Loading…

Examining postpartum depression screening effectiveness in well child clinics in Alberta, Canada: A study using the All Our Families cohort and administrative data

AbstractAffecting 10–15% of women, postpartum depression (PPD) can be debilitating and costly. While early identification has the potential to improve timely care, recommendations regarding the implementation of routine screening are inconsistent. In Alberta, screening is completed using the Edinbur...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Preventive medicine reports 2019-06, Vol.14, p.100888-100888, Article 100888
Main Authors: Premji, Shainur, McDonald, Sheila W, Metcalfe, Amy, Faris, Peter, Quan, Hude, Tough, Suzanne, McNeil, Deborah A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-bf3e4ce1780c720e515228f164c7be9c57188dc9b5c59ede00f3bc0c6604de5d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-bf3e4ce1780c720e515228f164c7be9c57188dc9b5c59ede00f3bc0c6604de5d3
container_end_page 100888
container_issue
container_start_page 100888
container_title Preventive medicine reports
container_volume 14
creator Premji, Shainur
McDonald, Sheila W
Metcalfe, Amy
Faris, Peter
Quan, Hude
Tough, Suzanne
McNeil, Deborah A
description AbstractAffecting 10–15% of women, postpartum depression (PPD) can be debilitating and costly. While early identification has the potential to improve timely care, recommendations regarding the implementation of routine screening are inconsistent. In Alberta, screening is completed using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale during public health well child clinic visits. The objective of this study was to examine the effectiveness of screening in identifying, diagnosing and treating women at increased risk for PPD over the first year postpartum, compared to those unscreened. The All Our Families prospective pregnancy cohort was linked to public health, inpatient, outpatient, physician claims and community pharmaceutical data over the first year postpartum. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses examined differences in sample characteristics and PPD and non-PPD related utilization by screening category. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for PPD diagnosis and mental health drugs dispensed were generated using crude and multivariable logistic regression models. Within our sample, 87% of the eligible population were screened, with 3% receiving a high-risk score, and 13% were unscreened. Compared to those unscreened, women screened high-risk had higher odds of being diagnosed with PPD (OR: 3.88, 95% CI: 2.18–6.92) and women screened low/moderate-risk had reduced odds of receiving a diagnosis (OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.35–0.74). High-risk women had an increased likelihood of diagnosis, higher PPD-related utilization and drugs dispensed compared to those unscreened. This information suggests that screening was effective at streamlining resources in Alberta. Future work should focus on evaluating the cost-effectiveness of PPD screening.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100888
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a5246fa5d024478e894e3f5fa71fc433</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2211335519300671</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_a5246fa5d024478e894e3f5fa71fc433</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2340041761</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-bf3e4ce1780c720e515228f164c7be9c57188dc9b5c59ede00f3bc0c6604de5d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUsFu1DAQjRCIVqVfgIR85MAudhw7CRKVVqsWKlXqAThbjj3Z9eK1g-0s9Hv4UZxNqVouHCxbM2_emxm_onhN8JJgwt_vlsMedFiWmLQ5gpumeVacliUhC0oZe_7ofVKcx7jDGBNac1aTl8UJJaTNh58Wvy9_yb1xxm3Q4GMaZEjjHmkYAsRovENRBYBjHvoeVDIHcDmFjEM_wVqktsZqpGzmUMfoynYQknyH1tJJLT-gFYpp1HdojBNL2kKGWHQ7BnSVpa2BiJTf-pCQdBpJPbUTU5CTFNIyyVfFi17aCOf391nx7ery6_rz4ub20_V6dbNQrMFp0fUUKgWkbrCqSwyMsLJsesIrVXfQqjx602jVdkyxFjRg3NNOYcU5rjQwTc-K65lXe7kTQzB7Ge6El0YcAz5sRF6PURaEZGXFe8k0LquqbqBpK6A962VNelVRmrkuZq5h7PJHKXB5IvuE9GnGma3Y-IPgjNSM80zw9p4g-B8jxCT2Jqq8cenAj1GUtMK4IjUnGUpnqAo-xgD9gwzBYnKLyNNMbhGTW8Tsllz15nGHDzV_vZEBH2cA5J0fDAQRlQGnQJuQjZCXYv4jcPFP_ewSab_DHcSdH4PL3ymIiKXA4stk2MmvWR5jXhP6B53k6e0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2340041761</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Examining postpartum depression screening effectiveness in well child clinics in Alberta, Canada: A study using the All Our Families cohort and administrative data</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Premji, Shainur ; McDonald, Sheila W ; Metcalfe, Amy ; Faris, Peter ; Quan, Hude ; Tough, Suzanne ; McNeil, Deborah A</creator><creatorcontrib>Premji, Shainur ; McDonald, Sheila W ; Metcalfe, Amy ; Faris, Peter ; Quan, Hude ; Tough, Suzanne ; McNeil, Deborah A</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractAffecting 10–15% of women, postpartum depression (PPD) can be debilitating and costly. While early identification has the potential to improve timely care, recommendations regarding the implementation of routine screening are inconsistent. In Alberta, screening is completed using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale during public health well child clinic visits. The objective of this study was to examine the effectiveness of screening in identifying, diagnosing and treating women at increased risk for PPD over the first year postpartum, compared to those unscreened. The All Our Families prospective pregnancy cohort was linked to public health, inpatient, outpatient, physician claims and community pharmaceutical data over the first year postpartum. