracy did not substantially change when either SNPBLUP or PC were used. Improvement of DGV accuracy were observed for some traits in Brown Swiss, only when MB reference populations and PC approach were used instead of SB-SNPBLUP (+10% HBS, +16%HB for milk yield and +3% HBS and +7% HB for protein yield, respectively). With the exclusion of the abovementioned cases, similar accuracies were observed using MB reference population, under the PC or SNPBLUP models. Random variation owing to sampling effect or size and composition of the reference population may explain the difficulty in finding a defined pattern in the results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1751-7311</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1751-732X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1751-732X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1751731114002973</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25482828</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Animals ; Breeding ; Breeding and genetics ; Brown Swiss ; bulls ; Cattle - genetics ; dairy cattle ; data collection ; Genetics and Breeding ; Genetik och förädling ; Genome ; genomic selection ; Genomics - methods ; Genotype ; genotyping ; Holstein ; Male ; milk ; milk yield ; multiple breed ; Phenotype ; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide ; Population Density ; prediction ; Principal Component Analysis ; reference population ; Research Article ; Simmental ; single nucleotide polymorphism ; small population</subject><ispartof>Animal (Cambridge, England), 2015-05, Vol.9 (5), p.738-749</ispartof><rights>The Animal Consortium 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c577t-56c11058ed2672b79d55052d3ef5fbee4215d983c6be9762453135c45b7612593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c577t-56c11058ed2672b79d55052d3ef5fbee4215d983c6be9762453135c45b7612593</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25482828$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://res.slu.se/id/publ/66189$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gaspa, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jorjani, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dimauro, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cellesi, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ajmone-Marsan, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stella, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macciotta, N. P. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><title>Multiple-breed genomic evaluation by principal component analysis in small size populations</title><title>Animal (Cambridge, England)</title><addtitle>Animal</addtitle><description>In this study, the effects of breed composition and predictor dimensionality on the accuracy of direct genomic values (DGV) in a multiple breed (MB) cattle population were investigated. A total of 3559 bulls of three breeds were genotyped at 54 001 single nucleotide polymorphisms: 2093 Holstein (H), 749 Brown Swiss (B) and 717 Simmental (S). DGV were calculated using a principal component (PC) approach for either single (SB) or MB scenarios. Moreover, DGV were computed using all SNP genotypes simultaneously with SNPBLUP model as comparison. A total of seven data sets were used: three with a SB each, three with different pairs of breeds (HB, HS and BS), and one with all the three breeds together (HBS), respectively. Editing was performed separately for each scenario. Reference populations differed in breed composition, whereas the validation bulls were the same for all scenarios. The number of SNPs retained after data editing ranged from 36 521 to 41 360. PCs were extracted from actual genotypes. The total number of retained PCs ranged from 4029 to 7284 in Brown Swiss and HBS respectively, reducing the number of predictors by about 85% (from 82% to 89%). In all, three traits were considered: milk, fat and protein yield. Correlations between deregressed proofs and DGV were used to assess prediction accuracy in validation animals. In the SB scenarios, average DGV accuracy did not substantially change when either SNPBLUP or PC were used. Improvement of DGV accuracy were observed for some traits in Brown Swiss, only when MB reference populations and PC approach were used instead of SB-SNPBLUP (+10% HBS, +16%HB for milk yield and +3% HBS and +7% HB for protein yield, respectively). With the exclusion of the abovementioned cases, similar accuracies were observed using MB reference population, under the PC or SNPBLUP models. Random variation owing to sampling effect or size and composition of the reference population may explain the difficulty in finding a defined pattern in the results.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Breeding and genetics</subject><subject>Brown Swiss</subject><subject>bulls</subject><subject>Cattle - genetics</subject><subject>dairy cattle</subject><subject>data collection</subject><subject>Genetics and Breeding</subject><subject>Genetik och förädling</subject><subject>Genome</subject><subject>genomic selection</subject><subject>Genomics - methods</subject><subject>Genotype</subject><subject>genotyping</subject><subject>Holstein</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>milk</subject><subject>milk yield</subject><subject>multiple breed</subject><subject>Phenotype</subject><subject>Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide</subject><subject>Population Density</subject><subject>prediction</subject><subject>Principal Component Analysis</subject><subject>reference population</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Simmental</subject><subject>single nucleotide polymorphism</subject><subject>small population</subject><issn>1751-7311</issn><issn>1751-732X</issn><issn>1751-732X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks2L1TAQwIso7rr6B3jRghcv1Uyaj-Yoi6sLKx7WBcFDSNLpI4-0qUmrvP3r7ds-H34gSA4Tht_8ZhimKJ4CeQUE5OtrkBxkDQCMEKpkfa843acqWdPP949_gJPiUc5bQrgCxh4WJ5Szhi7vtPjyYQ6THwNWNiG25QaH2HtX4jcTZjP5OJR2V47JD86PJpQu9mMccJhKM5iwyz6Xfihzb0Ios7_FcozjHO4K8-PiQWdCxieHeFbcXLz9dP6-uvr47vL8zVXluJRTxYUDILzBlgpJrVQt54TTtsaOdxaRUeCtamonLCopKOM11NwxbqUAylV9Vlyu3jaarV5m7U3a6Wi8vkvEtNEmTd4F1GYRK-VaFFaxRdqYplFcEGrbDjswi6taXfk7jrP9zZbDbE3aB51RCwHNvvfLlR9T_DpjnnTvs8MQzIBxzhpEQxgnUrD_QCUTjVKCL-iLP9BtnNOy8JUCCVTRhYKVcinmnLA7TgtE7w9E_3UgS82zg3m2PbbHip8XsQDPV6AzUZtN8lnfXFMCghAAWqs9UR_amt4m327wl-n-2fgHtsfNYA</recordid><startdate>20150501</startdate><enddate>20150501</enddate><creator>Gaspa, G.</creator><creator>Jorjani, H.