Loading…

A Nutritional Investigation of Major Feed Types and Feed Rations Used in Medium-Scale Dairy Production Systems in Sri Lanka

In this paper, the nutritional quality, digestibility, and chemical composition of major feed types as well as the use of those feeds in rations by medium-scale dairy farmers in the Kurunegala district of Sri Lanka were studied. Nine dairy farms were visited fortnightly over a five-month period to i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Animals (Basel) 2022-09, Vol.12 (18), p.2391
Main Authors: Kumara, Sagara N., Parkinson, Tim J., Laven, Richard A., Waghorn, Garry C., Pushpakumara, Anil, Donaghy, Daniel J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-1c5fbb01507ab04b5d8c30ce3221fd8e3e4e46779b4af69cbb2e584a693761353
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-1c5fbb01507ab04b5d8c30ce3221fd8e3e4e46779b4af69cbb2e584a693761353
container_end_page
container_issue 18
container_start_page 2391
container_title Animals (Basel)
container_volume 12
creator Kumara, Sagara N.
Parkinson, Tim J.
Laven, Richard A.
Waghorn, Garry C.
Pushpakumara, Anil
Donaghy, Daniel J.
description In this paper, the nutritional quality, digestibility, and chemical composition of major feed types as well as the use of those feeds in rations by medium-scale dairy farmers in the Kurunegala district of Sri Lanka were studied. Nine dairy farms were visited fortnightly over a five-month period to identify the feeds that were commonly used. All farms operated under a stall-feeding system in which a manually mixed ration (MMR) was fed 2–3 times daily. Four forages were identified: Guinea grass ecotype A (Panicum maximum), called Guinea grass; Hybrid Napier CO-3 (Pennisetum purpureum × Pennisetum americanum), called CO-3 grass; Gliricidia (Gliricidia sepium); and maize stover (Zea mays L.), along with three other supplementary feeds (maize silage, barley distillers’ by-products, and commercially formulated cattle feed). These feeds were subjected to proximate analysis and in vitro digestibility analysis. The metabolisable energy (ME) of the forages ranged from 7.5–10.0 MJ/kg dry matter (DM), with the ME of Guinea grass and CO-3 grass (7.5 and 8.0 MJ/kg DM, respectively) being lower than that of Gliricidia (10.0 MJ/kg DM). The neutral detergent fibre (NDF) concentration of both Guinea grass and CO-3 grass (both 72% DM) was much higher than that of Gliricidia (47% DM). Crude protein (CP) was higher in Gliricidia (17.5% DM) than in either Guinea grass or CO-3 grass (8.0 and 8.8% DM, respectively). The ME of the supplementary feeds varied between 11.0 and 12.8 MJ/kg DM, while CP varied between 15.0 and 24.0% DM. The daily ME intake of cows was consistently 10% lower than their calculated daily energy requirement; for dry cows, the mean intake was 90 MJ/cow/day supplied vs. 101 MJ required, while for cows in early lactation the mean intake was 126 MJ/cow/day supplied vs. 140 MJ required. The average CP intake of lactating cows (13.5% DM) was inadequate (requirements: 16 to 17.5% DM), while the average CP intake of dry cows (11.8% DM) was satisfactory (requirements: 11 to 12% DM). The current study shows that the majority of the feed types used in these medium-scale dairy farms provide insufficient ME or CP to meet the nutritional requirements of either lactating or dry cows irrespective of the quantity of feed provided.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/ani12182391
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a3d5560042e14e43be4785b0253a981a</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_a3d5560042e14e43be4785b0253a981a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2717699237</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-1c5fbb01507ab04b5d8c30ce3221fd8e3e4e46779b4af69cbb2e584a693761353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkl1rFDEUhgdRsNRe-QcC3ggyNt-Z3AiltnZhq-K21-FM5syadWayJjOFxT_v7G6R1twkb_LwcDg5RfGW0Y9CWHoOQ2CcVVxY9qI44dTokmumXj45vy7Oct7QeRklmGInxZ8L8nUaUxhDHKAji-EB8xjWsM8ktuQWNjGRa8SG3O22mAkMzTH-ODCZ3Oc5hIHcYhOmvlx56JB8hpB25HuKzeQPqtUuj9jnPbhKgSxh-AVvilctdBnPHvfT4v766u7yplx--7K4vFiWXio-lsyrtq4pU9RATWWtmsoL6lFwztqmQoESpTbG1hJabX1dc1SVBG2F0UwocVosjt4mwsZtU-gh7VyE4A4XMa0dpDH4Dh2IRilNqeTIZquoUZpK1ZQrAbZiMLs-HV3bqe6x8TiMCbpn0ucvQ_jp1vHBWWkVlfti3j8KUvw9zc12fcgeuw4GjFN23DCjreXCzOi7_9BNnNL8TQdKS2O1ljP14Uj5FHNO2P4rhlG3Hwz3ZDDEX-DmqsU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2716479664</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Nutritional