Loading…
Establishment of a corneal ulcer prognostic model based on machine learning
Corneal infection is a major public health concern worldwide and the most common cause of unilateral corneal blindness. Toxic effects of different microorganisms, such as bacteria and fungi, worsen keratitis leading to corneal perforation even with optimal drug treatment. The cornea forms the main r...
Saved in:
Published in: | Scientific reports 2024-07, Vol.14 (1), p.16154-11, Article 16154 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-520559388d3332196b56a2458a5160b82dc87b06fb89d74d00ef26c6348accb3 |
container_end_page | 11 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 16154 |
container_title | Scientific reports |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Wang, Meng-Tong Cai, You-Ran Jang, Vlon Meng, Hong-Jian Sun, Ling-Bo Deng, Li-Min Liu, Yu-Wen Zou, Wen-Jin |
description | Corneal infection is a major public health concern worldwide and the most common cause of unilateral corneal blindness. Toxic effects of different microorganisms, such as bacteria and fungi, worsen keratitis leading to corneal perforation even with optimal drug treatment. The cornea forms the main refractive surface of the eye. Diseases affecting the cornea can cause severe visual impairment. Therefore, it is crucial to analyze the risk of corneal perforation and visual impairment in corneal ulcer patients for making early treatment strategies. The modeling of a fully automated prognostic model system was performed in two parts. In the first part, the dataset contained 4973 slit lamp images of corneal ulcer patients in three centers. A deep learning model was developed and tested for segmenting and classifying five lesions (corneal ulcer, corneal scar, hypopyon, corneal descementocele, and corneal neovascularization) in the eyes of corneal ulcer patients. Further, hierarchical quantification was carried out based on policy rules. In the second part, the dataset included clinical data (name, gender, age, best corrected visual acuity, and type of corneal ulcer) of 240 patients with corneal ulcers and respective 1010 slit lamp images under two light sources (natural light and cobalt blue light). The slit lamp images were then quantified hierarchically according to the policy rules developed in the first part of the modeling. Combining the above clinical data, the features were used to build the final prognostic model system for corneal ulcer perforation outcome and visual impairment using machine learning algorithms such as XGBoost, LightGBM. The ROC curve area (AUC value) evaluated the model’s performance. For segmentation of the five lesions, the accuracy rates of hypopyon, descemetocele, corneal ulcer under blue light, and corneal neovascularization were 96.86, 91.64, 90.51, and 93.97, respectively. For the corneal scar lesion classification, the accuracy rate of the final model was 69.76. The XGBoost model performed the best in predicting the 1-month prognosis of patients, with an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI 0.63–1.00) for ulcer perforation and an AUC of 0.77 (95% CI 0.63–0.91) for visual impairment. In predicting the 3-month prognosis of patients, the XGBoost model received the best AUC of 0.97 (95% CI 0.92–1.00) for ulcer perforation, while the LightGBM model achieved the best performance with an AUC of 0.98 (95% CI 0.94–1.00) for visual impairment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/s41598-024-66608-7 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a963b842015d4bf38646cc60b69682ca</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_a963b842015d4bf38646cc60b69682ca</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3079856324</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-520559388d3332196b56a2458a5160b82dc87b06fb89d74d00ef26c6348accb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kbtuFTEQhi0EIlHIC1AgSzQ0C77O2iWKAkREoklv-bYne-S1g71b8PaYsyEgCqbxaPzNPzP6EXpNyXtKuPrQBJVaDYSJAQCIGsZn6JwRIQfGGXv-V36GLls7kh6SaUH1S3TGldYj5_ocfb1uq3VpbvdLzCsuE7bYl5qjTXhLPlb8UMshl7bOHi8lxISdbTHgkvFi_f2cI07R1jznwyv0YrKpxcvH9wLdfbq-u_oy3H77fHP18XbwHGAdJCNSaq5U4JwzqsFJsExIZSUF4hQLXo2OwOSUDqMIhMSJgQculPXe8Qt0s8uGYo_moc6LrT9MsbM5FUo9GFv7uikaq4E7JRihMgg3cQUCvO9DQINi3natd7tWv_L7Fttqlrn5mJLNsWzNcDJqJYEz0dG3_6DHstXcDz1RQJlmvFNsp3wtrdU4PS1IifllnNmNM904czLOjL3pzaP05pYYnlp-29QBvgOtf-VDrH9m_0f2Jx7koIg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3079612923</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Establishment of a corneal ulcer prognostic model based on machine learning</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access</source><creator>Wang, Meng-Tong ; Cai, You-Ran ; Jang, Vlon ; Meng, Hong-Jian ; Sun, Ling-Bo ; Deng, Li-Min ; Liu, Yu-Wen ; Zou, Wen-Jin</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Meng-Tong ; Cai, You-Ran ; Jang, Vlon ; Meng, Hong-Jian ; Sun, Ling-Bo ; Deng, Li-Min ; Liu, Yu-Wen ; Zou, Wen-Jin</creatorcontrib><description>Corneal infection is a major public health concern worldwide and the most common cause of unilateral corneal blindness. Toxic effects of different microorganisms, such as bacteria