Ten Years of Experience With a Telemedicine Platform Dedicated to Health Care Personnel: Implementation Report

• Published in: JMIR medical informatics 2024-01, Vol.12, p.e42847-e42847
• Main Authors: Azzolini, Claudio, Premi, Elias, Donati, Simone, Falco, Andrea, Torreggiani, Aldo, Sicurello, Francesco, Baj, Andreina, Azzi, Lorenzo, Orro, Alessandro, Porta, Giovanni, Azzolini, Giovanna, Sorrentino, Marco, Melillo, Paolo, Testa, Francesco, Simonelli, Francesca, Giardina, Gianfranco, Paolucci, Umberto
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Airports; COVID-19; Data collection; Design; Eye diseases; Medical personnel; Physicians; Professionals; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; Software; Telemedicine
• ISSN: 2291-9694; 2291-9694
• DOI: 10.2196/42847

Telemedicine, a term that encompasses several applications and tasks, generally involves the remote management and treatment of patients by physicians. It is known as transversal telemedicine when practiced among health care professionals (HCPs). We describe the experience of implementing our telemedicine Eumeda platform for HCPs over the last 10 years. A web-based informatics platform was developed that had continuously updated hypertext created using advanced technology and the following features: security, data insertion, dedicated software for image analysis, and the ability to export data for statistical surveys. Customizable files called "modules" were designed and built for different fields of medicine, mainly in the ophthalmology subspecialty. Each module was used by HCPs with different authorization profiles. Twelve representative modules for different projects are presented in this manuscript. These modules evolved over time, with varying degrees of interconnectivity, including the participation of a number of centers in 19 cities across Italy. The number of HCP operators involved in each single module ranged from 6 to 114 (average 21.8, SD 28.5). Data related to 2574 participants were inserted across all the modules. The average percentage of completed text/image fields in the 12 modules was 65.7%. All modules were evaluated in terms of access, acceptability, and medical efficacy. In their final evaluation, the participants judged the modules to be useful and efficient for clinical use. Our results demonstrate the usefulness of the telemedicine platform for HCPs in terms of improved knowledge in medicine, patient care, scientific research, teaching, and the choice of therapies. It would be useful to start similar projects across various health care fields, considering that in the near future medicine as we know it will completely change.