Loading…

Retrospective Longitudinal Survey on Canine Vector-Borne Pathogens: Trends and Challenges of 10 Years of Activities of a Veterinary Blood Bank

Canine vector-borne pathogens (CVBPs) represent a challenge for veterinary transfusion medicine, since some can be transmitted by blood transfusion and are of zoonotic concern. Epidemiological data on CVBPs, obtained during 10 years of pre-donor screening (2012−2021) by a veterinary blood bank in ce...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Veterinary sciences 2022-06, Vol.9 (6), p.274
Main Authors: Morganti, Giulia, Miglio, Arianna, Moretta, Iolanda, Misia, Ambra L, Rigamonti, Giulia, Cremonini, Valentina, Antognoni, Maria T, Veronesi, Fabrizia
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-a219d46357d5985334e35f0f3fd03a382aabcacd2e77b4cb261d1efd8db031a73
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-a219d46357d5985334e35f0f3fd03a382aabcacd2e77b4cb261d1efd8db031a73
container_end_page
container_issue 6
container_start_page 274
container_title Veterinary sciences
container_volume 9
creator Morganti, Giulia
Miglio, Arianna
Moretta, Iolanda
Misia, Ambra L
Rigamonti, Giulia
Cremonini, Valentina
Antognoni, Maria T
Veronesi, Fabrizia
description Canine vector-borne pathogens (CVBPs) represent a challenge for veterinary transfusion medicine, since some can be transmitted by blood transfusion and are of zoonotic concern. Epidemiological data on CVBPs, obtained during 10 years of pre-donor screening (2012−2021) by a veterinary blood bank in central Italy, were used to conduct a retrospective epidemiological longitudinal survey. The results were obtained using the Immunofluorescent Antibody Test (IFAT) conducted on sera in order to assess IgG antibodies against Leishmania infantum, Ehrlichia canis, Anaplasma phagocythophilum, Babesia canis, and Rickettsia conorii; the modified Knott’s test and an ELISA kit were used to detect Dirofilaria immitis and Dirofilaria repens. In total, 324 out of the 1260 canine blood donors (25.71%) tested seropositive for at least one pathogen. The highest overall positive rate was detected for L. infantum (12.22%), followed by E. canis (2.30%), A. phagocytophilum (1.19%), D. repens (0.95%), D. immitis (0.32%), and B. canis (0.16%). From 2012 to 2014, a prevalence of 20.12% was recorded for R. conorii. Mixed infections were recorded in 21 dogs. For all the CVBPs investigated, significant differences (p < 0.05) were not observed over the period studied. The results evidenced a non-negligible prevalence of CVBPs in canine donors, which were selected based on strict criteria concerning regular endo- and ectoparasite controls. The results confirmed that the blood bank could be a reliable local epidemiological observatory. The need for implemented screening is discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/vetsci9060274
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a3d857d166954084aa5b73ee9df5738d</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_a3d857d166954084aa5b73ee9df5738d</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2679857560</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-a219d46357d5985334e35f0f3fd03a382aabcacd2e77b4cb261d1efd8db031a73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkktvEzEQgFcIRKvSI1dkiQuXBT9217sckJqIR6VIIChInKxZezZx2NjB9kbqn-hvrtOUquHkx3z6ZsaeonjJ6FshOvpuhylq29GGclk9KU65oE0pRcuePtqfFOcxrimlTFS8lux5cSJqKaTgzWlx8x1T8HGLOtkdkoV3S5smYx2M5McUdnhNvCNzcNYh-ZUpH8qZD_nwDdLKL9HF9-QqoDORgDNkvoJxRLfESPxAGCW_EcLd_mKfwSZ7iECWJQw5T7gms9F7Q2bg_rwong0wRjy_X8-Kn58-Xs2_lIuvny_nF4tSV4ylEjjrTNXkNkzdtbUQFYp6oIMYDBUgWg7Qa9CGo5R9pXveMMNwMK3pqWAgxVlxefAaD2u1DXaT61AerLq78GGpICSrR1QgTJvzsKbp6oq2FUDdS4HYmSG_Ymuy68PBtZ36DRqNLgUYj6THEWdXaul3quO8lR3Ngjf3guD_ThiT2tiocRzBoZ-i4k1LuZBdyzP6-j907aeQP2tPZaKWdbMXlgdK56-NAYeHYhhV-8FRR4OT-VePO3ig_42JuAV6NcDq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2679857560</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Retrospective Longitudinal Survey on Canine Vector-Borne Pathogens: Trends and Challenges of 10 Years of Activities of a Veterinary Blood Bank</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Morganti, Giulia ; Miglio, Arianna ; Moretta, Iolanda ; Misia, Ambra L ; Rigamonti, Giulia ; Cremonini, Valentina ; Antognoni, Maria T ; Veronesi, Fabrizia</creator><creatorcontrib>Morganti, Giulia ; Miglio, Arianna ; Moretta, Iolanda ; Misia, Ambra L ; Rigamonti, Giulia ; Cremonini, Valentina ; Antognoni, Maria T ; Veronesi, Fabrizia</creatorcontrib><description>Canine