and fungi, worsen keratitis leading to corneal perforation even with optimal drug treatment. The cornea forms the main refractive surface of the eye. Diseases affecting the cornea can cause severe visual impairment. Therefore, it is crucial to analyze the risk of corneal perforation and visual impairment in corneal ulcer patients for making early treatment strategies. The modeling of a fully automated prognostic model system was performed in two parts. In the first part, the dataset contained 4973 slit lamp images of corneal ulcer patients in three centers. A deep learning model was developed and tested for segmenting and classifying five lesions (corneal ulcer, corneal scar, hypopyon, corneal descementocele, and corneal neovascularization) in the eyes of corneal ulcer patients. Further, hierarchical quantification was carried out based on policy rules. In the second part, the dataset included clinical data (name, gender, age, best corrected visual acuity, and type of corneal ulcer) of 240 patients with corneal ulcers and respective 1010 slit lamp images under two light sources (natural light and cobalt blue light). The slit lamp images were then quantified hierarchically according to the policy rules developed in the first part of the modeling. Combining the above clinical data, the features were used to build the final prognostic model system for corneal ulcer perforation outcome and visual impairment using machine learning algorithms such as XGBoost, LightGBM. The ROC curve area (AUC value) evaluated the model’s performance. For segmentation of the five lesions, the accuracy rates of hypopyon, descemetocele, corneal ulcer under blue light, and corneal neovascularization were 96.86, 91.64, 90.51, and 93.97, respectively. For the corneal scar lesion classification, the accuracy rate of the final model was 69.76. The XGBoost model performed the best in predicting the 1-month prognosis of patients, with an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI 0.63–1.00) for ulcer perforation and an AUC of 0.77 (95% CI 0.63–0.91) for visual impairment. In predicting the 3-month prognosis of patients, the XGBoost model received the best AUC of 0.97 (95% CI 0.92–1.00) for ulcer perforation, while the LightGBM model achieved the best performance with an AUC of 0.98 (95% CI 0.94–1.00) for visual impairment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-66608-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38997339</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>692/308 ; 692/499 ; 692/699 ; Acuity ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Artificial intelligence ; Cobalt ; Cornea ; Corneal ulcer ; Corneal Ulcer - diagnosis ; Deep Learning ; Deep-learning algorithm ; Eye diseases ; Female ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Humans ; Keratitis ; Learning algorithms ; Lesions ; Light sources ; Machine Learning ; Male ; Microorganisms ; Middle Aged ; multidisciplinary ; Patients ; Prognosis ; Public health ; ROC Curve ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary) ; Ulcers ; Vascularization ; Visual Acuity ; Visual discrimination learning ; Visual impairment</subject><ispartof>Scientific reports, 2024-07, Vol.14 (1), p.16154-11, Article 16154</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>2024. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-520559388d3332196b56a2458a5160b82dc87b06fb89d74d00ef26c6348accb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3079612923/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3079612923?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,74998</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38997339$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Meng-Tong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, You-Ran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jang, Vlon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meng, Hong-Jian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Ling-Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deng, Li-Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yu-Wen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zou, Wen-Jin</creatorcontrib><title>Establishment of a corneal ulcer prognostic model based on machine learning</title><title>Scientific reports</title><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><description>Corneal infection is a major public health concern worldwide and the most common cause of unilateral corneal blindness. Toxic effects of different microorganisms, such as bacteria and fungi, worsen keratitis leading to corneal perforation even with optimal drug treatment. The cornea forms the main refractive surface of the eye. Diseases affecting the cornea can cause severe visual impairment. Therefore, it is crucial to analyze the risk of corneal perforation and visual impairment in corneal ulcer patients for making early treatment strategies. The modeling of a fully automated prognostic model system was performed in two parts. In the first part, the dataset contained 4973 slit lamp images of corneal ulcer patients in three centers. A deep learning model was developed