Loading…

An early model to predict the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in the absence of blood examination indexes: application in primary health care centres

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is one of the critical causes of adverse perinatal outcomes. A reliable estimate of GDM in early pregnancy would facilitate intervention plans for maternal and infant health care to prevent the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. This study aims to build an early...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC pregnancy and childbirth 2021-12, Vol.21 (1), p.814-814, Article 814
Main Authors: Wang, Jingyuan, Lv, Bohan, Chen, Xiujuan, Pan, Yueshuai, Chen, Kai, Zhang, Yan, Li, Qianqian, Wei, Lili, Liu, Yan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-7281d7c35452e8c473008d7f51d1b442bf07d33e9c8d00054b7b5dae52918b003
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-7281d7c35452e8c473008d7f51d1b442bf07d33e9c8d00054b7b5dae52918b003
container_end_page 814
container_issue 1
container_start_page 814
container_title BMC pregnancy and childbirth
container_volume 21
creator Wang, Jingyuan
Lv, Bohan
Chen, Xiujuan
Pan, Yueshuai
Chen, Kai
Zhang, Yan
Li, Qianqian
Wei, Lili
Liu, Yan
description Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is one of the critical causes of adverse perinatal outcomes. A reliable estimate of GDM in early pregnancy would facilitate intervention plans for maternal and infant health care to prevent the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. This study aims to build an early model to predict GDM in the first trimester for the primary health care centre. Characteristics of pregnant women in the first trimester were collected from eastern China from 2017 to 2019. The univariate analysis was performed using SPSS 23.0 statistical software. Characteristics comparison was applied with Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and chi-square test for categorical variables. All analyses were two-sided with p < 0.05 indicating statistical significance. The train_test_split function in Python was used to split the data set into 70% for training and 30% for test. The Random Forest model and Logistic Regression model in Python were applied to model the training data set. The 10-fold cross-validation was used to assess the model's performance by the areas under the ROC Curve, diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. A total of 1,139 pregnant women (186 with GDM) were included in the final data analysis. Significant differences were observed in age (Z=-2.693, p=0.007), pre-pregnancy BMI (Z=-5.502, p
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s12884-021-04295-2
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a6ec72091b0748948d26ca98833040a8</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_a6ec72091b0748948d26ca98833040a8</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2609460557</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-7281d7c35452e8c473008d7f51d1b442bf07d33e9c8d00054b7b5dae52918b003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkstuFDEQRVsIRELgB1ggS2zYdPCzbbNAiiIgkSKxgbXltmtmPLjbg-1Bybfws3geiRJWLpVPXVeVb9e9JficEDV8LIQqxXtMSY851aKnz7pTwiXpKdPs-aP4pHtVyhpjIpXAL7sTxpXULTzt_l7MCGyOd2hKHiKqCW0y-OAqqitAOZRfKC3QEkq1NaTZRuSDHaFCQRPEGOq2oDDvYTsWmB3s-DGm5BHc2inM-7rGeLiF8gnZzSYGd59sr4XJ5ju0AhvrCjmbATmYa4byunuxsLHAm-N51v38-uXH5VV_8_3b9eXFTe_EwGovqSJeOia4oKAclwxj5eVCEE9Gzum4wNIzBtopjzEWfJSj8BYE1USNGLOz7vqg65Ndm2NDJtlg9omUl8bmGlwEYwdwkmJNRiy50lx5OjirlWIMc2xV0_p80Npsxwn8fhIbn4g-vZnDyizTH6MGwYTQTeDDUSCn39u2djOF4tqm7QxpWwwdsOYDFkI29P1_6Dptc_uiHUUI41IL2ih6oFxOpWRYPDRDsNn5yBx8ZJqPzN5HZlf07vEYDyX3xmH_AMSHxQA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2611347952</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An early model to predict the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in the absence of blood examination indexes: application in primary health care centres</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Wang, Jingyuan ; Lv, Bohan ; Chen, Xiujuan ; Pan, Yueshuai ; Chen, Kai ; Zhang, Yan ; Li, Qianqian ; Wei, Lili ; Liu, Yan</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jingyuan ; Lv, Bohan ; Chen, Xiujuan ; Pan, Yueshuai ; Chen, Kai ; Zhang, Yan ; Li, Qianqian ; Wei, Lili ; Liu, Yan</creatorcontrib><description>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is one of the critical causes of adverse perinatal outcomes. A reliable estimate of GDM in early pregnancy would facilitate intervention plans for maternal and infant health care to prevent the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. This study aims to build an early model to predict GDM in the first trimester for the primary health care centre. Characteristics of pregnant women in the first trimester were collected from eastern China from 2017 to 2019. The univariate analysis was performed using SPSS 23.0 statistical software. Characteristics comparison was applied with Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and