Loading…
Surveillance for anthrax cases associated with contaminated letters, New Jersey, Delaware, and Pennsylvania, 2001
In October 2001, two inhalational anthrax and four cutaneous anthrax cases, resulting from the processing of Bacillus anthracis-containing envelopes at a New Jersey mail facility, were identified. Subsequently, we initiated stimulated passive hospital-based and enhanced passive surveillance for anth...
Saved in:
Published in: | Emerging infectious diseases 2002-10, Vol.8 (10), p.1073-1077 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c654t-230eaa33cffade916219bd8f49613917f76d3e2c853e28c40d8b3eb31f2048653 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c654t-230eaa33cffade916219bd8f49613917f76d3e2c853e28c40d8b3eb31f2048653 |
container_end_page | 1077 |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1073 |
container_title | Emerging infectious diseases |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Tan, Christina G Sandhu, Hardeep S Crawford, Dana C Redd, Stephen C Beach, Michael J Buehler, James W Bresnitz, Eddy A Pinner, Robert W Bell, Beth P |
description | In October 2001, two inhalational anthrax and four cutaneous anthrax cases, resulting from the processing of Bacillus anthracis-containing envelopes at a New Jersey mail facility, were identified. Subsequently, we initiated stimulated passive hospital-based and enhanced passive surveillance for anthrax-compatible syndromes. From October 24 to December 17, 2001, hospitals reported 240,160 visits and 7,109 intensive-care unit admissions in the surveillance area (population 6.7 million persons). Following a change of reporting criteria on November 8, the average of possible inhalational anthrax reports decreased 83% from 18 to 3 per day; the proportion of reports requiring follow-up increased from 37% (105/286) to 41% (47/116). Clinical follow-up was conducted on 214 of 464 possible inhalational anthrax patients and 98 possible cutaneous anthrax patients; 49 had additional laboratory testing. No additional cases were identified. To verify the limited scope of the outbreak, surveillance was essential, though labor-intensive. The flexibility of the system allowed interim evaluation, thus improving surveillance efficiency. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3201/eid0810.020322 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a705403d2d5f4d2a83891fba386c5ac9</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A93532600</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_a705403d2d5f4d2a83891fba386c5ac9</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A93532600</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c654t-230eaa33cffade916219bd8f49613917f76d3e2c853e28c40d8b3eb31f2048653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1vEzEQhlcIREvhyhHtBcQhKf7YdewLUlW-giqKKHC1JvZs4mpjt7aTNP8ep4lKI1UCWbLH42fescdTVS8pOeaM0HfoLJFlQxjhjD2qDimRZChIqx7f2Q05qJ6ldEkILSHqaXVAGVdCUXlYXV8s4hJd34M3WHch1uDzLMJNbSBhqiGlYBxktPXK5Vltgs8wd_7W02POGNOg_oar-muxcD2oP2APK4g4KEq2_o7ep3W_BO9gULNyhefVkw76hC9261H169PHn6dfhmfnn8enJ2dDI9omDxknCMC56TqwqKhgVE2s7BolKFd01I2E5ciMbMssTUOsnHCccNox0kjR8qNqvNW1AS71VXRziGsdwOlbR4hTDTE706OGEWkbwi2zbddYBpJLRbsJcClMC0YVrfdbravFZI7WoM8R-j3R_RPvZnoalpqNOGFyI_BmJxDD9QJT1nOXDG7KjmGR9Ii1jEkq_wlSqRohiCjgYAtOobzA-S6UxGaKHkv-4LFzxX2ieMuZIKTgwwfwMizOnXmIf7vHb_4db_IUFinp8cWP_0bPf--hr--hM4Q-z1LoF9kFn_a44y1nYkgpYndXakr0pu_1ru_1tu9LwKv7H_QX3zU6_wOaQful</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18946606</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Surveillance for anthrax cases associated with contaminated letters, New Jersey, Delaware, and Pennsylvania, 2001</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Tan, Christina G ; Sandhu, Hardeep S ; Crawford, Dana C ; Redd, Stephen C ; Beach, Michael J ; Buehler, James W ; Bresnitz, Eddy A ; Pinner, Robert W ; Bell, Beth P</creator><creatorcontrib>Tan, Christina G ; Sandhu, Hardeep S ; Crawford, Dana C ; Redd, Stephen C ; Beach, Michael J ; Buehler, James W ; Bresnitz, Eddy A ; Pinner, Robert W ; Bell, Beth P ; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention New Jersey Anthrax Surveillance Team ; Regional Anthrax Surveillance Team ; the Regional Anthrax Surveillance Team ; the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention New Jersey Anthrax Surveillance Team</creatorcontrib><description>In October 2001, two inhalational anthrax and four cutaneous anthrax cases, resulting from the processing of Bacillus anthracis-containing envelopes at a New Jersey mail facility, were identified. Subsequently, we initiated stimulated passive hospital-based and enhanced passive surveillance for anthrax-compatible syndromes. From October 24 to December 17, 2001, hospitals reported 240,160 visits and 7,109 intensive-care unit admissions in the surveillance area (population 6.7 million persons). Following a change of reporting criteria on November 8, the average of possible inhalational anthrax reports decreased 83% from 18 to 3 per day; the proportion of reports requiring follow-up increased from 37% (105/286) to 41% (47/116). Clinical follow-up was conducted on 214 of 464 possible inhalational anthrax patients and 98 possible cutaneous anthrax patients; 49 had additional laboratory testing. No additional cases were identified. To verify the limited scope of the outbreak, surveillance was essential, though labor-intensive. The flexibility of the system allowed interim evaluation, thus improving surveillance efficiency.