Investigation of Major Feed Types and Feed Rations Used in Medium-Scale Dairy Production Systems in Sri Lanka</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Kumara, Sagara N. ; Parkinson, Tim J. ; Laven, Richard A. ; Waghorn, Garry C. ; Pushpakumara, Anil ; Donaghy, Daniel J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kumara, Sagara N. ; Parkinson, Tim J. ; Laven, Richard A. ; Waghorn, Garry C. ; Pushpakumara, Anil ; Donaghy, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, the nutritional quality, digestibility, and chemical composition of major feed types as well as the use of those feeds in rations by medium-scale dairy farmers in the Kurunegala district of Sri Lanka were studied. Nine dairy farms were visited fortnightly over a five-month period to identify the feeds that were commonly used. All farms operated under a stall-feeding system in which a manually mixed ration (MMR) was fed 2–3 times daily. Four forages were identified: Guinea grass ecotype A (Panicum maximum), called Guinea grass; Hybrid Napier CO-3 (Pennisetum purpureum × Pennisetum americanum), called CO-3 grass; Gliricidia (Gliricidia sepium); and maize stover (Zea mays L.), along with three other supplementary feeds (maize silage, barley distillers’ by-products, and commercially formulated cattle feed). These feeds were subjected to proximate analysis and in vitro digestibility analysis. The metabolisable energy (ME) of the forages ranged from 7.5–10.0 MJ/kg dry matter (DM), with the ME of Guinea grass and CO-3 grass (7.5 and 8.0 MJ/kg DM, respectively) being lower than that of Gliricidia (10.0 MJ/kg DM). The neutral detergent fibre (NDF) concentration of both Guinea grass and CO-3 grass (both 72% DM) was much higher than that of Gliricidia (47% DM). Crude protein (CP) was higher in Gliricidia (17.5% DM) than in either Guinea grass or CO-3 grass (8.0 and 8.8% DM, respectively). The ME of the supplementary feeds varied between 11.0 and 12.8 MJ/kg DM, while CP varied between 15.0 and 24.0% DM. The daily ME intake of cows was consistently 10% lower than their calculated daily energy requirement; for dry cows, the mean intake was 90 MJ/cow/day supplied vs. 101 MJ required, while for cows in early lactation the mean intake was 126 MJ/cow/day supplied vs. 140 MJ required. The average CP intake of lactating cows (13.5% DM) was inadequate (requirements: 16 to 17.5% DM), while the average CP intake of dry cows (11.8% DM) was satisfactory (requirements: 11 to 12% DM). The current study shows that the majority of the feed types used in these medium-scale dairy farms provide insufficient ME or CP to meet the nutritional requirements of either lactating or dry cows irrespective of the quantity of feed provided.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2076-2615</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2076-2615</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ani12182391</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Animal lactation ; Availability ; Carbon monoxide ; Cattle ; Cattle feeds ; Chemical composition ; Corn ; Cow's milk ; cows ; Dairy cattle ; Dairy farming ; Dairy farms ; Diet ; Digestibility ; Dry matter ; energy ; Energy requirements ; Farmers ; Feeds ; forages ; Gliricidia sepium ; Grasses ; Investigations ; Laboratories ; Lactation ; Legumes ; Livestock ; Milk ; Milk production ; Nutritional requirements ; Nutritive value ; Panicum maximum ; Pennisetum americanum ; Pennisetum purpureum ; protein ; Proteins ; Rations ; tropical dairy farming ; Zea mays</subject><ispartof>Animals (Basel), 2022-09, Vol.12 (18), p.2391</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-1c5fbb01507ab04b5d8c30ce3221fd8e3e4e46779b4af69cbb2e584a693761353</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-1c5fbb01507ab04b5d8c30ce3221fd8e3e4e46779b4af69cbb2e584a693761353</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8938-8595</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2716479664/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2716479664?