Loading…
Reproducibility of SNV-calling in multiple sequencing runs from single tumors
We examined 55 technical sequencing replicates of Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) tumors from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) to ascertain the degree of repeatability in calling single-nucleotide variants (SNVs). We used the same mutation-calling pipeline on all pairs of samples, and we measured the ex...
Saved in:
Published in: | PeerJ (San Francisco, CA) CA), 2016-01, Vol.4, p.e1508-e1508, Article e1508 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-5faa9a2f6610f6e292b42a3c744957c7ffe27d959dee1480686312db1cf0b8473 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-5faa9a2f6610f6e292b42a3c744957c7ffe27d959dee1480686312db1cf0b8473 |
container_end_page | e1508 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | e1508 |
container_title | PeerJ (San Francisco, CA) |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | Derryberry, Dakota Z Cowperthwaite, Matthew C Wilke, Claus O |
description | We examined 55 technical sequencing replicates of Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) tumors from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) to ascertain the degree of repeatability in calling single-nucleotide variants (SNVs). We used the same mutation-calling pipeline on all pairs of samples, and we measured the extent of the overlap between two replicates; that is, how many specific point mutations were found in both replicates. We further tested whether additional filtering increased or decreased the size of the overlap. We found that about half of the putative mutations identified in one sequencing run of a given sample were also identified in the second, and that this percentage remained steady throughout orders of magnitude of variation in the total number of mutations identified (from 23 to 10,966). We further found that using filtering after SNV-calling removed the overlap completely. We concluded that there is variation in the frequency of mutations in GBMs, and that while some filtering approaches preferentially removed putative mutations found in only one replicate, others removed a large fraction of putative mutations found in both. |
doi_str_mv | 10.7717/peerj.1508 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a725e0b2d8ab4ad39451b97a436f87ab</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A543413963</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_a725e0b2d8ab4ad39451b97a436f87ab</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A543413963</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-5faa9a2f6610f6e292b42a3c744957c7ffe27d959dee1480686312db1cf0b8473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkmtrFDEUhgdRbKn94g-QAUFEmDXJ5DL5IpTipVAVvH0NmczJbpZMsiYzQv-9mW6tu2ISSHLOc96Ql1NVTzFaCYHF6x1A2q4wQ92D6pRgLpquZfLhwfmkOs95i8roCEdd-7g6IbxjrKzT6uMX2KU4zMb1zrvppo62_vrpR2O09y6saxfqcfaT23moM_ycIZglnOaQa5viWOdyLblpHmPKT6pHVvsM53f7WfX93dtvlx-a68_vry4vrhvDBJoaZrWWmljOMbIciCQ9Jbo1glLJhBHWAhGDZHIAwLRDvOMtJkOPjUV9R0V7Vl3tdYeot2qX3KjTjYraqdtATGul0-SMB6UFYYB6MnS6p3poJWW4l0LTlttO6L5ovdlr7eZ-hMFAmJL2R6LHmeA2ah1_KSooRpwWgZd3AikWg_KkRpcNeK8DxDkrLApECaUL-vwfdBvnFIpVCkuGOZNCkL_UWpcPuGBjedcsouqCFSncSt4WavUfqswBRmdiAOtK_KjgxUHBBrSfNjn6eXIx5GPw1R40KeacwN6bgZFamk7dNp1amq7Azw7tu0f_tFj7GyT10Lg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1951659772</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reproducibility of SNV-calling in multiple sequencing runs from single tumors</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>PubMed Central (PMC)</source><creator>Derryberry, Dakota Z ; Cowperthwaite, Matthew C ; Wilke, Claus O</creator><creatorcontrib>Derryberry, Dakota Z ; Cowperthwaite, Matthew C ; Wilke, Claus O</creatorcontrib><description>We examined 55 technical sequencing replicates of Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) tumors from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) to ascertain the degree of repeatability in calling single-nucleotide variants (SNVs). We used the same mutation-calling pipeline on all pairs of samples, and we measured the extent of the overlap between two replicates; that is, how many specific point mutations were found in both replicates. We further tested whether additional filtering increased or decreased the size of the overlap. We found that about half of the putative mutations identified in one sequencing run of a given sample were also identified in the second, and that this percentage remained steady throughout orders of magnitude of variation in the total number of mutations identified (from 23 to 10,966). We further found that using filtering after SNV-calling removed the overlap completely. We concluded that there is variation in the frequency of mutations in GBMs, and that while some filtering approaches preferentially removed putative mutations found in only one replicate, others removed a large fraction of putative mutations found in both.