Loading…

Evaluation of a short instrument for measuring health-related quality of life in oncological patients in routine care (HELP-6): an observational study

Patient-reported outcomes have not been sufficiently implemented into the routine care of cancer patients because the existing instruments are often too long and complex or not cancer-specific. The aim of this study is the determination of psychometric properties and item reduction of a newly develo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in psychology 2023-05, Vol.14, p.1158449-1158449
Main Authors: Schrage, Theresa, Görlach, Mirja, Betz, Christian Stephan, Bokemeyer, Carsten, Kröger, Nicolaus, Mueller, Volkmar, Krüll, Andreas, Schulz, Holger, Bleich, Christiane
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-919a04127c13879dcea5ce7d7df35f826682fb4fe535a164c91ab9c5da4ee4383
container_end_page 1158449
container_issue
container_start_page 1158449
container_title Frontiers in psychology
container_volume 14
creator Schrage, Theresa
Görlach, Mirja
Betz, Christian Stephan
Bokemeyer, Carsten
Kröger, Nicolaus
Mueller, Volkmar
Krüll, Andreas
Schulz, Holger
Bleich, Christiane
description Patient-reported outcomes have not been sufficiently implemented into the routine care of cancer patients because the existing instruments are often too long and complex or not cancer-specific. The aim of this study is the determination of psychometric properties and item reduction of a newly developed health-related quality of life (HrQoL) questionnaire for use in oncological clinical routines. This observational study with a repeated measurements design included oncological inpatients and outpatients. A total of 630 patients participated at the first point of measurement and 404 at the second point of measurement. To evaluate the instrument, we conducted hierarchical confirmative factor analyses and for further validation correlated the resulting factors with standardized and validated HrQoL measurements. Test-retest reliability and responsiveness to change were tested. The developed questionnaire "HELP-6" ("Hamburg Inventory for Measuring Quality of Life in Oncological Patients") has a six-factor structure and has moderate-to-good convergent validity ( = -0.25 --0.68). Test-retest reliability was moderate-to-good ( =0.56-0.81, < 0.001). Indications for responsiveness to change were found for three dimensions. The final version of the questionnaire HELP-6 has six dimensions with one item each. With the HELP-6 instrument for measuring HrQoL in cancer patients, we provide a short and practical patient-reported outcome instrument. Though responsiveness to change could not be confirmed for all dimensions in this study, the HELP-6 includes time-efficient completion and evaluation and is informative in relevant HrQoL dimensions of cancer patients. Therefore, the HELP-6 poses an important addition to inpatient and outpatient routine cancer care. This study was registered at Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/y7xce/), on 9 June 2018.
doi_str_mv 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1158449
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a6a301d91d6041ec973b0a5c68d41d64</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_a6a301d91d6041ec973b0a5c68d41d64</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2821643025</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-919a04127c13879dcea5ce7d7df35f826682fb4fe535a164c91ab9c5da4ee4383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVks1q3DAUhU1paUKaF-iiaJkuPNWfZbubUsK0CQy0i3YtruVrj4LGmkjywLxInrean4ZEG4mje757L5yi-MjoQoim_TJs435ccMrFgrGqkbJ9U1wypWTJaN28ffG-KK5jfKD5SMop5e-LC1FzRVtVXRZPyx24GZL1E_EDARLXPiRip5jCvMEpkcEHskGIc7DTSNYILq3LgA4S9uRxBmfT_mB1dsDsI34y3vnRGnBkm8GZEQ968HOyExIDAcnN3XL1u1SfvxLIji5i2B1nyJ6Y5n7_oXg3gIt4fb6vir8_ln9u78rVr5_3t99XpZGcprJlLVDJeG2YaOq2NwiVwbqv-0FUQ8OVavjQyQErUQFT0rQMutZUPUhEKRpxVdyfuL2HB70NdgNhrz1YfRR8GDWEZI1DDQoEZX3LepVbomlr0dHcTjW9zJrMrG8n1nbuNphnmVIA9wr6-meyaz36nWaU86aiIhNuzoTgH2eMSW9sNOgcTOjnqHnD8xKC8iqX8lOpCT7GgMNzH0b1ISD6GBB9CIg-BySbPr2c8NnyPw7iH1Zyurk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2821643025</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of a short instrument for measuring health-related quality of life in oncological patients in routine care (HELP-6): an observational study</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Schrage, Theresa ; Görlach, Mirja ; Betz, Christian Stephan ; Bokemeyer, Carsten ; Kröger, Nicolaus ; Mueller, Volkmar ; Krüll, Andreas ; Schulz, Holger ; Bleich, Christiane</creator><creatorcontrib>Schrage, Theresa ; Görlach, Mirja ; Betz, Christian Stephan ; Bokemeyer, Carsten ; Kröger, Nicolaus ; Mueller, Volkmar ; Krüll, Andreas ; Schulz, Holger ; Bleich, Christiane</creatorcontrib><description>Patient-reported outcomes have not been sufficiently implemented into the routine care of cancer patients because the existing instruments are often too long and complex or not cancer-specific. The aim of this study is the determination of psychometric properties and item reduction of a newly developed health-related quality of life (HrQoL) questionnaire for use in oncological clinical routines. This observational study with a repeated measurements design included oncological inpatients and outpatients. A total of 630 patients participated at the first point of measurement and 404 at the second point of measurement. To evaluate the instrument, we conducted hierarchical confirmative factor analyses and for further validation correlated the resulting factors with standardized and validated HrQoL measurements. Test-retest reliability and responsiveness to change were tested. The developed questionnaire "HELP-6" ("Hamburg Inventory for Measuring Quality of Life in Oncological Patients") has a six-factor structure and has moderate-to-good convergent validity ( = -0.25 --0.68). Test-retest reliability was moderate-to-good ( =0.56-0.81, &lt; 0.001). Indications for responsiveness to change were found for three dimensions. The final version of the questionnaire HELP-6 has six dimensions with one item each. With the HELP-6 instrument for measuring HrQoL in cancer patients, we provide a short and practical patient-reported outcome instrument. Though responsiveness to change could not be confirmed for all dimensions in this study, the HELP-6 includes time-efficient completion and evaluation and is informative in relevant HrQoL dimensions of cancer patients. Therefore, the HELP-6 poses an important addition to inpatient and outpatient routine cancer care. This study was registered at Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/y7xce/), on 9 June 2018.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1664-1078</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1664-1078</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1158449</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37260965</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Frontiers Media S.A</publisher><subject>confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) ; health-related quality of life (HrQoL) ; oncological routine care ; psycho-oncology ; Psychology ; psychometrics</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in psychology, 2023-05, Vol.14, p.1158449-1158449</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023 Schrage, Görlach, Betz, Bokemeyer, Kröger, Mueller, Krüll, Schulz and Bleich.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Schrage, Görlach, Betz, Bokemeyer, Kröger, Mueller, Krüll, Schulz and Bleich. 2023 Schrage, Görlach, Betz, Bokemeyer, Kröger, Mueller, Krüll, Schulz and Bleich</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-919a04127c13879dcea5ce7d7df35f826682fb4fe535a164c91ab9c5da4ee4383</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10228503/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10228503/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37260965$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schrage, Theresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Görlach, Mirja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Betz, Christian Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bokemeyer, Carsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kröger, Nicolaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mueller, Volkmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krüll, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulz, Holger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bleich, Christiane</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of a short instrument for measuring health-related quality of life in oncological patients in routine care (HELP-6): an observational study</title><title>Frontiers in psychology</title><addtitle>Front Psychol</addtitle><description>Patient-reported