Loading…

Caesarean sections before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in western Sydney, Australia

BackgroundTo determine the changes in emergency and elective caesarean section (CS) rates since the COVID-19 pandemic, identify the groups most affected, and examine changes in the factors associated with CS rates, and reasons for CS.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using routinely c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2023-12, Vol.43 (2), p.2265668-2265668
Main Authors: Trinh, Lieu Thi Thuy, Achat, Helen M., Pesce, Andrew
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-8a2852b855d16de650eb601cb9b4f5cb617ba45be1cfffc64e836b99181f37e73
container_end_page 2265668
container_issue 2
container_start_page 2265668
container_title Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
container_volume 43
creator Trinh, Lieu Thi Thuy
Achat, Helen M.
Pesce, Andrew
description BackgroundTo determine the changes in emergency and elective caesarean section (CS) rates since the COVID-19 pandemic, identify the groups most affected, and examine changes in the factors associated with CS rates, and reasons for CS.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using routinely collected data of 22,346 births from before the pandemic (January 2018–February 2020) and 18,597 births during the pandemic (March 2020–December 2021). Data were analysed using multinominal logistic regression.ResultsThe CS rate increased by 4.1% (from 30.1% to 34.2%), reflecting increases of 2.3% in emergency CS (from 11.5% to 13.8%) and 1.7% in elective CS (from 18.7% to 20.4%). Large groups with notable increases were women who were nulliparous (7.2% increase), from South Asia (6.0%), obese (5.2%) and giving birth at a small hospital (6.1%). Compared to pre-pandemic, the relative risk of an emergency CS versus a vaginal delivery increased 1.36 times (adjusted relative risk ratio (aRRR) = 1.36; 95% CI = 1.27, 1.45) and the risk of having an elective CS increased 1.11 times (aRRR = 1.11; 95% CI = 1.04, 1.20). Factors associated with both emergency and elective CS were age, region of birth, reproductive history, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes, mode of antenatal care and hospital. Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas and antenatal care were only associated with elective CS. Baby gender was only associated with emergency CS. Preterm gestation at delivery was associated with reduced emergency but increased elective CS. Foetal compromise was the most common indication for emergency CS (43.2%) and increased the most (8.0%). Previous CS was the most common indication for elective CS (61.5%) and reduced the most (1.9%).ConclusionsBoth emergency and elective CS rates increased significantly during the pandemic, with the former increasing at a higher rate. The persistent upward trend of CS rates, exacerbated by increasing proportions of nulliparous women undergoing CSs, is concerning.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/01443615.2023.2265668
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a79dfbfb045f43cab3cfef402e34cab1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_a79dfbfb045f43cab3cfef402e34cab1</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3087524816</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-8a2852b855d16de650eb601cb9b4f5cb617ba45be1cfffc64e836b99181f37e73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1rGzEQhkVpoW6Sn1AQ9NJD19H3ao_BaRJDIIe0zVFI2lEqs5YcaZfgf991nPSQ0zAzDy8zPAh9pWRJiSbnhArBFZVLRhhfMqakUvoDWlCuRKN0xz-ixYFpDtBn9KXWDSGEEikW6GFlodoCNuEKfow5Vewg5ALYph73U4npEY9_Aa_u_qwvG9rh3byAbfQ4JvwMdYSS8P2-T7D_gS-mOhY7RHuKPgU7VDh7rSfo99XPX6ub5vbuer26uG08b-XYaMu0ZE5L2VPVg5IEnCLUu86JIL1TtHVWSAfUhxC8EqC5cl1HNQ28hZafoPUxt892Y3Ylbm3Zm2yjeRnk8mhsGaMfwNi264MLjggZBPfWcR8gCMKAi7mjc9b3Y9au5Kdp_sxsY_UwDDZBnqphWnPZaiHJjH57h27yVNL8qeFEt5IJTdVMySPlS661QPh_ICXmoM68qTMHdeZVHf8HFjCK5w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3087524816</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Caesarean sections before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in western Sydney, Australia</title><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Trinh, Lieu Thi Thuy ; Achat, Helen M. ; Pesce, Andrew</creator><creatorcontrib>Trinh, Lieu Thi Thuy ; Achat, Helen M. ; Pesce, Andrew</creatorcontrib><description>BackgroundTo determine the changes in emergency and elective caesarean section (CS) rates since the COVID-19 pandemic, identify the groups most affected, and examine changes in the factors associated with CS rates, and reasons for CS.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using routinely collected data of 22,346 births from before the pandemic (January 2018–February 2020) and 18,597 births during the pandemic (March 2020–December 2021). Data were analysed using multinominal logistic regression.ResultsThe CS rate increased by 4.1% (from 30.1% to 34.2%), reflecting increases of 2.3% in emergency CS (from 11.5% to 13.8%) and 1.7% in elective CS (from 18.7% to 20.4%). Large groups with notable increases were women who were nulliparous (7.2% increase), from South Asia (6.0%), obese (5.2%) and giving birth at a small hospital (6.1%). Compared to pre-pandemic, the relative risk of an emergency CS versus a vaginal delivery increased 1.36 times (adjusted relative risk ratio (aRRR) = 1.36; 95% CI = 1.27, 1.45) and the risk of having an elective CS increased 1.11 times (aRRR = 1.11; 95% CI = 1.04, 1.20). Factors associated with both emergency and elective CS were age, region of birth, reproductive history, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes, mode of antenatal care and hospital. Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas and antenatal care were only associated with elective CS. Baby gender was only associated with emergency CS. Preterm gestation at delivery was associated with reduced emergency but increased elective CS. Foetal compromise was the most common indication for emergency CS (43.2%) and increased the most (8.0%). Previous CS was the most common indication for elective CS (61.5%) and reduced the most (1.9%).ConclusionsBoth emergency and elective CS rates increased significantly during the pandemic, with the former increasing at a higher rate. The persistent upward trend of CS rates, exacerbated by increasing proportions of nulliparous women undergoing CSs, is concerning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-3615</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1364-6893</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2023.2265668</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</publisher><subject>Births ; caesarean section ; Cesarean section ; Childbirth &amp; labor ; country of birth ; COVID-19 ; covid-19 pandemic ; immigrants ; Pandemics ; parity ; Pregnancy ; pregnant women ; Prenatal care</subject><ispartof>Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2023-12, Vol.43 (2), p.2265668-2265668</ispartof><rights>2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-8a2852b855d16de650eb601cb9b4f5cb617ba45be1cfffc64e836b99181f37e73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6303-860X ; 0000-0003-3952-7734</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Trinh, Lieu Thi Thuy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Achat, Helen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pesce, Andrew</creatorcontrib><title>Caesarean sections before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in western Sydney, Australia</title><title>Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</title><description>BackgroundTo determine the changes in emergency and elective caesarean section (CS) rates since the COVID-19 pandemic, identify the groups most affected, and examine changes in the factors associated with CS rates, and reasons for CS.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using routinely collected data of 22,346 births from before the pandemic (January 2018–February 2020) and 18,597 births during the pandemic (March 2020–December 2021). Data were analysed using multinominal logistic regression.ResultsThe CS rate increased by 4.1% (from 30.1% to 34.2%), reflecting increases of 2.3% in emergency CS (from 11.5% to 13.8%) and 1.7% in elective CS (from 18.7% to 20.4%). Large groups with notable increases were women who were nulliparous (7.2% increase), from South Asia (6.0%), obese (5.2%) and giving birth at a small hospital (6.1%). Compared to pre-pandemic, the relative risk of an emergency CS versus a vaginal delivery increased 1.36 times (adjusted relative risk ratio (aRRR) = 1.36; 95% CI = 1.27, 1.45) and the risk of having an elective CS increased 1.11 times (aRRR = 1.11; 95% CI = 1.04, 1.20). Factors associated with both emergency and elective CS were age, region of birth, reproductive history, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes, mode of antenatal care and hospital. Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas and antenatal care were only associated with elective CS. Baby gender was only associated with emergency CS. Preterm gestation at delivery was associated with reduced emergency but increased elective CS. Foetal compromise was the most common indication for emergency CS (43.2%) and increased the most (8.0%). Previous CS was the most common indication for elective CS (61.5%) and reduced the most (1.9%).ConclusionsBoth emergency and elective CS rates increased significantly during the pandemic, with the former increasing at a higher rate. The persistent upward trend of CS rates, exacerbated by increasing proportions of nulliparous women undergoing CSs, is concerning.</description><subject>Births</subject><subject>caesarean section</subject><subject>Cesarean section</subject><subject>Childbirth &amp; labor</subject><subject>country of birth</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>covid-19 pandemic</subject><subject>immigrants</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>parity</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>pregnant women</subject><subject>Prenatal care</subject><issn>0144-3615</issn><issn>1364-6893</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1rGzEQhkVpoW6Sn1AQ9NJD19H3ao_BaRJDIIe0zVFI2lEqs5YcaZfgf991nPSQ0zAzDy8zPAh9pWRJiSbnhArBFZVLRhhfMqakUvoDWlCuRKN0xz-ixYFpDtBn9KXWDSGEEikW6GFlodoCNuEKfow5Vewg5ALYph73U4npEY9_Aa_u_qwvG9rh3byAbfQ4JvwMdYSS8P2-T7D_gS-mOhY7RHuKPgU7VDh7rSfo99XPX6ub5vbuer26uG08b-XYaMu0ZE5L2VPVg5IEnCLUu86JIL1TtHVWSAfUhxC8EqC5cl1HNQ28hZafoPUxt892Y3Ylbm3Zm2yjeRnk8mhsGaMfwNi264MLjggZBPfWcR8gCMKAi7mjc9b3Y9au5Kdp_sxsY_UwDDZBnqphWnPZaiHJjH57h27yVNL8qeFEt5IJTdVMySPlS661QPh_ICXmoM68qTMHdeZVHf8HFjCK5w</recordid><startdate>20231201</startdate><enddate>20231201</enddate><creator>Trinh, Lieu Thi Thuy</creator><creator>Achat, Helen M.