chi-square test for categorical variables. All analyses were two-sided with p &lt; 0.05 indicating statistical significance. The train_test_split function in Python was used to split the data set into 70% for training and 30% for test. The Random Forest model and Logistic Regression model in Python were applied to model the training data set. The 10-fold cross-validation was used to assess the model's performance by the areas under the ROC Curve, diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. A total of 1,139 pregnant women (186 with GDM) were included in the final data analysis. Significant differences were observed in age (Z=-2.693, p=0.007), pre-pregnancy BMI (Z=-5.502, p&lt;0.001), abdomen circumference in the first trimester (Z=-6.069, p&lt;0.001), gravidity (Z=-3.210, p=0.001), PCOS (χ =101.024, p&lt;0.001), irregular menstruation (χ =6.578, p=0.010), and family history of diabetes (χ =15.266, p&lt;0.001) between participants with GDM or without GDM. The Random Forest model achieved a higher AUC than the Logistic Regression model (0.777±0.034 vs 0.755±0.032), and had a better discrimination ability of GDM from Non-GDMs (Sensitivity: 0.651±0.087 vs 0.683±0.084, Specificity: 0.813±0.075 vs 0.736±0.087). This research developed a simple model to predict the risk of GDM using machine learning algorithm based on pre-pregnancy BMI, abdomen circumference in the first trimester, age, PCOS, gravidity, irregular menstruation, and family history of diabetes. The model was easy in operation, and all predictors were easily obtained in the first trimester in primary health care centres.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2393</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2393</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-04295-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34879850</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Adult ; Biomarkers ; China ; Datasets ; Diabetes, Gestational - diagnosis ; Fasting ; Female ; Gestational diabetes ; Gestational diabetes mellitus ; Glucose ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Hyperglycemia ; Laboratories ; Machine Learning ; Maternal and infant health care ; Menstruation ; Models, Statistical ; Obstetrics ; Polycystic ovary syndrome ; Prediction model ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Trimester, First ; Primary care ; Primary Health Care ; Primary health care centre ; Risk Factors ; ROC Curve ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Variables ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2021-12, Vol.21 (1), p.814-814, Article 814</ispartof><rights>2021. The Author(s).</rights><rights>2021. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-7281d7c35452e8c473008d7f51d1b442bf07d33e9c8d00054b7b5dae52918b003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-7281d7c35452e8c473008d7f51d1b442bf07d33e9c8d00054b7b5dae52918b003</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8653559/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2611347952?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,883,25736,27907,27908,36995,36996,44573,53774,53776</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34879850$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jingyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lv, Bohan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xiujuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pan, Yueshuai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Kai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Qianqian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Lili</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yan</creatorcontrib><title>An early model to predict the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in the absence of blood examination indexes: application in primary health care centres</title><title>BMC pregnancy and childbirth</title><addtitle>BMC Pregnancy Childbirth</addtitle><description>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is one of the critical causes of adverse perinatal outcomes. A reliable estimate of GDM in early pregnancy would facilitate intervention plans for maternal and infant health care to prevent the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. This study aims to build an early model to predict GDM in the first trimester for the primary health care centre. Characteristics of pregnant women in the first trimester were collected from eastern China from 2017 to 2019. The univariate analysis was performed using SPSS 23.0 statistical software. Characteristics comparison was applied with Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and chi-square test for categorical variables. All analyses were two-sided with p &lt; 0.05 indicating statistical significance. The train_test_split function in Python was used to split the data set into 70% for training and 30% for test. The Random Forest model and Logistic Regression model in Python were applied to model the training data set. The 10-fold cross-validation was