Loading…

Psychological Influences on Bus Travel Mode Choice: A Comparative Analysis between Two Chinese Cities

Psychological factors give an important influence on the behavior of travel mode choice, but the effects vary from different cities. To identify and explain the differences, this study makes a comparative analysis between two Chinese cities, Chongqing and Chengdu: a typical mountain city and a typic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of advanced transportation 2020, Vol.2020 (2020), p.1-9
Main Authors: Chen, Jian, Li, He-ping, Chen, Qi
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-91cdada437ab85be0fd32a72cf6feb9b6fdbaf440d3a7b3b995537349e12cf493
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-91cdada437ab85be0fd32a72cf6feb9b6fdbaf440d3a7b3b995537349e12cf493
container_end_page 9
container_issue 2020
container_start_page 1
container_title Journal of advanced transportation
container_volume 2020
creator Chen, Jian
Li, He-ping
Chen, Qi
description Psychological factors give an important influence on the behavior of travel mode choice, but the effects vary from different cities. To identify and explain the differences, this study makes a comparative analysis between two Chinese cities, Chongqing and Chengdu: a typical mountain city and a typical plain city. The sample is obtained by questionnaires containing 401 and 450 valid records of the two cities, respectively. The model used in this study is established based on the framework of the theory of planned behavior. The main work of this study has three aspects: (1) define the measured variables based on the combination of bus travel characteristics and the theory of planned behavior; (2) verify the model validity in both two cities; (3) make a comparative analysis on the two cities. According to the results, the validity of the theory framework and measured variables is verified; the perceived behavioral control plays the most important role in affecting the behavior of traveling by bus in both two cities; significant differences between the two cities are presented and explained.
doi_str_mv 10.1155/2020/8848741
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a5113da1f1854434ba9d8cd84323f435</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_a5113da1f1854434ba9d8cd84323f435</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2440435995</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-91cdada437ab85be0fd32a72cf6feb9b6fdbaf440d3a7b3b995537349e12cf493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0U1vEzEQBuAVAonQcuOMLHGEpf7MrrmlER-RitpDOFtje9w62q6DvWmUf4_LVnDsyZL1-J0ZT9O8Y_QzY0pdcMrpRd_LvpPsRbPgVPJWMK1eNgvKdNcuO65fN29K2VEqtNJy0eBNObm7NKTb6GAgmzEMBxwdFpJGcnkoZJvhAQfyM3kk67sUHX4hK7JO93vIMMUHJKsRhlOJhVicjogj2R5TpXHEUp_EKWI5b14FGAq-fTrPml_fvm7XP9qr6--b9eqqdVLJqdXMefAgRQe2VxZp8IJDx11YBrTaLoO3EKSkXkBnhdVaKdEJqZFVI7U4azZzrk-wM_sc7yGfTIJo_l6kfGsgT9ENaEAxJjywwHolpZAWtO-d76XgIkihataHOWuf0-8Dlsns0iHXWYvhtYVKavmqPs3K5VRKxvCvKqPmcSnmcSnmaSmVf5x5_R4Px_icfj9rrAYD_NesW6ra6h9EepVs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2440435995</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Psychological Influences on Bus Travel Mode Choice: A Comparative Analysis between Two Chinese Cities</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>Wiley Open Access</source><creator>Chen, Jian ; Li, He-ping ; Chen, Qi</creator><contributor>Tay, Richard S. ; Richard S Tay</contributor><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jian ; Li, He-ping ; Chen, Qi ; Tay, Richard S. ; Richard S Tay</creatorcontrib><description>Psychological factors give an important influence on the behavior of travel mode choice, but the effects vary from different cities. To identify and explain the differences, this study makes a comparative analysis between two Chinese cities, Chongqing and Chengdu: a typical mountain city and a typical plain city. The sample is obtained by questionnaires containing 401 and 450 valid records of the two cities, respectively. The model used in this study is established based on the framework of the theory of planned behavior. The main work of this study has three aspects: (1) define the measured variables based on the combination of bus travel characteristics and the theory of planned behavior; (2) verify the model validity in both two cities; (3) make a comparative analysis on the two cities. According to the results, the validity of the theory framework and measured variables is verified; the perceived behavioral control plays the most important role in affecting the behavior of traveling by bus in both two cities; significant differences between the two cities are presented and explained.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0197-6729</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2042-3195</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2020/8848741</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cairo, Egypt: Hindawi Publishing Corporation</publisher><subject>Attitudes ; Cities ; Comparative analysis ; Energy consumption ; Influence ; Modal choice ; Mountains ; Psychological factors ; Public transportation ; Theory of planned behavior ; Travel ; Travel modes ; Variables</subject><ispartof>Journal of advanced transportation, 2020, Vol.2020 (2020), p.1-9</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2020 Jian Chen et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Jian Chen et al. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-91cdada437ab85be0fd32a72cf6feb9b6fdbaf440d3a7b3b995537349e12cf493</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-91cdada437ab85be0fd32a72cf6feb9b6fdbaf440d3a7b3b995537349e12cf493</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3792-0594</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2440435995/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2440435995?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,11688,25753,27923,27924,27925,36060,37012,44363,44590,74895,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Tay, Richard S.