Wikis and collaborative writing applications in health care: a scoping review protocol

• Published in: JMIR research protocols 2012-04, Vol.1 (1), p.e1-e1
• Main Authors: Archambault, Patrick Michel, van de Belt, Tom H, Grajales Iii, Francisco J, Eysenbach, Gunther, Aubin, Karine, Gold, Irving, Gagnon, Marie-Pierre, Kuziemsky, Craig E, Turgeon, Alexis F, Poitras, Julien, Faber, Marjan J, Kremer, Jan A M, Heldoorn, Marcel, Bilodeau, Andrea, Légaré, France
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Access to information; Associations; Clinical decision making; Collaboration; Communication; Decision making; Developing countries; Education; Electronic support groups; Empowerment; Health care; Health care access; Health services; Informatics; Knowledge; LDCs; Literature reviews; Mass media; Medical research; Medicine; Patients; Physicians; Protocol; Social networks; Software; Translation; Virtual communities; Web 2.0; Wikis; Writing
• ISSN: 1929-0748; 1438-8871; 1929-0748
• DOI: 10.2196/resprot.1993

The rapid rise in the use of collaborative writing applications (eg, wikis, Google Documents, and Google Knol) has created the need for a systematic synthesis of the evidence of their impact as knowledge translation (KT) tools in the health care sector and for an inventory of the factors that affect their use. While researchers have conducted systematic reviews on a range of software-based information and communication technologies as well as other social media (eg, virtual communities of practice, virtual peer-to-peer communities, and electronic support groups), none have reviewed collaborative writing applications in the medical sector. The overarching goal of this project is to explore the depth and breadth of evidence for the use of collaborative writing applications in health care. Thus, the purposes of this scoping review will be to (1) map the literature on collaborative writing applications; (2) compare the applications' features; (3) describe the evidence of each application's positive and negative effects as a KT intervention in health care; (4) inventory and describe the barriers and facilitators that affect the applications' use; and (5) produce an action plan and a research agenda. A six-stage framework for scoping reviews will be used: (1) identifying the research question; (2) identifying relevant studies within the selected databases (using the EPPI-Reviewer software to classify the studies); (3) selecting studies (an iterative process in which two reviewers search the literature, refine the search strategy, and review articles for inclusion); (4) charting the data (using EPPI-Reviewer's data-charting form); (5) collating, summarizing, and reporting the results (performing a descriptive, numerical, and interpretive synthesis); and (6) consulting knowledge users during three planned meetings. Since this scoping review concerns the use of collaborative writing applications as KT interventions in health care, we will use the Knowledge to Action (KTA) framework to describe and compare the various studies and collaborative writing projects we find. In addition to guiding the use of collaborative writing applications in health care, this scoping review will advance the science of KT by testing tools that could be used to evaluate other social media. We also expect to identify areas that require further systematic reviews and primary research and to produce a highly relevant research agenda that explores and leverages the potential of collaborativ