vector-borne pathogens (CVBPs) represent a challenge for veterinary transfusion medicine, since some can be transmitted by blood transfusion and are of zoonotic concern. Epidemiological data on CVBPs, obtained during 10 years of pre-donor screening (2012−2021) by a veterinary blood bank in central Italy, were used to conduct a retrospective epidemiological longitudinal survey. The results were obtained using the Immunofluorescent Antibody Test (IFAT) conducted on sera in order to assess IgG antibodies against Leishmania infantum, Ehrlichia canis, Anaplasma phagocythophilum, Babesia canis, and Rickettsia conorii; the modified Knott’s test and an ELISA kit were used to detect Dirofilaria immitis and Dirofilaria repens. In total, 324 out of the 1260 canine blood donors (25.71%) tested seropositive for at least one pathogen. The highest overall positive rate was detected for L. infantum (12.22%), followed by E. canis (2.30%), A. phagocytophilum (1.19%), D. repens (0.95%), D. immitis (0.32%), and B. canis (0.16%). From 2012 to 2014, a prevalence of 20.12% was recorded for R. conorii. Mixed infections were recorded in 21 dogs. For all the CVBPs investigated, significant differences (p &lt; 0.05) were not observed over the period studied. The results evidenced a non-negligible prevalence of CVBPs in canine donors, which were selected based on strict criteria concerning regular endo- and ectoparasite controls. The results confirmed that the blood bank could be a reliable local epidemiological observatory. The need for implemented screening is discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2306-7381</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2306-7381</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/vetsci9060274</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35737326</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>10 years activity ; Antigens ; Blood &amp; organ donations ; Blood banks ; Blood donors ; Blood transfusion ; canine vector-borne pathogens ; Dogs ; Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay ; epidemiological data ; Epidemiology ; Health care ; Immunoglobulin G ; Infections ; Longitudinal studies ; Pathogens ; Public health ; Serology ; Surveys ; Trends ; Vectors (Biology) ; veterinary blood bank ; Veterinary medicine</subject><ispartof>Veterinary sciences, 2022-06, Vol.9 (6), p.274</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-a219d46357d5985334e35f0f3fd03a382aabcacd2e77b4cb261d1efd8db031a73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-a219d46357d5985334e35f0f3fd03a382aabcacd2e77b4cb261d1efd8db031a73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5459-6298 ; 0000-0003-1082-5666 ; 0000-0002-4880-699X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2679857560?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2679857560?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,25734,27905,27906,36993,36994,38497,43876,44571,53772,53774,74161,74875</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35737326$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morganti, Giulia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miglio, Arianna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moretta, Iolanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Misia, Ambra L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rigamonti, Giulia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cremonini, Valentina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antognoni, Maria T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veronesi, Fabrizia</creatorcontrib><title>Retrospective Longitudinal Survey on Canine Vector-Borne Pathogens: Trends and Challenges of 10 Years of Activities of a Veterinary Blood Bank</title><title>Veterinary sciences</title><addtitle>Vet Sci</addtitle><description>Canine vector-borne pathogens (CVBPs) represent a challenge for veterinary transfusion medicine, since some can be transmitted by blood transfusion and are of zoonotic concern. Epidemiological data on CVBPs, obtained during 10 years of pre-donor screening (2012−2021) by a veterinary blood bank in central Italy, were used to conduct a retrospective epidemiological longitudinal survey. The results were obtained using the Immunofluorescent Antibody Test (IFAT) conducted on sera in order to assess IgG antibodies against Leishmania infantum, Ehrlichia canis, Anaplasma phagocythophilum, Babesia canis, and Rickettsia conorii; the modified Knott’s test