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2167-8359</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2167-8359</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1508</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26855855</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: PeerJ. Ltd</publisher><subject>Benchmarking ; Bioinformatics ; Biology ; Brain cancer ; Cancer ; Cancer genetics ; Computational Biology ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; Exome sequencing ; Gene mutation ; Genetic aspects ; Genetics ; Genomes ; Genomics ; Glioblastoma ; Medical prognosis ; Mutation ; Oncology ; Reproducibility ; SNV-calling ; TCGA ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA), 2016-01, Vol.4, p.e1508-e1508, Article e1508</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 PeerJ. Ltd.</rights><rights>2016 Derryberry et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2016 Derryberry et al. 2016 Derryberry et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-5faa9a2f6610f6e292b42a3c744957c7ffe27d959dee1480686312db1cf0b8473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-5faa9a2f6610f6e292b42a3c744957c7ffe27d959dee1480686312db1cf0b8473</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1951659772/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1951659772?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25751,27922,27923,37010,37011,44588,53789,53791,74896</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26855855$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Derryberry, Dakota Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cowperthwaite, Matthew C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilke, Claus O</creatorcontrib><title>Reproducibility of SNV-calling in multiple sequencing runs from single tumors</title><title>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA)</title><addtitle>PeerJ</addtitle><description>We examined 55 technical sequencing replicates of Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) tumors from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) to ascertain the degree of repeatability in calling single-nucleotide variants (SNVs). We used the same mutation-calling pipeline on all pairs of samples, and we measured the extent of the overlap between two replicates; that is, how many specific point mutations were found in both replicates. We further tested whether additional filtering increased or decreased the size of the overlap. We found that about half of the putative mutations identified in one sequencing run of a given sample were also identified in the second, and that this percentage remained steady throughout orders of magnitude of variation in the total number of mutations identified (from 23 to 10,966). We further found that using filtering after SNV-calling removed the overlap completely. We concluded that there is variation in the frequency of mutations in GBMs, and that while some filtering approaches preferentially removed putative mutations found in only one replicate, others removed a large fraction of putative mutations found in both.</description><subject>Benchmarking</subject><subject>Bioinformatics</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Brain cancer</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer genetics</subject><subject>Computational Biology</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>Exome sequencing</subject><subject>Gene mutation</subject><subject>Genetic aspects</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>Genomics</subject><subject>Glioblastoma</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Reproducibility</subject><subject>SNV-calling</subject><subject>TCGA</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>2167-8359</issn><issn>2167-8359</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkmtrFDEUhgdRbKn94g-QAUFEmDXJ5DL5IpTipVAVvH0NmczJbpZMsiYzQv-9mW6tu2ISSHLOc96Ql1NVTzFaCYHF6x1A2q4wQ92D6pRgLpquZfLhwfmkOs95i8roCEdd-7g6IbxjrKzT6uMX2KU4zMb1zrvppo62_vrpR2O09y6saxfqcfaT23moM_ycIZglnOaQa5viWOdyLblpHmPKT6pHVvsM53f7WfX93dtvlx-a68_vry4vrhvDBJoaZrWWmljOMbIciCQ9Jbo1glLJhBHWAhGDZHIAwLRDvOMtJkOPjUV9R0V7Vl3tdYeot2qX3KjTjYraqdtATGul0-SMB6UFYYB6MnS6p3poJWW4l0LTlttO6L5ovdlr7eZ-hMFAmJL2R6LHmeA2ah1_KSooRpwWgZd3AikWg_KkRpcNeK8DxDkrLApECaUL-vwfdBvnFIpVCkuGOZNCkL_UWpcPuGBjedcsouqCFSncSt4WavUfqswBRmdiAOtK_KjgxUHBBrSfNjn6eXIx5GPw1R40KeacwN6bgZFamk7dNp1amq7Azw7tu0f_tFj7GyT10Lg</recordid><startdate>20160104</startdate><enddate>20160104</enddate><creator>Derryberry, Dakota