Loading…

Surveillance for anthrax cases associated with contaminated letters, New Jersey, Delaware, and Pennsylvania, 2001

In October 2001, two inhalational anthrax and four cutaneous anthrax cases, resulting from the processing of Bacillus anthracis-containing envelopes at a New Jersey mail facility, were identified. Subsequently, we initiated stimulated passive hospital-based and enhanced passive surveillance for anth...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Emerging infectious diseases 2002-10, Vol.8 (10), p.1073-1077
Main Authors: Tan, Christina G, Sandhu, Hardeep S, Crawford, Dana C, Redd, Stephen C, Beach, Michael J, Buehler, James W, Bresnitz, Eddy A, Pinner, Robert W, Bell, Beth P
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c654t-230eaa33cffade916219bd8f49613917f76d3e2c853e28c40d8b3eb31f2048653
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c654t-230eaa33cffade916219bd8f49613917f76d3e2c853e28c40d8b3eb31f2048653
container_end_page 1077
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1073
container_title Emerging infectious diseases
container_volume 8
creator Tan, Christina G
Sandhu, Hardeep S
Crawford, Dana C
Redd, Stephen C
Beach, Michael J
Buehler, James W
Bresnitz, Eddy A
Pinner, Robert W
Bell, Beth P
description In October 2001, two inhalational anthrax and four cutaneous anthrax cases, resulting from the processing of Bacillus anthracis-containing envelopes at a New Jersey mail facility, were identified. Subsequently, we initiated stimulated passive hospital-based and enhanced passive surveillance for anthrax-compatible syndromes. From October 24 to December 17, 2001, hospitals reported 240,160 visits and 7,109 intensive-care unit admissions in the surveillance area (population 6.7 million persons). Following a change of reporting criteria on November 8, the average of possible inhalational anthrax reports decreased 83% from 18 to 3 per day; the proportion of reports requiring follow-up increased from 37% (105/286) to 41% (47/116). Clinical follow-up was conducted on 214 of 464 possible inhalational anthrax patients and 98 possible cutaneous anthrax patients; 49 had additional laboratory testing. No additional cases were identified. To verify the limited scope of the outbreak, surveillance was essential, though labor-intensive. The flexibility of the system allowed interim evaluation, thus improving surveillance efficiency.
doi_str_mv 10.3201/eid0810.020322
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a705403d2d5f4d2a83891fba386c5ac9</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A93532600</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_a705403d2d5f4d2a83891fba386c5ac9</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A93532600</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c654t-230eaa33cffade916219bd8f49613917f76d3e2c853e28c40d8b3eb31f2048653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1vEzEQhlcIREvhyhHtBcQhKf7YdewLUlW-giqKKHC1JvZs4mpjt7aTNP8ep4lKI1UCWbLH42fescdTVS8pOeaM0HfoLJFlQxjhjD2qDimRZChIqx7f2Q05qJ6ldEkILSHqaXVAGVdCUXlYXV8s4hJd34M3WHch1uDzLMJNbSBhqiGlYBxktPXK5Vltgs8wd_7W02POGNOg_oar-muxcD2oP2APK4g4KEq2_o7ep3W_BO9gULNyhefVkw76hC9261H169PHn6dfhmfnn8enJ2dDI9omDxknCMC56TqwqKhgVE2s7BolKFd01I2E5ciMbMssTUOsnHCccNox0kjR8qNqvNW1AS71VXRziGsdwOlbR4hTDTE706OGEWkbwi2zbddYBpJLRbsJcClMC0YVrfdbravFZI7WoM8R-j3R_RPvZnoalpqNOGFyI_BmJxDD9QJT1nOXDG7KjmGR9Ii1jEkq_wlSqRohiCjgYAtOobzA-S6UxGaKHkv-4LFzxX2ieMuZIKTgwwfwMizOnXmIf7vHb_4db_IUFinp8cWP_0bPf--hr--hM4Q-z1LoF9kFn_a44y1nYkgpYndXakr0pu_1ru_1tu9LwKv7H_QX3zU6_wOaQful</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18946606</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Surveillance for anthrax cases associated with contaminated letters, New Jersey, Delaware, and Pennsylvania, 2001</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Tan, Christina G ; Sandhu, Hardeep S ; Crawford, Dana C ; Redd, Stephen C ; Beach, Michael J ; Buehler, James W ; Bresnitz, Eddy A ; Pinner, Robert W ; Bell, Beth P</creator><creatorcontrib>Tan, Christina G ; Sandhu, Hardeep S ; Crawford, Dana C ; Redd, Stephen C ; Beach, Michael J ; Buehler, James W ; Bresnitz, Eddy A ; Pinner, Robert W ; Bell, Beth P ; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention New Jersey Anthrax Surveillance Team ; Regional Anthrax Surveillance Team ; the Regional Anthrax Surveillance Team ; the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention New Jersey Anthrax Surveillance Team</creatorcontrib><description>In October 2001, two inhalational anthrax and four cutaneous anthrax cases, resulting from the processing of Bacillus anthracis-containing envelopes at a New Jersey mail facility, were identified. Subsequently, we initiated stimulated passive hospital-based and enhanced passive surveillance for anthrax-compatible syndromes. From October 24 to December 17, 2001, hospitals reported 240,160 visits and 7,109 intensive-care unit admissions in the surveillance area (population 6.7 million persons). Following a change of reporting criteria on November 8, the average of possible inhalational anthrax reports decreased 83% from 18 to 3 per day; the proportion of reports requiring follow-up increased from 37% (105/286) to 41% (47/116). Clinical follow-up was conducted on 214 of 464 possible inhalational anthrax patients and 98 possible cutaneous anthrax patients; 49 had additional laboratory testing. No additional cases were identified. To verify the limited scope of the outbreak, surveillance was essential, though labor-intensive. The flexibility of the system allowed interim evaluation, thus improving surveillance efficiency.