Loading…

Trisodium citrate 4% versus heparin as a catheter lock for non-tunneled hemodialysis catheters in critically ill patients: a multicenter, randomized clinical trial

Background Non-tunneled hemodialysis catheters are currently used for critically ill patients with acute kidney injury requiring extracorporeal renal replacement therapy. Strategies to prevent catheter dysfunction and infection with catheter locks remain controversial. Methods In a multicenter, rand...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of intensive care 2019-07, Vol.9 (1), p.75-10, Article 75
Main Authors: Quenot, Jean-Pierre, Helms, Julie, Bourredjem, Abderrahmane, Dargent, Auguste, Meziani, Ferhat, Badie, Julio, Blasco, Gilles, Piton, Gaël, Capellier, Gilles, Mezher, Chaouki, Rebibou, Jean-Michel, Nadji, Abdelouaid, Crepin, Thomas, Barbar, Saber Davide, Fleck, Camille, Cransac, Amélie, Boulin, Mathieu, Binquet, Christine, Soudry-Faure, Agnès, Bruyère, Rémi
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c603t-770c44b0bb0de496c0f56b9799a15970e3ea2cbcc5d48e266a99d95146f85a723
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c603t-770c44b0bb0de496c0f56b9799a15970e3ea2cbcc5d48e266a99d95146f85a723
container_end_page 10
container_issue 1
container_start_page 75
container_title Annals of intensive care
container_volume 9
creator Quenot, Jean-Pierre
Helms, Julie
Bourredjem, Abderrahmane
Dargent, Auguste
Meziani, Ferhat
Badie, Julio
Blasco, Gilles
Piton, Gaël
Capellier, Gilles
Mezher, Chaouki
Rebibou, Jean-Michel
Nadji, Abdelouaid
Crepin, Thomas
Barbar, Saber Davide
Fleck, Camille
Cransac, Amélie
Boulin, Mathieu
Binquet, Christine
Soudry-Faure, Agnès
Bruyère, Rémi
description Background Non-tunneled hemodialysis catheters are currently used for critically ill patients with acute kidney injury requiring extracorporeal renal replacement therapy. Strategies to prevent catheter dysfunction and infection with catheter locks remain controversial. Methods In a multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-blind trial, we compared two strategies for catheter locking of non-tunneled hemodialysis catheters, namely trisodium citrate at 4% (intervention group) versus unfractionated heparin (control group), in patients aged 18 years or older admitted to the intensive care unit and in whom a first non-tunneled hemodialysis catheter was to be inserted by the jugular or femoral vein. The primary endpoint was length of event-free survival of the first non-tunneled hemodialysis catheter. Secondary endpoints were: rate of fibrinolysis, incidence of catheter dysfunction and incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI), all per 1000 catheter-days; number of hemorrhagic events requiring transfusion, length of stay in intensive care and in hospital; 28-day mortality. Results Overall, 396 randomized patients completed the trial: 199 in the citrate group and 197 in the heparin group. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between groups. The duration of event-free survival of the first non-tunneled hemodialysis catheter was not significantly different between groups: 7 days (IQR 3–10) in the citrate group and 5 days (IQR 3–11) in the heparin group ( p  = 0.51). Rates of catheter thrombosis, CRBSI, and adverse events were not statistically different between groups. Conclusions In critically ill patients, there was no significant difference in the duration of event-free survival of the first non-tunneled hemodialysis catheter between trisodium citrate 4% and heparin as a locking solution. Catheter thrombosis, catheter-related infection, and adverse events were not statistically different between the two groups. Trial registration Registered with Clinicaltrials.gov under the number NCT01962116. Registered 14 October 2013.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s13613-019-0553-4
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a0c88b48bece4020a1d04550309f5afc</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_a0c88b48bece4020a1d04550309f5afc</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2251103297</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c603t-770c44b0bb0de496c0f56b9799a15970e3ea2cbcc5d48e266a99d95146f85a723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kk1v1DAQhiMEolXpD-CCLCEkDgTGjp0PDkio4qNSJS7lbE2cya4Xx17spNLyd_ijeNmytEjk4sTzzBNP8hbFUw6vOW_rN4lXNa9K4F0JSlWlfFCcCs6hVK2Ah3fuT4rzlDaQLwWNENXj4qTiopbQVKfFz-toUxjsMjFj54gzMfmC3VBMS2Jr2mK0nmFiyAzOa5opMhfMNzaGyHzw5bx4T46GzE5Zg26XbDqyieVuE-1sDTq3Y9Y5tsXZkp_T2-ycFpdL-YniKxbRD2GyP7LMOOv3LWyOWfmkeDSiS3R-u54VXz9-uL74XF59-XR58f6qNDVUc9k0YKTsoe9hINnVBkZV913TdchV1wBVhML0xqhBtiTqGrtu6BSX9dgqbER1VlwevEPAjd5GO2Hc6YBW_94IcaUx5vM60gimbXvZ9mRIggDkA0iloIJuVDia7Hp3cG2XfqJhP2NEd096v-LtWq_Cja7zLBzaLHh5K4jh-0Jp1pNNhpxDT2FJWgiVf3Aluiajz_9BN2GJPn-qPQWq4RJUpviBMjGkFGk8HoaD3idKHxKlc6L0PlFa5p5nd6c4dvzJTwbEAUi55FcU_776_9ZfclDZTQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2250571405</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Trisodium citrate 4% versus heparin as a catheter lock for non-tunneled