</creator><creator>Pesce, Andrew</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6303-860X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3952-7734</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231201</creationdate><title>Caesarean sections before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in western Sydney, Australia</title><author>Trinh, Lieu Thi Thuy ; Achat, Helen M. ; Pesce, Andrew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-8a2852b855d16de650eb601cb9b4f5cb617ba45be1cfffc64e836b99181f37e73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Births</topic><topic>caesarean section</topic><topic>Cesarean section</topic><topic>Childbirth &amp; labor</topic><topic>country of birth</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>covid-19 pandemic</topic><topic>immigrants</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>parity</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>pregnant women</topic><topic>Prenatal care</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Trinh, Lieu Thi Thuy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Achat, Helen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pesce, Andrew</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Trinh, Lieu Thi Thuy</au><au>Achat, Helen M.</au><au>Pesce, Andrew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Caesarean sections before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in western Sydney, Australia</atitle><jtitle>Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle><date>2023-12-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>2265668</spage><epage>2265668</epage><pages>2265668-2265668</pages><issn>0144-3615</issn><eissn>1364-6893</eissn><abstract>BackgroundTo determine the changes in emergency and elective caesarean section (CS) rates since the COVID-19 pandemic, identify the groups most affected, and examine changes in the factors associated with CS rates, and reasons for CS.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using routinely collected data of 22,346 births from before the pandemic (January 2018–February 2020) and 18,597 births during the pandemic (March 2020–December 2021). Data were analysed using multinominal logistic regression.ResultsThe CS rate increased by 4.1% (from 30.1% to 34.2%), reflecting increases of 2.3% in emergency CS (from 11.5% to 13.8%) and 1.7% in elective CS (from 18.7% to 20.4%). Large groups with notable increases were women who were nulliparous (7.2% increase), from South Asia (6.0%), obese (5.2%) and giving birth at a small hospital (6.1%). Compared to pre-pandemic, the relative risk of an emergency CS versus a vaginal delivery increased 1.36 times (adjusted relative risk ratio (aRRR) = 1.36; 95% CI = 1.27, 1.45) and the risk of having an elective CS increased 1.11 times (aRRR = 1.11; 95% CI = 1.04, 1.20). Factors associated with both emergency and elective CS were age, region of birth, reproductive history, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes, mode of antenatal care and hospital. Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas and antenatal care were only associated with elective CS. Baby gender was only associated with emergency CS. Preterm gestation at delivery was associated with reduced emergency but increased elective CS. Foetal compromise was the most common indication for emergency CS (43.2%) and increased the most (8.0%). Previous CS was the most common indication for elective CS (61.5%) and reduced the most (1.9%).ConclusionsBoth emergency and elective CS rates increased significantly during the pandemic, with the former increasing at a higher rate. The persistent upward trend of CS rates, exacerbated by increasing proportions of nulliparous women undergoing CSs, is concerning.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</pub><doi>10.1080/01443615.2023.2265668</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6303-860X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3952-7734</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0144-3615
ispartof Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2023-12, Vol.43 (2), p.2265668-2265668
issn 0144-3615
1364-6893
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a79dfbfb045f43cab3cfef402e34cab1
source Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)
subjects Births
caesarean section
Cesarean section
Childbirth & labor
country of birth
COVID-19
covid-19 pandemic
immigrants
Pandemics
parity
Pregnancy
pregnant women
Prenatal care
title Caesarean sections before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in western Sydney, Australia
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T07%3A30%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Caesarean%20sections%20before%20and%20during%20the%20COVID-19%20pandemic%20in%20western%20Sydney,%20Australia&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynaecology&rft.au=Trinh,%20Lieu%20Thi%20Thuy&rft.date=2023-12-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=2265668&rft.epage=2265668&rft.pages=2265668-2265668&rft.issn=0144-3615&rft.eissn=1364-6893&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/01443615.2023.2265668&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3087524816%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-8a2852b855d16de650eb601cb9b4f5cb617ba45be1cfffc64e836b99181f37e73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3087524816&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true