and an ELISA kit were used to detect Dirofilaria immitis and Dirofilaria repens. In total, 324 out of the 1260 canine blood donors (25.71%) tested seropositive for at least one pathogen. The highest overall positive rate was detected for L. infantum (12.22%), followed by E. canis (2.30%), A. phagocytophilum (1.19%), D. repens (0.95%), D. immitis (0.32%), and B. canis (0.16%). From 2012 to 2014, a prevalence of 20.12% was recorded for R. conorii. Mixed infections were recorded in 21 dogs. For all the CVBPs investigated, significant differences (p &lt; 0.05) were not observed over the period studied. The results evidenced a non-negligible prevalence of CVBPs in canine donors, which were selected based on strict criteria concerning regular endo- and ectoparasite controls. The results confirmed that the blood bank could be a reliable local epidemiological observatory. The need for implemented screening is discussed.</description><subject>10 years activity</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Blood &amp; organ donations</subject><subject>Blood banks</subject><subject>Blood donors</subject><subject>Blood transfusion</subject><subject>canine vector-borne pathogens</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay</subject><subject>epidemiological data</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin G</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Longitudinal studies</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Serology</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Vectors (Biology)</subject><subject>veterinary blood bank</subject><subject>Veterinary medicine</subject><issn>2306-7381</issn><issn>2306-7381</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkktvEzEQgFcIRKvSI1dkiQuXBT9217sckJqIR6VIIChInKxZezZx2NjB9kbqn-hvrtOUquHkx3z6ZsaeonjJ6FshOvpuhylq29GGclk9KU65oE0pRcuePtqfFOcxrimlTFS8lux5cSJqKaTgzWlx8x1T8HGLOtkdkoV3S5smYx2M5McUdnhNvCNzcNYh-ZUpH8qZD_nwDdLKL9HF9-QqoDORgDNkvoJxRLfESPxAGCW_EcLd_mKfwSZ7iECWJQw5T7gms9F7Q2bg_rwong0wRjy_X8-Kn58-Xs2_lIuvny_nF4tSV4ylEjjrTNXkNkzdtbUQFYp6oIMYDBUgWg7Qa9CGo5R9pXveMMNwMK3pqWAgxVlxefAaD2u1DXaT61AerLq78GGpICSrR1QgTJvzsKbp6oq2FUDdS4HYmSG_Ymuy68PBtZ36DRqNLgUYj6THEWdXaul3quO8lR3Ngjf3guD_ThiT2tiocRzBoZ-i4k1LuZBdyzP6-j907aeQP2tPZaKWdbMXlgdK56-NAYeHYhhV-8FRR4OT-VePO3ig_42JuAV6NcDq</recordid><startdate>20220606</startdate><enddate>20220606</enddate><creator>Morganti, Giulia</creator><creator>Miglio, Arianna</creator><creator>Moretta, Iolanda</creator><creator>Misia, Ambra L</creator><creator>Rigamonti, Giulia</creator><creator>Cremonini, Valentina</creator><creator>Antognoni, Maria T</creator><creator>Veronesi, Fabrizia</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5459-6298</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1082-5666</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4880-699X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220606</creationdate><title>Retrospective Longitudinal Survey on Canine Vector-Borne Pathogens: Trends and Challenges of 10 Years of Activities of a Veterinary Blood Bank</title><author>Morganti, Giulia ; Miglio, Arianna ; Moretta, Iolanda ; Misia, Ambra L ; Rigamonti, Giulia ; Cremonini, Valentina ; Antognoni, Maria T ; Veronesi, Fabrizia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-a219d46357d5985334e35f0f3fd03a382aabcacd2e77b4cb261d1efd8db031a73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>10 years activity</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Blood &amp; organ donations</topic><topic>Blood banks</topic><topic>Blood donors</topic><topic>Blood transfusion</topic><topic>canine vector-borne pathogens</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay</topic><topic>epidemiological data</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin G</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Longitudinal studies</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Serology</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Vectors (Biology)</topic><topic>veterinary blood bank</topic><topic>Veterinary medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morganti, Giulia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miglio, Arianna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moretta, Iolanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Misia, Ambra L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rigamonti, Giulia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cremonini, Valentina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antognoni, Maria