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,53766,53768,74869</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kumara, Sagara N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parkinson, Tim J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laven, Richard A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waghorn, Garry C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pushpakumara, Anil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donaghy, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><title>A Nutritional Investigation of Major Feed Types and Feed Rations Used in Medium-Scale Dairy Production Systems in Sri Lanka</title><title>Animals (Basel)</title><description>In this paper, the nutritional quality, digestibility, and chemical composition of major feed types as well as the use of those feeds in rations by medium-scale dairy farmers in the Kurunegala district of Sri Lanka were studied. Nine dairy farms were visited fortnightly over a five-month period to identify the feeds that were commonly used. All farms operated under a stall-feeding system in which a manually mixed ration (MMR) was fed 2–3 times daily. Four forages were identified: Guinea grass ecotype A (Panicum maximum), called Guinea grass; Hybrid Napier CO-3 (Pennisetum purpureum × Pennisetum americanum), called CO-3 grass; Gliricidia (Gliricidia sepium); and maize stover (Zea mays L.), along with three other supplementary feeds (maize silage, barley distillers’ by-products, and commercially formulated cattle feed). These feeds were subjected to proximate analysis and in vitro digestibility analysis. The metabolisable energy (ME) of the forages ranged from 7.5–10.0 MJ/kg dry matter (DM), with the ME of Guinea grass and CO-3 grass (7.5 and 8.0 MJ/kg DM, respectively) being lower than that of Gliricidia (10.0 MJ/kg DM). The neutral detergent fibre (NDF) concentration of both Guinea grass and CO-3 grass (both 72% DM) was much higher than that of Gliricidia (47% DM). Crude protein (CP) was higher in Gliricidia (17.5% DM) than in either Guinea grass or CO-3 grass (8.0 and 8.8% DM, respectively). The ME of the supplementary feeds varied between 11.0 and 12.8 MJ/kg DM, while CP varied between 15.0 and 24.0% DM. The daily ME intake of cows was consistently 10% lower than their calculated daily energy requirement; for dry cows, the mean intake was 90 MJ/cow/day supplied vs. 101 MJ required, while for cows in early lactation the mean intake was 126 MJ/cow/day supplied vs. 140 MJ required. The average CP intake of lactating cows (13.5% DM) was inadequate (requirements: 16 to 17.5% DM), while the average CP intake of dry cows (11.8% DM) was satisfactory (requirements: 11 to 12% DM). The current study shows that the majority of the feed types used in these medium-scale dairy farms provide insufficient ME or CP to meet the nutritional requirements of either lactating or dry cows irrespective of the quantity of feed provided.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Animal lactation</subject><subject>Availability</subject><subject>Carbon monoxide</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cattle feeds</subject><subject>Chemical composition</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Cow's milk</subject><subject>cows</subject><subject>Dairy cattle</subject><subject>Dairy farming</subject><subject>Dairy farms</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Digestibility</subject><subject>Dry matter</subject><subject>energy</subject><subject>Energy requirements</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Feeds</subject><subject>forages</subject><subject>Gliricidia sepium</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Lactation</subject><subject>Legumes</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Milk</subject><subject>Milk