hemodialysis catheters in critically ill patients: a multicenter, randomized clinical trial</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Springer Nature - SpringerLink Journals - Fully Open Access </source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Quenot, Jean-Pierre ; Helms, Julie ; Bourredjem, Abderrahmane ; Dargent, Auguste ; Meziani, Ferhat ; Badie, Julio ; Blasco, Gilles ; Piton, Gaël ; Capellier, Gilles ; Mezher, Chaouki ; Rebibou, Jean-Michel ; Nadji, Abdelouaid ; Crepin, Thomas ; Barbar, Saber Davide ; Fleck, Camille ; Cransac, Amélie ; Boulin, Mathieu ; Binquet, Christine ; Soudry-Faure, Agnès ; Bruyère, Rémi</creator><creatorcontrib>Quenot, Jean-Pierre ; Helms, Julie ; Bourredjem, Abderrahmane ; Dargent, Auguste ; Meziani, Ferhat ; Badie, Julio ; Blasco, Gilles ; Piton, Gaël ; Capellier, Gilles ; Mezher, Chaouki ; Rebibou, Jean-Michel ; Nadji, Abdelouaid ; Crepin, Thomas ; Barbar, Saber Davide ; Fleck, Camille ; Cransac, Amélie ; Boulin, Mathieu ; Binquet, Christine ; Soudry-Faure, Agnès ; Bruyère, Rémi ; VERROU-REA Trial Investigators and the CRICS TRIGGERSEP Group (Clinical Research in Intensive Care and Sepsis Trial Group for Global Evaluation and Research in Sepsis) ; for the VERROU-REA Trial Investigators and the CRICS TRIGGERSEP Group (Clinical Research in Intensive Care and Sepsis Trial Group for Global Evaluation and Research in Sepsis)</creatorcontrib><description>Background Non-tunneled hemodialysis catheters are currently used for critically ill patients with acute kidney injury requiring extracorporeal renal replacement therapy. Strategies to prevent catheter dysfunction and infection with catheter locks remain controversial. Methods In a multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-blind trial, we compared two strategies for catheter locking of non-tunneled hemodialysis catheters, namely trisodium citrate at 4% (intervention group) versus unfractionated heparin (control group), in patients aged 18 years or older admitted to the intensive care unit and in whom a first non-tunneled hemodialysis catheter was to be inserted by the jugular or femoral vein. The primary endpoint was length of event-free survival of the first non-tunneled hemodialysis catheter. Secondary endpoints were: rate of fibrinolysis, incidence of catheter dysfunction and incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI), all per 1000 catheter-days; number of hemorrhagic events requiring transfusion, length of stay in intensive care and in hospital; 28-day mortality. Results Overall, 396 randomized patients completed the trial: 199 in the citrate group and 197 in the heparin group. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between groups. The duration of event-free survival of the first non-tunneled hemodialysis catheter was not significantly different between groups: 7 days (IQR 3–10) in the citrate group and 5 days (IQR 3–11) in the heparin group ( p  = 0.51). Rates of catheter thrombosis, CRBSI, and adverse events were not statistically different between groups. Conclusions In critically ill patients, there was no significant difference in the duration of event-free survival of the first non-tunneled hemodialysis catheter between trisodium citrate 4% and heparin as a locking solution. Catheter thrombosis, catheter-related infection, and adverse events were not statistically different between the two groups. Trial registration Registered with Clinicaltrials.gov under the number NCT01962116. Registered 14 October 2013.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2110-5820</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2110-5820</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s13613-019-0553-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31264073</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Acute renal failure ; Anesthesiology ; Anticoagulants ; Catheters ; Citra-Lock ; Clinical trials ; Critical Care Medicine ; Critical illness ; Emergency Medicine ; Evidence-based medicine ; Hemodialysis ; Heparin ; Infections ; Intensive ; Intensive care ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; NCT ; NCT01962116 ; Thrombosis</subject><ispartof>Annals of intensive care, 2019-07, Vol.9 (1), p.75-10, Article 75</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><rights>Annals of Intensive Care is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved. © 2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c603t-770c44b0bb0de496c0f56b9799a15970e3ea2cbcc5d48e266a99d95146f85a723</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c603t-770c44b0bb0de496c0f56b9799a15970e3ea2cbcc5d48e266a99d95146f85a723</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2351-682X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2250571405/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2250571405?