T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veronesi, Fabrizia</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Open Access: DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Veterinary sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morganti, Giulia</au><au>Miglio, Arianna</au><au>Moretta, Iolanda</au><au>Misia, Ambra L</au><au>Rigamonti, Giulia</au><au>Cremonini, Valentina</au><au>Antognoni, Maria T</au><au>Veronesi, Fabrizia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Retrospective Longitudinal Survey on Canine Vector-Borne Pathogens: Trends and Challenges of 10 Years of Activities of a Veterinary Blood Bank</atitle><jtitle>Veterinary sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Vet Sci</addtitle><date>2022-06-06</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>274</spage><pages>274-</pages><issn>2306-7381</issn><eissn>2306-7381</eissn><abstract>Canine vector-borne pathogens (CVBPs) represent a challenge for veterinary transfusion medicine, since some can be transmitted by blood transfusion and are of zoonotic concern. Epidemiological data on CVBPs, obtained during 10 years of pre-donor screening (2012−2021) by a veterinary blood bank in central Italy, were used to conduct a retrospective epidemiological longitudinal survey. The results were obtained using the Immunofluorescent Antibody Test (IFAT) conducted on sera in order to assess IgG antibodies against Leishmania infantum, Ehrlichia canis, Anaplasma phagocythophilum, Babesia canis, and Rickettsia conorii; the modified Knott’s test and an ELISA kit were used to detect Dirofilaria immitis and Dirofilaria repens. In total, 324 out of the 1260 canine blood donors (25.71%) tested seropositive for at least one pathogen. The highest overall positive rate was detected for L. infantum (12.22%), followed by E. canis (2.30%), A. phagocytophilum (1.19%), D. repens (0.95%), D. immitis (0.32%), and B. canis (0.16%). From 2012 to 2014, a prevalence of 20.12% was recorded for R. conorii. Mixed infections were recorded in 21 dogs. For all the CVBPs investigated, significant differences (p &lt; 0.05) were not observed over the period studied. The results evidenced a non-negligible prevalence of CVBPs in canine donors, which were selected based on strict criteria concerning regular endo- and ectoparasite controls. The results confirmed that the blood bank could be a reliable local epidemiological observatory. The need for implemented screening is discussed.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>35737326</pmid><doi>10.3390/vetsci9060274</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5459-6298</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1082-5666</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4880-699X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2306-7381
ispartof Veterinary sciences, 2022-06, Vol.9 (6), p.274
issn 2306-7381
2306-7381
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a3d857d166954084aa5b73ee9df5738d
source Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content Database; Coronavirus Research Database
subjects 10 years activity
Antigens
Blood & organ donations
Blood banks
Blood donors
Blood transfusion
canine vector-borne pathogens
Dogs
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
epidemiological data
Epidemiology
Health care
Immunoglobulin G
Infections
Longitudinal studies
Pathogens
Public health
Serology
Surveys
Trends
Vectors (Biology)
veterinary blood bank
Veterinary medicine
title Retrospective Longitudinal Survey on Canine Vector-Borne Pathogens: Trends and Challenges of 10 Years of Activities of a Veterinary Blood Bank
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T14%3A52%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Retrospective%20Longitudinal%20Survey%20on%20Canine%20Vector-Borne%20Pathogens:%20Trends%20and%20Challenges%20of%2010%20Years%20of%20Activities%20of%20a%20Veterinary%20Blood%20Bank&rft.jtitle=Veterinary%20sciences&rft.au=Morganti,%20Giulia&rft.date=2022-06-06&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=274&rft.pages=274-&rft.issn=2306-7381&rft.eissn=2306-7381&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/vetsci9060274&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2679857560%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-a219d46357d5985334e35f0f3fd03a382aabcacd2e77b4cb261d1efd8db031a73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2679857560&rft_id=info:pmid/35737326&rfr_iscdi=true