Loading…
Evaluation of a short instrument for measuring health-related quality of life in oncological patients in routine care (HELP-6): an observational study
Patient-reported outcomes have not been sufficiently implemented into the routine care of cancer patients because the existing instruments are often too long and complex or not cancer-specific. The aim of this study is the determination of psychometric properties and item reduction of a newly develo...
Saved in:
Published in: | Frontiers in psychology 2023-05, Vol.14, p.1158449-1158449 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-919a04127c13879dcea5ce7d7df35f826682fb4fe535a164c91ab9c5da4ee4383 |
container_end_page | 1158449 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 1158449 |
container_title | Frontiers in psychology |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Schrage, Theresa Görlach, Mirja Betz, Christian Stephan Bokemeyer, Carsten Kröger, Nicolaus Mueller, Volkmar Krüll, Andreas Schulz, Holger Bleich, Christiane |
description | Patient-reported outcomes have not been sufficiently implemented into the routine care of cancer patients because the existing instruments are often too long and complex or not cancer-specific. The aim of this study is the determination of psychometric properties and item reduction of a newly developed health-related quality of life (HrQoL) questionnaire for use in oncological clinical routines.
This observational study with a repeated measurements design included oncological inpatients and outpatients. A total of 630 patients participated at the first point of measurement and 404 at the second point of measurement. To evaluate the instrument, we conducted hierarchical confirmative factor analyses and for further validation correlated the resulting factors with standardized and validated HrQoL measurements. Test-retest reliability and responsiveness to change were tested.
The developed questionnaire "HELP-6" ("Hamburg Inventory for Measuring Quality of Life in Oncological Patients") has a six-factor structure and has moderate-to-good convergent validity (
= -0.25 --0.68). Test-retest reliability was moderate-to-good (
=0.56-0.81,
< 0.001). Indications for responsiveness to change were found for three dimensions. The final version of the questionnaire HELP-6 has six dimensions with one item each.
With the HELP-6 instrument for measuring HrQoL in cancer patients, we provide a short and practical patient-reported outcome instrument. Though responsiveness to change could not be confirmed for all dimensions in this study, the HELP-6 includes time-efficient completion and evaluation and is informative in relevant HrQoL dimensions of cancer patients. Therefore, the HELP-6 poses an important addition to inpatient and outpatient routine cancer care.
This study was registered at Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/y7xce/), on 9 June 2018. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1158449 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a6a301d91d6041ec973b0a5c68d41d64</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_a6a301d91d6041ec973b0a5c68d41d64</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2821643025</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-919a04127c13879dcea5ce7d7df35f826682fb4fe535a164c91ab9c5da4ee4383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVks1q3DAUhU1paUKaF-iiaJkuPNWfZbubUsK0CQy0i3YtruVrj4LGmkjywLxInrean4ZEG4mje757L5yi-MjoQoim_TJs435ccMrFgrGqkbJ9U1wypWTJaN28ffG-KK5jfKD5SMop5e-LC1FzRVtVXRZPyx24GZL1E_EDARLXPiRip5jCvMEpkcEHskGIc7DTSNYILq3LgA4S9uRxBmfT_mB1dsDsI34y3vnRGnBkm8GZEQ968HOyExIDAcnN3XL1u1SfvxLIji5i2B1nyJ6Y5n7_oXg3gIt4fb6vir8_ln9u78rVr5_3t99XpZGcprJlLVDJeG2YaOq2NwiVwbqv-0FUQ8OVavjQyQErUQFT0rQMutZUPUhEKRpxVdyfuL2HB70NdgNhrz1YfRR8GDWEZI1DDQoEZX3LepVbomlr0dHcTjW9zJrMrG8n1nbuNphnmVIA9wr6-meyaz36nWaU86aiIhNuzoTgH2eMSW9sNOgcTOjnqHnD8xKC8iqX8lOpCT7GgMNzH0b1ISD6GBB9CIg-BySbPr2c8NnyPw7iH1Zyurk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2821643025</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of a short instrument for measuring health-related quality of life in oncological patients in routine care (HELP-6): an observational study</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Schrage, Theresa ; Görlach, Mirja ; Betz, Christian Stephan ; Bokemeyer, Carsten ; Kröger, Nicolaus ; Mueller, Volkmar ; Krüll, Andreas ; Schulz, Holger ; Bleich, Christiane</creator><creatorcontrib>Schrage, Theresa ; Görlach, Mirja ; Betz, Christian Stephan ; Bokemeyer, Carsten ; Kröger, Nicolaus ; Mueller, Volkmar ; Krüll, Andreas ; Schulz, Holger ; Bleich, Christiane</creatorcontrib><description>Patient-reported outcomes have not been sufficiently implemented into the routine care of cancer patients because the existing instruments are often too long and complex or not cancer-specific. The aim of this study is the determination of psychometric properties and item reduction of a newly developed health-related quality of life (HrQoL) questionnaire for use in oncological clinical routines.