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1080-6040</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1080-6059</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3201/eid0810.020322</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12396918</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: U.S. National Center for Infectious Diseases</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anthrax ; Anthrax - diagnosis ; Anthrax - epidemiology ; Bacillus anthracis ; bioterrorism ; Bioterrorism - statistics & numerical data ; Coroners and Medical Examiners ; Delaware ; Delaware - epidemiology ; Diagnosis ; Dispatch ; Equipment Contamination ; Female ; Health aspects ; Hospital patients ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Infection ; Infection control ; infectious diseases ; Inhalation Exposure ; Medical examination ; Methods ; New Jersey ; New Jersey - epidemiology ; Pennsylvania ; Pennsylvania - epidemiology ; Population Surveillance ; Postal Service ; Practice ; Prevention ; Public health ; Respiratory Tract Infections - diagnosis ; Respiratory Tract Infections - epidemiology ; Respiratory Tract Infections - microbiology ; Safety and security measures ; Skin Diseases, Bacterial - diagnosis ; Skin Diseases, Bacterial - epidemiology ; Skin Diseases, Bacterial - microbiology ; Time Factors ; United States</subject><ispartof>Emerging infectious diseases, 2002-10, Vol.8 (10), p.1073-1077</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2002 U.S. National Center for Infectious Diseases</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c654t-230eaa33cffade916219bd8f49613917f76d3e2c853e28c40d8b3eb31f2048653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c654t-230eaa33cffade916219bd8f49613917f76d3e2c853e28c40d8b3eb31f2048653</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2730289/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2730289/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12396918$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tan, Christina G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandhu, Hardeep S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crawford, Dana C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Redd, Stephen C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beach, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buehler, James W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bresnitz, Eddy A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinner, Robert W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, Beth P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Centers for Disease Control and Prevention New Jersey Anthrax Surveillance Team</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Regional Anthrax Surveillance Team</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the Regional Anthrax Surveillance Team</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention New Jersey Anthrax Surveillance Team</creatorcontrib><title>Surveillance for anthrax cases associated with contaminated letters, New Jersey, Delaware, and Pennsylvania, 2001</title><title>Emerging infectious diseases</title><addtitle>Emerg Infect Dis</addtitle><description>In October 2001, two inhalational anthrax and four cutaneous anthrax cases, resulting from the processing of Bacillus anthracis-containing envelopes at a New Jersey mail facility, were identified. Subsequently, we initiated stimulated passive hospital-based and enhanced passive surveillance for anthrax-compatible syndromes. From October 24 to December 17, 2001, hospitals reported 240,160 visits and 7,109 intensive-care unit admissions in the surveillance area (population 6.7 million persons). Following a change of reporting criteria on November 8, the average of possible inhalational anthrax reports decreased 83% from 18 to 3 per day; the proportion of reports requiring follow-up increased from 37% (105/286) to 41% (47/116). Clinical follow-up was conducted on 214 of 464 possible inhalational anthrax patients and 98 possible cutaneous anthrax patients; 49 had additional laboratory testing. No additional cases were identified. To verify the limited scope of the outbreak, surveillance was essential, though labor-intensive. The flexibility of the system allowed interim evaluation, thus improving surveillance efficiency.