and tested for segmenting and classifying five lesions (corneal ulcer, corneal scar, hypopyon, corneal descementocele, and corneal neovascularization) in the eyes of corneal ulcer patients. Further, hierarchical quantification was carried out based on policy rules. In the second part, the dataset included clinical data (name, gender, age, best corrected visual acuity, and type of corneal ulcer) of 240 patients with corneal ulcers and respective 1010 slit lamp images under two light sources (natural light and cobalt blue light). The slit lamp images were then quantified hierarchically according to the policy rules developed in the first part of the modeling. Combining the above clinical data, the features were used to build the final prognostic model system for corneal ulcer perforation outcome and visual impairment using machine learning algorithms such as XGBoost, LightGBM. The ROC curve area (AUC value) evaluated the model’s performance. For segmentation of the five lesions, the accuracy rates of hypopyon, descemetocele, corneal ulcer under blue light, and corneal neovascularization were 96.86, 91.64, 90.51, and 93.97, respectively. For the corneal scar lesion classification, the accuracy rate of the final model was 69.76. The XGBoost model performed the best in predicting the 1-month prognosis of patients, with an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI 0.63–1.00) for ulcer perforation and an AUC of 0.77 (95% CI 0.63–0.91) for visual impairment. In predicting the 3-month prognosis of patients, the XGBoost model received the best AUC of 0.97 (95% CI 0.92–1.00) for ulcer perforation, while the LightGBM model achieved the best performance with an AUC of 0.98 (95% CI 0.94–1.00) for visual impairment.</description><subject>692/308</subject><subject>692/499</subject><subject>692/699</subject><subject>Acuity</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Cobalt</subject><subject>Cornea</subject><subject>Corneal ulcer</subject><subject>Corneal Ulcer - diagnosis</subject><subject>Deep Learning</subject><subject>Deep-learning algorithm</subject><subject>Eye diseases</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Keratitis</subject><subject>Learning algorithms</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Light sources</subject><subject>Machine Learning</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><subject>Ulcers</subject><subject>Vascularization</subject><subject>Visual Acuity</subject><subject>Visual discrimination learning</subject><subject>Visual impairment</subject><issn>2045-2322</issn><issn>2045-2322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kbtuFTEQhi0EIlHIC1AgSzQ0C77O2iWKAkREoklv-bYne-S1g71b8PaYsyEgCqbxaPzNPzP6EXpNyXtKuPrQBJVaDYSJAQCIGsZn6JwRIQfGGXv-V36GLls7kh6SaUH1S3TGldYj5_ocfb1uq3VpbvdLzCsuE7bYl5qjTXhLPlb8UMshl7bOHi8lxISdbTHgkvFi_f2cI07R1jznwyv0YrKpxcvH9wLdfbq-u_oy3H77fHP18XbwHGAdJCNSaq5U4JwzqsFJsExIZSUF4hQLXo2OwOSUDqMIhMSJgQculPXe8Qt0s8uGYo_moc6LrT9MsbM5FUo9GFv7uikaq4E7JRihMgg3cQUCvO9DQINi3natd7tWv_L7Fttqlrn5mJLNsWzNcDJqJYEz0dG3_6DHstXcDz1RQJlmvFNsp3wtrdU4PS1IifllnNmNM904czLOjL3pzaP05pYYnlp-29QBvgOtf-VDrH9m_0f2Jx7koIg</recordid><startdate>20240712</startdate><enddate>20240712</enddate><creator>Wang, Meng-Tong</creator><creator>Cai, You-Ran</creator><creator>Jang, Vlon</creator><creator>Meng, Hong-Jian</creator><creator>Sun, Ling-Bo</creator><creator>Deng, Li-Min</creator><creator>Liu, Yu-Wen</creator><creator>Zou, Wen-Jin</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><general>Nature Portfolio</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240712</creationdate><title>Establishment of a corneal ulcer prognostic model based on machine learning</title><author>Wang, Meng-Tong ; Cai, You-Ran ; Jang, Vlon ; Meng, Hong-Jian ; Sun, Ling-Bo ; Deng, Li-Min ; Liu, Yu-Wen ; Zou, Wen-Jin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-520559388d3332196b56a2458a5160b82dc87b06fb89d74d00ef26c6348accb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>692/308</topic><topic>692/499</topic><topic>692/699</topic><topic>Acuity</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Cobalt</topic><topic>Cornea</topic><topic>Corneal ulcer</topic><topic>Corneal Ulcer - diagnosis</topic><topic>Deep Learning</topic><topic>Deep-learning algorithm</topic><topic>Eye diseases</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Keratitis</topic><topic>Learning algorithms</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Light sources</topic><topic>Machine Learning</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><topic>Ulcers</topic><topic>Vascularization</topic><topic>Visual Acuity</topic><topic>Visual discrimination learning</topic><topic>Visual impairment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Meng-Tong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, You-Ran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jang, Vlon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meng, Hong-Jian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Ling-Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deng, Li-Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yu-Wen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zou, Wen-Jin</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Meng-Tong</au><au>Cai, You-Ran</au><au>Jang, Vlon</au><au>Meng, Hong-Jian</au><au>Sun, Ling-Bo</au><au>Deng, Li-Min</au><au>Liu, Yu-Wen</au><au>Zou, Wen-Jin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Establishment