This observational study with a repeated measurements design included oncological inpatients and outpatients. A total of 630 patients participated at the first point of measurement and 404 at the second point of measurement. To evaluate the instrument, we conducted hierarchical confirmative factor analyses and for further validation correlated the resulting factors with standardized and validated HrQoL measurements. Test-retest reliability and responsiveness to change were tested.
The developed questionnaire "HELP-6" ("Hamburg Inventory for Measuring Quality of Life in Oncological Patients") has a six-factor structure and has moderate-to-good convergent validity (
= -0.25 --0.68). Test-retest reliability was moderate-to-good (
=0.56-0.81,
< 0.001). Indications for responsiveness to change were found for three dimensions. The final version of the questionnaire HELP-6 has six dimensions with one item each.
With the HELP-6 instrument for measuring HrQoL in cancer patients, we provide a short and practical patient-reported outcome instrument. Though responsiveness to change could not be confirmed for all dimensions in this study, the HELP-6 includes time-efficient completion and evaluation and is informative in relevant HrQoL dimensions of cancer patients. Therefore, the HELP-6 poses an important addition to inpatient and outpatient routine cancer care.
This study was registered at Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/y7xce/), on 9 June 2018.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1664-1078</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1664-1078</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1158449</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37260965</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Frontiers Media S.A</publisher><subject>confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) ; health-related quality of life (HrQoL) ; oncological routine care ; psycho-oncology ; Psychology ; psychometrics</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in psychology, 2023-05, Vol.14, p.1158449-1158449</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023 Schrage, Görlach, Betz, Bokemeyer, Kröger, Mueller, Krüll, Schulz and Bleich.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Schrage, Görlach, Betz, Bokemeyer, Kröger, Mueller, Krüll, Schulz and Bleich. 2023 Schrage, Görlach, Betz, Bokemeyer, Kröger, Mueller, Krüll, Schulz and Bleich</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-919a04127c13879dcea5ce7d7df35f826682fb4fe535a164c91ab9c5da4ee4383</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10228503/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10228503/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37260965$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schrage, Theresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Görlach, Mirja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Betz, Christian Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bokemeyer, Carsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kröger, Nicolaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mueller, Volkmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krüll, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulz, Holger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bleich, Christiane</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of a short instrument for measuring health-related quality of life in oncological patients in routine care (HELP-6): an observational study</title><title>Frontiers in psychology</title><addtitle>Front Psychol</addtitle><description>Patient-reported outcomes have not been sufficiently implemented into the routine care of cancer patients because the existing instruments are often too long and complex or not cancer-specific. The aim of this study is the determination of psychometric properties and item reduction of a newly developed health-related quality of life (HrQoL) questionnaire for use in oncological clinical routines.
This observational study with a repeated measurements design included oncological inpatients and outpatients. A total of 630 patients participated at the first point of measurement and 404 at the second point of measurement. To evaluate the instrument, we conducted hierarchical confirmative factor analyses and for further validation correlated the resulting factors with standardized and validated HrQoL measurements. Test-retest reliability and responsiveness to change were tested.
The developed questionnaire "HELP-6" ("Hamburg Inventory for Measuring Quality of Life in Oncological Patients") has a six-factor structure and has moderate-to-good convergent validity (
= -0.25 --0.68). Test-retest reliability was moderate-to-good (
=0.56-0.81,
< 0.001). Indications for responsiveness to change were found for three dimensions. The final version of the questionnaire HELP-6 has six dimensions with one item each.
With the HELP-6 instrument for measuring HrQoL in cancer patients, we provide a short and practical patient-reported outcome instrument. Though responsiveness to change could not be confirmed for all dimensions in this study, the HELP-6 includes time-efficient completion and evaluation and is informative in relevant HrQoL dimensions of cancer patients. Therefore, the HELP-6 poses an important addition to inpatient and outpatient routine cancer care.