production</subject><subject>Nutritional requirements</subject><subject>Nutritive value</subject><subject>Panicum maximum</subject><subject>Pennisetum americanum</subject><subject>Pennisetum purpureum</subject><subject>protein</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Rations</subject><subject>tropical dairy farming</subject><subject>Zea mays</subject><issn>2076-2615</issn><issn>2076-2615</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkl1rFDEUhgdRsNRe-QcC3ggyNt-Z3AiltnZhq-K21-FM5syadWayJjOFxT_v7G6R1twkb_LwcDg5RfGW0Y9CWHoOQ2CcVVxY9qI44dTokmumXj45vy7Oct7QeRklmGInxZ8L8nUaUxhDHKAji-EB8xjWsM8ktuQWNjGRa8SG3O22mAkMzTH-ODCZ3Oc5hIHcYhOmvlx56JB8hpB25HuKzeQPqtUuj9jnPbhKgSxh-AVvilctdBnPHvfT4v766u7yplx--7K4vFiWXio-lsyrtq4pU9RATWWtmsoL6lFwztqmQoESpTbG1hJabX1dc1SVBG2F0UwocVosjt4mwsZtU-gh7VyE4A4XMa0dpDH4Dh2IRilNqeTIZquoUZpK1ZQrAbZiMLs-HV3bqe6x8TiMCbpn0ucvQ_jp1vHBWWkVlfti3j8KUvw9zc12fcgeuw4GjFN23DCjreXCzOi7_9BNnNL8TQdKS2O1ljP14Uj5FHNO2P4rhlG3Hwz3ZDDEX-DmqsU</recordid><startdate>20220913</startdate><enddate>20220913</enddate><creator>Kumara, Sagara N.</creator><creator>Parkinson, Tim J.</creator><creator>Laven, Richard A.</creator><creator>Waghorn, Garry C.</creator><creator>Pushpakumara, Anil</creator><creator>Donaghy, Daniel J.</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8938-8595</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220913</creationdate><title>A Nutritional Investigation of Major Feed Types and Feed Rations Used in Medium-Scale Dairy Production Systems in Sri Lanka</title><author>Kumara, Sagara N. ; Parkinson, Tim J. ; Laven, Richard A. ; Waghorn, Garry C. ; Pushpakumara, Anil ; Donaghy, Daniel J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-1c5fbb01507ab04b5d8c30ce3221fd8e3e4e46779b4af69cbb2e584a693761353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Animal lactation</topic><topic>Availability</topic><topic>Carbon monoxide</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cattle feeds</topic><topic>Chemical composition</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Cow's milk</topic><topic>cows</topic><topic>Dairy cattle</topic><topic>Dairy farming</topic><topic>Dairy farms</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Digestibility</topic><topic>Dry matter</topic><topic>energy</topic><topic>Energy requirements</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Feeds</topic><topic>forages</topic><topic>Gliricidia sepium</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Lactation</topic><topic>Legumes</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Milk</topic><topic>Milk production</topic><topic>Nutritional requirements</topic><topic>Nutritive value</topic><topic>Panicum maximum</topic><topic>Pennisetum americanum</topic><topic>Pennisetum purpureum</topic><topic>protein</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Rations</topic><topic>tropical dairy farming</topic><topic>Zea mays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kumara, Sagara N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parkinson, Tim J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laven, Richard A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waghorn, Garry C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pushpakumara, Anil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donaghy, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Animals (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kumara, Sagara N.</au><au>Parkinson, Tim J.</au><au>Laven, Richard A.</au><au>Waghorn, Garry C.