Biomechanical study of oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) augmented with different types of instrumentation: a finite element analysis

• Published in: Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research 2022-05, Vol.17 (1), p.269-269, Article 269
• Main Authors: Cai, Xin-Yi, Bian, Han-Ming, Chen, Chao, Ma, Xin-Long, Yang, Qiang
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Analysis; Augmentation; Biomechanical Phenomena; Biomechanical study; Biomechanics; CAE; Cancellous bone; Cartilage; Computer aided engineering; Computer simulation; Finite Element Analysis; Finite element method; Humans; Intervertebral discs; Ligaments; Lumbar spine; Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery; Lumbosacral Region; Mathematical models; Oblique lumbar interbody fusion; Orthopedics; Pedicle Screws; Range of Motion, Articular; Software; Spinal Fusion - methods; Spine (lumbar); Surgery
• ISSN: 1749-799X; 1749-799X
• DOI: 10.1186/s13018-022-03143-z

To explore the biomechanical differences in oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) augmented by different types of instrumentation. A three-dimensional nonlinear finite element (FE) model of an intact L3-S1 lumbar spine was built and validated. The intact model was modified to develop five OLIF surgery models (Stand-alone OLIF; OLIF with lateral plate fixation [OLIF + LPF]; OLIF with unilateral pedicle screws fixation [OLIF + UPSF]; OLIF with bilateral pedicle screws fixation [OLIF + BPSF]; OLIF with translaminar facet joint fixation + unilateral pedicle screws fixation [OLIF + TFJF + UPSF]) in which the surgical segment was L4-L5. Under a follower load of 500 N, a 7.5-Nm moment was applied to all lumbar spine models to calculate the range of motion (ROM), equivalent stress peak of fixation instruments (ESPFI), equivalent stress peak of cage (ESPC), equivalent stress peak of cortical endplate (ESPCE), and equivalent stress average value of cancellous bone (ESAVCB). Compared with the intact model, the ROM of the L4-L5 segment in each OLIF surgery model decreased by > 80%. The ROM values of adjacent segments were not significantly different. The ESPFI, ESPC, and ESPCE values of the OLIF + BPSF model were smaller than those of the other OLIF surgery models. The ESAVCB value of the normal lumbar model was less than the ESAVCB values of all OLIF surgical models. In most postures, the ESPFI, ESPCE, and ESAVCB values of the OLIF + LPF model were the largest. The ESPC was higher in the Stand-alone OLIF model than in the other OLIF models. The stresses of several important components of the OLIF + UPSF and OLIF + TFJF + UPSF models were between those of the OLIF + LPF and OLIF + BPSF models. Our biomechanical FE analysis indicated the greater ability of OLIF + BPSF to retain lumbar stability, resist cage subsidence, and maintain disc height. Therefore, in the augmentation of OLIF, bilateral pedicle screws fixation may be the best approach.