outcomes have not been sufficiently implemented into the routine care of cancer patients because the existing instruments are often too long and complex or not cancer-specific. The aim of this study is the determination of psychometric properties and item reduction of a newly developed health-related quality of life (HrQoL) questionnaire for use in oncological clinical routines. This observational study with a repeated measurements design included oncological inpatients and outpatients. A total of 630 patients participated at the first point of measurement and 404 at the second point of measurement. To evaluate the instrument, we conducted hierarchical confirmative factor analyses and for further validation correlated the resulting factors with standardized and validated HrQoL measurements. Test-retest reliability and responsiveness to change were tested. The developed questionnaire "HELP-6" ("Hamburg Inventory for Measuring Quality of Life in Oncological Patients") has a six-factor structure and has moderate-to-good convergent validity ( = -0.25 --0.68). Test-retest reliability was moderate-to-good ( =0.56-0.81, &lt; 0.001). Indications for responsiveness to change were found for three dimensions. The final version of the questionnaire HELP-6 has six dimensions with one item each. With the HELP-6 instrument for measuring HrQoL in cancer patients, we provide a short and practical patient-reported outcome instrument. Though responsiveness to change could not be confirmed for all dimensions in this study, the HELP-6 includes time-efficient completion and evaluation and is informative in relevant HrQoL dimensions of cancer patients. Therefore, the HELP-6 poses an important addition to inpatient and outpatient routine cancer care. This study was registered at Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/y7xce/), on 9 June 2018.</description><subject>confirmatory factor analysis (CFA)</subject><subject>health-related quality of life (HrQoL)</subject><subject>oncological routine care</subject><subject>psycho-oncology</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>psychometrics</subject><issn>1664-1078</issn><issn>1664-1078</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVks1q3DAUhU1paUKaF-iiaJkuPNWfZbubUsK0CQy0i3YtruVrj4LGmkjywLxInrean4ZEG4mje757L5yi-MjoQoim_TJs435ccMrFgrGqkbJ9U1wypWTJaN28ffG-KK5jfKD5SMop5e-LC1FzRVtVXRZPyx24GZL1E_EDARLXPiRip5jCvMEpkcEHskGIc7DTSNYILq3LgA4S9uRxBmfT_mB1dsDsI34y3vnRGnBkm8GZEQ968HOyExIDAcnN3XL1u1SfvxLIji5i2B1nyJ6Y5n7_oXg3gIt4fb6vir8_ln9u78rVr5_3t99XpZGcprJlLVDJeG2YaOq2NwiVwbqv-0FUQ8OVavjQyQErUQFT0rQMutZUPUhEKRpxVdyfuL2HB70NdgNhrz1YfRR8GDWEZI1DDQoEZX3LepVbomlr0dHcTjW9zJrMrG8n1nbuNphnmVIA9wr6-meyaz36nWaU86aiIhNuzoTgH2eMSW9sNOgcTOjnqHnD8xKC8iqX8lOpCT7GgMNzH0b1ISD6GBB9CIg-BySbPr2c8NnyPw7iH1Zyurk</recordid><startdate>20230516</startdate><enddate>20230516</enddate><creator>Schrage, Theresa</creator><creator>Görlach, Mirja</creator><creator>Betz, Christian Stephan</creator><creator>Bokemeyer, Carsten</creator><creator>Kröger, Nicolaus</creator><creator>Mueller, Volkmar</creator><creator>Krüll, Andreas</creator><creator>Schulz, Holger</creator><creator>Bleich, Christiane</creator><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230516</creationdate><title>Evaluation of a short instrument for measuring health-related quality of life in oncological patients in routine care (HELP-6): an observational study</title><author>Schrage, Theresa ; Görlach, Mirja ; Betz, Christian Stephan ; Bokemeyer, Carsten ; Kröger, Nicolaus ; Mueller, Volkmar ; Krüll, Andreas ; Schulz, Holger ; Bleich, Christiane</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-919a04127c13879dcea5ce7d7df35f826682fb4fe535a164c91ab9c5da4ee4383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>confirmatory factor analysis (CFA)</topic><topic>health-related quality of life (HrQoL)</topic><topic>oncological routine care</topic><topic>psycho-oncology</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>psychometrics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schrage, Theresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Görlach, Mirja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Betz, Christian Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bokemeyer, Carsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kröger, Nicolaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mueller, Volkmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krüll, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulz, Holger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bleich, Christiane</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schrage, Theresa</au><au>Görlach, Mirja</au><au>Betz, Christian