This study was registered at Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/y7xce/), on 9 June 2018.</description><subject>confirmatory factor analysis (CFA)</subject><subject>health-related quality of life (HrQoL)</subject><subject>oncological routine care</subject><subject>psycho-oncology</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>psychometrics</subject><issn>1664-1078</issn><issn>1664-1078</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVks1q3DAUhU1paUKaF-iiaJkuPNWfZbubUsK0CQy0i3YtruVrj4LGmkjywLxInrean4ZEG4mje757L5yi-MjoQoim_TJs435ccMrFgrGqkbJ9U1wypWTJaN28ffG-KK5jfKD5SMop5e-LC1FzRVtVXRZPyx24GZL1E_EDARLXPiRip5jCvMEpkcEHskGIc7DTSNYILq3LgA4S9uRxBmfT_mB1dsDsI34y3vnRGnBkm8GZEQ968HOyExIDAcnN3XL1u1SfvxLIji5i2B1nyJ6Y5n7_oXg3gIt4fb6vir8_ln9u78rVr5_3t99XpZGcprJlLVDJeG2YaOq2NwiVwbqv-0FUQ8OVavjQyQErUQFT0rQMutZUPUhEKRpxVdyfuL2HB70NdgNhrz1YfRR8GDWEZI1DDQoEZX3LepVbomlr0dHcTjW9zJrMrG8n1nbuNphnmVIA9wr6-meyaz36nWaU86aiIhNuzoTgH2eMSW9sNOgcTOjnqHnD8xKC8iqX8lOpCT7GgMNzH0b1ISD6GBB9CIg-BySbPr2c8NnyPw7iH1Zyurk</recordid><startdate>20230516</startdate><enddate>20230516</enddate><creator>Schrage, Theresa</creator><creator>Görlach, Mirja</creator><creator>Betz, Christian Stephan</creator><creator>Bokemeyer, Carsten</creator><creator>Kröger, Nicolaus</creator><creator>Mueller, Volkmar</creator><creator>Krüll, Andreas</creator><creator>Schulz, Holger</creator><creator>Bleich, Christiane</creator><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230516</creationdate><title>Evaluation of a short instrument for measuring health-related quality of life in oncological patients in routine care (HELP-6): an observational study</title><author>Schrage, Theresa ; Görlach, Mirja ; Betz, Christian Stephan ; Bokemeyer, Carsten ; Kröger, Nicolaus ; Mueller, Volkmar ; Krüll, Andreas ; Schulz, Holger ; Bleich, Christiane</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-919a04127c13879dcea5ce7d7df35f826682fb4fe535a164c91ab9c5da4ee4383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>confirmatory factor analysis (CFA)</topic><topic>health-related quality of life (HrQoL)</topic><topic>oncological routine care</topic><topic>psycho-oncology</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>psychometrics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schrage, Theresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Görlach, Mirja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Betz, Christian Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bokemeyer, Carsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kröger, Nicolaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mueller, Volkmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krüll, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulz, Holger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bleich, Christiane</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schrage, Theresa</au><au>Görlach, Mirja</au><au>Betz, Christian Stephan</au><au>Bokemeyer, Carsten</au><au>Kröger, Nicolaus</au><au>Mueller, Volkmar</au><au>Krüll, Andreas</au><au>Schulz, Holger</au><au>Bleich, Christiane</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of a short instrument for measuring health-related quality of life in oncological patients in routine care (HELP-6): an observational study</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Front Psychol</addtitle><date>2023-05-16</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>14</volume><spage>1158449</spage><epage>1158449</epage><pages>1158449-1158449</pages><issn>1664-1078</issn><eissn>1664-1078</eissn><abstract>Patient-reported outcomes have not been sufficiently implemented into the routine care of cancer patients because the existing instruments are often too long and complex or not cancer-specific. The aim of this study is the determination of psychometric properties and item reduction of a newly developed health-related quality of life (HrQoL) questionnaire for use in oncological clinical routines.
This observational study with a repeated measurements design included oncological inpatients and outpatients. A total of 630 patients participated at the first point of measurement and 404 at the second point of measurement. To evaluate the instrument, we conducted hierarchical confirmative factor analyses and for further validation correlated the resulting factors with standardized and validated HrQoL measurements. Test-retest reliability and responsiveness to change were tested.
The developed questionnaire "HELP-6" ("Hamburg Inventory for Measuring Quality of Life in Oncological Patients") has a six-factor structure and has moderate-to-good convergent validity (
= -0.25 --0.68). Test-retest reliability was moderate-to-good (
=0.56-0.81,
< 0.001). Indications for responsiveness to change were found for three dimensions. The final version of the questionnaire HELP-6 has six dimensions with one item each.
With the HELP-6 instrument for measuring HrQoL in cancer patients, we provide a short and practical patient-reported outcome instrument. Though responsiveness to change could not be confirmed for all dimensions in this study, the HELP-6 includes time-efficient completion and evaluation and is informative in relevant HrQoL dimensions of cancer patients. Therefore, the HELP-6 poses an important addition to inpatient and outpatient routine cancer care.
This study was registered at Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/y7xce/), on 9 June 2018.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Frontiers Media S.A</pub><pmid>37260965</pmid><doi>10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1158449</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1664-1078 |
ispartof | Frontiers in psychology, 2023-05, Vol.14, p.1158449-1158449 |
issn | 1664-1078 1664-1078 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a6a301d91d6041ec973b0a5c68d41d64 |
source | PubMed Central |
subjects | confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) health-related quality of life (HrQoL) oncological routine care psycho-oncology Psychology psychometrics |
title | Evaluation of a short instrument for measuring health-related quality of life in oncological patients in routine care (HELP-6): an observational study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T16%3A09%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20a%20short%20instrument%20for%20measuring%20health-related%20quality%20of%20life%20in%20oncological%20patients%20in%20routine%20care%20(HELP-6):%20an%20observational%20study&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20psychology&rft.au=Schrage,%20Theresa&rft.date=2023-05-16&rft.volume=14&rft.spage=1158449&rft.epage=1158449&rft.pages=1158449-1158449&rft.issn=1664-1078&rft.eissn=1664-1078&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1158449&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2821643025%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-919a04127c13879dcea5ce7d7df35f826682fb4fe535a164c91ab9c5da4ee4383%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2821643025&rft_id=info:pmid/37260965&rfr_iscdi=true |