Loading…

Clinical usefulness of magnifying endoscopy for non-ampullary duodenal tumors

Abstract Study aims  This study aimed to investigate the clinical usefulness of magnifying endoscopy (ME) for non-ampullary duodenal tumors. Patients and methods  We enrolled 103 consecutive patients with non-ampullary duodenal tumors that were observed by ME with narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI) and ha...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Endoscopy International Open 2017-04, Vol.5 (4), p.E297-E302
Main Authors: Mizumoto, Takeshi, Sanomura, Yoji, Tanaka, Shinji, Kuroki, Kazutoshi, Kurihara, Mio, Yoshifuku, Yoshikazu, Oka, Shiro, Arihiro, Koji, Shimamoto, Fumio, Chayama, Kazuaki
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Study aims  This study aimed to investigate the clinical usefulness of magnifying endoscopy (ME) for non-ampullary duodenal tumors. Patients and methods  We enrolled 103 consecutive patients with non-ampullary duodenal tumors that were observed by ME with narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI) and had pit pattern analysis before endoscopic resection at Hiroshima University Hospital before December 2014. ME-NBI images were classified as Type B or Type C according to the Hiroshima classification, and pit patterns were classified as regular or irregular. We studied the clinicopathological features and diagnoses with ME-NBI and pit pattern analyses according to the Vienna classification (category 3: 73 patients; category 4: 30 patients). Results  Category 4 lesions were significantly larger than category 3 lesions. According to ME-NBI images, category 4 Type C lesions (83 %) were significantly more common than category 4 Type B lesions (17 %). According to pit pattern analyses, category 4 irregular lesions 4 (77 %) were significantly more common than category 4 regular lesions (23 %). The accuracies of using Type C ME-NBI images and irregular pit patterns to diagnose category 4 lesions were 87 % and 84 %, the sensitivities were 83 % and 77 %, and the specificities were 89 % and 88 %, respectively. There was no significant difference between ME-NBI and pit pattern analyses for diagnosing the histologic grade of non-ampullary duodenal tumors. Conclusion  Our study showed that ME-NBI and pit pattern analysis had equivalent abilities to determine the histologic grade of non-ampullary duodenal tumors. ME-NBI may be more useful because it is a simple, less time-consuming procedure.
ISSN:2364-3722
2196-9736
DOI:10.1055/s-0043-103681