Loading…

Oxygen Targets During Mechanical Ventilation in the ICU: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Patients admitted to intensive care often require treatment with invasive mechanical ventilation and high concentrations of oxygen. Mechanical ventilation can cause acute lung injury that may be exacerbated by oxygen therapy. Uncertainty remains about which oxygen therapy targets result in the best...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Critical care explorations 2022-04, Vol.4 (4), p.e0652-e0652
Main Authors: Cumpstey, Andrew F, Oldman, Alex H, Martin, Daniel S, Smith, Andrew, Grocott, Michael P W
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-d607c5477f2bdfe748e995dcfd025cd2ed775b0db10b1f67671b08fc7ba6290d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-d607c5477f2bdfe748e995dcfd025cd2ed775b0db10b1f67671b08fc7ba6290d3
container_end_page e0652
container_issue 4
container_start_page e0652
container_title Critical care explorations
container_volume 4
creator Cumpstey, Andrew F
Oldman, Alex H
Martin, Daniel S
Smith, Andrew
Grocott, Michael P W
description Patients admitted to intensive care often require treatment with invasive mechanical ventilation and high concentrations of oxygen. Mechanical ventilation can cause acute lung injury that may be exacerbated by oxygen therapy. Uncertainty remains about which oxygen therapy targets result in the best clinical outcomes for these patients. This review aims to determine whether higher or lower oxygenation targets are beneficial for mechanically ventilated adult patients. Excerpta Medica dataBASE, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, and Cochrane medical databases were searched from inception through to February 28, 2021. Randomized controlled trials comparing higher and lower oxygen targets in adult patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation via an endotracheal tube or tracheostomy in an intensive care setting. Study setting, participant type, participant numbers, and intervention targets were captured. Outcome measures included "mortality at longest follow-up" (primary), mechanical ventilator duration and free days, vasopressor-free days, patients on renal replacement therapy, renal replacement free days, cost benefit, and quality of life scores. Evidence certainty and risk of bias were evaluated using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. A random-effects models was used. Post hoc subgroup analysis looked separately at studies comparing hypoxemia versus normoxemia and normoxemia versus hyperoxemia. Data from eight trials (4,415 participants) were analyzed. Comparing higher and lower oxygen targets, there was no difference in mortality (odds ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.74-1.22), but heterogeneous and overlapping target ranges limit the validity and clinical relevance of this finding. Data from seven studies ( = 4,245) demonstrated targeting normoxemia compared with hyperoxemia may reduce mortality at longest follow-up (0.73 [0.57-0.95]) but this estimate had very low certainty. There was no difference in mortality between targeting relative hypoxemia or normoxemia (1.20 [0.83-1.73]). This systematic review and meta-analysis identified possible increased mortality with liberal oxygen targeting strategies and no difference in morbidity between high or low oxygen targets in mechanically ventilated adults. Findings were limited by substantial heterogeneity in study methodology and further research is urgently required to define optimal oxygen therapy targets.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000652
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a55021a56972474aa09347828abf90c8</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_a55021a56972474aa09347828abf90c8</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2659604801</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-d607c5477f2bdfe748e995dcfd025cd2ed775b0db10b1f67671b08fc7ba6290d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU9v1DAQxS0EolXpN0DIRy4ptuM_MQekVSiwUqtKpeWINbGdrKusU-xsYb89hm2rbX2x5Xnzmzd6CL2l5IQSrT607ekJ2T9SsBfokMlaVw1hzcu99wE6zvmmaBgVVCj-Gh3UQhBJKD9EPy_-bAcf8RWkwc8Zf96kEAd87u0KYrAw4h8-zmGEOUwRh4jnlcfL9vojXuDv2zz7dalYfOnvgv-NIbrSOkO1iDBuc8hv0KsexuyP7-8jdP3l9Kr9Vp1dfF22i7PKcsXnykmirOBK9axzvVe88VoLZ3tHmLCOeaeU6IjrKOloL5VUtCNNb1UHkmni6iO03HHdBDfmNoU1pK2ZIJj_H1MaDKRidPQGyu6MgpBasTIcgOiaq4Y10PWa2KawPu1Yt5tu7Z0t-ycYn0CfVmJYmWG6M5pwXfwWwPt7QJp-bXyezTpk68cRop822TAptCS8IbRI-U5q05Rz8v3jGErMv6RNSdo8T7q0vdu3-Nj0kGv9FxqAozs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2659604801</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Oxygen Targets During Mechanical Ventilation in the ICU: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><source>LWW Online</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Cumpstey, Andrew F ; Oldman, Alex H ; Martin, Daniel S ; Smith, Andrew ; Grocott, Michael P W</creator><creatorcontrib>Cumpstey, Andrew F ; Oldman, Alex H ; Martin, Daniel S ; Smith, Andrew ; Grocott, Michael P W</creatorcontrib><description>Patients admitted to intensive care often require treatment with invasive mechanical ventilation and high concentrations of oxygen. Mechanical ventilation can cause acute lung injury that may be exacerbated by oxygen therapy. Uncertainty remains about which oxygen therapy targets result in the best clinical outcomes for these patients. This review aims to determine whether higher or lower oxygenation targets are beneficial for mechanically ventilated adult patients. Excerpta Medica dataBASE, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, and Cochrane medical databases were searched from inception through to February 28, 2021. Randomized controlled trials comparing higher and lower oxygen