used to assess the model's performance by the areas under the ROC Curve, diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. A total of 1,139 pregnant women (186 with GDM) were included in the final data analysis. Significant differences were observed in age (Z=-2.693, p=0.007), pre-pregnancy BMI (Z=-5.502, p&lt;0.001), abdomen circumference in the first trimester (Z=-6.069, p&lt;0.001), gravidity (Z=-3.210, p=0.001), PCOS (χ =101.024, p&lt;0.001), irregular menstruation (χ =6.578, p=0.010), and family history of diabetes (χ =15.266, p&lt;0.001) between participants with GDM or without GDM. The Random Forest model achieved a higher AUC than the Logistic Regression model (0.777±0.034 vs 0.755±0.032), and had a better discrimination ability of GDM from Non-GDMs (Sensitivity: 0.651±0.087 vs 0.683±0.084, Specificity: 0.813±0.075 vs 0.736±0.087). This research developed a simple model to predict the risk of GDM using machine learning algorithm based on pre-pregnancy BMI, abdomen circumference in the first trimester, age, PCOS, gravidity, irregular menstruation, and family history of diabetes. The model was easy in operation, and all predictors were easily obtained in the first trimester in primary health care centres.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Diabetes, Gestational - diagnosis</subject><subject>Fasting</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gestational diabetes</subject><subject>Gestational diabetes mellitus</subject><subject>Glucose</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hyperglycemia</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Machine Learning</subject><subject>Maternal and infant health care</subject><subject>Menstruation</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Polycystic ovary syndrome</subject><subject>Prediction model</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Trimester, First</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Primary Health Care</subject><subject>Primary health care centre</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Variables</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1471-2393</issn><issn>1471-2393</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkstuFDEQRVsIRELgB1ggS2zYdPCzbbNAiiIgkSKxgbXltmtmPLjbg-1Bybfws3geiRJWLpVPXVeVb9e9JficEDV8LIQqxXtMSY851aKnz7pTwiXpKdPs-aP4pHtVyhpjIpXAL7sTxpXULTzt_l7MCGyOd2hKHiKqCW0y-OAqqitAOZRfKC3QEkq1NaTZRuSDHaFCQRPEGOq2oDDvYTsWmB3s-DGm5BHc2inM-7rGeLiF8gnZzSYGd59sr4XJ5ju0AhvrCjmbATmYa4byunuxsLHAm-N51v38-uXH5VV_8_3b9eXFTe_EwGovqSJeOia4oKAclwxj5eVCEE9Gzum4wNIzBtopjzEWfJSj8BYE1USNGLOz7vqg65Ndm2NDJtlg9omUl8bmGlwEYwdwkmJNRiy50lx5OjirlWIMc2xV0_p80Npsxwn8fhIbn4g-vZnDyizTH6MGwYTQTeDDUSCn39u2djOF4tqm7QxpWwwdsOYDFkI29P1_6Dptc_uiHUUI41IL2ih6oFxOpWRYPDRDsNn5yBx8ZJqPzN5HZlf07vEYDyX3xmH_AMSHxQA</recordid><startdate>20211208</startdate><enddate>20211208</enddate><creator>Wang, Jingyuan</creator><creator>Lv, Bohan</creator><creator>Chen, Xiujuan</creator><creator>Pan, Yueshuai</creator><creator>Chen, Kai</creator><creator>Zhang, Yan</creator><creator>Li, Qianqian</creator><creator>Wei, Lili</creator><creator>Liu, Yan</creator><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211208</creationdate><title>An early model to predict the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in the absence of blood examination indexes: application in primary health care centres</title><author>Wang, Jingyuan ; Lv, Bohan ; Chen, Xiujuan ; Pan, Yueshuai ; Chen, Kai ; Zhang, Yan ; Li, Qianqian ; Wei, Lili ; Liu, Yan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-7281d7c35452e8c473008d7f51d1b442bf07d33e9c8d00054b7b5dae52918b003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Diabetes, Gestational - diagnosis</topic><topic>Fasting</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gestational diabetes</topic><topic>Gestational diabetes mellitus</topic><topic>Glucose</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hyperglycemia</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Machine Learning</topic><topic>Maternal and infant health care</topic><topic>Menstruation</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Polycystic ovary syndrome</topic><topic>Prediction model</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Trimester, First</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Primary Health Care</topic><topic>Primary health care centre</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Variables</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jingyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lv, Bohan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xiujuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pan, Yueshuai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Kai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Qianqian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Lili</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC pregnancy and