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses examined differences in sample characteristics and PPD and non-PPD related utilization by screening category. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for PPD diagnosis and mental health drugs dispensed were generated using crude and multivariable logistic regression models. Within our sample, 87% of the eligible population were screened, with 3% receiving a high-risk score, and 13% were unscreened. Compared to those unscreened, women screened high-risk had higher odds of being diagnosed with PPD (OR: 3.88, 95% CI: 2.18–6.92) and women screened low/moderate-risk had reduced odds of receiving a diagnosis (OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.35–0.74). High-risk women had an increased likelihood of diagnosis, higher PPD-related utilization and drugs dispensed compared to those unscreened. This information suggests that screening was effective at streamlining resources in Alberta. Future work should focus on evaluating the cost-effectiveness of PPD screening.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2211-3355</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2211-3355</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100888</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31193116</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Evaluation ; Internal Medicine ; Perinatal depression ; Public health ; Regular ; Screening</subject><ispartof>Preventive medicine reports, 2019-06, Vol.14, p.100888-100888, Article 100888</ispartof><rights>The Authors</rights><rights>2019 The Authors</rights><rights>2019 The Authors 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-bf3e4ce1780c720e515228f164c7be9c57188dc9b5c59ede00f3bc0c6604de5d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-bf3e4ce1780c720e515228f164c7be9c57188dc9b5c59ede00f3bc0c6604de5d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9951-5244</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6517566/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211335519300671$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,3536,27905,27906,45761,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31193116$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Premji, Shainur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Sheila W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metcalfe, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faris, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quan, Hude</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tough, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNeil, Deborah A</creatorcontrib><title>Examining postpartum depression screening effectiveness in well child clinics in Alberta, Canada: A study using the All Our Families cohort and administrative data</title><title>Preventive medicine reports</title><addtitle>Prev Med Rep</addtitle><description>AbstractAffecting 10–15% of women, postpartum depression (PPD) can be debilitating and costly. While early identification has the potential to improve timely care, recommendations regarding the implementation of routine screening are inconsistent. In Alberta, screening is completed using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale during public health well child clinic visits. The objective of this study was to examine the effectiveness of screening in identifying, diagnosing and treating women at increased risk for PPD over the first year postpartum, compared to those unscreened. The All Our Families prospective pregnancy cohort was linked to public health, inpatient, outpatient, physician claims and community pharmaceutical data over the first year postpartum. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses examined differences in sample characteristics and PPD and non-PPD related utilization by screening category. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for PPD diagnosis and mental health drugs dispensed were generated using crude and multivariable logistic regression models. Within our sample, 87% of the eligible population were screened, with 3% receiving a high-risk score, and 13% were unscreened. Compared to those unscreened, women screened high-risk had higher odds of being diagnosed with PPD (OR: 3.88, 95% CI: 2.18–6.92) and women screened low/moderate-risk had reduced odds of receiving a diagnosis (OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.35–0.74). High-risk women had an increased likelihood of diagnosis, higher PPD-related utilization and drugs dispensed compared to those unscreened. This information suggests that screening was effective at streamlining resources in Alberta. Future work should focus on evaluating the cost-effectiveness of PPD screening.</description><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Perinatal depression</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Regular</subject><subject>Screening</subject><issn>2211-3355</issn><issn>2211-3355</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUsFu1DAQjRCIVqVfgIR85MAudhw7CRKVVqsWKlXqAThbjj3Z9eK1g-0s9Hv4UZxNqVouHCxbM2_emxm_onhN8JJgwt_vlsMedFiWmLQ5gpumeVacliUhC0oZe_7ofVKcx7jDGBNac1aTl8UJJaTNh58Wvy9_yb1xxm3Q4GMaZEjjHmkYAsRovENRBYBjHvoeVDIHcDmFjEM_wVqktsZqpGzmUMfoynYQknyH1tJJLT-gFYpp1HdojBNL2kKGWHQ7BnSVpa2BiJTf-pCQdBpJPbUTU5CTFNIyyVfFi17aCOf391nx7ery6_rz4ub20_V6dbNQrMFp0fUUKgWkbrCqSwyMsLJsesIrVXfQqjx602jVdkyxFjRg3NNOYcU5rjQwTc-K65lXe7kTQzB7Ge6El0YcAz5sRF6PURaEZGXFe8k0LquqbqBpK6A962VNelVRmrkuZq5h7PJHKXB5IvuE9GnGma3Y-IPgjNSM80zw9p4g-B8jxCT2Jqq8cenAj1GUtMK4IjUnGUpnqAo-xgD9gwzBYnKLyNNMbhGTW8Tsllz15nGHDzV_vZEBH2cA5J0fDAQRlQGnQJuQjZCXYv4jcPFP_ewSab_DHcSdH4PL3ymIiKXA4stk2MmvWR5jXhP6B53k6e0</recordid><startdate>20190601</startdate><enddate>20190601</enddate><creator>Premji, Shainur</creator><creator>McDonald, Sheila