targets in adult patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation via an endotracheal tube or tracheostomy in an intensive care setting. Study setting, participant type, participant numbers, and intervention targets were captured. Outcome measures included "mortality at longest follow-up" (primary), mechanical ventilator duration and free days, vasopressor-free days, patients on renal replacement therapy, renal replacement free days, cost benefit, and quality of life scores. Evidence certainty and risk of bias were evaluated using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. A random-effects models was used. Post hoc subgroup analysis looked separately at studies comparing hypoxemia versus normoxemia and normoxemia versus hyperoxemia. Data from eight trials (4,415 participants) were analyzed. Comparing higher and lower oxygen targets, there was no difference in mortality (odds ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.74-1.22), but heterogeneous and overlapping target ranges limit the validity and clinical relevance of this finding. Data from seven studies ( = 4,245) demonstrated targeting normoxemia compared with hyperoxemia may reduce mortality at longest follow-up (0.73 [0.57-0.95]) but this estimate had very low certainty. There was no difference in mortality between targeting relative hypoxemia or normoxemia (1.20 [0.83-1.73]). This systematic review and meta-analysis identified possible increased mortality with liberal oxygen targeting strategies and no difference in morbidity between high or low oxygen targets in mechanically ventilated adults. Findings were limited by substantial heterogeneity in study methodology and further research is urgently required to define optimal oxygen therapy targets.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2639-8028</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2639-8028</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000652</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35506014</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Systematic Review</subject><ispartof>Critical care explorations, 2022-04, Vol.4 (4), p.e0652-e0652</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-d607c5477f2bdfe748e995dcfd025cd2ed775b0db10b1f67671b08fc7ba6290d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-d607c5477f2bdfe748e995dcfd025cd2ed775b0db10b1f67671b08fc7ba6290d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9049025/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9049025/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35506014$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cumpstey, Andrew F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oldman, Alex H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Daniel S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grocott, Michael P W</creatorcontrib><title>Oxygen Targets During Mechanical Ventilation in the ICU: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><title>Critical care explorations</title><addtitle>Crit Care Explor</addtitle><description>Patients admitted to intensive care often require treatment with invasive mechanical ventilation and high concentrations of oxygen. Mechanical ventilation can cause acute lung injury that may be exacerbated by oxygen therapy. Uncertainty remains about which oxygen therapy targets result in the best clinical outcomes for these patients. This review aims to determine whether higher or lower oxygenation targets are beneficial for mechanically ventilated adult patients. Excerpta Medica dataBASE, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, and Cochrane medical databases were searched from inception through to February 28, 2021. Randomized controlled trials comparing higher and lower oxygen targets in adult patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation via an endotracheal tube or tracheostomy in an intensive care setting. Study setting, participant type, participant numbers, and intervention targets were captured. Outcome measures included "mortality at longest follow-up" (primary), mechanical ventilator duration and free days, vasopressor-free days, patients on renal replacement therapy, renal replacement free days, cost benefit, and quality of life scores. Evidence certainty and risk of bias were evaluated using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. A random-effects models was used. Post hoc subgroup analysis looked separately at studies comparing hypoxemia versus normoxemia and normoxemia versus hyperoxemia. Data from eight trials (4,415 participants) were analyzed. Comparing higher and lower oxygen targets, there was no difference in mortality (odds ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.74-1.22), but heterogeneous and overlapping target ranges limit the validity and clinical relevance of this finding. Data from seven studies ( = 4,245) demonstrated targeting normoxemia compared with hyperoxemia may reduce mortality at longest follow-up (0.73 [0.57-0.95]) but this estimate had very low certainty. There was no difference in mortality between targeting relative hypoxemia or normoxemia (1.20 [0.83-1.73]). This systematic review and meta-analysis identified possible increased mortality with liberal oxygen targeting strategies and no difference in morbidity between high or low oxygen targets in mechanically ventilated adults. Findings were limited by substantial heterogeneity in study methodology and further research is urgently required to define optimal oxygen therapy targets.