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1080-6040</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1080-6059</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3201/eid0810.020322</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12396918</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: U.S. National Center for Infectious Diseases</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anthrax ; Anthrax - diagnosis ; Anthrax - epidemiology ; Bacillus anthracis ; bioterrorism ; Bioterrorism - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Coroners and Medical Examiners ; Delaware ; Delaware - epidemiology ; Diagnosis ; Dispatch ; Equipment Contamination ; Female ; Health aspects ; Hospital patients ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Infection ; Infection control ; infectious diseases ; Inhalation Exposure ; Medical examination ; Methods ; New Jersey ; New Jersey - epidemiology ; Pennsylvania ; Pennsylvania - epidemiology ; Population Surveillance ; Postal Service ; Practice ; Prevention ; Public health ; Respiratory Tract Infections - diagnosis ; Respiratory Tract Infections - epidemiology ; Respiratory Tract Infections - microbiology ; Safety and security measures ; Skin Diseases, Bacterial - diagnosis ; Skin Diseases, Bacterial - epidemiology ; Skin Diseases, Bacterial - microbiology ; Time Factors ; United States</subject><ispartof>Emerging infectious diseases, 2002-10, Vol.8 (10), p.1073-1077</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2002 U.S. National Center for Infectious Diseases</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c654t-230eaa33cffade916219bd8f49613917f76d3e2c853e28c40d8b3eb31f2048653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c654t-230eaa33cffade916219bd8f49613917f76d3e2c853e28c40d8b3eb31f2048653</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2730289/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2730289/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12396918$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tan, Christina G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandhu, Hardeep S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crawford, Dana C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Redd, Stephen C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beach, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buehler, James W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bresnitz, Eddy A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinner, Robert W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, Beth P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Centers for Disease Control and Prevention New Jersey Anthrax Surveillance Team</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Regional Anthrax Surveillance Team</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the Regional Anthrax Surveillance Team</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention New Jersey Anthrax Surveillance Team</creatorcontrib><title>Surveillance for anthrax cases associated with contaminated letters, New Jersey, Delaware, and Pennsylvania, 2001</title><title>Emerging infectious diseases</title><addtitle>Emerg Infect Dis</addtitle><description>In October 2001, two inhalational anthrax and four cutaneous anthrax cases, resulting from the processing of Bacillus anthracis-containing envelopes at a New Jersey mail facility, were identified. Subsequently, we initiated stimulated passive hospital-based and enhanced passive surveillance for anthrax-compatible syndromes. From October 24 to December 17, 2001, hospitals reported 240,160 visits and 7,109 intensive-care unit admissions in the surveillance area (population 6.7 million persons). Following a change of reporting criteria on November 8, the average of possible inhalational anthrax reports decreased 83% from 18 to 3 per day; the proportion of reports requiring follow-up increased from 37% (105/286) to 41% (47/116). Clinical follow-up was conducted on 214 of 464 possible inhalational anthrax patients and 98 possible cutaneous anthrax patients; 49 had additional laboratory testing. No additional cases were identified. To verify the limited scope of the outbreak, surveillance was essential, though labor-intensive. The flexibility of the system allowed interim evaluation, thus improving surveillance efficiency.