Evaluating the environmental impacts of stabilization and solidification technologies for managing hazardous wastes through life cycle assessment: A case study of Hong Kong

• Published in: Environment international 2020-12, Vol.145, p.106139, Article 106139
• Main Authors: Hossain, Md. Uzzal, Wang, Lei, Chen, Liang, Tsang, Daniel C.W., Ng, S. Thomas, Poon, Chi Sun, Mechtcherine, Viktor
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Construction utilization; Contaminated sediment; Environment; Green remediation; Hazardous Waste; Hong Kong; Incineration; Life cycle assessment; Life Cycle Stages; Refuse Disposal; Stabilization/solidification; Technology; Waste incineration fly ash
• ISSN: 0160-4120; 1873-6750
• DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106139

[Display omitted] •Stabilization/Solidification (S/S) for hazardous materials was evaluated by life cycle assessment.•Sediment and municipal solid waste incineration fly ash remediation was studied with 17 S/S scenarios under five strategies.•Alternative binders and recycled materials reduced the overall environmental impacts.•This decision-support process could facilitate the design of sustainable remediation. Proper management of hazardous materials arouses widespread environmental concerns due to its enormous ecological and health impacts. The development of green stabilization/solidification (S/S) technology for resourceful utilization of hazardous materials, as well as the immobilization of potentially toxic elements is of great scientific interests. Cement-based S/S is often considered a low-cost and highly efficient technology, but the environmental sustainability of a broad spectrum of S/S technologies has yet to be evaluated. Therefore, this study assessed the environmental sustainability of S/S technologies for managing two common types of hazardous wastes, i.e., contaminated marine sediment and municipal solid waste incineration fly ash (MIFA) by using life cycle assessment (LCA). A total of 17 scenarios under three strategies for sediment and two strategies for MIFA S/S technologies were comprehensively evaluated. The LCA results identified the most preferable S/S technology in each strategy. In particular, Scenario 1 (mixture of sediment with a small percentage of ordinary Portland cement and incinerated sewage sludge ash) of Strategy 1 (use as fill materials) would be the preferred option, as it reduces about 54% and 70% global warming potential compared to those of Scenarios 2 and 3, respectively. This is the first initiative for evaluating the environmental impacts of a wide range of recently developed S/S technologies using green/alternative binders for diverting hazardous wastes from disposal. The results can serve as a decision support for the practical application of the environmentally friendly S/S technology for sustainable remediation.