Gene mutation analysis in EGFR wild type NSCLC responsive to erlotinib: are there features to guide patient selection?

• Published in: International journal of molecular sciences 2014-12, Vol.16 (1), p.747-757
• Main Authors: Ulivi, Paola, Delmonte, Angelo, Chiadini, Elisa, Calistri, Daniele, Papi, Maximilian, Mariotti, Marita, Verlicchi, Alberto, Ragazzini, Angela, Capelli, Laura, Gamboni, Alessandro, Puccetti, Maurizio, Dubini, Alessandra, Burgio, Marco Angelo, Casanova, Claudia, Crinò, Lucio, Amadori, Dino, Dazzi, Claudio
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aged; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - drug therapy; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - genetics; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - pathology; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Drug therapy; EGFR wt; erlotinib; Erlotinib Hydrochloride; Exons; Female; Genes; Humans; Inhibitor drugs; Kinases; KRAS; Lung cancer; Lung Neoplasms - drug therapy; Lung Neoplasms - genetics; Lung Neoplasms - pathology; Male; Middle Aged; Mutation; NSCLC; p53; Protein Kinase Inhibitors - therapeutic use; Quinazolines - therapeutic use; ras Proteins - genetics; ras Proteins - metabolism; Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - genetics; Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - metabolism; Receptor, Notch1 - genetics; Receptor, Notch1 - metabolism; Tumor Suppressor Protein p53 - genetics; Tumor Suppressor Protein p53 - metabolism
• ISSN: 1422-0067; 1661-6596; 1422-0067
• DOI: 10.3390/ijms16010747

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are very efficacious in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring activating Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) mutations. However, about 10% of EGFR wild type (wt) patients respond to TKI, with unknown molecular mechanisms of sensitivity. We considered a case series of 34 EGFR wt NSCLC patients responsive to erlotinib after at least one line of therapy. Responsive patients were matched with an equal number of non-responsive EGFR wt patients. A panel of 26 genes, for a total of 214 somatic mutations, was analyzed by MassARRAY® System (Sequenom, San Diego, CA, USA). A 15% KRAS mutation was observed in both groups, with a prevalence of G12C in non-responders (80% vs. 40% in responders). NOTCH1, p53 and EGFR-resistance-related mutations were found more frequently in non-responders, whereas EGFR-sensitizing mutations and alterations in genes involved in proliferation pathways were more frequent in responders. In conclusion, our findings indicate that p53, NOTCH1 and exon 20 EGFR mutations seem to be related to TKI resistance. KRAS mutations do not appear to influence the TKI response, although G12C mutation is more frequent in non-responders. Finally, the use of highly sensitive methodologies could lead to the identification of under-represented EGFR mutations potentially associated with TKI sensitivity.