Loading…
Examining postpartum depression screening effectiveness in well child clinics in Alberta, Canada: A study using the All Our Families cohort and administrative data
AbstractAffecting 10–15% of women, postpartum depression (PPD) can be debilitating and costly. While early identification has the potential to improve timely care, recommendations regarding the implementation of routine screening are inconsistent. In Alberta, screening is completed using the Edinbur...
Saved in:
Published in: | Preventive medicine reports 2019-06, Vol.14, p.100888-100888, Article 100888 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-bf3e4ce1780c720e515228f164c7be9c57188dc9b5c59ede00f3bc0c6604de5d3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-bf3e4ce1780c720e515228f164c7be9c57188dc9b5c59ede00f3bc0c6604de5d3 |
container_end_page | 100888 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 100888 |
container_title | Preventive medicine reports |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Premji, Shainur McDonald, Sheila W Metcalfe, Amy Faris, Peter Quan, Hude Tough, Suzanne McNeil, Deborah A |
description | AbstractAffecting 10–15% of women, postpartum depression (PPD) can be debilitating and costly. While early identification has the potential to improve timely care, recommendations regarding the implementation of routine screening are inconsistent. In Alberta, screening is completed using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale during public health well child clinic visits. The objective of this study was to examine the effectiveness of screening in identifying, diagnosing and treating women at increased risk for PPD over the first year postpartum, compared to those unscreened. The All Our Families prospective pregnancy cohort was linked to public health, inpatient, outpatient, physician claims and community pharmaceutical data over the first year postpartum. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses examined differences in sample characteristics and PPD and non-PPD related utilization by screening category. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for PPD diagnosis and mental health drugs dispensed were generated using crude and multivariable logistic regression models. Within our sample, 87% of the eligible population were screened, with 3% receiving a high-risk score, and 13% were unscreened. Compared to those unscreened, women screened high-risk had higher odds of being diagnosed with PPD (OR: 3.88, 95% CI: 2.18–6.92) and women screened low/moderate-risk had reduced odds of receiving a diagnosis (OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.35–0.74). High-risk women had an increased likelihood of diagnosis, higher PPD-related utilization and drugs dispensed compared to those unscreened. This information suggests that screening was effective at streamlining resources in Alberta. Future work should focus on evaluating the cost-effectiveness of PPD screening. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100888 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a5246fa5d024478e894e3f5fa71fc433</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2211335519300671</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_a5246fa5d024478e894e3f5fa71fc433</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2340041761</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-bf3e4ce1780c720e515228f164c7be9c57188dc9b5c59ede00f3bc0c6604de5d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUsFu1DAQjRCIVqVfgIR85MAudhw7CRKVVqsWKlXqAThbjj3Z9eK1g-0s9Hv4UZxNqVouHCxbM2_emxm_onhN8JJgwt_vlsMedFiWmLQ5gpumeVacliUhC0oZe_7ofVKcx7jDGBNac1aTl8UJJaTNh58Wvy9_yb1xxm3Q4GMaZEjjHmkYAsRovENRBYBjHvoeVDIHcDmFjEM_wVqktsZqpGzmUMfoynYQknyH1tJJLT-gFYpp1HdojBNL2kKGWHQ7BnSVpa2BiJTf-pCQdBpJPbUTU5CTFNIyyVfFi17aCOf391nx7ery6_rz4ub20_V6dbNQrMFp0fUUKgWkbrCqSwyMsLJsesIrVXfQqjx602jVdkyxFjRg3NNOYcU5rjQwTc-K65lXe7kTQzB7Ge6El0YcAz5sRF6PURaEZGXFe8k0LquqbqBpK6A962VNelVRmrkuZq5h7PJHKXB5IvuE9GnGma3Y-IPgjNSM80zw9p4g-B8jxCT2Jqq8cenAj1GUtMK4IjUnGUpnqAo-xgD9gwzBYnKLyNNMbhGTW8Tsllz15nGHDzV_vZEBH2cA5J0fDAQRlQGnQJuQjZCXYv4jcPFP_ewSab_DHcSdH4PL3ymIiKXA4stk2MmvWR5jXhP6B53k6e0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2340041761</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Examining postpartum depression screening effectiveness in well child clinics in Alberta, Canada: A study using the All Our Families cohort and administrative data</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Premji, Shainur ; McDonald, Sheila W ; Metcalfe, Amy ; Faris, Peter ; Quan, Hude ; Tough, Suzanne ; McNeil, Deborah A</creator><creatorcontrib>Premji, Shainur ; McDonald, Sheila W ; Metcalfe, Amy ; Faris, Peter ; Quan, Hude ; Tough, Suzanne ; McNeil, Deborah A</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractAffecting 10–15% of women, postpartum depression (PPD) can be debilitating and costly. While early identification has the potential to improve timely care, recommendations regarding the implementation of routine screening are inconsistent. In Alberta, screening is completed using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale during public health well child clinic visits. The objective of this study was to examine the effectiveness of screening in identifying, diagnosing and treating women at increased risk for PPD over the first year postpartum, compared to those unscreened. The All Our Families prospective pregnancy cohort was linked to public health, inpatient, outpatient, physician claims and community pharmaceutical data over the first year postpartum. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses examined differences in sample characteristics and PPD and non-PPD related utilization by screening category. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for PPD diagnosis and mental health drugs dispensed were generated using crude and multivariable logistic regression models. Within our sample, 87% of the eligible population were screened, with 3% receiving a high-risk score, and 13% were unscreened. Compared to those unscreened, women screened high-risk had higher odds of being diagnosed with PPD (OR: 3.88, 95% CI: 2.18–6.92) and women screened low/moderate-risk had reduced odds of receiving a diagnosis (OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.35–0.74). High-risk women had an increased likelihood of diagnosis, higher PPD-related utilization and drugs dispensed compared to those unscreened. This information suggests that screening was effective at streamlining resources in Alberta. Future work should focus on evaluating the cost-effectiveness of PPD screening.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2211-3355</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2211-3355</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100888</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31193116</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Evaluation ; Internal Medicine ; Perinatal depression ; Public health ; Regular ; Screening</subject><ispartof>Preventive medicine reports, 2019-06, Vol.14, p.100888-100888, Article 100888</ispartof><rights>The Authors</rights><rights>2019 The Authors</rights><rights>2019 The Authors 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-bf3e4ce1780c720e515228f164c7be9c57188dc9b5c59ede00f3bc0c6604de5d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-bf3e4ce1780c720e515228f164c7be9c57188dc9b5c59ede00f3bc0c6604de5d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9951-5244</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6517566/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211335519300671$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,3536,27905,27906,45761,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31193116$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Premji, Shainur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Sheila W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metcalfe, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faris, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quan, Hude</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tough, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNeil, Deborah A</creatorcontrib><title>Examining postpartum depression screening effectiveness in well child clinics in Alberta, Canada: A study using the All Our Families cohort and administrative data</title><title>Preventive medicine reports</title><addtitle>Prev Med Rep</addtitle><description>AbstractAffecting 10–15% of women, postpartum depression (PPD) can be debilitating and costly. While early identification has the potential to improve timely care, recommendations regarding the implementation of routine screening are inconsistent. In Alberta, screening is completed using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale during public health well child clinic visits. The objective of this study was to examine the effectiveness of screening in identifying, diagnosing and treating women at increased risk for PPD over the first year postpartum, compared to those unscreened. The All Our Families prospective pregnancy cohort was linked to public health, inpatient, outpatient, physician claims and community pharmaceutical data over the first year postpartum. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses examined differences in sample characteristics and PPD and non-PPD related utilization by screening category. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for PPD diagnosis and mental health drugs dispensed were generated using crude and multivariable logistic regression models. Within our sample, 87% of the eligible population were screened, with 3% receiving a high-risk score, and 13% were unscreened. Compared to those unscreened, women screened high-risk had higher odds of being diagnosed with PPD (OR: 3.88, 95% CI: 2.18–6.92) and women screened low/moderate-risk had reduced odds of receiving a diagnosis (OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.35–0.74). High-risk women had an increased likelihood of diagnosis, higher PPD-related utilization and drugs dispensed compared to those unscreened. This information suggests that screening was effective at streamlining resources in Alberta. Future work should focus on evaluating the cost-effectiveness of PPD screening.</description><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Perinatal depression</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Regular</subject><subject>Screening</subject><issn>2211-3355</issn><issn>2211-3355</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUsFu1DAQjRCIVqVfgIR85MAudhw7CRKVVqsWKlXqAThbjj3Z9eK1g-0s9Hv4UZxNqVouHCxbM2_emxm_onhN8JJgwt_vlsMedFiWmLQ5gpumeVacliUhC0oZe_7ofVKcx7jDGBNac1aTl8UJJaTNh58Wvy9_yb1xxm3Q4GMaZEjjHmkYAsRovENRBYBjHvoeVDIHcDmFjEM_wVqktsZqpGzmUMfoynYQknyH1tJJLT-gFYpp1HdojBNL2kKGWHQ7BnSVpa2BiJTf-pCQdBpJPbUTU5CTFNIyyVfFi17aCOf391nx7ery6_rz4ub20_V6dbNQrMFp0fUUKgWkbrCqSwyMsLJsesIrVXfQqjx602jVdkyxFjRg3NNOYcU5rjQwTc-K65lXe7kTQzB7Ge6El0YcAz5sRF6PURaEZGXFe8k0LquqbqBpK6A962VNelVRmrkuZq5h7PJHKXB5IvuE9GnGma3Y-IPgjNSM80zw9p4g-B8jxCT2Jqq8cenAj1GUtMK4IjUnGUpnqAo-xgD9gwzBYnKLyNNMbhGTW8Tsllz15nGHDzV_vZEBH2cA5J0fDAQRlQGnQJuQjZCXYv4jcPFP_ewSab_DHcSdH4PL3ymIiKXA4stk2MmvWR5jXhP6B53k6e0</recordid><startdate>20190601</startdate><enddate>20190601</enddate><creator>Premji, Shainur</creator><creator>McDonald, Sheila