of a corneal ulcer prognostic model based on machine learning</atitle><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle><stitle>Sci Rep</stitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><date>2024-07-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>16154</spage><epage>11</epage><pages>16154-11</pages><artnum>16154</artnum><issn>2045-2322</issn><eissn>2045-2322</eissn><abstract>Corneal infection is a major public health concern worldwide and the most common cause of unilateral corneal blindness. Toxic effects of different microorganisms, such as bacteria and fungi, worsen keratitis leading to corneal perforation even with optimal drug treatment. The cornea forms the main refractive surface of the eye. Diseases affecting the cornea can cause severe visual impairment. Therefore, it is crucial to analyze the risk of corneal perforation and visual impairment in corneal ulcer patients for making early treatment strategies. The modeling of a fully automated prognostic model system was performed in two parts. In the first part, the dataset contained 4973 slit lamp images of corneal ulcer patients in three centers. A deep learning model was developed and tested for segmenting and classifying five lesions (corneal ulcer, corneal scar, hypopyon, corneal descementocele, and corneal neovascularization) in the eyes of corneal ulcer patients. Further, hierarchical quantification was carried out based on policy rules. In the second part, the dataset included clinical data (name, gender, age, best corrected visual acuity, and type of corneal ulcer) of 240 patients with corneal ulcers and respective 1010 slit lamp images under two light sources (natural light and cobalt blue light). The slit lamp images were then quantified hierarchically according to the policy rules developed in the first part of the modeling. Combining the above clinical data, the features were used to build the final prognostic model system for corneal ulcer perforation outcome and visual impairment using machine learning algorithms such as XGBoost, LightGBM. The ROC curve area (AUC value) evaluated the model’s performance. For segmentation of the five lesions, the accuracy rates of hypopyon, descemetocele, corneal ulcer under blue light, and corneal neovascularization were 96.86, 91.64, 90.51, and 93.97, respectively. For the corneal scar lesion classification, the accuracy rate of the final model was 69.76. The XGBoost model performed the best in predicting the 1-month prognosis of patients, with an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI 0.63–1.00) for ulcer perforation and an AUC of 0.77 (95% CI 0.63–0.91) for visual impairment. In predicting the 3-month prognosis of patients, the XGBoost model received the best AUC of 0.97 (95% CI 0.92–1.00) for ulcer perforation, while the LightGBM model achieved the best performance with an AUC of 0.98 (95% CI 0.94–1.00) for visual impairment.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>38997339</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41598-024-66608-7</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2045-2322 |
ispartof | Scientific reports, 2024-07, Vol.14 (1), p.16154-11, Article 16154 |
issn | 2045-2322 2045-2322 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a963b842015d4bf38646cc60b69682ca |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access |
subjects | 692/308 692/499 692/699 Acuity Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Artificial intelligence Cobalt Cornea Corneal ulcer Corneal Ulcer - diagnosis Deep Learning Deep-learning algorithm Eye diseases Female Humanities and Social Sciences Humans Keratitis Learning algorithms Lesions Light sources Machine Learning Male Microorganisms Middle Aged multidisciplinary Patients Prognosis Public health ROC Curve Science Science (multidisciplinary) Ulcers Vascularization Visual Acuity Visual discrimination learning Visual impairment |
title | Establishment of a corneal ulcer prognostic model based on machine learning |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T01%3A20%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Establishment%20of%20a%20corneal%20ulcer%20prognostic%20model%20based%20on%20machine%20learning&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20reports&rft.au=Wang,%20Meng-Tong&rft.date=2024-07-12&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=16154&rft.epage=11&rft.pages=16154-11&rft.artnum=16154&rft.issn=2045-2322&rft.eissn=2045-2322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41598-024-66608-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3079856324%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-520559388d3332196b56a2458a5160b82dc87b06fb89d74d00ef26c6348accb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3079612923&rft_id=info:pmid/38997339&rfr_iscdi=true |