Loading…
Magnetic resonance imaging for jawbone assessment: a systematic review
To evaluate the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for jawbone assessment compared to reference-standard measurements in the literature. An electronic database search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library in June 2022, and updated in August 2023....
Saved in:
Published in: | Head & face medicine 2024-04, Vol.20 (1), p.25-10, Article 25 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-db338962303a06910898e2e668c893e59445b3f42b0a9acbe6da6095f1017ae73 |
container_end_page | 10 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 25 |
container_title | Head & face medicine |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Parize, Hian Sadilina, Sofya Caldas, Ricardo Armini Cordeiro, João Victor Cunha Kleinheinz, Johannes Laganá, Dalva Cruz Sesma, Newton Bohner, Lauren |
description | To evaluate the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for jawbone assessment compared to reference-standard measurements in the literature.
An electronic database search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library in June 2022, and updated in August 2023. Studies evaluating the accuracy of MRI for jawbone assessment compared with reference-standard measurements (histology, physical measurements, or computed tomography) were included. The outcome measures included bone histomorphometry and linear measurements. The risk of bias was assessed by the Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2). The review was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42022342697).
From 63 studies selected for full-text analysis, nine manuscripts were considered eligible for this review. The studies included assessments of 54 participants, 35 cadavers, and one phantom. A linear measurement error ranging from 0.03 to 3.11 mm was shown. The accuracy of bone histomorphometry varies among studies. Limitations of the evidence included heterogeneity of MRI protocols and the methodology of the included studies.
Few studies have suggested the feasibility of MRI for jawbone assessment, as MRI provides comparable results to those of standard reference tests. However, further advancements and optimizations are needed to increase the applicability, validate the efficacy, and establish clinical utility of these methods. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s13005-024-00424-2 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a2b323fb932e4d039cdc6f20b735995c</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A790851884</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_a2b323fb932e4d039cdc6f20b735995c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A790851884</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-db338962303a06910898e2e668c893e59445b3f42b0a9acbe6da6095f1017ae73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkktr3TAQhU1paB7tH-iiGLrpxunoaam7EJo0kJJNAt2JsTwyvlxbqeTbkH9fJU7TB0UgCfGdoxnpVNVbBseMGf0xMwGgGuCyAZBl5i-qA9ZK3TAN317-sd-vDnPeFEgpzl5V-8JoyTQTB9XZVxxmWkZfJ8pxxtlTPU44jPNQh5jqDd51caYac6acJ5qXTzXW-T4vNOEq-zHS3etqL-A205un9ai6Oft8ffqlubw6vzg9uWy8VHZp-k4IYzUXIBC0ZWCsIU5aG2-sIGWlVJ0IkneAFn1HukcNVgUGrEVqxVF1sfr2ETfuNpVS072LOLrHg5gGh6mUtSWHvBNchM4KTrIHYX3vdeDQtUJZq3zx-rB63ab4fUd5cdOYPW23OFPcZSdACmhbDVDQ9_-gm7hLc-m0UEpyxlrDflMDlvvHOcQloX8wdSetBaOYMbJQx_-hyuhpGn156zCW878EfBX4FHNOFJ77ZuAeguDWILgSBPcYBMeL6N1Txbtuov5Z8uvnxU_da6pa</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3054211781</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Magnetic resonance imaging for jawbone assessment: a systematic review</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Parize, Hian ; Sadilina, Sofya ; Caldas, Ricardo Armini ; Cordeiro, João Victor Cunha ; Kleinheinz, Johannes ; Laganá, Dalva Cruz ; Sesma, Newton ; Bohner, Lauren</creator><creatorcontrib>Parize, Hian ; Sadilina, Sofya ; Caldas, Ricardo Armini ; Cordeiro, João Victor Cunha ; Kleinheinz, Johannes ; Laganá, Dalva Cruz ; Sesma, Newton ; Bohner, Lauren</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for jawbone assessment compared to reference-standard measurements in the literature.
An electronic database search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library in June 2022, and updated in August 2023. Studies evaluating the accuracy of MRI for jawbone assessment compared with reference-standard measurements (histology, physical measurements, or computed tomography) were included. The outcome measures included bone histomorphometry and linear measurements. The risk of bias was assessed by the Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2). The review was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42022342697).
