Loading…

Effects of helical centerline stent vs. straight stent placement on blood flow velocity

As an approach to maintain patency in femoropopliteal stenting, a helical stent configuration was proposed, which showed improved patency in clinical trials. However, the effects of helical stent placement on the flow have not been quantitatively analyzed. The purpose of this study was to estimate f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in medical technology 2023-06, Vol.5, p.1196125
Main Authors: Kohata, Yutaro, Ohta, Makoto, Jin, Kazuyoshi, Anzai, Hitomi
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-b24a349dc0fb252094608ea639706149707122401408745bef4a1fcd8ba5498a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-b24a349dc0fb252094608ea639706149707122401408745bef4a1fcd8ba5498a3
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 1196125
container_title Frontiers in medical technology
container_volume 5
creator Kohata, Yutaro
Ohta, Makoto
Jin, Kazuyoshi
Anzai, Hitomi
description As an approach to maintain patency in femoropopliteal stenting, a helical stent configuration was proposed, which showed improved patency in clinical trials. However, the effects of helical stent placement on the flow have not been quantitatively analyzed. The purpose of this study was to estimate flow velocities to quantify the influence of helical stent placement. Helical and straight stents were implanted in three healthy pigs, and the flow velocities were estimated using the time-intensity curve (TIC) in the angiography images. The angiographic images indicated thinning of the leading edge of the contrast medium through the helically deformed artery, which was not observed in the straight stent. The slower rise of the TIC peak in the helical stent indicated faster travel of this thinner edge. Arterial expansion due to stenting was observed in all cases, and the expansion rate varied according to location. All cases of helical stent implantation showed that velocity was maintained (55.0%-71.3% velocity retention), unlike for straight stent implantation (43.0%-68.0% velocity retention); however, no significant difference was observed.
doi_str_mv 10.3389/fmedt.2023.1196125
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a58237d224b747d8b292245a4db8e74c</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_a58237d224b747d8b292245a4db8e74c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2827664227</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-b24a349dc0fb252094608ea639706149707122401408745bef4a1fcd8ba5498a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkkFvFCEUx4nR2Kb2C3gwc9TDrvCAAU6maaptsokXjUfCMLBLww4rsGv67WW6a9MaEvjn8d4PePwRek_wklKpPvutG-sSMNAlIaonwF-hc-gFXVAC6vUzfYYuS7nHGAMnAJS9RWdU0AaRcI5-3XjvbC1d8t3GxWBN7KybqssxTK4rtenuUJZNZRPWm3oK7aKxbjurNHVDTGnsfEx_uoOLyYb68A698SYWd3laL9DPrzc_rm8Xq-_f7q6vVgvLMa2LAZihTI0W-wE4YMV6LJ3pqRK4J6zNot2ZYcKwFIwPzjNDvB3lYDhT0tALdHfkjsnc610OW5MfdDJBPwZSXmuTa7DRacMlUDE23CCYaAhQTXPDxkE6wWxjfTmydvuhdXduQzbxBfTlzhQ2ep0OmmAQbeBG-HQkbP6ru71a6TmGGZEcK3wgLffj6bScfu9dqXobinUxmsmlfdEgQfQ9AxAtFY6pNqdSsvNPbIL17Ab96AY9u0Gf3NCKPjx_zVPJv7-nfwEc16_O</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2827664227</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of helical centerline stent vs. straight stent placement on blood flow velocity</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kohata, Yutaro ; Ohta, Makoto ; Jin, Kazuyoshi ; Anzai, Hitomi</creator><creatorcontrib>Kohata, Yutaro ; Ohta, Makoto ; Jin, Kazuyoshi ; Anzai, Hitomi</creatorcontrib><description>As an approach to maintain patency in femoropopliteal stenting, a helical stent configuration was proposed, which showed improved patency in clinical trials. However, the effects of helical stent placement on the flow have not been quantitatively analyzed. The purpose of this study was to estimate flow velocities to quantify the influence of helical stent placement. Helical and straight stents were implanted in three healthy pigs, and the flow velocities were estimated using the time-intensity curve (TIC) in the angiography images. The angiographic images indicated thinning of the leading edge of the contrast medium through the helically deformed artery, which was not observed in the straight stent. The slower rise of the TIC peak in the helical stent indicated faster travel of this thinner edge. Arterial expansion due to stenting was observed