Not Only Toxic but Repellent: What Can Organisms' Responses Tell Us about Contamination and What Are the Ecological Consequences When They Flee from an Environment?

• Published in: Toxics (Basel) 2020-12, Vol.8 (4), p.118
• Main Authors: Araújo, Cristiano V M, Laissaoui, Abdelmourhit, Silva, Daniel C V R, Ramos-Rodríguez, Eloisa, González-Ortegón, Enrique, Espíndola, Evaldo L G, Baldó, Francisco, Mena, Freylan, Parra, Gema, Blasco, Julián, López-Doval, Julio, Sendra, Marta, Banni, Mohamed, Islam, Mohammed Ariful, Moreno-Garrido, Ignacio
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adaptation; Aquatic ecosystems; Aquatic environment; Aquatic organisms; avoidance; behavior; Biodiversity; Chemical contamination; Chemical pollution; Chemicals; Contaminants; Contamination; Ecological effects; Ecological niches; Ecology; Ecosystems; Environmental factors; Environmental risk; Exposure; Habitat selection; Habitats; Homeostasis; Landscape ecology; multi-compartmented systems; Niches; non-forced exposure; Organisms; Repellency; Review; Spatial distribution; Toxicity; Toxicology
• ISSN: 2305-6304; 2305-6304
• DOI: 10.3390/toxics8040118

The ability of aquatic organisms to sense the surrounding environment chemically and interpret such signals correctly is crucial for their ecological niche and survival. Although it is an oversimplification of the ecological interactions, we could consider that a significant part of the decisions taken by organisms are, to some extent, chemically driven. Accordingly, chemical contamination might interfere in the way organisms behave and interact with the environment. Just as any environmental factor, contamination can make a habitat less attractive or even unsuitable to accommodate life, conditioning to some degree the decision of organisms to stay in, or move from, an ecosystem. If we consider that contamination is not always spatially homogeneous and that many organisms can avoid it, the ability of contaminants to repel organisms should also be of concern. Thus, in this critical review, we have discussed the dual role of contamination: toxicity (disruption of the physiological and behavioral homeostasis) vs. repellency (contamination-driven changes in spatial distribution/habitat selection). The discussion is centered on methodologies (forced exposure against non-forced multi-compartmented exposure systems) and conceptual improvements (individual stress due to the toxic effects caused by a continuous exposure against contamination-driven spatial distribution). Finally, we propose an approach in which Stress and Landscape Ecology could be integrated with each other to improve our understanding of the threat contaminants represent to aquatic ecosystems.