From 63 studies selected for full-text analysis, nine manuscripts were considered eligible for this review. The studies included assessments of 54 participants, 35 cadavers, and one phantom. A linear measurement error ranging from 0.03 to 3.11 mm was shown. The accuracy of bone histomorphometry varies among studies. Limitations of the evidence included heterogeneity of MRI protocols and the methodology of the included studies.
Few studies have suggested the feasibility of MRI for jawbone assessment, as MRI provides comparable results to those of standard reference tests. However, further advancements and optimizations are needed to increase the applicability, validate the efficacy, and establish clinical utility of these methods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1746-160X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1746-160X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s13005-024-00424-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38641613</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Bias ; Bone Assessment ; Bone density ; Comparative analysis ; CT imaging ; Dental implants ; Histology ; Magnetic fields ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Medical imaging equipment ; Radiation ; Surgery oral ; Systematic review ; Tomography</subject><ispartof>Head & face medicine, 2024-04, Vol.20 (1), p.25-10, Article 25</ispartof><rights>2024. The Author(s).</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2024. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-db338962303a06910898e2e668c893e59445b3f42b0a9acbe6da6095f1017ae73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3054211781?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25732,27903,27904,36991,36992,44569</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38641613$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parize, Hian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadilina, Sofya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caldas, Ricardo Armini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cordeiro, João Victor Cunha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleinheinz, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laganá, Dalva Cruz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sesma, Newton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bohner, Lauren</creatorcontrib><title>Magnetic resonance imaging for jawbone assessment: a systematic review</title><title>Head & face medicine</title><addtitle>Head Face Med</addtitle><description>To evaluate the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for jawbone assessment compared to reference-standard measurements in the literature.
An electronic database search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library in June 2022, and updated in August 2023. Studies evaluating the accuracy of MRI for jawbone assessment compared with reference-standard measurements (histology, physical measurements, or computed tomography) were included. The outcome measures included bone histomorphometry and linear measurements. The risk of bias was assessed by the Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2). The review was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42022342697).
From 63 studies selected for full-text analysis, nine manuscripts were considered eligible for this review. The studies included assessments of 54 participants, 35 cadavers, and one phantom. A linear measurement error ranging from 0.03 to 3.11 mm was shown. The accuracy of bone histomorphometry varies among studies. Limitations of the evidence included heterogeneity of MRI protocols and the methodology of the included studies.
Few studies have suggested the feasibility of MRI for jawbone assessment, as MRI provides comparable results to those of standard reference tests. However, further advancements and optimizations are needed to increase the applicability, validate the efficacy, and establish clinical utility of these methods.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Bone Assessment</subject><subject>Bone density</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>CT imaging</subject><subject>Dental implants</subject><subject>Histology</subject><subject>Magnetic fields</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Medical imaging equipment</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Surgery oral</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><issn>1746-160X</issn><issn>1746-160X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkktr3TAQhU1paB7tH-iiGLrpxunoaam7EJo0kJJNAt2JsTwyvlxbqeTbkH9fJU7TB0UgCfGdoxnpVNVbBseMGf0xMwGgGuCyAZBl5i-qA9ZK3TAN317-sd-vDnPeFEgpzl5V-8JoyTQTB9XZVxxmWkZfJ8pxxtlTPU44jPNQh5jqDd51caYac6acJ5qXTzXW-T4vNOEq-zHS3etqL-A205un9ai6Oft8ffqlubw6vzg9uWy8VHZp-k4IYzUXIBC0ZWCsIU5aG2-sIGWlVJ0IkneAFn1HukcNVgUGrEVqxVF1sfr2ETfuNpVS072LOLrHg5gGh6mUtSWHvBNchM4KTrIHYX3vdeDQtUJZq3zx-rB63ab4fUd5cdOYPW23OFPcZSdACmhbDVDQ9_-gm7hLc-m0UEpyxlrDflMDlvvHOcQloX8wdSetBaOYMbJQx_-hyuhpGn156zCW878EfBX4FHNOFJ77ZuAeguDWILgSBPcYBMeL6N1Txbtuov5Z8uvnxU_da6pa</recordid><startdate>20240419</startdate><enddate>20240419</enddate><creator>Parize, Hian</creator><creator>Sadilina, Sofya</creator><creator>Caldas, Ricardo Armini</creator><creator>Cordeiro, João Victor