Loading…

Temporal Dimensions of Data Quality in Bird Atlases: the Case of the Second Southern African Bird Atlas Project

Halting biodiversity loss on land (Sustainable Development Goal [SDG] 15) is an unfolding problem, and as such, requires novel solutions. Citizen science (CS) promises large quantities of data, but introduces the challenge of ensuring these are valuable to conservation research and can inform meanin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Citizen science : theory and practice 2023-06, Vol.8 (1), p.31-31
Main Authors: Daniel, Karis A, Underhill, Leslie G
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3718-1230086ba4d0fcb55faca64290762aac2a545ab5f34f83307224a708740cbf843
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3718-1230086ba4d0fcb55faca64290762aac2a545ab5f34f83307224a708740cbf843
container_end_page 31
container_issue 1
container_start_page 31
container_title Citizen science : theory and practice
container_volume 8
creator Daniel, Karis A
Underhill, Leslie G
description Halting biodiversity loss on land (Sustainable Development Goal [SDG] 15) is an unfolding problem, and as such, requires novel solutions. Citizen science (CS) promises large quantities of data, but introduces the challenge of ensuring these are valuable to conservation research and can inform meaningful action. This paper contributes to this endeavour, examining the impact of systematic as opposed to unstructured fieldwork on the biodiversity monitoring value of data from the Second Southern African Bird Atlas Project (SABAP2). SABAP2 "atlasers" work within a fine-scale grid system to generate avian species checklists that are comprehensive at the time of fieldwork. Though valuable, unstructured fieldwork efforts paint an incomplete picture; effective conservation action requires monitoring-keeping a finger on the pulse of local biodiversity through consistent and systematic data collection. Systematic collection allows for the detection of nuanced biological patterns such as seasonal population trends and movements, rapidly alerting scientists to anomalies and galvanizing swift response. It is, however, a demanding protocol, and implementation requires careful consideration of participant impact and motivations. Here, we used a newly developed approach for measuring temporal data quality to examine the systematic atlasing efforts of a CS community in the Hessequa Atlasing Area, South Africa, assessing the biodiversity monitoring value of structured data collection versus opportunistic checklists. We found that structured data collection increased the temporal resolution of atlas data, and thus its monitoring quality. We discuss challenges in maintaining achievable fieldwork goals for participants, and examine Hessequa's project structure and participant motivations to provide recommendations for future project management.
doi_str_mv 10.5334/cstp.578
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_aad936a204ab42d6aefb1ad9a79c25e3</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A761629464</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_aad936a204ab42d6aefb1ad9a79c25e3</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A761629464</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3718-1230086ba4d0fcb55faca64290762aac2a545ab5f34f83307224a708740cbf843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkl2LEzEYhQdRcFkX_AkBb_Si9c3XZMa72vWjsOBH1-vwTiapKTOTmmRg99-bbkW3ILnIm8NzDkk4VfWSwlJyLt6alA9LqZon1QUDqRaibenTR_Pz6iqlPQAwShsh1UUVbu14CBEHcu1HOyUfpkSCI9eYkXybcfD5nviJvPexJ6s8YLLpHck_LVmX8Uge5601YerJNszlFCeyctEbfOwiX2PYW5NfVM8cDsle_dkvqx8fP9yuPy9uvnzarFc3C8MVbRaUcYCm7lD04EwnpUODtWAtqJohGoZSSOyk48I1nINiTKCCRgkwnWsEv6w2p9w-4F4foh8x3uuAXj8IIe40xuzNYDVi3_IaGQjsBOtrtK6jRUPVGiYtL1mvTlmHGH7NNmW9D3OcyvU1h2IFBbX4R-2whPrJhRzRjD4ZvVI1rVkrHqjlf6iyejv68onW-aKfGd6cGQqT7V3e4ZyS3my_n7OvT6yJIaVo3d-HU9DHguhjQXQpCP8NEPWqPg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3093607064</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Temporal Dimensions of Data Quality in Bird Atlases: the Case of the Second Southern African Bird Atlas Project</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Daniel, Karis A ; Underhill, Leslie G</creator><creatorcontrib>Daniel, Karis A ; Underhill, Leslie G</creatorcontrib><description>Halting biodiversity loss on land (Sustainable Development Goal [SDG] 15) is an unfolding problem, and as such, requires novel solutions. Citizen science (CS) promises large quantities of data, but introduces the challenge of ensuring these are valuable to conservation research and can inform meaningful action. This paper contributes to this endeavour, examining the impact of systematic as opposed to unstructured fieldwork on the biodiversity monitoring value of data from the Second Southern African Bird Atlas Project (SABAP2). SABAP2 "atlasers" work within a fine-scale grid system to