Loading…
Simple and approximate estimations of future precipitation return values
We present estimates of future 20-year return values for 24 h precipitation based on multi-model ensembles of temperature projections and a crude method to quantify how warmer conditions may influence precipitation intensity. Our results suggest an increase by as much as 40–50 % projected for 2100 f...
Saved in:
Published in: | Natural hazards and earth system sciences 2017-07, Vol.17 (7), p.993-1001 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-975aa9f33e9e422ec88c0a1f0295245a99ce282d031de9b003e07f34fe81856f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-975aa9f33e9e422ec88c0a1f0295245a99ce282d031de9b003e07f34fe81856f3 |
container_end_page | 1001 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 993 |
container_title | Natural hazards and earth system sciences |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Benestad, Rasmus E Parding, Kajsa M Mezghani, Abdelkader Dyrrdal, Anita V |
description | We present estimates of future 20-year return values for 24 h precipitation based on multi-model ensembles of temperature projections and a crude method to quantify how warmer conditions may influence precipitation intensity. Our results suggest an increase by as much as 40–50 % projected for 2100 for a number of locations in Europe, assuming the high Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 emission scenario. The new strategy was based on combining physical understandings with the limited information available, and it utilised the covariance between the mean seasonal variations in precipitation intensity and the North Atlantic saturation vapour pressure. Rather than estimating the expected values and interannual variability, we tried to estimate an upper bound for the response in the precipitation intensity based on the assumption that the seasonal variations in the precipitation intensity are caused by the seasonal variations in temperature. Return values were subsequently derived from the estimated precipitation intensity through a simple and approximate scheme that combined the 1-year 24 h precipitation return values and downscaled annual wet-day mean precipitation for a 20-year event. The latter was based on the 95th percentile of a multi-model ensemble spread of downscaled climate model results. We found geographical variations in the shape of the seasonal cycle of the wet-day mean precipitation which suggest that different rain-producing mechanisms dominate in different regions. These differences indicate that the simple method used here to estimate the response of precipitation intensity to temperature was more appropriate for convective precipitation than for orographic rainfall. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5194/nhess-17-993-2017 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a6c959d79234414e97d0e7b9529d11be</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A497652948</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_a6c959d79234414e97d0e7b9529d11be</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A497652948</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-975aa9f33e9e422ec88c0a1f0295245a99ce282d031de9b003e07f34fe81856f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk1rGzEQhpeSQj6aH5DbQk45bKqRtKvVMYS0MQQKTXIWsnbkytirrSSX5N93bJemhhJ00Gj0zCdvVV0Au25By8_jD8y5AdVoLRrOQH2oTqDrJb17OPrHPq5Oc14yxnUr2Ul1_xjW0wprOw61naYUX8LaFqwxl60R4pjr6Gu_KZuE9ZTQhSmU3UedkJxj_cuuNpg_VR-9XWU8_3OfVc9f7p5u75uHb19ntzcPjWsBSqNVa632QqBGyTm6vnfMgt_2w2VrtXbIez4wAQPqOWMCmfJCeuyhbzsvzqrZPu8Q7dJMibpMrybaYHaOmBbGphLcCo3tnG71oDQXUoJErQaGak6F9AAwR8p1uc9Fc_-kGYpZRpqI2jecAjrFQcj3KNDQ8o62yt-ohaXSYfSxJOvWITtzI7XqqKjsibr-D0VnwHVwcUQfyH8QcHUQQEzBl7Kwm5zN7PH7IQt71qWYc0L_dz3AzFYlZqcSA8qQSsxWJeI3ulitmw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1915269812</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Simple and approximate estimations of future precipitation return values</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>IngentaConnect Journals</source><creator>Benestad, Rasmus E ; Parding, Kajsa M ; Mezghani, Abdelkader ; Dyrrdal, Anita V</creator><creatorcontrib>Benestad, Rasmus E ; Parding, Kajsa M ; Mezghani, Abdelkader ; Dyrrdal, Anita V</creatorcontrib><description>We present estimates of future 20-year return values for 24 h precipitation based on multi-model ensembles of temperature projections and a crude method to quantify how warmer conditions may influence precipitation intensity. Our results suggest an increase by as much as 40–50 % projected for 2100 for a number of locations in Europe, assuming the high Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 emission scenario. The new strategy was based on combining physical understandings with the limited information available, and it utilised the covariance between the mean seasonal variations in precipitation intensity and the North Atlantic saturation vapour pressure. Rather than estimating the expected values and interannual variability, we tried to estimate an upper bound for the response in the precipitation intensity based on the assumption that the seasonal variations in the precipitation intensity are caused by the seasonal variations in temperature. Return values were subsequently derived from the estimated precipitation intensity through a simple and approximate scheme that combined the 1-year 24 h precipitation return values and downscaled annual wet-day mean precipitation for a 20-year event. The latter was based on the 95th percentile of a multi-model ensemble spread of downscaled climate model results. We found geographical variations in the shape of the seasonal cycle of the wet-day mean precipitation which suggest that different rain-producing mechanisms dominate in different regions. These differences indicate that the simple method used here to estimate the response of precipitation intensity to temperature was more appropriate for convective precipitation than for orographic rainfall.