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anthrax</subject><subject>Anthrax - diagnosis</subject><subject>Anthrax - epidemiology</subject><subject>Bacillus anthracis</subject><subject>bioterrorism</subject><subject>Bioterrorism - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Coroners and Medical Examiners</subject><subject>Delaware</subject><subject>Delaware - epidemiology</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Dispatch</subject><subject>Equipment Contamination</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Hospital patients</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infection</subject><subject>Infection control</subject><subject>infectious diseases</subject><subject>Inhalation Exposure</subject><subject>Medical examination</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>New Jersey</subject><subject>New Jersey - epidemiology</subject><subject>Pennsylvania</subject><subject>Pennsylvania - epidemiology</subject><subject>Population Surveillance</subject><subject>Postal Service</subject><subject>Practice</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Respiratory Tract Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Respiratory Tract Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Respiratory Tract Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Safety and security measures</subject><subject>Skin Diseases, Bacterial - diagnosis</subject><subject>Skin Diseases, Bacterial - epidemiology</subject><subject>Skin Diseases, Bacterial - microbiology</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1080-6040</issn><issn>1080-6059</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1vEzEQhlcIREvhyhHtBcQhKf7YdewLUlW-giqKKHC1JvZs4mpjt7aTNP8ep4lKI1UCWbLH42fescdTVS8pOeaM0HfoLJFlQxjhjD2qDimRZChIqx7f2Q05qJ6ldEkILSHqaXVAGVdCUXlYXV8s4hJd34M3WHch1uDzLMJNbSBhqiGlYBxktPXK5Vltgs8wd_7W02POGNOg_oar-muxcD2oP2APK4g4KEq2_o7ep3W_BO9gULNyhefVkw76hC9261H169PHn6dfhmfnn8enJ2dDI9omDxknCMC56TqwqKhgVE2s7BolKFd01I2E5ciMbMssTUOsnHCccNox0kjR8qNqvNW1AS71VXRziGsdwOlbR4hTDTE706OGEWkbwi2zbddYBpJLRbsJcClMC0YVrfdbravFZI7WoM8R-j3R_RPvZnoalpqNOGFyI_BmJxDD9QJT1nOXDG7KjmGR9Ii1jEkq_wlSqRohiCjgYAtOobzA-S6UxGaKHkv-4LFzxX2ieMuZIKTgwwfwMizOnXmIf7vHb_4db_IUFinp8cWP_0bPf--hr--hM4Q-z1LoF9kFn_a44y1nYkgpYndXakr0pu_1ru_1tu9LwKv7H_QX3zU6_wOaQful</recordid><startdate>200210</startdate><enddate>200210</enddate><creator>Tan, Christina G</creator><creator>Sandhu, Hardeep S</creator><creator>Crawford, Dana C</creator><creator>Redd, Stephen C</creator><creator>Beach, Michael J</creator><creator>Buehler, James W</creator><creator>Bresnitz, Eddy A</creator><creator>Pinner, Robert W</creator><creator>Bell, Beth P</creator><general>U.S. National Center for Infectious Diseases</general><general>Centers for Disease Control and Prevention</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200210</creationdate><title>Surveillance for anthrax cases associated with contaminated letters, New Jersey, Delaware, and Pennsylvania, 2001</title><author>Tan, Christina G ; Sandhu, Hardeep S ; Crawford, Dana C ; Redd, Stephen C ; Beach, Michael J ; Buehler, James W ; Bresnitz, Eddy A ; Pinner, Robert W ; Bell, Beth P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c654t-230eaa33cffade916219bd8f49613917f76d3e2c853e28c40d8b3eb31f2048653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anthrax</topic><topic>Anthrax - diagnosis</topic><topic>Anthrax - epidemiology</topic><topic>Bacillus anthracis</topic><topic>bioterrorism</topic><topic>Bioterrorism - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Coroners and Medical Examiners</topic><topic>Delaware</topic><topic>Delaware - epidemiology</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Dispatch</topic><topic>Equipment Contamination</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Hospital patients</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infection</topic><topic>Infection control</topic><topic>infectious diseases</topic><topic>Inhalation Exposure</topic><topic>Medical examination</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>New Jersey</topic><topic>New Jersey - epidemiology</topic><topic>Pennsylvania</topic><topic>Pennsylvania - epidemiology</topic><topic>Population Surveillance</topic><topic>Postal Service</topic><topic>Practice</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Respiratory Tract Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Respiratory Tract Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Respiratory Tract Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Safety and security measures</topic><topic>Skin Diseases, Bacterial - diagnosis</topic><topic>Skin Diseases, Bacterial - epidemiology</topic><topic>Skin Diseases, Bacterial - microbiology</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tan, Christina G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandhu, Hardeep S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crawford, Dana C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Redd, Stephen C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beach, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buehler, James W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bresnitz, Eddy A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinner, Robert W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, Beth