childbirth</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Jingyuan</au><au>Lv, Bohan</au><au>Chen, Xiujuan</au><au>Pan, Yueshuai</au><au>Chen, Kai</au><au>Zhang, Yan</au><au>Li, Qianqian</au><au>Wei, Lili</au><au>Liu, Yan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An early model to predict the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in the absence of blood examination indexes: application in primary health care centres</atitle><jtitle>BMC pregnancy and childbirth</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Pregnancy Childbirth</addtitle><date>2021-12-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>814</spage><epage>814</epage><pages>814-814</pages><artnum>814</artnum><issn>1471-2393</issn><eissn>1471-2393</eissn><abstract>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is one of the critical causes of adverse perinatal outcomes. A reliable estimate of GDM in early pregnancy would facilitate intervention plans for maternal and infant health care to prevent the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. This study aims to build an early model to predict GDM in the first trimester for the primary health care centre. Characteristics of pregnant women in the first trimester were collected from eastern China from 2017 to 2019. The univariate analysis was performed using SPSS 23.0 statistical software. Characteristics comparison was applied with Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and chi-square test for categorical variables. All analyses were two-sided with p &lt; 0.05 indicating statistical significance. The train_test_split function in Python was used to split the data set into 70% for training and 30% for test. The Random Forest model and Logistic Regression model in Python were applied to model the training data set. The 10-fold cross-validation was used to assess the model's performance by the areas under the ROC Curve, diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. A total of 1,139 pregnant women (186 with GDM) were included in the final data analysis. Significant differences were observed in age (Z=-2.693, p=0.007), pre-pregnancy BMI (Z=-5.502, p&lt;0.001), abdomen circumference in the first trimester (Z=-6.069, p&lt;0.001), gravidity (Z=-3.210, p=0.001), PCOS (χ =101.024, p&lt;0.001), irregular menstruation (χ =6.578, p=0.010), and family history of diabetes (χ =15.266, p&lt;0.001) between participants with GDM or without GDM. The Random Forest model achieved a higher AUC than the Logistic Regression model (0.777±0.034 vs 0.755±0.032), and had a better discrimination ability of GDM from Non-GDMs (Sensitivity: 0.651±0.087 vs 0.683±0.084, Specificity: 0.813±0.075 vs 0.736±0.087). This research developed a simple model to predict the risk of GDM using machine learning algorithm based on pre-pregnancy BMI, abdomen circumference in the first trimester, age, PCOS, gravidity, irregular menstruation, and family history of diabetes. The model was easy in operation, and all predictors were easily obtained in the first trimester in primary health care centres.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central</pub><pmid>34879850</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12884-021-04295-2</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1471-2393
ispartof BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2021-12, Vol.21 (1), p.814-814, Article 814
issn 1471-2393
1471-2393
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a6ec72091b0748948d26ca98833040a8
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Accuracy
Adult
Biomarkers
China
Datasets
Diabetes, Gestational - diagnosis
Fasting
Female
Gestational diabetes
Gestational diabetes mellitus
Glucose
Hospitals
Humans
Hyperglycemia
Laboratories
Machine Learning
Maternal and infant health care
Menstruation
Models, Statistical
Obstetrics
Polycystic ovary syndrome
Prediction model
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Trimester, First
Primary care
Primary Health Care
Primary health care centre
Risk Factors
ROC Curve
Sensitivity and Specificity
Variables
Womens health
title An early model to predict the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in the absence of blood examination indexes: application in primary health care centres
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T18%3A48%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20early%20model%20to%20predict%20the%20risk%20of%20gestational%20diabetes%20mellitus%20in%20the%20absence%20of%20blood%20examination%20indexes:%20application%20in%20primary%20health%20care%20centres&rft.jtitle=BMC%20pregnancy%20and%20childbirth&rft.au=Wang,%20Jingyuan&rft.date=2021-12-08&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=814&rft.epage=814&rft.pages=814-814&rft.artnum=814&rft.issn=1471-2393&rft.eissn=1471-2393&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12884-021-04295-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2609460557%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-7281d7c35452e8c473008d7f51d1b442bf07d33e9c8d00054b7b5dae52918b003%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2611347952&rft_id=info:pmid/34879850&rfr_iscdi=true