How are large-scale One Health initiatives targeting infectious diseases and antimicrobial resistance evaluated? A scoping review

• Published in: One health 2022-06, Vol.14, p.100380-100380, Article 100380
• Main Authors: Delesalle, Léa, Sadoine, Margaux L., Mediouni, Sarah, Denis-Robichaud, José, Zinszer, Kate, Zarowsky, Christina, Aenishaenslin, Cécile, Carabin, Hélène
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Evaluation; Global health; Infectious diseases; Multisectoral; One health; Participatory; Research Paper
• ISSN: 2352-7714; 2352-7714
• DOI: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2022.100380

While One Health initiatives are gaining in popularity, it is unclear if and how they are evaluated when implementation at scale is intended. The main purpose of this scoping review was to describe how One Health initiatives targeting infectious diseases and antimicrobial resistance at a large scale are evaluated. Secondary objectives included identifying the main facilitators and barriers to the implementation and success of these initiatives, and how their impacts were assessed. Twenty-three studies evaluating One Health initiatives were eligible. Most studies included the human (n = 22) and animal (n = 15) sectors; only four included the environment sector. The types of evaluated initiative (non-exclusive) included governance (n = 5), knowledge (n = 6), protection (n = 17), promotion (n = 16), prevention (n = 9), care (n = 8), advocacy (n = 10) and capacity (n = 10). Studies used normative (n = 4) and evaluative (n = 20) approaches to assess the One Health initiatives, the latter including impact (n = 19), implementation (n = 8), and performance (n = 7) analyses. Structural and economic, social, political, communication and coordination-related factors, as well as ontological factors, were identified as both facilitators and barriers for successful One Health initiatives. These results identified a wide range of evaluation methods and indicators used to demonstrate One Health's added values, strengths, and limitations: the inherent complexity of the One Health approach leads to the use of multiple types of evaluation. The strengths and remaining gaps in the evaluation of such initiative highlight the relevance of comprehensive, mixed-method, context-sensitive evaluation frameworks to inform and support the implementation of One Health initiatives by stakeholders in different governance settings. [Display omitted] •Studies evaluating One Health initiatives were scarce.•Only One Health initiatives related to infectious diseases were evaluated.•Evaluations were mainly conducted using quantitative approaches.•Involvement of the community was identified as a major facilitator.