in all cases, and the expansion rate varied according to location. All cases of helical stent implantation showed that velocity was maintained (55.0%-71.3% velocity retention), unlike for straight stent implantation (43.0%-68.0% velocity retention); however, no significant difference was observed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2673-3129</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2673-3129</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fmedt.2023.1196125</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37333882</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: University of Birmingham, United Kingdom</publisher><subject>angiography images ; Biomechanics ; blood flow velocities ; helical stent ; Mechanics ; Medical Technology ; Physics ; swirling flow ; time-intensity curve (TIC)</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in medical technology, 2023-06, Vol.5, p.1196125</ispartof><rights>2023 Kohata, Ohta, Jin and Anzai.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><rights>2023 Kohata, Ohta, Jin and Anzai. 2023 Kohata, Ohta, Jin and Anzai</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-b24a349dc0fb252094608ea639706149707122401408745bef4a1fcd8ba5498a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-b24a349dc0fb252094608ea639706149707122401408745bef4a1fcd8ba5498a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8571-6400</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10272720/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10272720/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37333882$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-04185090$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kohata, Yutaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohta, Makoto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin, Kazuyoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anzai, Hitomi</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of helical centerline stent vs. straight stent placement on blood flow velocity</title><title>Frontiers in medical technology</title><addtitle>Front Med Technol</addtitle><description>As an approach to maintain patency in femoropopliteal stenting, a helical stent configuration was proposed, which showed improved patency in clinical trials. However, the effects of helical stent placement on the flow have not been quantitatively analyzed. The purpose of this study was to estimate flow velocities to quantify the influence of helical stent placement. Helical and straight stents were implanted in three healthy pigs, and the flow velocities were estimated using the time-intensity curve (TIC) in the angiography images. The angiographic images indicated thinning of the leading edge of the contrast medium through the helically deformed artery, which was not observed in the straight stent. The slower rise of the TIC peak in the helical stent indicated faster travel of this thinner edge. Arterial expansion due to stenting was observed in all cases, and the expansion rate varied according to location. All cases of helical stent implantation showed that velocity was maintained (55.0%-71.3% velocity retention), unlike for straight stent implantation (43.0%-68.0% velocity retention); however, no significant difference was observed.</description><subject>angiography images</subject><subject>Biomechanics</subject><subject>blood flow velocities</subject><subject>helical stent</subject><subject>Mechanics</subject><subject>Medical Technology</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>swirling flow</subject><subject>time-intensity curve (TIC)</subject><issn>2673-3129</issn><issn>2673-3129</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkkFvFCEUx4nR2Kb2C3gwc9TDrvCAAU6maaptsokXjUfCMLBLww4rsGv67WW6a9MaEvjn8d4PePwRek_wklKpPvutG-sSMNAlIaonwF-hc-gFXVAC6vUzfYYuS7nHGAMnAJS9RWdU0AaRcI5-3XjvbC1d8t3GxWBN7KybqssxTK4rtenuUJZNZRPWm3oK7aKxbjurNHVDTGnsfEx_uoOLyYb68A698SYWd3laL9DPrzc_rm8Xq-_f7q6vVgvLMa2LAZihTI0W-wE4YMV6LJ3pqRK4J6zNot2ZYcKwFIwPzjNDvB3lYDhT0tALdHfkjsnc610OW5MfdDJBPwZSXmuTa7DRacMlUDE23CCYaAhQTXPDxkE6wWxjfTmydvuhdXduQzbxBfTlzhQ2ep0OmmAQbeBG-HQkbP6ru71a6TmGGZEcK3wgLffj6bScfu9dqXobinUxmsmlfdEgQfQ9AxAtFY6pNqdSsvNPbIL17Ab96AY9u0Gf3NCKPjx_zVPJv7-nfwEc16_O</recordid><startdate>20230602</startdate><enddate>20230602</enddate><creator>Kohata, Yutaro</creator><creator>Ohta, Makoto</creator><creator>Jin, Kazuyoshi</creator><creator>Anzai, Hitomi</creator><general>University