generate avian species checklists that are comprehensive at the time of fieldwork. Though valuable, unstructured fieldwork efforts paint an incomplete picture; effective conservation action requires monitoring-keeping a finger on the pulse of local biodiversity through consistent and systematic data collection. Systematic collection allows for the detection of nuanced biological patterns such as seasonal population trends and movements, rapidly alerting scientists to anomalies and galvanizing swift response. It is, however, a demanding protocol, and implementation requires careful consideration of participant impact and motivations. Here, we used a newly developed approach for measuring temporal data quality to examine the systematic atlasing efforts of a CS community in the Hessequa Atlasing Area, South Africa, assessing the biodiversity monitoring value of structured data collection versus opportunistic checklists. We found that structured data collection increased the temporal resolution of atlas data, and thus its monitoring quality. We discuss challenges in maintaining achievable fieldwork goals for participants, and examine Hessequa's project structure and participant motivations to provide recommendations for future project management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2057-4991</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2057-4991</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5334/cstp.578</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Ubiquity Press Ltd</publisher><subject>Bibliography ; Biodiversity ; biodiversity monitoring ; Biological diversity ; Birds ; Collective action ; Crowdsourcing ; Data collection ; Data entry ; data quality ; Field study ; Information management ; Participation ; Scientists ; Social aspects ; social impact ; Statistical analysis ; Sustainable development ; systematic fieldwork ; temporal proximity ; Trends</subject><ispartof>Citizen science : theory and practice, 2023-06, Vol.8 (1), p.31-31</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Ubiquity Press Ltd.</rights><rights>2023. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3718-1230086ba4d0fcb55faca64290762aac2a545ab5f34f83307224a708740cbf843</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3718-1230086ba4d0fcb55faca64290762aac2a545ab5f34f83307224a708740cbf843</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8758-1527 ; 0000-0003-4190-0411</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3093607064?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,38516,43895,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Daniel, Karis A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Underhill, Leslie G</creatorcontrib><title>Temporal Dimensions of Data Quality in Bird Atlases: the Case of the Second Southern African Bird Atlas Project</title><title>Citizen science : theory and practice</title><description>Halting biodiversity loss on land (Sustainable Development Goal [SDG] 15) is an unfolding problem, and as such, requires novel solutions. Citizen science (CS) promises large quantities of data, but introduces the challenge of ensuring these are valuable to conservation research and can inform meaningful action. This paper contributes to this endeavour, examining the impact of systematic as opposed to unstructured fieldwork on the biodiversity monitoring value of data from the Second Southern African Bird Atlas Project (SABAP2). SABAP2 "atlasers" work within a fine-scale grid system to generate avian species checklists that are comprehensive at the time of fieldwork. Though valuable, unstructured fieldwork efforts paint an incomplete picture; effective conservation action requires monitoring-keeping a finger on the pulse of local biodiversity through consistent and systematic data collection. Systematic collection allows for the detection of nuanced biological patterns such as seasonal population trends and movements, rapidly alerting scientists to anomalies and galvanizing swift response. It is, however, a demanding protocol, and implementation requires careful consideration of participant impact and motivations. Here, we used a newly developed approach for measuring temporal data quality to examine the systematic atlasing efforts of a CS community in the Hessequa Atlasing Area, South Africa, assessing the biodiversity monitoring value of structured data collection versus opportunistic checklists. We found that structured data collection increased the temporal resolution of atlas data, and thus its monitoring quality. We discuss challenges in maintaining achievable fieldwork goals for participants, and examine Hessequa's project structure and participant motivations to provide recommendations for future project management.