</description><subject>Systematic Review</subject><issn>2639-8028</issn><issn>2639-8028</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU9v1DAQxS0EolXpN0DIRy4ptuM_MQekVSiwUqtKpeWINbGdrKusU-xsYb89hm2rbX2x5Xnzmzd6CL2l5IQSrT607ekJ2T9SsBfokMlaVw1hzcu99wE6zvmmaBgVVCj-Gh3UQhBJKD9EPy_-bAcf8RWkwc8Zf96kEAd87u0KYrAw4h8-zmGEOUwRh4jnlcfL9vojXuDv2zz7dalYfOnvgv-NIbrSOkO1iDBuc8hv0KsexuyP7-8jdP3l9Kr9Vp1dfF22i7PKcsXnykmirOBK9axzvVe88VoLZ3tHmLCOeaeU6IjrKOloL5VUtCNNb1UHkmni6iO03HHdBDfmNoU1pK2ZIJj_H1MaDKRidPQGyu6MgpBasTIcgOiaq4Y10PWa2KawPu1Yt5tu7Z0t-ycYn0CfVmJYmWG6M5pwXfwWwPt7QJp-bXyezTpk68cRop822TAptCS8IbRI-U5q05Rz8v3jGErMv6RNSdo8T7q0vdu3-Nj0kGv9FxqAozs</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Cumpstey, Andrew F</creator><creator>Oldman, Alex H</creator><creator>Martin, Daniel S</creator><creator>Smith, Andrew</creator><creator>Grocott, Michael P W</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><general>Wolters Kluwer</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>Oxygen Targets During Mechanical Ventilation in the ICU: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><author>Cumpstey, Andrew F ; Oldman, Alex H ; Martin, Daniel S ; Smith, Andrew ; Grocott, Michael P W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-d607c5477f2bdfe748e995dcfd025cd2ed775b0db10b1f67671b08fc7ba6290d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Systematic Review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cumpstey, Andrew F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oldman, Alex H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Daniel S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grocott, Michael P W</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Critical care explorations</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cumpstey, Andrew F</au><au>Oldman, Alex H</au><au>Martin, Daniel S</au><au>Smith, Andrew</au><au>Grocott, Michael P W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Oxygen Targets During Mechanical Ventilation in the ICU: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Critical care explorations</jtitle><addtitle>Crit Care Explor</addtitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e0652</spage><epage>e0652</epage><pages>e0652-e0652</pages><issn>2639-8028</issn><eissn>2639-8028</eissn><abstract>Patients admitted to intensive care often require treatment with invasive mechanical ventilation and high concentrations of oxygen. Mechanical ventilation can cause acute lung injury that may be exacerbated by oxygen therapy. Uncertainty remains about which oxygen therapy targets result in the best clinical outcomes for these patients. This review aims to determine whether higher or lower oxygenation targets are beneficial for mechanically ventilated adult patients. Excerpta Medica dataBASE, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, and Cochrane medical databases were searched from inception through to February 28, 2021. Randomized controlled trials comparing higher and lower oxygen targets in adult patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation via an endotracheal tube or tracheostomy in an intensive care setting. Study setting, participant type, participant numbers, and intervention targets were captured. Outcome measures included "mortality at longest follow-up" (primary), mechanical ventilator duration and free days, vasopressor-free days, patients on renal replacement therapy, renal replacement free days, cost benefit, and quality of life scores. Evidence certainty and risk of bias were evaluated using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. A random-effects models was used. Post hoc subgroup analysis looked separately at studies comparing hypoxemia versus normoxemia and normoxemia versus hyperoxemia. Data from eight trials (4,415 participants) were analyzed. Comparing higher and lower oxygen targets, there was no difference in mortality (odds ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.74-1.22), but heterogeneous and overlapping target ranges limit the validity and clinical relevance of this finding. Data from seven studies ( = 4,245) demonstrated targeting normoxemia compared with hyperoxemia may reduce mortality at longest follow-up (0.73 [0.57-0.95]) but this estimate had very low certainty. There was no difference in mortality between targeting relative hypoxemia or normoxemia (1.20 [0.83-1.73]). This systematic review and meta-analysis identified possible increased mortality with liberal oxygen targeting strategies and no difference in morbidity between high or low oxygen targets in mechanically ventilated adults. Findings were limited by substantial heterogeneity in study methodology and further research is urgently required to define optimal oxygen therapy targets.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>35506014</pmid><doi>10.1097/CCE.0000000000000652</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2639-8028
ispartof Critical care explorations, 2022-04, Vol.4 (4), p.e0652-e0652
issn 2639-8028
2639-8028
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a55021a56972474aa09347828abf90c8
source LWW Online; PubMed Central
subjects Systematic Review
title Oxygen Targets During Mechanical Ventilation in the ICU: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T02%3A47%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Oxygen%20Targets%20During%20Mechanical%20Ventilation%20in%20the%20ICU:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta-Analysis&rft.jtitle=Critical%20care%20explorations&rft.au=Cumpstey,%20Andrew%20F&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e0652&rft.epage=e0652&rft.pages=e0652-e0652&rft.issn=2639-8028&rft.eissn=2639-8028&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000652&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2659604801%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-d607c5477f2bdfe748e995dcfd025cd2ed775b0db10b1f67671b08fc7ba6290d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2659604801&rft_id=info:pmid/35506014&rfr_iscdi=true