of Birmingham, United Kingdom</general><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8571-6400</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230602</creationdate><title>Effects of helical centerline stent vs. straight stent placement on blood flow velocity</title><author>Kohata, Yutaro ; Ohta, Makoto ; Jin, Kazuyoshi ; Anzai, Hitomi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-b24a349dc0fb252094608ea639706149707122401408745bef4a1fcd8ba5498a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>angiography images</topic><topic>Biomechanics</topic><topic>blood flow velocities</topic><topic>helical stent</topic><topic>Mechanics</topic><topic>Medical Technology</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>swirling flow</topic><topic>time-intensity curve (TIC)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kohata, Yutaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohta, Makoto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin, Kazuyoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anzai, Hitomi</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in medical technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kohata, Yutaro</au><au>Ohta, Makoto</au><au>Jin, Kazuyoshi</au><au>Anzai, Hitomi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of helical centerline stent vs. straight stent placement on blood flow velocity</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in medical technology</jtitle><addtitle>Front Med Technol</addtitle><date>2023-06-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>5</volume><spage>1196125</spage><pages>1196125-</pages><issn>2673-3129</issn><eissn>2673-3129</eissn><abstract>As an approach to maintain patency in femoropopliteal stenting, a helical stent configuration was proposed, which showed improved patency in clinical trials. However, the effects of helical stent placement on the flow have not been quantitatively analyzed. The purpose of this study was to estimate flow velocities to quantify the influence of helical stent placement. Helical and straight stents were implanted in three healthy pigs, and the flow velocities were estimated using the time-intensity curve (TIC) in the angiography images. The angiographic images indicated thinning of the leading edge of the contrast medium through the helically deformed artery, which was not observed in the straight stent. The slower rise of the TIC peak in the helical stent indicated faster travel of this thinner edge. Arterial expansion due to stenting was observed in all cases, and the expansion rate varied according to location. All cases of helical stent implantation showed that velocity was maintained (55.0%-71.3% velocity retention), unlike for straight stent implantation (43.0%-68.0% velocity retention); however, no significant difference was observed.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>University of Birmingham, United Kingdom</pub><pmid>37333882</pmid><doi>10.3389/fmedt.2023.1196125</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8571-6400</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2673-3129
ispartof Frontiers in medical technology, 2023-06, Vol.5, p.1196125
issn 2673-3129
2673-3129
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a58237d224b747d8b292245a4db8e74c
source PubMed Central
subjects angiography images
Biomechanics
blood flow velocities
helical stent
Mechanics
Medical Technology
Physics
swirling flow
time-intensity curve (TIC)
title Effects of helical centerline stent vs. straight stent placement on blood flow velocity
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T11%3A14%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20helical%20centerline%20stent%20vs.%20straight%20stent%20placement%20on%20blood%20flow%20velocity&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20medical%20technology&rft.au=Kohata,%20Yutaro&rft.date=2023-06-02&rft.volume=5&rft.spage=1196125&rft.pages=1196125-&rft.issn=2673-3129&rft.eissn=2673-3129&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fmedt.2023.1196125&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2827664227%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-b24a349dc0fb252094608ea639706149707122401408745bef4a1fcd8ba5498a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2827664227&rft_id=info:pmid/37333882&rfr_iscdi=true