W</creator><creator>Metcalfe, Amy</creator><creator>Faris, Peter</creator><creator>Quan, Hude</creator><creator>Tough, Suzanne</creator><creator>McNeil, Deborah A</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9951-5244</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190601</creationdate><title>Examining postpartum depression screening effectiveness in well child clinics in Alberta, Canada: A study using the All Our Families cohort and administrative data</title><author>Premji, Shainur ; McDonald, Sheila W ; Metcalfe, Amy ; Faris, Peter ; Quan, Hude ; Tough, Suzanne ; McNeil, Deborah A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-bf3e4ce1780c720e515228f164c7be9c57188dc9b5c59ede00f3bc0c6604de5d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Perinatal depression</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Regular</topic><topic>Screening</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Premji, Shainur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Sheila W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metcalfe, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faris, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quan, Hude</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tough, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNeil, Deborah A</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Preventive medicine reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Premji, Shainur</au><au>McDonald, Sheila W</au><au>Metcalfe, Amy</au><au>Faris, Peter</au><au>Quan, Hude</au><au>Tough, Suzanne</au><au>McNeil, Deborah A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Examining postpartum depression screening effectiveness in well child clinics in Alberta, Canada: A study using the All Our Families cohort and administrative data</atitle><jtitle>Preventive medicine reports</jtitle><addtitle>Prev Med Rep</addtitle><date>2019-06-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>14</volume><spage>100888</spage><epage>100888</epage><pages>100888-100888</pages><artnum>100888</artnum><issn>2211-3355</issn><eissn>2211-3355</eissn><abstract>AbstractAffecting 10–15% of women, postpartum depression (PPD) can be debilitating and costly. While early identification has the potential to improve timely care, recommendations regarding the implementation of routine screening are inconsistent. In Alberta, screening is completed using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale during public health well child clinic visits. The objective of this study was to examine the effectiveness of screening in identifying, diagnosing and treating women at increased risk for PPD over the first year postpartum, compared to those unscreened. The All Our Families prospective pregnancy cohort was linked to public health, inpatient, outpatient, physician claims and community pharmaceutical data over the first year postpartum. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses examined differences in sample characteristics and PPD and non-PPD related utilization by screening category. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for PPD diagnosis and mental health drugs dispensed were generated using crude and multivariable logistic regression models. Within our sample, 87% of the eligible population were screened, with 3% receiving a high-risk score, and 13% were unscreened. Compared to those unscreened, women screened high-risk had higher odds of being diagnosed with PPD (OR: 3.88, 95% CI: 2.18–6.92) and women screened low/moderate-risk had reduced odds of receiving a diagnosis (OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.35–0.74). High-risk women had an increased likelihood of diagnosis, higher PPD-related utilization and drugs dispensed compared to those unscreened. This information suggests that screening was effective at streamlining resources in Alberta. Future work should focus on evaluating the cost-effectiveness of PPD screening.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31193116</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100888</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9951-5244</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2211-3355
ispartof Preventive medicine reports, 2019-06, Vol.14, p.100888-100888, Article 100888
issn 2211-3355
2211-3355
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a5246fa5d024478e894e3f5fa71fc433
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Evaluation
Internal Medicine
Perinatal depression
Public health
Regular
Screening
title Examining postpartum depression screening effectiveness in well child clinics in Alberta, Canada: A study using the All Our Families cohort and administrative data
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T11%3A27%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Examining%20postpartum%20depression%20screening%20effectiveness%20in%20well%20child%20clinics%20in%20Alberta,%20Canada:%20A%20study%20using%20the%20All%20Our%20Families%20cohort%20and%20administrative%20data&rft.jtitle=Preventive%20medicine%20reports&rft.au=Premji,%20Shainur&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.volume=14&rft.spage=100888&rft.epage=100888&rft.pages=100888-100888&rft.artnum=100888&rft.issn=2211-3355&rft.eissn=2211-3355&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100888&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2340041761%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-bf3e4ce1780c720e515228f164c7be9c57188dc9b5c59ede00f3bc0c6604de5d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2340041761&rft_id=info:pmid/31193116&rfr_iscdi=true