Loading…

The natural history of the concept of antidote

•For several centuries, the antidote paradigm was the same as the drug paradigm.•However, when chemistry progressed, the concepts of a specific chemical antidote were assumed.•In the face of the increasing number of acute poisoning, the ideas of a universal antidote play a more critical role.•The de...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Toxicology reports 2021-01, Vol.8, p.1305-1309
Main Author: Magowska, Anita
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-b097ff5a6ce6e4f0fa7bc7f1372c978370be71b6e78c08dc9e66dc2910132a193
container_end_page 1309
container_issue
container_start_page 1305
container_title Toxicology reports
container_volume 8
creator Magowska, Anita
description •For several centuries, the antidote paradigm was the same as the drug paradigm.•However, when chemistry progressed, the concepts of a specific chemical antidote were assumed.•In the face of the increasing number of acute poisoning, the ideas of a universal antidote play a more critical role.•The development of toxicology prompts reflection on the price of civilization progress. Over the centuries, the development of knowledge about poisons and antidotes depended on their conceptualization, however, a range of poisons and the concept of antidote evolved. With the passing of time, different substances of plant, animal, and mineral origin, moreover, man-made ones, were used deliberatively, accidentally, or unintentionally as poisons. The concept of antidote was changing in line with the progress of medicine and understanding of the mechanism of how poison works. From this perspective, the history of antidotes may be considered as the quintessence of changes within toxicology. Among the theories of antidote, the most interesting is the concept of a universal one, because it has never become obsolete. This review article focuses on the changing conceptualization of antidotes. It contains an analysis of historical toxicological treatises on antidotes and PubMed articles on the same topic.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.toxrep.2021.06.019
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a325afc77b5c47b693c71bf613f48042</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2214750021001256</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_a325afc77b5c47b693c71bf613f48042</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2547538572</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-b097ff5a6ce6e4f0fa7bc7f1372c978370be71b6e78c08dc9e66dc2910132a193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1vEzEQhi0EolXpP-CQI5cs4-_dCxKq-KhUiUs5W97ZceNosw62U9F_j9NEiF44eTxjPzPvvIy959Bx4Objtqvpd6Z9J0DwDkwHfHjFLoXgam01wOt_4gt2XcoWALjQBrR6yy6k4oNuXy5Zd7-h1eLrIft5tYmlpvy0SmFVWxrTgrSvx6tfapxSpXfsTfBzoevzecV-fv1yf_N9fffj2-3N57s1Kq3reoTBhqC9QTKkAgRvR7SBSytwsL20MJLloyHbI_QTDmTMhGJo2qTwfJBX7PbEnZLfun2OO5-fXPLRPSdSfnA-14gzOS-F9gGtHTUqO5pBYkMHw2VQPSjRWJ9OrP1h3NGEtNQm9gX0ZWWJG_eQHl0vpNWCN8CHMyCnXwcq1e1iQZpnv1A6FCe0slr22h57qdNTzKmUTOFvGw7u6JzbupNz7uicA-PgWe55RGo7fYyUXcFIbftTzIS1iY7_B_wBnWmhiw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2547538572</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The natural history of the concept of antidote</title><source>PubMed Central (Open Access)</source><source>ScienceDirect®</source><creator>Magowska, Anita</creator><creatorcontrib>Magowska, Anita</creatorcontrib><description>•For several centuries, the antidote paradigm was the same as the drug paradigm.•However, when chemistry progressed, the concepts of a specific chemical antidote were assumed.•In the face of the increasing number of acute poisoning, the ideas of a universal antidote play a more critical role.•The development of toxicology prompts reflection on the price of civilization progress. Over the centuries, the development of knowledge about poisons and antidotes depended on their conceptualization, however, a range of poisons and the concept of antidote evolved. With the passing of time, different substances of plant, animal, and mineral origin, moreover, man-made ones, were used deliberatively, accidentally, or unintentionally as poisons. The concept of antidote was changing in line with the progress of medicine and understanding of the mechanism of how poison works. From this perspective, the history of antidotes may be considered as the quintessence of changes within toxicology. Among the theories of antidote, the most interesting is the concept of a universal one, because it has never become obsolete. This review article focuses on the changing conceptualization of antidotes. It contains an analysis of historical toxicological treatises on antidotes and PubMed articles on the same topic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2214-7500</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2214-7500</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2021.06.019</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34195019</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Antidote ; Experimental toxicology ; Poisoning ; Specific antidote ; Toxicology and Redox Biology under the frame of their historical evolution ; Universal antidote</subject><ispartof>Toxicology reports, 2021-01, Vol.8, p.1305-1309</ispartof><rights>2021 The Author</rights><rights>2021 The Author. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-b097ff5a6ce6e4f0fa7bc7f1372c978370be71b6e78c08dc9e66dc2910132a193</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6046-3993</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8237521/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214750021001256$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,3547,27923,27924,45779,53790,53792</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Magowska, Anita</creatorcontrib><title>The natural history of the concept of antidote</title><title>Toxicology reports</title><description>•For several centuries, the antidote paradigm was the same as the drug paradigm.