Loading…

Enhancing the Ability of the Square Footing to Resist Positive and Negative Eccentric-inclined Loading Using an Inclined Skirt

Shallow and inclined skirted foundations on 30% sandy soil were examined in the experiment program. The study examined the effects of positive and negative eccentric-inclined loading on foundations. Experimental testing was done in a 600 × 600 mm box with a 50 x 50 mm square footing with a 10 mm thi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Engineering 2024-05, Vol.30 (5), p.186-204
Main Authors: Alhalbusi, Ghazwan Salah, Al-Saidi, A’amal A. H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 204
container_issue 5
container_start_page 186
container_title Journal of Engineering
container_volume 30
creator Alhalbusi, Ghazwan Salah
Al-Saidi, A’amal A. H.
description Shallow and inclined skirted foundations on 30% sandy soil were examined in the experiment program. The study examined the effects of positive and negative eccentric-inclined loading on foundations. Experimental testing was done in a 600 × 600 mm box with a 50 x 50 mm square footing with a 10 mm thickness. The skirt angles were 10°, 20°, and 30°, and the skirt depth was Ds was 0.5 B. Results showed that using skirts significantly increases load-bearing capacity and decreases tilting. Tilting reduces with a skirt, and skirt inclination (alpha) increases with similar loads. Inclined skirts decrease tilt by (2.3% to 0.66%) at e was 0.15 B, load angle (beta) was 15°, and alpha was 30° in the negative case. Tilting increases with eccentricity. As load inclination grows, unskirted and skirted foundations slide and rotate. For the positive case, the tilting decreases from 10% to 2% with e was 0.15 B, loading angle (beta) was 15°, and alpha was 30° with an inclination skirt. The amount of horizontal displacement of the skirted foundation is more than that of the unskirted foundation when comparing the failure load for the unskirted foundation with the same load for the skirted foundation. Loading a foundation without a skirt causes significant settlement and little horizontal displacement. Increasing the load angle is effective since it greatly affects horizontal displacement. In some situations, such as a negative eccentric-inclined load with Ds was 0.5 B, beta was 15, and e was 0.05 B, the influence of the loading angle may be decreased once failures with eccentricity. When eccentricity increases while the load angle (beta) remains constant, the horizontal displacement of a negative eccentric-inclined load reduces.
doi_str_mv 10.31026/j.eng.2024.05.12
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>doaj_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a5f0842a4fb44ee78df492ad94d64cd7</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_a5f0842a4fb44ee78df492ad94d64cd7</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>oai_doaj_org_article_a5f0842a4fb44ee78df492ad94d64cd7</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1087-d5e29cec2eb3e1bfdf666819c174fcc674bb712db14f99bb1b26b3e998eb36df3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kc1OGzEUhS1EJaKQB2DnF5ip7fHY4yVCoY0UASrN2vLPdXAINrWnSNn02UmGwuZenXvP-TYHoStK2o4SJr7vWkjblhHGW9K3lJ2hGesZabquU-doRiUTDSeyu0CLWneEEDYoKno5Q_-W6ckkF9MWj0-Ar23cx_GAc5jk45-_pgC-zXmcHBn_ghrriB9yjWN8A2ySx3ewNZNYOgdpLNE1Mbl9TODxOht_im7qaZqEV5-fx-dYxkv0LZh9hcX_PUeb2-Xvm5_N-v7H6uZ63ThKBtn4Hphy4BjYDqgNPgghBqoclTw4JyS3VlLmLeVBKWupZeLoVGo4BoQP3RytPrg-m51-LfHFlIPOJurpkMtWmzJGtwdt-kAGzgwPlnMAOfjAFTNecS-48_LIoh8sV3KtBcIXjxI99aF3-tiHPvWhSa8p694BSlqBGg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Enhancing the Ability of the Square Footing to Resist Positive and Negative Eccentric-inclined Loading Using an Inclined Skirt</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>Alhalbusi, Ghazwan Salah ; Al-Saidi, A’amal A. H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Alhalbusi, Ghazwan Salah ; Al-Saidi, A’amal A. H.