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31264073$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Quenot, Jean-Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helms, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourredjem, Abderrahmane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dargent, Auguste</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meziani, Ferhat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badie, Julio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blasco, Gilles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piton, Gaël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capellier, Gilles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mezher, Chaouki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rebibou, Jean-Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nadji, Abdelouaid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crepin, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbar, Saber Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleck, Camille</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cransac, Amélie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boulin, Mathieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Binquet, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soudry-Faure, Agnès</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruyère, Rémi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VERROU-REA Trial Investigators and the CRICS TRIGGERSEP Group (Clinical Research in Intensive Care and Sepsis Trial Group for Global Evaluation and Research in Sepsis)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for the VERROU-REA Trial Investigators and the CRICS TRIGGERSEP Group (Clinical Research in Intensive Care and Sepsis Trial Group for Global Evaluation and Research in Sepsis)</creatorcontrib><title>Trisodium citrate 4% versus heparin as a catheter lock for non-tunneled hemodialysis catheters in critically ill patients: a multicenter, randomized clinical trial</title><title>Annals of intensive care</title><addtitle>Ann. Intensive Care</addtitle><addtitle>Ann Intensive Care</addtitle><description>Background Non-tunneled hemodialysis catheters are currently used for critically ill patients with acute kidney injury requiring extracorporeal renal replacement therapy. Strategies to prevent catheter dysfunction and infection with catheter locks remain controversial. Methods In a multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-blind trial, we compared two strategies for catheter locking of non-tunneled hemodialysis catheters, namely trisodium citrate at 4% (intervention group) versus unfractionated heparin (control group), in patients aged 18 years or older admitted to the intensive care unit and in whom a first non-tunneled hemodialysis catheter was to be inserted by the jugular or femoral vein. The primary endpoint was length of event-free survival of the first non-tunneled hemodialysis catheter. Secondary endpoints were: rate of fibrinolysis, incidence of catheter dysfunction and incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI), all per 1000 catheter-days; number of hemorrhagic events requiring transfusion, length of stay in intensive care and in hospital; 28-day mortality. Results Overall, 396 randomized patients completed the trial: 199 in the citrate group and 197 in the heparin group. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between groups. The duration of event-free survival of the first non-tunneled hemodialysis catheter was not significantly different between groups: 7 days (IQR 3–10) in the citrate group and 5 days (IQR 3–11) in the heparin group ( p  = 0.51). Rates of catheter thrombosis, CRBSI, and adverse events were not statistically different between groups. Conclusions In critically ill patients, there was no significant difference in the duration of event-free survival of the first non-tunneled hemodialysis catheter between trisodium citrate 4% and heparin as a locking solution. Catheter thrombosis, catheter-related infection, and adverse events were not statistically different between the two groups. Trial registration Registered with Clinicaltrials.gov under the number NCT01962116. Registered 14 October 2013.</description><subject>Acute renal failure</subject><subject>Anesthesiology</subject><subject>Anticoagulants</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>Citra-Lock</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Critical Care Medicine</subject><subject>Critical illness</subject><subject>Emergency Medicine</subject><subject>Evidence-based