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anthrax</subject><subject>Anthrax - diagnosis</subject><subject>Anthrax - epidemiology</subject><subject>Bacillus anthracis</subject><subject>bioterrorism</subject><subject>Bioterrorism - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Coroners and Medical Examiners</subject><subject>Delaware</subject><subject>Delaware - epidemiology</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Dispatch</subject><subject>Equipment Contamination</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Hospital patients</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infection</subject><subject>Infection control</subject><subject>infectious diseases</subject><subject>Inhalation Exposure</subject><subject>Medical examination</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>New Jersey</subject><subject>New Jersey - epidemiology</subject><subject>Pennsylvania</subject><subject>Pennsylvania - epidemiology</subject><subject>Population Surveillance</subject><subject>Postal Service</subject><subject>Practice</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Respiratory Tract Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Respiratory Tract Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Respiratory Tract Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Safety and security measures</subject><subject>Skin Diseases, Bacterial - diagnosis</subject><subject>Skin Diseases, Bacterial - epidemiology</subject><subject>Skin Diseases, Bacterial - microbiology</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1080-6040</issn><issn>1080-6059</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1vEzEQhlcIREvhyhHtBcQhKf7YdewLUlW-giqKKHC1JvZs4mpjt7aTNP8ep4lKI1UCWbLH42fescdTVS8pOeaM0HfoLJFlQxjhjD2qDimRZChIqx7f2Q05qJ6ldEkILSHqaXVAGVdCUXlYXV8s4hJd34M3WHch1uDzLMJNbSBhqiGlYBxktPXK5Vltgs8wd_7W02POGNOg_oar-muxcD2oP2APK4g4KEq2_o7ep3W_BO9gULNyhefVkw76hC9261H169PHn6dfhmfnn8enJ2dDI9omDxknCMC56TqwqKhgVE2s7BolKFd01I2E5ciMbMssTUOsnHCccNox0kjR8qNqvNW1AS71VXRziGsdwOlbR4hTDTE706OGEWkbwi2zbddYBpJLRbsJcClMC0YVrfdbravFZI7WoM8R-j3R_RPvZnoalpqNOGFyI_BmJxDD9QJT1nOXDG7KjmGR9Ii1jEkq_wlSqRohiCjgYAtOobzA-S6UxGaKHkv-4LFzxX2ieMuZIKTgwwfwMizOnXmIf7vHb_4db_IUFinp8cWP_0bPf--hr--hM4Q-z1LoF9kFn_a44y1nYkgpYndXakr0pu_1ru_1tu9LwKv7H_QX3zU6_wOaQful</recordid><startdate>200210</startdate><enddate>200210</enddate><creator>Tan, Christina G</creator><creator>Sandhu, Hardeep S</creator><creator>Crawford, Dana C</creator><creator>Redd, Stephen C</creator><creator>Beach, Michael J</creator><creator>Buehler, James W</creator><creator>Bresnitz, Eddy A</creator><creator>Pinner, Robert W</creator><creator>Bell, Beth P</creator><general>U.S. National Center for Infectious Diseases</general><general>Centers for Disease Control and Prevention</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200210</creationdate><title>Surveillance for anthrax cases associated with contaminated letters, New Jersey, Delaware, and Pennsylvania, 2001</title><author>Tan, Christina G ; Sandhu, Hardeep S ; Crawford, Dana C ; Redd, Stephen C ; Beach, Michael J ; Buehler, James W ; Bresnitz, Eddy A ; Pinner, Robert W ; Bell, Beth P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c654t-230eaa33cffade916219bd8f49613917f76d3e2c853e28c40d8b3eb31f2048653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anthrax</topic><topic>Anthrax - diagnosis</topic><topic>Anthrax - epidemiology</topic><topic>Bacillus anthracis</topic><topic>bioterrorism</topic><topic>Bioterrorism - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Coroners and Medical Examiners</topic><topic>Delaware</topic><topic>Delaware - epidemiology</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Dispatch</topic><topic>Equipment Contamination</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Hospital patients</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infection</topic><topic>Infection control</topic><topic>infectious diseases</topic><topic>Inhalation Exposure</topic><topic>Medical examination</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>New Jersey</topic><topic>New Jersey - epidemiology</topic><topic>Pennsylvania</topic><topic>Pennsylvania - epidemiology</topic><topic>Population Surveillance</topic><topic>Postal Service</topic><topic>Practice</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Respiratory Tract Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Respiratory Tract Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Respiratory Tract Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Safety and security measures</topic><topic>Skin Diseases, Bacterial - diagnosis</topic><topic>Skin Diseases, Bacterial - epidemiology</topic><topic>Skin Diseases, Bacterial - microbiology</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tan, Christina G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandhu, Hardeep S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crawford, Dana C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Redd, Stephen C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beach, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buehler, James W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bresnitz, Eddy A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinner, Robert W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, Beth