P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Centers for Disease Control and Prevention New Jersey Anthrax Surveillance Team</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Regional Anthrax Surveillance Team</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the Regional Anthrax Surveillance Team</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention New Jersey Anthrax Surveillance Team</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints in Context (Gale)</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Emerging infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tan, Christina G</au><au>Sandhu, Hardeep S</au><au>Crawford, Dana C</au><au>Redd, Stephen C</au><au>Beach, Michael J</au><au>Buehler, James W</au><au>Bresnitz, Eddy A</au><au>Pinner, Robert W</au><au>Bell, Beth P</au><aucorp>Centers for Disease Control and Prevention New Jersey Anthrax Surveillance Team</aucorp><aucorp>Regional Anthrax Surveillance Team</aucorp><aucorp>the Regional Anthrax Surveillance Team</aucorp><aucorp>the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention New Jersey Anthrax Surveillance Team</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Surveillance for anthrax cases associated with contaminated letters, New Jersey, Delaware, and Pennsylvania, 2001</atitle><jtitle>Emerging infectious diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Emerg Infect Dis</addtitle><date>2002-10</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1073</spage><epage>1077</epage><pages>1073-1077</pages><issn>1080-6040</issn><eissn>1080-6059</eissn><abstract>In October 2001, two inhalational anthrax and four cutaneous anthrax cases, resulting from the processing of Bacillus anthracis-containing envelopes at a New Jersey mail facility, were identified. Subsequently, we initiated stimulated passive hospital-based and enhanced passive surveillance for anthrax-compatible syndromes. From October 24 to December 17, 2001, hospitals reported 240,160 visits and 7,109 intensive-care unit admissions in the surveillance area (population 6.7 million persons). Following a change of reporting criteria on November 8, the average of possible inhalational anthrax reports decreased 83% from 18 to 3 per day; the proportion of reports requiring follow-up increased from 37% (105/286) to 41% (47/116). Clinical follow-up was conducted on 214 of 464 possible inhalational anthrax patients and 98 possible cutaneous anthrax patients; 49 had additional laboratory testing. No additional cases were identified. To verify the limited scope of the outbreak, surveillance was essential, though labor-intensive. The flexibility of the system allowed interim evaluation, thus improving surveillance efficiency.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>U.S. National Center for Infectious Diseases</pub><pmid>12396918</pmid><doi>10.3201/eid0810.020322</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1080-6040 |
ispartof | Emerging infectious diseases, 2002-10, Vol.8 (10), p.1073-1077 |
issn | 1080-6040 1080-6059 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a705403d2d5f4d2a83891fba386c5ac9 |
source | PubMed Central |
subjects | Adult Anthrax Anthrax - diagnosis Anthrax - epidemiology Bacillus anthracis bioterrorism Bioterrorism - statistics & numerical data Coroners and Medical Examiners Delaware Delaware - epidemiology Diagnosis Dispatch Equipment Contamination Female Health aspects Hospital patients Hospitals Humans Infection Infection control infectious diseases Inhalation Exposure Medical examination Methods New Jersey New Jersey - epidemiology Pennsylvania Pennsylvania - epidemiology Population Surveillance Postal Service Practice Prevention Public health Respiratory Tract Infections - diagnosis Respiratory Tract Infections - epidemiology Respiratory Tract Infections - microbiology Safety and security measures Skin Diseases, Bacterial - diagnosis Skin Diseases, Bacterial - epidemiology Skin Diseases, Bacterial - microbiology Time Factors United States |
title | Surveillance for anthrax cases associated with contaminated letters, New Jersey, Delaware, and Pennsylvania, 2001 |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T22%3A48%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Surveillance%20for%20anthrax%20cases%20associated%20with%20contaminated%20letters,%20New%20Jersey,%20Delaware,%20and%20Pennsylvania,%202001&rft.jtitle=Emerging%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=Tan,%20Christina%20G&rft.aucorp=Centers%20for%20Disease%20Control%20and%20Prevention%20New%20Jersey%20Anthrax%20Surveillance%20Team&rft.date=2002-10&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1073&rft.epage=1077&rft.pages=1073-1077&rft.issn=1080-6040&rft.eissn=1080-6059&rft_id=info:doi/10.3201/eid0810.020322&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA93532600%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c654t-230eaa33cffade916219bd8f49613917f76d3e2c853e28c40d8b3eb31f2048653%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18946606&rft_id=info:pmid/12396918&rft_galeid=A93532600&rfr_iscdi=true |