medicine</subject><subject>Hemodialysis</subject><subject>Heparin</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Intensive</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>NCT</subject><subject>NCT01962116</subject><subject>Thrombosis</subject><issn>2110-5820</issn><issn>2110-5820</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kk1v1DAQhiMEolXpD-CCLCEkDgTGjp0PDkio4qNSJS7lbE2cya4Xx17spNLyd_ijeNmytEjk4sTzzBNP8hbFUw6vOW_rN4lXNa9K4F0JSlWlfFCcCs6hVK2Ah3fuT4rzlDaQLwWNENXj4qTiopbQVKfFz-toUxjsMjFj54gzMfmC3VBMS2Jr2mK0nmFiyAzOa5opMhfMNzaGyHzw5bx4T46GzE5Zg26XbDqyieVuE-1sDTq3Y9Y5tsXZkp_T2-ycFpdL-YniKxbRD2GyP7LMOOv3LWyOWfmkeDSiS3R-u54VXz9-uL74XF59-XR58f6qNDVUc9k0YKTsoe9hINnVBkZV913TdchV1wBVhML0xqhBtiTqGrtu6BSX9dgqbER1VlwevEPAjd5GO2Hc6YBW_94IcaUx5vM60gimbXvZ9mRIggDkA0iloIJuVDia7Hp3cG2XfqJhP2NEd096v-LtWq_Cja7zLBzaLHh5K4jh-0Jp1pNNhpxDT2FJWgiVf3Aluiajz_9BN2GJPn-qPQWq4RJUpviBMjGkFGk8HoaD3idKHxKlc6L0PlFa5p5nd6c4dvzJTwbEAUi55FcU_776_9ZfclDZTQ</recordid><startdate>20190701</startdate><enddate>20190701</enddate><creator>Quenot, Jean-Pierre</creator><creator>Helms, Julie</creator><creator>Bourredjem, Abderrahmane</creator><creator>Dargent, Auguste</creator><creator>Meziani, Ferhat</creator><creator>Badie, Julio</creator><creator>Blasco, Gilles</creator><creator>Piton, Gaël</creator><creator>Capellier, Gilles</creator><creator>Mezher, Chaouki</creator><creator>Rebibou, Jean-Michel</creator><creator>Nadji, Abdelouaid</creator><creator>Crepin, Thomas</creator><creator>Barbar, Saber Davide</creator><creator>Fleck, Camille</creator><creator>Cransac, Amélie</creator><creator>Boulin, Mathieu</creator><creator>Binquet, Christine</creator><creator>Soudry-Faure, Agnès</creator><creator>Bruyère, Rémi</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>SpringerOpen</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2351-682X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190701</creationdate><title>Trisodium citrate 4% versus heparin as a catheter lock for non-tunneled hemodialysis catheters in critically ill patients: a multicenter, randomized clinical trial</title><author>Quenot, Jean-Pierre ; Helms, Julie ; Bourredjem, Abderrahmane ; Dargent, Auguste ; Meziani, Ferhat ; Badie, Julio ; Blasco, Gilles ; Piton, Gaël ; Capellier, Gilles ; Mezher, Chaouki ; Rebibou, Jean-Michel ; Nadji, Abdelouaid ; Crepin, Thomas ; Barbar, Saber Davide ; Fleck, Camille ; Cransac, Amélie ; Boulin, Mathieu ; Binquet, Christine ; Soudry-Faure, Agnès ; Bruyère, Rémi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c603t-770c44b0bb0de496c0f56b9799a15970e3ea2cbcc5d48e266a99d95146f85a723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Acute renal failure</topic><topic>Anesthesiology</topic><topic>Anticoagulants</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>Citra-Lock</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Critical Care Medicine</topic><topic>Critical illness</topic><topic>Emergency Medicine</topic><topic>Evidence-based medicine</topic><topic>Hemodialysis</topic><topic>Heparin</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Intensive</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>NCT</topic><topic>NCT01962116</topic><topic>Thrombosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Quenot, Jean-Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helms, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourredjem, Abderrahmane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dargent, Auguste</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meziani, Ferhat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badie, Julio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blasco, Gilles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piton, Gaël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capellier, Gilles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mezher, Chaouki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rebibou, Jean-Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nadji, Abdelouaid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crepin, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbar, Saber Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleck, Camille</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cransac, Amélie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boulin, Mathieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Binquet, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soudry-Faure, Agnès</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruyère, Rémi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VERROU-REA Trial Investigators and the CRICS TRIGGERSEP Group (Clinical Research in Intensive Care and Sepsis Trial Group for Global Evaluation and Research in Sepsis)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for the VERROU-REA Trial Investigators and the CRICS TRIGGERSEP Group (Clinical Research in Intensive Care and Sepsis Trial Group for Global Evaluation and Research in Sepsis)</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Annals of intensive care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Quenot, Jean-Pierre</au><au>Helms, Julie</au><au>Bourredjem, Abderrahmane</au><au>Dargent, Auguste</au><au>Meziani, Ferhat</au><au>Badie, Julio</au><au>Blasco, Gilles</au><au>Piton, Gaël</au><au>Capellier, Gilles</au><au>Mezher, Chaouki</au><au>Rebibou, Jean-Michel</au><au>Nadji, Abdelouaid</au><au>Crepin, Thomas</au><au>Barbar, Saber Davide</au><au>Fleck, Camille</au><au>Cransac, Amélie</au><au>Boulin, Mathieu</au><au>Binquet, Christine</au><au>Soudry-Faure, Agnès</au><au>Bruyère, Rémi</au><aucorp>VERROU-REA Trial Investigators and the CRICS TRIGGERSEP Group (Clinical Research in Intensive Care and Sepsis Trial Group