</creatorcontrib><description>Shallow and inclined skirted foundations on 30% sandy soil were examined in the experiment program. The study examined the effects of positive and negative eccentric-inclined loading on foundations. Experimental testing was done in a 600 × 600 mm box with a 50 x 50 mm square footing with a 10 mm thickness. The skirt angles were 10°, 20°, and 30°, and the skirt depth was Ds was 0.5 B. Results showed that using skirts significantly increases load-bearing capacity and decreases tilting. Tilting reduces with a skirt, and skirt inclination (alpha) increases with similar loads. Inclined skirts decrease tilt by (2.3% to 0.66%) at e was 0.15 B, load angle (beta) was 15°, and alpha was 30° in the negative case. Tilting increases with eccentricity. As load inclination grows, unskirted and skirted foundations slide and rotate. For the positive case, the tilting decreases from 10% to 2% with e was 0.15 B, loading angle (beta) was 15°, and alpha was 30° with an inclination skirt. The amount of horizontal displacement of the skirted foundation is more than that of the unskirted foundation when comparing the failure load for the unskirted foundation with the same load for the skirted foundation. Loading a foundation without a skirt causes significant settlement and little horizontal displacement. Increasing the load angle is effective since it greatly affects horizontal displacement. In some situations, such as a negative eccentric-inclined load with Ds was 0.5 B, beta was 15, and e was 0.05 B, the influence of the loading angle may be decreased once failures with eccentricity. When eccentricity increases while the load angle (beta) remains constant, the horizontal displacement of a negative eccentric-inclined load reduces.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1726-4073</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2520-3339</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.31026/j.eng.2024.05.12</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>University of Baghdad</publisher><subject>Bearing capacity ; Inclined skirt ; Shallow foundation ; Tilting, Horizontal displacement</subject><ispartof>Journal of Engineering, 2024-05, Vol.30 (5), p.186-204</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,2102,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alhalbusi, Ghazwan Salah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Saidi, A’amal A. H.</creatorcontrib><title>Enhancing the Ability of the Square Footing to Resist Positive and Negative Eccentric-inclined Loading Using an Inclined Skirt</title><title>Journal of Engineering</title><description>Shallow and inclined skirted foundations on 30% sandy soil were examined in the experiment program. The study examined the effects of positive and negative eccentric-inclined loading on foundations. Experimental testing was done in a 600 × 600 mm box with a 50 x 50 mm square footing with a 10 mm thickness. The skirt angles were 10°, 20°, and 30°, and the skirt depth was Ds was 0.5 B. Results showed that using skirts significantly increases load-bearing capacity and decreases tilting. Tilting reduces with a skirt, and skirt inclination (alpha) increases with similar loads. Inclined skirts decrease tilt by (2.3% to 0.66%) at e was 0.15 B, load angle (beta) was 15°, and alpha was 30° in the negative case. Tilting increases with eccentricity. As load inclination grows, unskirted and skirted foundations slide and rotate. For the positive case, the tilting decreases from 10% to 2% with e was 0.15 B, loading angle (beta) was 15°, and alpha was 30° with an inclination skirt. The amount of horizontal displacement of the skirted foundation is more than that of the unskirted foundation when comparing the failure load for the unskirted foundation with the same load for the skirted foundation. Loading a foundation without a skirt causes significant settlement and little horizontal displacement. Increasing the load angle is effective since it greatly affects horizontal displacement. In some situations, such as a negative eccentric-inclined load with Ds was 0.5 B, beta was 15, and e was 0.05 B, the influence of the loading angle may be decreased once failures with eccentricity. When eccentricity increases while the load angle (beta) remains constant, the horizontal displacement of a negative eccentric-inclined load reduces.</description><subject>Bearing capacity</subject><subject>Inclined skirt</subject><subject>Shallow foundation</subject><subject>Tilting, Horizontal displacement</subject><issn>1726-4073</issn><issn>2520-3339</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kc1OGzEUhS1EJaKQB2DnF5ip7fHY4yVCoY0UASrN2vLPdXAINrWnSNn02UmGwuZenXvP-TYHoStK2o4SJr7vWkjblhHGW9K3lJ2hGesZabquU-doRiUTDSeyu0CLWneEEDYoKno5Q_-W6ckkF9MWj0-Ar23cx_GAc5jk45-_pgC-zXmcHBn_ghrriB9yjWN8A2ySx3ewNZNYOgdpLNE1Mbl9TODxOht_im7qaZqEV5-fx-dYxkv0LZh9hcX_PUeb2-Xvm5_N-v7H6uZ63ThKBtn4Hphy4BjYDqgNPgghBqoclTw4JyS3VlLmLeVBKWupZeLoVGo4BoQP3RytPrg-m51-LfHFlIPOJurpkMtWmzJGtwdt-kAGzgwPlnMAOfjAFTNecS-48_LIoh8sV3KtBcIXjxI99aF3-tiHPvWhSa8p694BSlqBGg</recordid><startdate>20240501</startdate><enddate>20240501</enddate><creator>Alhalbusi, Ghazwan Salah</creator><creator>Al-Saidi, A’amal A. H.