Loading…

The retrospective study for effectiveness of cervical cerclage in preventing recurrent preterm birth

This study aimed to clarify the effectiveness of cervical cerclage in preventing recurrent preterm births. A retrospective study was conducted using the perinatal registration database of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology for the Perinatal Center from 2014 to 2016. The efficacies of his...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Taiwanese journal of obstetrics & gynecology 2022-01, Vol.61 (1), p.63-69
Main Authors: Seyama, Rie, Makino, Shintaro, Takeda, Jun, Takeda, Satoru, Itakura, Atsuo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study aimed to clarify the effectiveness of cervical cerclage in preventing recurrent preterm births. A retrospective study was conducted using the perinatal registration database of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology for the Perinatal Center from 2014 to 2016. The efficacies of history-indicated, ultrasound-indicated, and physical examination-indicated cerclage as preventive treatments for women with a history of preterm birth were evaluated by comparing cerclage and non-cerclage cases. Fisher's exact test was performed to evaluate any significant differences in patient backgrounds. Prior to the evaluation, propensity score matching was performed for history-indicated and ultrasound-indicated cerclage patients. For this study, 6060 multiparous women with a history of preterm birth were reviewed. After excluding 17 patients with unknown indications for cervical cerclage, 6043 patients were included in the study. History-indicated and ultrasound-indicated cerclage did not reduce the risk of preterm birth in subsequent pregnancies for any of the pregnancy periods (p = 0.413, p = 1.000). In contrast, physical examination-indicated cerclage significantly reduced the risk of subsequent preterm births for all pregnancy periods (p 
ISSN:1028-4559
DOI:10.1016/j.tjog.2021.11.012