P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Centers for Disease Control and Prevention New Jersey Anthrax Surveillance Team</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Regional Anthrax Surveillance Team</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the Regional Anthrax Surveillance Team</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention New Jersey Anthrax Surveillance Team</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints in Context (Gale)</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Emerging infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tan, Christina G</au><au>Sandhu, Hardeep S</au><au>Crawford, Dana C</au><au>Redd, Stephen C</au><au>Beach, Michael J</au><au>Buehler, James W</au><au>Bresnitz, Eddy A</au><au>Pinner, Robert W</au><au>Bell, Beth P</au><aucorp>Centers for Disease Control and Prevention New Jersey Anthrax Surveillance Team</aucorp><aucorp>Regional Anthrax Surveillance Team</aucorp><aucorp>the Regional Anthrax Surveillance Team</aucorp><aucorp>the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention New Jersey Anthrax Surveillance Team</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Surveillance for anthrax cases associated with contaminated letters, New Jersey, Delaware, and Pennsylvania, 2001</atitle><jtitle>Emerging infectious diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Emerg Infect Dis</addtitle><date>2002-10</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1073</spage><epage>1077</epage><pages>1073-1077</pages><issn>1080-6040</issn><eissn>1080-6059</eissn><abstract>In October 2001, two inhalational anthrax and four cutaneous anthrax cases, resulting from the processing of Bacillus anthracis-containing envelopes at a New Jersey mail facility, were identified. Subsequently, we initiated stimulated passive hospital-based and enhanced passive surveillance for anthrax-compatible syndromes. From October 24 to December 17, 2001, hospitals reported 240,160 visits and 7,109 intensive-care unit admissions in the surveillance area (population 6.7 million persons). Following a change of reporting criteria on November 8, the average of possible inhalational anthrax reports decreased 83% from 18 to 3 per day; the proportion of reports requiring follow-up increased from 37% (105/286) to 41% (47/116). Clinical follow-up was conducted on 214 of 464 possible inhalational anthrax patients and 98 possible cutaneous anthrax patients; 49 had additional laboratory testing. No additional cases were identified. To verify the limited scope of the outbreak, surveillance was essential, though labor-intensive. The flexibility of the system allowed interim evaluation, thus improving surveillance efficiency.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>U.S. National Center for Infectious Diseases</pub><pmid>12396918</pmid><doi>10.3201/eid0810.020322</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1080-6040
ispartof Emerging infectious diseases, 2002-10, Vol.8 (10), p.1073-1077
issn 1080-6040
1080-6059
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a705403d2d5f4d2a83891fba386c5ac9
source PubMed Central
subjects Adult
Anthrax
Anthrax - diagnosis
Anthrax - epidemiology
Bacillus anthracis
bioterrorism
Bioterrorism - statistics & numerical data
Coroners and Medical Examiners
Delaware
Delaware - epidemiology
Diagnosis
Dispatch
Equipment Contamination
Female
Health aspects
Hospital patients
Hospitals
Humans
Infection
Infection control
infectious diseases
Inhalation Exposure
Medical examination
Methods
New Jersey
New Jersey - epidemiology
Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania - epidemiology
Population Surveillance
Postal Service
Practice
Prevention
Public health
Respiratory Tract Infections - diagnosis
Respiratory Tract Infections - epidemiology
Respiratory Tract Infections - microbiology
Safety and security measures
Skin Diseases, Bacterial - diagnosis
Skin Diseases, Bacterial - epidemiology
Skin Diseases, Bacterial - microbiology
Time Factors
United States
title Surveillance for anthrax cases associated with contaminated letters, New Jersey, Delaware, and Pennsylvania, 2001
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T22%3A48%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Surveillance%20for%20anthrax%20cases%20associated%20with%20contaminated%20letters,%20New%20Jersey,%20Delaware,%20and%20Pennsylvania,%202001&rft.jtitle=Emerging%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=Tan,%20Christina%20G&rft.aucorp=Centers%20for%20Disease%20Control%20and%20Prevention%20New%20Jersey%20Anthrax%20Surveillance%20Team&rft.date=2002-10&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1073&rft.epage=1077&rft.pages=1073-1077&rft.issn=1080-6040&rft.eissn=1080-6059&rft_id=info:doi/10.3201/eid0810.020322&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA93532600%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c654t-230eaa33cffade916219bd8f49613917f76d3e2c853e28c40d8b3eb31f2048653%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18946606&rft_id=info:pmid/12396918&rft_galeid=A93532600&rfr_iscdi=true