Cunha</creator><creator>Kleinheinz, Johannes</creator><creator>Laganá, Dalva Cruz</creator><creator>Sesma, Newton</creator><creator>Bohner, Lauren</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240419</creationdate><title>Magnetic resonance imaging for jawbone assessment: a systematic review</title><author>Parize, Hian ; Sadilina, Sofya ; Caldas, Ricardo Armini ; Cordeiro, João Victor Cunha ; Kleinheinz, Johannes ; Laganá, Dalva Cruz ; Sesma, Newton ; Bohner, Lauren</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-db338962303a06910898e2e668c893e59445b3f42b0a9acbe6da6095f1017ae73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Bone Assessment</topic><topic>Bone density</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>CT imaging</topic><topic>Dental implants</topic><topic>Histology</topic><topic>Magnetic fields</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Medical imaging equipment</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Surgery oral</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parize, Hian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadilina, Sofya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caldas, Ricardo Armini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cordeiro, João Victor Cunha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleinheinz, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laganá, Dalva Cruz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sesma, Newton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bohner, Lauren</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Head & face medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parize, Hian</au><au>Sadilina, Sofya</au><au>Caldas, Ricardo Armini</au><au>Cordeiro, João Victor Cunha</au><au>Kleinheinz, Johannes</au><au>Laganá, Dalva Cruz</au><au>Sesma, Newton</au><au>Bohner, Lauren</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Magnetic resonance imaging for jawbone assessment: a systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Head & face medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Head Face Med</addtitle><date>2024-04-19</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>25</spage><epage>10</epage><pages>25-10</pages><artnum>25</artnum><issn>1746-160X</issn><eissn>1746-160X</eissn><abstract>To evaluate the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for jawbone assessment compared to reference-standard measurements in the literature.
An electronic database search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library in June 2022, and updated in August 2023. Studies evaluating the accuracy of MRI for jawbone assessment compared with reference-standard measurements (histology, physical measurements, or computed tomography) were included. The outcome measures included bone histomorphometry and linear measurements. The risk of bias was assessed by the Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2). The review was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42022342697).
From 63 studies selected for full-text analysis, nine manuscripts were considered eligible for this review. The studies included assessments of 54 participants, 35 cadavers, and one phantom. A linear measurement error ranging from 0.03 to 3.11 mm was shown. The accuracy of bone histomorphometry varies among studies. Limitations of the evidence included heterogeneity of MRI protocols and the methodology of the included studies.
Few studies have suggested the feasibility of MRI for jawbone assessment, as MRI provides comparable results to those of standard reference tests. However, further advancements and optimizations are needed to increase the applicability, validate the efficacy, and establish clinical utility of these methods.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>38641613</pmid><doi>10.1186/s13005-024-00424-2</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1746-160X |
ispartof | Head & face medicine, 2024-04, Vol.20 (1), p.25-10, Article 25 |
issn | 1746-160X 1746-160X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a2b323fb932e4d039cdc6f20b735995c |
source | Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Accuracy Bias Bone Assessment Bone density Comparative analysis CT imaging Dental implants Histology Magnetic fields Magnetic resonance imaging Medical imaging equipment Radiation Surgery oral Systematic review Tomography |
title | Magnetic resonance imaging for jawbone assessment: a systematic review |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T00%3A01%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Magnetic%20resonance%20imaging%20for%20jawbone%20assessment:%20a%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Head%20&%20face%20medicine&rft.au=Parize,%20Hian&rft.date=2024-04-19&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=25&rft.epage=10&rft.pages=25-10&rft.artnum=25&rft.issn=1746-160X&rft.eissn=1746-160X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s13005-024-00424-2&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA790851884%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-db338962303a06910898e2e668c893e59445b3f42b0a9acbe6da6095f1017ae73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3054211781&rft_id=info:pmid/38641613&rft_galeid=A790851884&rfr_iscdi=true |