Loading…

Effectiveness of robotic balance training on postural instability in patients with mild Parkinson's disease: A pilot, single blind, randomized controlled trial

To examine whether tailored robotic platform training could improve postural stability compared with conventional balance treatment in patients with mild Parkinson's disease.  Design: Randomized single-blind pilot study. Twenty-two patients with mild Parkinson's disease (Hoehn and Yahr sca...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of rehabilitation medicine 2021-02, Vol.53 (2), p.jrm00154
Main Authors: Spina, Stefania, Facciorusso, Salvatore, Cinone, Nicoletta, Armiento, Raffaella, Picelli, Alessandro, Avvantaggiato, Christian, Ciritella, Chiara, Fiore, Pietro, Santamato, Andrea
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To examine whether tailored robotic platform training could improve postural stability compared with conventional balance treatment in patients with mild Parkinson's disease.  Design: Randomized single-blind pilot study. Twenty-two patients with mild Parkinson's disease (Hoehn and Yahr scale; HandY 1-2). Patients were randomly assigned to an experimental group for robotic balance training and to a control group for conventional balance training. Each patient received 20 treatments (45 min/session, 5 times/week). Blinded evaluations were conducted before and after the treatment and 1 month post-treatment. Primary outcome measures were Mini BESTest, and Berg Balance Scale; secondary outcome measures were 10-Meter Walk Test, Five Times Sit to Stand Test, and Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire 39. Primary outcome measures in patients in both the experimental and control groups improved significantly after the balance treatment. Similar results were found for all the secondary outcome measures. The experimental group performed significantly better than the control group at both post-intervention and follow-up evaluation in the primary outcomes (p 
ISSN:1651-2081
1650-1977
1651-2081
DOI:10.2340/16501977-2793