</creator><creator>Dimauro, C.</creator><creator>Cellesi, M.</creator><creator>Ajmone-Marsan, P.</creator><creator>Stella, A.</creator><creator>Macciotta, N. P. P.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150501</creationdate><title>Multiple-breed genomic evaluation by principal component analysis in small size populations</title><author>Gaspa, G. ; Jorjani, H. ; Dimauro, C. ; Cellesi, M. ; Ajmone-Marsan, P. ; Stella, A. ; Macciotta, N. P. P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c577t-56c11058ed2672b79d55052d3ef5fbee4215d983c6be9762453135c45b7612593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Breeding and genetics</topic><topic>Brown Swiss</topic><topic>bulls</topic><topic>Cattle - genetics</topic><topic>dairy cattle</topic><topic>data collection</topic><topic>Genetics and Breeding</topic><topic>Genetik och förädling</topic><topic>Genome</topic><topic>genomic selection</topic><topic>Genomics - methods</topic><topic>Genotype</topic><topic>genotyping</topic><topic>Holstein</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>milk</topic><topic>milk yield</topic><topic>multiple breed</topic><topic>Phenotype</topic><topic>Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide</topic><topic>Population Density</topic><topic>prediction</topic><topic>Principal Component Analysis</topic><topic>reference population</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Simmental</topic><topic>single nucleotide polymorphism</topic><topic>small population</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gaspa, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jorjani, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dimauro, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cellesi, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ajmone-Marsan, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stella, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macciotta, N. P. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Animal (Cambridge, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gaspa, G.</au><au>Jorjani, H.</au><au>Dimauro, C.</au><au>Cellesi, M.</au><au>Ajmone-Marsan, P.</au><au>Stella, A.</au><au>Macciotta, N. P. P.</au><aucorp>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multiple-breed genomic evaluation by principal component analysis in small size populations</atitle><jtitle>Animal (Cambridge, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Animal</addtitle><date>2015-05-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>738</spage><epage>749</epage><pages>738-749</pages><issn>1751-7311</issn><issn>1751-732X</issn><eissn>1751-732X</eissn><abstract>In this study, the effects of breed composition and predictor dimensionality on the accuracy of direct genomic values (DGV) in a multiple breed (MB) cattle population were investigated. A total of 3559 bulls of three breeds were genotyped at 54 001 single nucleotide polymorphisms: 2093 Holstein (H), 749 Brown Swiss (B) and 717 Simmental (S). DGV were calculated using a principal component (PC) approach for either single (SB) or MB scenarios. Moreover, DGV were computed using all SNP genotypes simultaneously with SNPBLUP model as comparison. A total of seven data sets were used: three with a SB each, three with different pairs of breeds (HB, HS and BS), and one with all the three breeds together (HBS), respectively. Editing was performed separately for each scenario. Reference populations differed in breed composition, whereas the validation bulls were the same for all scenarios. The number of SNPs retained after data editing ranged from 36 521 to 41 360. PCs were extracted from actual genotypes. The total number of retained PCs ranged from 4029 to 7284 in Brown Swiss and HBS respectively, reducing the number of predictors by about 85% (from 82% to 89%). In all, three traits were considered: milk, fat and protein yield. Correlations between deregressed proofs and DGV were used to assess prediction accuracy in validation animals. In the SB scenarios, average DGV accuracy did not substantially change when either SNPBLUP or PC were used. Improvement of DGV accuracy were observed for some traits in Brown Swiss, only when MB reference populations and PC approach were used instead of SB-SNPBLUP (+10% HBS, +16%HB for milk yield and +3% HBS and +7% HB for protein yield, respectively). With the exclusion of the abovementioned cases, similar accuracies were observed using MB reference population, under the PC or SNPBLUP models. Random variation owing to sampling effect or size and composition of the reference population may explain the difficulty in finding a defined pattern in the results.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>25482828</pmid><doi>10.1017/S1751731114002973</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1751-7311 |
ispartof | Animal (Cambridge, England), 2015-05, Vol.9 (5), p.738-749 |
issn | 1751-7311 1751-732X 1751-732X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a05299cde6b94d988a8895602bdfef1a |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Animals Breeding Breeding and genetics Brown Swiss bulls Cattle - genetics dairy cattle data collection Genetics and Breeding Genetik och förädling Genome genomic selection Genomics - methods Genotype genotyping Holstein Male milk milk yield multiple breed Phenotype Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide Population Density prediction Principal Component Analysis reference population Research Article Simmental single nucleotide polymorphism small population |
title | Multiple-breed genomic evaluation by principal component analysis in small size populations |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T23%3A18%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multiple-breed%20genomic%20evaluation%20by%20principal%20component%20analysis%20in%20small%20size%20populations&rft.jtitle=Animal%20(Cambridge,%20England)&rft.au=Gaspa,%20G.&rft.aucorp=Sveriges%20lantbruksuniversitet&rft.date=2015-05-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=738&rft.epage=749&rft.pages=738-749&rft.issn=1751-7311&rft.eissn=1751-732X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1751731114002973&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E1674689965%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c577t-56c11058ed2672b79d55052d3ef5fbee4215d983c6be9762453135c45b7612593%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1674171292&rft_id=info:pmid/25482828&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1751731114002973&rfr_iscdi=true |