</creator><general>University of Baghdad</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240501</creationdate><title>Enhancing the Ability of the Square Footing to Resist Positive and Negative Eccentric-inclined Loading Using an Inclined Skirt</title><author>Alhalbusi, Ghazwan Salah ; Al-Saidi, A’amal A. H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1087-d5e29cec2eb3e1bfdf666819c174fcc674bb712db14f99bb1b26b3e998eb36df3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Bearing capacity</topic><topic>Inclined skirt</topic><topic>Shallow foundation</topic><topic>Tilting, Horizontal displacement</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alhalbusi, Ghazwan Salah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Saidi, A’amal A. H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of Engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alhalbusi, Ghazwan Salah</au><au>Al-Saidi, A’amal A. H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Enhancing the Ability of the Square Footing to Resist Positive and Negative Eccentric-inclined Loading Using an Inclined Skirt</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Engineering</jtitle><date>2024-05-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>186</spage><epage>204</epage><pages>186-204</pages><issn>1726-4073</issn><eissn>2520-3339</eissn><abstract>Shallow and inclined skirted foundations on 30% sandy soil were examined in the experiment program. The study examined the effects of positive and negative eccentric-inclined loading on foundations. Experimental testing was done in a 600 × 600 mm box with a 50 x 50 mm square footing with a 10 mm thickness. The skirt angles were 10°, 20°, and 30°, and the skirt depth was Ds was 0.5 B. Results showed that using skirts significantly increases load-bearing capacity and decreases tilting. Tilting reduces with a skirt, and skirt inclination (alpha) increases with similar loads. Inclined skirts decrease tilt by (2.3% to 0.66%) at e was 0.15 B, load angle (beta) was 15°, and alpha was 30° in the negative case. Tilting increases with eccentricity. As load inclination grows, unskirted and skirted foundations slide and rotate. For the positive case, the tilting decreases from 10% to 2% with e was 0.15 B, loading angle (beta) was 15°, and alpha was 30° with an inclination skirt. The amount of horizontal displacement of the skirted foundation is more than that of the unskirted foundation when comparing the failure load for the unskirted foundation with the same load for the skirted foundation. Loading a foundation without a skirt causes significant settlement and little horizontal displacement. Increasing the load angle is effective since it greatly affects horizontal displacement. In some situations, such as a negative eccentric-inclined load with Ds was 0.5 B, beta was 15, and e was 0.05 B, the influence of the loading angle may be decreased once failures with eccentricity. When eccentricity increases while the load angle (beta) remains constant, the horizontal displacement of a negative eccentric-inclined load reduces.</abstract><pub>University of Baghdad</pub><doi>10.31026/j.eng.2024.05.12</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1726-4073
ispartof Journal of Engineering, 2024-05, Vol.30 (5), p.186-204
issn 1726-4073
2520-3339
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a5f0842a4fb44ee78df492ad94d64cd7
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
subjects Bearing capacity
Inclined skirt
Shallow foundation
Tilting, Horizontal displacement
title Enhancing the Ability of the Square Footing to Resist Positive and Negative Eccentric-inclined Loading Using an Inclined Skirt
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T03%3A38%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-doaj_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Enhancing%20the%20Ability%20of%20the%20Square%20Footing%20to%20Resist%20Positive%20and%20Negative%20Eccentric-inclined%20Loading%20Using%20an%20Inclined%20Skirt&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Engineering&rft.au=Alhalbusi,%20Ghazwan%20Salah&rft.date=2024-05-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=186&rft.epage=204&rft.pages=186-204&rft.issn=1726-4073&rft.eissn=2520-3339&rft_id=info:doi/10.31026/j.eng.2024.05.12&rft_dat=%3Cdoaj_cross%3Eoai_doaj_org_article_a5f0842a4fb44ee78df492ad94d64cd7%3C/doaj_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1087-d5e29cec2eb3e1bfdf666819c174fcc674bb712db14f99bb1b26b3e998eb36df3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true