for Global Evaluation and Research in Sepsis)</aucorp><aucorp>for the VERROU-REA Trial Investigators and the CRICS TRIGGERSEP Group (Clinical Research in Intensive Care and Sepsis Trial Group for Global Evaluation and Research in Sepsis)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Trisodium citrate 4% versus heparin as a catheter lock for non-tunneled hemodialysis catheters in critically ill patients: a multicenter, randomized clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>Annals of intensive care</jtitle><stitle>Ann. Intensive Care</stitle><addtitle>Ann Intensive Care</addtitle><date>2019-07-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>75</spage><epage>10</epage><pages>75-10</pages><artnum>75</artnum><issn>2110-5820</issn><eissn>2110-5820</eissn><abstract>Background Non-tunneled hemodialysis catheters are currently used for critically ill patients with acute kidney injury requiring extracorporeal renal replacement therapy. Strategies to prevent catheter dysfunction and infection with catheter locks remain controversial. Methods In a multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-blind trial, we compared two strategies for catheter locking of non-tunneled hemodialysis catheters, namely trisodium citrate at 4% (intervention group) versus unfractionated heparin (control group), in patients aged 18 years or older admitted to the intensive care unit and in whom a first non-tunneled hemodialysis catheter was to be inserted by the jugular or femoral vein. The primary endpoint was length of event-free survival of the first non-tunneled hemodialysis catheter. Secondary endpoints were: rate of fibrinolysis, incidence of catheter dysfunction and incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI), all per 1000 catheter-days; number of hemorrhagic events requiring transfusion, length of stay in intensive care and in hospital; 28-day mortality. Results Overall, 396 randomized patients completed the trial: 199 in the citrate group and 197 in the heparin group. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between groups. The duration of event-free survival of the first non-tunneled hemodialysis catheter was not significantly different between groups: 7 days (IQR 3–10) in the citrate group and 5 days (IQR 3–11) in the heparin group ( p  = 0.51). Rates of catheter thrombosis, CRBSI, and adverse events were not statistically different between groups. Conclusions In critically ill patients, there was no significant difference in the duration of event-free survival of the first non-tunneled hemodialysis catheter between trisodium citrate 4% and heparin as a locking solution. Catheter thrombosis, catheter-related infection, and adverse events were not statistically different between the two groups. Trial registration Registered with Clinicaltrials.gov under the number NCT01962116. Registered 14 October 2013.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>31264073</pmid><doi>10.1186/s13613-019-0553-4</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2351-682X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2110-5820
ispartof Annals of intensive care, 2019-07, Vol.9 (1), p.75-10, Article 75
issn 2110-5820
2110-5820
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a0c88b48bece4020a1d04550309f5afc
source Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Springer Nature - SpringerLink Journals - Fully Open Access ; PubMed Central
subjects Acute renal failure
Anesthesiology
Anticoagulants
Catheters
Citra-Lock
Clinical trials
Critical Care Medicine
Critical illness
Emergency Medicine
Evidence-based medicine
Hemodialysis
Heparin
Infections
Intensive
Intensive care
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
NCT
NCT01962116
Thrombosis
title Trisodium citrate 4% versus heparin as a catheter lock for non-tunneled hemodialysis catheters in critically ill patients: a multicenter, randomized clinical trial
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T17%3A31%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trisodium%20citrate%204%25%20versus%20heparin%20as%20a%20catheter%20lock%20for%20non-tunneled%20hemodialysis%20catheters%20in%20critically%20ill%20patients:%20a%20multicenter,%20randomized%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20intensive%20care&rft.au=Quenot,%20Jean-Pierre&rft.aucorp=VERROU-REA%20Trial%20Investigators%20and%20the%20CRICS%20TRIGGERSEP%20Group%20(Clinical%20Research%20in%20Intensive%20Care%20and%20Sepsis%20Trial%20Group%20for%20Global%20Evaluation%20and%20Research%20in%20Sepsis)&rft.date=2019-07-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=75&rft.epage=10&rft.pages=75-10&rft.artnum=75&rft.issn=2110-5820&rft.eissn=2110-5820&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s13613-019-0553-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2251103297%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c603t-770c44b0bb0de496c0f56b9799a15970e3ea2cbcc5d48e266a99d95146f85a723%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2250571405&rft_id=info:pmid/31264073&rfr_iscdi=true