</au><au>Pushpakumara, Anil</au><au>Donaghy, Daniel J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Nutritional Investigation of Major Feed Types and Feed Rations Used in Medium-Scale Dairy Production Systems in Sri Lanka</atitle><jtitle>Animals (Basel)</jtitle><date>2022-09-13</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>18</issue><spage>2391</spage><pages>2391-</pages><issn>2076-2615</issn><eissn>2076-2615</eissn><abstract>In this paper, the nutritional quality, digestibility, and chemical composition of major feed types as well as the use of those feeds in rations by medium-scale dairy farmers in the Kurunegala district of Sri Lanka were studied. Nine dairy farms were visited fortnightly over a five-month period to identify the feeds that were commonly used. All farms operated under a stall-feeding system in which a manually mixed ration (MMR) was fed 2–3 times daily. Four forages were identified: Guinea grass ecotype A (Panicum maximum), called Guinea grass; Hybrid Napier CO-3 (Pennisetum purpureum × Pennisetum americanum), called CO-3 grass; Gliricidia (Gliricidia sepium); and maize stover (Zea mays L.), along with three other supplementary feeds (maize silage, barley distillers’ by-products, and commercially formulated cattle feed). These feeds were subjected to proximate analysis and in vitro digestibility analysis. The metabolisable energy (ME) of the forages ranged from 7.5–10.0 MJ/kg dry matter (DM), with the ME of Guinea grass and CO-3 grass (7.5 and 8.0 MJ/kg DM, respectively) being lower than that of Gliricidia (10.0 MJ/kg DM). The neutral detergent fibre (NDF) concentration of both Guinea grass and CO-3 grass (both 72% DM) was much higher than that of Gliricidia (47% DM). Crude protein (CP) was higher in Gliricidia (17.5% DM) than in either Guinea grass or CO-3 grass (8.0 and 8.8% DM, respectively). The ME of the supplementary feeds varied between 11.0 and 12.8 MJ/kg DM, while CP varied between 15.0 and 24.0% DM. The daily ME intake of cows was consistently 10% lower than their calculated daily energy requirement; for dry cows, the mean intake was 90 MJ/cow/day supplied vs. 101 MJ required, while for cows in early lactation the mean intake was 126 MJ/cow/day supplied vs. 140 MJ required. The average CP intake of lactating cows (13.5% DM) was inadequate (requirements: 16 to 17.5% DM), while the average CP intake of dry cows (11.8% DM) was satisfactory (requirements: 11 to 12% DM). The current study shows that the majority of the feed types used in these medium-scale dairy farms provide insufficient ME or CP to meet the nutritional requirements of either lactating or dry cows irrespective of the quantity of feed provided.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/ani12182391</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8938-8595</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2076-2615
ispartof Animals (Basel), 2022-09, Vol.12 (18), p.2391
issn 2076-2615
2076-2615
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a3d5560042e14e43be4785b0253a981a
source Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)
subjects Agriculture
Animal lactation
Availability
Carbon monoxide
Cattle
Cattle feeds
Chemical composition
Corn
Cow's milk
cows
Dairy cattle
Dairy farming
Dairy farms
Diet
Digestibility
Dry matter
energy
Energy requirements
Farmers
Feeds
forages
Gliricidia sepium
Grasses
Investigations
Laboratories
Lactation
Legumes
Livestock
Milk
Milk production
Nutritional requirements
Nutritive value
Panicum maximum
Pennisetum americanum
Pennisetum purpureum
protein
Proteins
Rations
tropical dairy farming
Zea mays
title A Nutritional Investigation of Major Feed Types and Feed Rations Used in Medium-Scale Dairy Production Systems in Sri Lanka
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T06%3A56%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Nutritional%20Investigation%20of%20Major%20Feed%20Types%20and%20Feed%20Rations%20Used%20in%20Medium-Scale%20Dairy%20Production%20Systems%20in%20Sri%20Lanka&rft.jtitle=Animals%20(Basel)&rft.au=Kumara,%20Sagara%20N.&rft.date=2022-09-13&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=18&rft.spage=2391&rft.pages=2391-&rft.issn=2076-2615&rft.eissn=2076-2615&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ani12182391&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2717699237%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-1c5fbb01507ab04b5d8c30ce3221fd8e3e4e46779b4af69cbb2e584a693761353%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2716479664&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true