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1684-9981</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1561-8633</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1684-9981</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5194/nhess-17-993-2017</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Katlenburg-Lindau: Copernicus GmbH</publisher><subject>Annual precipitation ; Atmospheric precipitations ; Atmospheric temperature ; Climate change ; Climate models ; Convective precipitation ; Covariance ; Environmental aspects ; Estimates ; Floods ; Future precipitation ; Geographical variations ; Interannual variability ; Landslides & mudslides ; Mean precipitation ; Measurement ; Methods ; Precipitation ; Precipitation intensity ; Precipitation variability ; Precipitation variations ; Rain ; Rainfall ; Rainfall intensity ; Saturation ; Seasonal variation ; Seasonal variations ; Temperature ; Temperature effects ; Temperature variations ; Upper bounds ; Vapor pressure ; Vapors ; Vapour pressure</subject><ispartof>Natural hazards and earth system sciences, 2017-07, Vol.17 (7), p.993-1001</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Copernicus GmbH</rights><rights>Copyright Copernicus GmbH 2017</rights><rights>2017. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-975aa9f33e9e422ec88c0a1f0295245a99ce282d031de9b003e07f34fe81856f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-975aa9f33e9e422ec88c0a1f0295245a99ce282d031de9b003e07f34fe81856f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5969-4508</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1915269812/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1915269812?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25731,27901,27902,36989,44566,74869</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Benestad, Rasmus E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parding, Kajsa M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mezghani, Abdelkader</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dyrrdal, Anita V</creatorcontrib><title>Simple and approximate estimations of future precipitation return values</title><title>Natural hazards and earth system sciences</title><description>We present estimates of future 20-year return values for 24 h precipitation based on multi-model ensembles of temperature projections and a crude method to quantify how warmer conditions may influence precipitation intensity. Our results suggest an increase by as much as 40–50 % projected for 2100 for a number of locations in Europe, assuming the high Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 emission scenario. The new strategy was based on combining physical understandings with the limited information available, and it utilised the covariance between the mean seasonal variations in precipitation intensity and the North Atlantic saturation vapour pressure. Rather than estimating the expected values and interannual variability, we tried to estimate an upper bound for the response in the precipitation intensity based on the assumption that the seasonal variations in the precipitation intensity are caused by the seasonal variations in temperature. Return values were subsequently derived from the estimated precipitation intensity through a simple and approximate scheme that combined the 1-year 24 h precipitation return values and downscaled annual wet-day mean precipitation for a 20-year event. The latter was based on the 95th percentile of a multi-model ensemble spread of downscaled climate model results. We found geographical variations in the shape of the seasonal cycle of the wet-day mean precipitation which suggest that different rain-producing mechanisms dominate in different regions. These differences indicate that the simple method used here to estimate the response of precipitation intensity to temperature was more appropriate for convective precipitation than for orographic rainfall.</description><subject>Annual precipitation</subject><subject>Atmospheric precipitations</subject><subject>Atmospheric temperature</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Convective precipitation</subject><subject>Covariance</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>Future precipitation</subject><subject>Geographical variations</subject><subject>Interannual variability</subject><subject>Landslides & mudslides</subject><subject>Mean precipitation</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Precipitation intensity</subject><subject>Precipitation variability</subject><subject>Precipitation variations</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Rainfall intensity</subject><subject>Saturation</subject><subject>Seasonal variation</subject><subject>Seasonal variations</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Temperature effects</subject><subject>Temperature variations</subject><subject>Upper bounds</subject><subject>Vapor pressure</subject><subject>Vapors</subject><subject>Vapour pressure</subject><issn>1684-9981</issn><issn>1561-8633</issn><issn>1684-9981</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk1rGzEQhpeSQj6aH5DbQk45bKqRtKvVMYS0MQQKTXIWsnbkytirrSSX5N93bJemhhJ00Gj0zCdvVV0Au25By8_jD8y5AdVoLRrOQH2oTqDrJb17OPrHPq5Oc14yxnUr2Ul1_xjW0wprOw61naYUX8LaFqwxl60R4pjr6Gu_KZuE9ZTQhSmU3UedkJxj_cuuNpg_VR-9XWU8_3OfVc9f7p5u75uHb19ntzcPjWsBSqNVa632QqBGyTm6vnfMgt_2w2VrtXbIez4wAQPqOWMCmfJCeuyhbzsvzqrZPu8Q7dJMibpMrybaYHaOmBbGphLcCo3tnG71oDQXUoJErQaGak6F9AAwR8p1uc9Fc_-kGYpZRpqI2jecAjrFQcj3KNDQ8o62yt-ohaXSYfSxJOvWITtzI7XqqKjsibr-D0VnwHVwcUQfyH8QcHUQQEzBl7Kwm5zN7PH7IQt71qWYc0L_dz3AzFYlZqcSA8qQSsxWJeI3ulitmw</recordid><startdate>20170703</startdate><enddate>20170703</enddate><creator>Benestad, Rasmus E</creator><creator>Parding, Kajsa M</creator><creator>Mezghani, Abdelkader</creator><creator>Dyrrdal, Anita V</creator><general>Copernicus GmbH</general><general>Copernicus Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BFMQW</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5969-4508</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170703</creationdate><title>Simple