</contributor><contributor>Richard S Tay</contributor><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, He-ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Qi</creatorcontrib><title>Psychological Influences on Bus Travel Mode Choice: A Comparative Analysis between Two Chinese Cities</title><title>Journal of advanced transportation</title><description>Psychological factors give an important influence on the behavior of travel mode choice, but the effects vary from different cities. To identify and explain the differences, this study makes a comparative analysis between two Chinese cities, Chongqing and Chengdu: a typical mountain city and a typical plain city. The sample is obtained by questionnaires containing 401 and 450 valid records of the two cities, respectively. The model used in this study is established based on the framework of the theory of planned behavior. The main work of this study has three aspects: (1) define the measured variables based on the combination of bus travel characteristics and the theory of planned behavior; (2) verify the model validity in both two cities; (3) make a comparative analysis on the two cities. According to the results, the validity of the theory framework and measured variables is verified; the perceived behavioral control plays the most important role in affecting the behavior of traveling by bus in both two cities; significant differences between the two cities are presented and explained.</description><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Modal choice</subject><subject>Mountains</subject><subject>Psychological factors</subject><subject>Public transportation</subject><subject>Theory of planned behavior</subject><subject>Travel</subject><subject>Travel modes</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>0197-6729</issn><issn>2042-3195</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0U1vEzEQBuAVAonQcuOMLHGEpf7MrrmlER-RitpDOFtje9w62q6DvWmUf4_LVnDsyZL1-J0ZT9O8Y_QzY0pdcMrpRd_LvpPsRbPgVPJWMK1eNgvKdNcuO65fN29K2VEqtNJy0eBNObm7NKTb6GAgmzEMBxwdFpJGcnkoZJvhAQfyM3kk67sUHX4hK7JO93vIMMUHJKsRhlOJhVicjogj2R5TpXHEUp_EKWI5b14FGAq-fTrPml_fvm7XP9qr6--b9eqqdVLJqdXMefAgRQe2VxZp8IJDx11YBrTaLoO3EKSkXkBnhdVaKdEJqZFVI7U4azZzrk-wM_sc7yGfTIJo_l6kfGsgT9ENaEAxJjywwHolpZAWtO-d76XgIkihataHOWuf0-8Dlsns0iHXWYvhtYVKavmqPs3K5VRKxvCvKqPmcSnmcSnmaSmVf5x5_R4Px_icfj9rrAYD_NesW6ra6h9EepVs</recordid><startdate>2020</startdate><enddate>2020</enddate><creator>Chen, Jian</creator><creator>Li, He-ping</creator><creator>Chen, Qi</creator><general>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</general><general>Hindawi</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><general>Hindawi-Wiley</general><scope>ADJCN</scope><scope>AHFXO</scope><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3792-0594</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2020</creationdate><title>Psychological Influences on Bus Travel Mode Choice: A Comparative Analysis between Two Chinese Cities</title><author>Chen, Jian ; Li, He-ping ; Chen, Qi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-91cdada437ab85be0fd32a72cf6feb9b6fdbaf440d3a7b3b995537349e12cf493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Modal choice</topic><topic>Mountains</topic><topic>Psychological factors</topic><topic>Public transportation</topic><topic>Theory of planned behavior</topic><topic>Travel</topic><topic>Travel modes</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, He-ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Qi</creatorcontrib><collection>الدوريات العلمية والإحصائية - e-Marefa Academic and Statistical Periodicals</collection><collection>معرفة - المحتوى العربي الأكاديمي المتكامل - e-Marefa Academic Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database‎ (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of advanced transportation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Jian</au><au>Li, He-ping</au><au>Chen, Qi</au><au>Tay, Richard S.</au><au>Richard S Tay</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Psychological Influences on Bus Travel Mode Choice: A Comparative Analysis between Two Chinese Cities</atitle><jtitle>Journal of advanced transportation</jtitle><date>2020</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>2020</volume><issue>2020</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>1-9</pages><issn>0197-6729</issn><eissn>2042-3195</eissn><abstract>Psychological factors give an important influence on the behavior of travel mode choice, but the effects vary from different cities. To identify and explain the differences, this study makes a comparative analysis between two Chinese cities, Chongqing and Chengdu: a typical mountain city and a typical plain city. The sample is obtained by questionnaires containing 401 and 450 valid records of the two cities, respectively. The model used in this study is established based on the framework of the theory of planned behavior. The main work of this study has three aspects: (1) define the measured variables based on the combination of bus travel characteristics and the theory of planned behavior; (2) verify the model validity in both two cities; (3) make a comparative analysis on the two cities. According to the results, the validity of the theory framework and measured variables is verified; the perceived behavioral control plays the most important role in affecting the behavior of traveling by bus in both two cities; significant differences between the two cities are presented and explained.</abstract><cop>Cairo, Egypt</cop><pub>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</pub><doi>10.1155/2020/8848741</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3792-0594</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0197-6729
ispartof Journal of advanced transportation, 2020, Vol.2020 (2020), p.1-9
issn 0197-6729
2042-3195
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a5113da1f1854434ba9d8cd84323f435
source ABI/INFORM Global; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); Wiley Open Access
subjects Attitudes
Cities
Comparative analysis
Energy consumption
Influence
Modal choice
Mountains
Psychological factors
Public transportation
Theory of planned behavior
Travel
Travel modes
Variables
title Psychological Influences on Bus Travel Mode Choice: A Comparative Analysis between Two Chinese Cities
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T19%3A52%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Psychological%20Influences%20on%20Bus%20Travel%20Mode%20Choice:%20A%20Comparative%20Analysis%20between%20Two%20Chinese%20Cities&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20advanced%20transportation&rft.au=Chen,%20Jian&rft.date=2020&rft.volume=2020&rft.issue=2020&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=1-9&rft.issn=0197-6729&rft.eissn=2042-3195&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2020/8848741&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2440435995%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-91cdada437ab85be0fd32a72cf6feb9b6fdbaf440d3a7b3b995537349e12cf493%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2440435995&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true