•However, when chemistry progressed, the concepts of a specific chemical antidote were assumed.•In the face of the increasing number of acute poisoning, the ideas of a universal antidote play a more critical role.•The development of toxicology prompts reflection on the price of civilization progress. Over the centuries, the development of knowledge about poisons and antidotes depended on their conceptualization, however, a range of poisons and the concept of antidote evolved. With the passing of time, different substances of plant, animal, and mineral origin, moreover, man-made ones, were used deliberatively, accidentally, or unintentionally as poisons. The concept of antidote was changing in line with the progress of medicine and understanding of the mechanism of how poison works. From this perspective, the history of antidotes may be considered as the quintessence of changes within toxicology. Among the theories of antidote, the most interesting is the concept of a universal one, because it has never become obsolete. This review article focuses on the changing conceptualization of antidotes. It contains an analysis of historical toxicological treatises on antidotes and PubMed articles on the same topic.</description><subject>Antidote</subject><subject>Experimental toxicology</subject><subject>Poisoning</subject><subject>Specific antidote</subject><subject>Toxicology and Redox Biology under the frame of their historical evolution</subject><subject>Universal antidote</subject><issn>2214-7500</issn><issn>2214-7500</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1vEzEQhi0EolXpP-CQI5cs4-_dCxKq-KhUiUs5W97ZceNosw62U9F_j9NEiF44eTxjPzPvvIy959Bx4Objtqvpd6Z9J0DwDkwHfHjFLoXgam01wOt_4gt2XcoWALjQBrR6yy6k4oNuXy5Zd7-h1eLrIft5tYmlpvy0SmFVWxrTgrSvx6tfapxSpXfsTfBzoevzecV-fv1yf_N9fffj2-3N57s1Kq3reoTBhqC9QTKkAgRvR7SBSytwsL20MJLloyHbI_QTDmTMhGJo2qTwfJBX7PbEnZLfun2OO5-fXPLRPSdSfnA-14gzOS-F9gGtHTUqO5pBYkMHw2VQPSjRWJ9OrP1h3NGEtNQm9gX0ZWWJG_eQHl0vpNWCN8CHMyCnXwcq1e1iQZpnv1A6FCe0slr22h57qdNTzKmUTOFvGw7u6JzbupNz7uicA-PgWe55RGo7fYyUXcFIbftTzIS1iY7_B_wBnWmhiw</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Magowska, Anita</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6046-3993</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>The natural history of the concept of antidote</title><author>Magowska, Anita</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-b097ff5a6ce6e4f0fa7bc7f1372c978370be71b6e78c08dc9e66dc2910132a193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Antidote</topic><topic>Experimental toxicology</topic><topic>Poisoning</topic><topic>Specific antidote</topic><topic>Toxicology and Redox Biology under the frame of their historical evolution</topic><topic>Universal antidote</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Magowska, Anita</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Toxicology reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Magowska, Anita</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The natural history of the concept of antidote</atitle><jtitle>Toxicology reports</jtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>8</volume><spage>1305</spage><epage>1309</epage><pages>1305-1309</pages><issn>2214-7500</issn><eissn>2214-7500</eissn><abstract>•For several centuries, the antidote paradigm was the same as the drug paradigm.•However, when chemistry progressed, the concepts of a specific chemical antidote were assumed.•In the face of the increasing number of acute poisoning, the ideas of a universal antidote play a more critical role.•The development of toxicology prompts reflection on the price of civilization progress. Over the centuries, the development of knowledge about poisons and antidotes depended on their conceptualization, however, a range of poisons and the concept of antidote evolved. With the passing of time, different substances of plant, animal, and mineral origin, moreover, man-made ones, were used deliberatively, accidentally, or unintentionally as poisons. The concept of antidote was changing in line with the progress of medicine and understanding of the mechanism of how poison works. From this perspective, the history of antidotes may be considered as the quintessence of changes within toxicology. Among the theories of antidote, the most interesting is the concept of a universal one, because it has never become obsolete. This review article focuses on the changing conceptualization of antidotes. It contains an analysis of historical toxicological treatises on antidotes and PubMed articles on the same topic.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>34195019</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.toxrep.2021.06.019</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6046-3993</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2214-7500
ispartof Toxicology reports, 2021-01, Vol.8, p.1305-1309
issn 2214-7500
2214-7500
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a325afc77b5c47b693c71bf613f48042
source PubMed Central (Open Access); ScienceDirect®
subjects Antidote
Experimental toxicology
Poisoning
Specific antidote
Toxicology and Redox Biology under the frame of their historical evolution
Universal antidote
title The natural history of the concept of antidote
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T19%3A48%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20natural%20history%20of%20the%20concept%20of%20antidote&rft.jtitle=Toxicology%20reports&rft.au=Magowska,%20Anita&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=8&rft.spage=1305&rft.epage=1309&rft.pages=1305-1309&rft.issn=2214-7500&rft.eissn=2214-7500&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.toxrep.2021.06.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2547538572%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-b097ff5a6ce6e4f0fa7bc7f1372c978370be71b6e78c08dc9e66dc2910132a193%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2547538572&rft_id=info:pmid/34195019&rfr_iscdi=true