Stephan</au><au>Bokemeyer, Carsten</au><au>Kröger, Nicolaus</au><au>Mueller, Volkmar</au><au>Krüll, Andreas</au><au>Schulz, Holger</au><au>Bleich, Christiane</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of a short instrument for measuring health-related quality of life in oncological patients in routine care (HELP-6): an observational study</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Front Psychol</addtitle><date>2023-05-16</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>14</volume><spage>1158449</spage><epage>1158449</epage><pages>1158449-1158449</pages><issn>1664-1078</issn><eissn>1664-1078</eissn><abstract>Patient-reported outcomes have not been sufficiently implemented into the routine care of cancer patients because the existing instruments are often too long and complex or not cancer-specific. The aim of this study is the determination of psychometric properties and item reduction of a newly developed health-related quality of life (HrQoL) questionnaire for use in oncological clinical routines. This observational study with a repeated measurements design included oncological inpatients and outpatients. A total of 630 patients participated at the first point of measurement and 404 at the second point of measurement. To evaluate the instrument, we conducted hierarchical confirmative factor analyses and for further validation correlated the resulting factors with standardized and validated HrQoL measurements. Test-retest reliability and responsiveness to change were tested. The developed questionnaire "HELP-6" ("Hamburg Inventory for Measuring Quality of Life in Oncological Patients") has a six-factor structure and has moderate-to-good convergent validity ( = -0.25 --0.68). Test-retest reliability was moderate-to-good ( =0.56-0.81, &lt; 0.001). Indications for responsiveness to change were found for three dimensions. The final version of the questionnaire HELP-6 has six dimensions with one item each. With the HELP-6 instrument for measuring HrQoL in cancer patients, we provide a short and practical patient-reported outcome instrument. Though responsiveness to change could not be confirmed for all dimensions in this study, the HELP-6 includes time-efficient completion and evaluation and is informative in relevant HrQoL dimensions of cancer patients. Therefore, the HELP-6 poses an important addition to inpatient and outpatient routine cancer care. This study was registered at Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/y7xce/), on 9 June 2018.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Frontiers Media S.A</pub><pmid>37260965</pmid><doi>10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1158449</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1664-1078
ispartof Frontiers in psychology, 2023-05, Vol.14, p.1158449-1158449
issn 1664-1078
1664-1078
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a6a301d91d6041ec973b0a5c68d41d64
source PubMed Central
subjects confirmatory factor analysis (CFA)
health-related quality of life (HrQoL)
oncological routine care
psycho-oncology
Psychology
psychometrics
title Evaluation of a short instrument for measuring health-related quality of life in oncological patients in routine care (HELP-6): an observational study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T16%3A09%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20a%20short%20instrument%20for%20measuring%20health-related%20quality%20of%20life%20in%20oncological%20patients%20in%20routine%20care%20(HELP-6):%20an%20observational%20study&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20psychology&rft.au=Schrage,%20Theresa&rft.date=2023-05-16&rft.volume=14&rft.spage=1158449&rft.epage=1158449&rft.pages=1158449-1158449&rft.issn=1664-1078&rft.eissn=1664-1078&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1158449&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2821643025%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-919a04127c13879dcea5ce7d7df35f826682fb4fe535a164c91ab9c5da4ee4383%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2821643025&rft_id=info:pmid/37260965&rfr_iscdi=true