Z</creator><creator>Cowperthwaite, Matthew C</creator><creator>Wilke, Claus O</creator><general>PeerJ. Ltd</general><general>PeerJ, Inc</general><general>PeerJ Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160104</creationdate><title>Reproducibility of SNV-calling in multiple sequencing runs from single tumors</title><author>Derryberry, Dakota Z ; Cowperthwaite, Matthew C ; Wilke, Claus O</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-5faa9a2f6610f6e292b42a3c744957c7ffe27d959dee1480686312db1cf0b8473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Benchmarking</topic><topic>Bioinformatics</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Brain cancer</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer genetics</topic><topic>Computational Biology</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>Exome sequencing</topic><topic>Gene mutation</topic><topic>Genetic aspects</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>Genomics</topic><topic>Glioblastoma</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Reproducibility</topic><topic>SNV-calling</topic><topic>TCGA</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Derryberry, Dakota Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cowperthwaite, Matthew C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilke, Claus O</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Derryberry, Dakota Z</au><au>Cowperthwaite, Matthew C</au><au>Wilke, Claus O</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reproducibility of SNV-calling in multiple sequencing runs from single tumors</atitle><jtitle>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA)</jtitle><addtitle>PeerJ</addtitle><date>2016-01-04</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>4</volume><spage>e1508</spage><epage>e1508</epage><pages>e1508-e1508</pages><artnum>e1508</artnum><issn>2167-8359</issn><eissn>2167-8359</eissn><abstract>We examined 55 technical sequencing replicates of Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) tumors from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) to ascertain the degree of repeatability in calling single-nucleotide variants (SNVs). We used the same mutation-calling pipeline on all pairs of samples, and we measured the extent of the overlap between two replicates; that is, how many specific point mutations were found in both replicates. We further tested whether additional filtering increased or decreased the size of the overlap. We found that about half of the putative mutations identified in one sequencing run of a given sample were also identified in the second, and that this percentage remained steady throughout orders of magnitude of variation in the total number of mutations identified (from 23 to 10,966). We further found that using filtering after SNV-calling removed the overlap completely. We concluded that there is variation in the frequency of mutations in GBMs, and that while some filtering approaches preferentially removed putative mutations found in only one replicate, others removed a large fraction of putative mutations found in both.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>PeerJ. Ltd</pub><pmid>26855855</pmid><doi>10.7717/peerj.1508</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2167-8359 |
ispartof | PeerJ (San Francisco, CA), 2016-01, Vol.4, p.e1508-e1508, Article e1508 |
issn | 2167-8359 2167-8359 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a725e0b2d8ab4ad39451b97a436f87ab |
source | Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); PubMed Central (PMC) |
subjects | Benchmarking Bioinformatics Biology Brain cancer Cancer Cancer genetics Computational Biology Deoxyribonucleic acid DNA Exome sequencing Gene mutation Genetic aspects Genetics Genomes Genomics Glioblastoma Medical prognosis Mutation Oncology Reproducibility SNV-calling TCGA Tumors |
title | Reproducibility of SNV-calling in multiple sequencing runs from single tumors |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T11%3A55%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reproducibility%20of%20SNV-calling%20in%20multiple%20sequencing%20runs%20from%20single%20tumors&rft.jtitle=PeerJ%20(San%20Francisco,%20CA)&rft.au=Derryberry,%20Dakota%20Z&rft.date=2016-01-04&rft.volume=4&rft.spage=e1508&rft.epage=e1508&rft.pages=e1508-e1508&rft.artnum=e1508&rft.issn=2167-8359&rft.eissn=2167-8359&rft_id=info:doi/10.7717/peerj.1508&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA543413963%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-5faa9a2f6610f6e292b42a3c744957c7ffe27d959dee1480686312db1cf0b8473%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1951659772&rft_id=info:pmid/26855855&rft_galeid=A543413963&rfr_iscdi=true |