and approximate estimations of future precipitation return values</title><author>Benestad, Rasmus E ; Parding, Kajsa M ; Mezghani, Abdelkader ; Dyrrdal, Anita V</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-975aa9f33e9e422ec88c0a1f0295245a99ce282d031de9b003e07f34fe81856f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Annual precipitation</topic><topic>Atmospheric precipitations</topic><topic>Atmospheric temperature</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Convective precipitation</topic><topic>Covariance</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>Future precipitation</topic><topic>Geographical variations</topic><topic>Interannual variability</topic><topic>Landslides & mudslides</topic><topic>Mean precipitation</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Precipitation intensity</topic><topic>Precipitation variability</topic><topic>Precipitation variations</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Rainfall intensity</topic><topic>Saturation</topic><topic>Seasonal variation</topic><topic>Seasonal variations</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Temperature effects</topic><topic>Temperature variations</topic><topic>Upper bounds</topic><topic>Vapor pressure</topic><topic>Vapors</topic><topic>Vapour pressure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Benestad, Rasmus E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parding, Kajsa M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mezghani, Abdelkader</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dyrrdal, Anita V</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Continental Europe Database</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Natural hazards and earth system sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Benestad, Rasmus E</au><au>Parding, Kajsa M</au><au>Mezghani, Abdelkader</au><au>Dyrrdal, Anita V</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Simple and approximate estimations of future precipitation return values</atitle><jtitle>Natural hazards and earth system sciences</jtitle><date>2017-07-03</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>993</spage><epage>1001</epage><pages>993-1001</pages><issn>1684-9981</issn><issn>1561-8633</issn><eissn>1684-9981</eissn><abstract>We present estimates of future 20-year return values for 24 h precipitation based on multi-model ensembles of temperature projections and a crude method to quantify how warmer conditions may influence precipitation intensity. Our results suggest an increase by as much as 40–50 % projected for 2100 for a number of locations in Europe, assuming the high Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 emission scenario. The new strategy was based on combining physical understandings with the limited information available, and it utilised the covariance between the mean seasonal variations in precipitation intensity and the North Atlantic saturation vapour pressure. Rather than estimating the expected values and interannual variability, we tried to estimate an upper bound for the response in the precipitation intensity based on the assumption that the seasonal variations in the precipitation intensity are caused by the seasonal variations in temperature. Return values were subsequently derived from the estimated precipitation intensity through a simple and approximate scheme that combined the 1-year 24 h precipitation return values and downscaled annual wet-day mean precipitation for a 20-year event. The latter was based on the 95th percentile of a multi-model ensemble spread of downscaled climate model results. We found geographical variations in the shape of the seasonal cycle of the wet-day mean precipitation which suggest that different rain-producing mechanisms dominate in different regions. These differences indicate that the simple method used here to estimate the response of precipitation intensity to temperature was more appropriate for convective precipitation than for orographic rainfall.</abstract><cop>Katlenburg-Lindau</cop><pub>Copernicus GmbH</pub><doi>10.5194/nhess-17-993-2017</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5969-4508</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1684-9981 |
ispartof | Natural hazards and earth system sciences, 2017-07, Vol.17 (7), p.993-1001 |
issn | 1684-9981 1561-8633 1684-9981 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a6c959d79234414e97d0e7b9529d11be |
source | Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); IngentaConnect Journals |
subjects | Annual precipitation Atmospheric precipitations Atmospheric temperature Climate change Climate models Convective precipitation Covariance Environmental aspects Estimates Floods Future precipitation Geographical variations Interannual variability Landslides & mudslides Mean precipitation Measurement Methods Precipitation Precipitation intensity Precipitation variability Precipitation variations Rain Rainfall Rainfall intensity Saturation Seasonal variation Seasonal variations Temperature Temperature effects Temperature variations Upper bounds Vapor pressure Vapors Vapour pressure |
title | Simple and approximate estimations of future precipitation return values |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T06%3A55%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Simple%20and%20approximate%20estimations%20of%20future%20precipitation%20return%20values&rft.jtitle=Natural%20hazards%20and%20earth%20system%20sciences&rft.au=Benestad,%20Rasmus%20E&rft.date=2017-07-03&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=993&rft.epage=1001&rft.pages=993-1001&rft.issn=1684-9981&rft.eissn=1684-9981&rft_id=info:doi/10.5194/nhess-17-993-2017&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA497652948%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-975aa9f33e9e422ec88c0a1f0295245a99ce282d031de9b003e07f34fe81856f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1915269812&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A497652948&rfr_iscdi=true |