W</creator><creator>Metcalfe, Amy</creator><creator>Faris, Peter</creator><creator>Quan, Hude</creator><creator>Tough, Suzanne</creator><creator>McNeil, Deborah A</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9951-5244</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190601</creationdate><title>Examining postpartum depression screening effectiveness in well child clinics in Alberta, Canada: A study using the All Our Families cohort and administrative data</title><author>Premji, Shainur ; McDonald, Sheila W ; Metcalfe, Amy ; Faris, Peter ; Quan, Hude ; Tough, Suzanne ; McNeil, Deborah A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-bf3e4ce1780c720e515228f164c7be9c57188dc9b5c59ede00f3bc0c6604de5d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Perinatal depression</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Regular</topic><topic>Screening</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Premji, Shainur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Sheila W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metcalfe, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faris, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quan, Hude</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tough, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNeil, Deborah A</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Preventive medicine reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Premji, Shainur</au><au>McDonald, Sheila W</au><au>Metcalfe, Amy</au><au>Faris, Peter</au><au>Quan, Hude</au><au>Tough, Suzanne</au><au>McNeil, Deborah A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Examining postpartum depression screening effectiveness in well child clinics in Alberta, Canada: A study using the All Our Families cohort and administrative data</atitle><jtitle>Preventive medicine reports</jtitle><addtitle>Prev Med Rep</addtitle><date>2019-06-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>14</volume><spage>100888</spage><epage>100888</epage><pages>100888-100888</pages><artnum>100888</artnum><issn>2211-3355</issn><eissn>2211-3355</eissn><abstract>AbstractAffecting 10–15% of women, postpartum depression (PPD) can be debilitating and costly. While early identification has the potential to improve timely care, recommendations regarding the implementation of routine screening are inconsistent. In Alberta, screening is completed using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale during public health well child clinic visits. The objective of this study was to examine the effectiveness of screening in identifying, diagnosing and treating women at increased risk for PPD over the first year postpartum, compared to those unscreened. The All Our Families prospective pregnancy cohort was linked to public health, inpatient, outpatient, physician claims and community pharmaceutical data over the first year postpartum. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses examined differences in sample characteristics and PPD and non-PPD related utilization by screening category. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for PPD diagnosis and mental health drugs dispensed were generated using crude and multivariable logistic regression models. Within our sample, 87% of the eligible population were screened, with 3% receiving a high-risk score, and 13% were unscreened. Compared to those unscreened, women screened high-risk had higher odds of being diagnosed with PPD (OR: 3.88, 95% CI: 2.18–6.92) and women screened low/moderate-risk had reduced odds of receiving a diagnosis (OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.35–0.74). High-risk women had an increased likelihood of diagnosis, higher PPD-related utilization and drugs dispensed compared to those unscreened. This information suggests that screening was effective at streamlining resources in Alberta. Future work should focus on evaluating the cost-effectiveness of PPD screening.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31193116</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100888</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9951-5244</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2211-3355 |
ispartof | Preventive medicine reports, 2019-06, Vol.14, p.100888-100888, Article 100888 |
issn | 2211-3355 2211-3355 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a5246fa5d024478e894e3f5fa71fc433 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Evaluation Internal Medicine Perinatal depression Public health Regular Screening |
title | Examining postpartum depression screening effectiveness in well child clinics in Alberta, Canada: A study using the All Our Families cohort and administrative data |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T11%3A27%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Examining%20postpartum%20depression%20screening%20effectiveness%20in%20well%20child%20clinics%20in%20Alberta,%20Canada:%20A%20study%20using%20the%20All%20Our%20Families%20cohort%20and%20administrative%20data&rft.jtitle=Preventive%20medicine%20reports&rft.au=Premji,%20Shainur&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.volume=14&rft.spage=100888&rft.epage=100888&rft.pages=100888-100888&rft.artnum=100888&rft.issn=2211-3355&rft.eissn=2211-3355&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100888&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2340041761%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-bf3e4ce1780c720e515228f164c7be9c57188dc9b5c59ede00f3bc0c6604de5d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2340041761&rft_id=info:pmid/31193116&rfr_iscdi=true |