</description><subject>Bibliography</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>biodiversity monitoring</subject><subject>Biological diversity</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Collective action</subject><subject>Crowdsourcing</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Data entry</subject><subject>data quality</subject><subject>Field study</subject><subject>Information management</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Scientists</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>social impact</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>systematic fieldwork</subject><subject>temporal proximity</subject><subject>Trends</subject><issn>2057-4991</issn><issn>2057-4991</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkl2LEzEYhQdRcFkX_AkBb_Si9c3XZMa72vWjsOBH1-vwTiapKTOTmmRg99-bbkW3ILnIm8NzDkk4VfWSwlJyLt6alA9LqZon1QUDqRaibenTR_Pz6iqlPQAwShsh1UUVbu14CBEHcu1HOyUfpkSCI9eYkXybcfD5nviJvPexJ6s8YLLpHck_LVmX8Uge5601YerJNszlFCeyctEbfOwiX2PYW5NfVM8cDsle_dkvqx8fP9yuPy9uvnzarFc3C8MVbRaUcYCm7lD04EwnpUODtWAtqJohGoZSSOyk48I1nINiTKCCRgkwnWsEv6w2p9w-4F4foh8x3uuAXj8IIe40xuzNYDVi3_IaGQjsBOtrtK6jRUPVGiYtL1mvTlmHGH7NNmW9D3OcyvU1h2IFBbX4R-2whPrJhRzRjD4ZvVI1rVkrHqjlf6iyejv68onW-aKfGd6cGQqT7V3e4ZyS3my_n7OvT6yJIaVo3d-HU9DHguhjQXQpCP8NEPWqPg</recordid><startdate>20230627</startdate><enddate>20230627</enddate><creator>Daniel, Karis A</creator><creator>Underhill, Leslie G</creator><general>Ubiquity Press Ltd</general><general>Ubiquity Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8758-1527</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4190-0411</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230627</creationdate><title>Temporal Dimensions of Data Quality in Bird Atlases: the Case of the Second Southern African Bird Atlas Project</title><author>Daniel, Karis A ; Underhill, Leslie G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3718-1230086ba4d0fcb55faca64290762aac2a545ab5f34f83307224a708740cbf843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Bibliography</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>biodiversity monitoring</topic><topic>Biological diversity</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Collective action</topic><topic>Crowdsourcing</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Data entry</topic><topic>data quality</topic><topic>Field study</topic><topic>Information management</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Scientists</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>social impact</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>systematic fieldwork</topic><topic>temporal proximity</topic><topic>Trends</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Daniel, Karis A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Underhill, Leslie G</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Citizen science : theory and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Daniel, Karis A</au><au>Underhill, Leslie G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Temporal Dimensions of Data Quality in Bird Atlases: the Case of the Second Southern African Bird Atlas Project</atitle><jtitle>Citizen science : theory and practice</jtitle><date>2023-06-27</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>31</spage><epage>31</epage><pages>31-31</pages><issn>2057-4991</issn><eissn>2057-4991</eissn><abstract>Halting biodiversity loss on land (Sustainable Development Goal [SDG] 15) is an unfolding problem, and as such, requires novel solutions. Citizen science (CS) promises large quantities of data, but introduces the challenge of ensuring these are valuable to conservation research and can inform meaningful action. This paper contributes to this endeavour, examining the impact of systematic as opposed to unstructured fieldwork on the biodiversity monitoring value of data from the Second Southern African Bird Atlas Project (SABAP2). SABAP2 "atlasers" work within a fine-scale grid system to generate avian species checklists that are comprehensive at the time of fieldwork. Though valuable, unstructured fieldwork efforts paint an incomplete picture; effective conservation action requires monitoring-keeping a finger on the pulse of local biodiversity through consistent and systematic data collection. Systematic collection allows for the detection of nuanced biological patterns such as seasonal population trends and movements, rapidly alerting scientists to anomalies and galvanizing swift response. It is, however, a demanding protocol, and implementation requires careful consideration of participant impact and motivations. Here, we used a newly developed approach for measuring temporal data quality to examine the systematic atlasing efforts of a CS community in the Hessequa Atlasing Area, South Africa, assessing the biodiversity monitoring value of structured data collection versus opportunistic checklists. We found that structured data collection increased the temporal resolution of atlas data, and thus its monitoring quality. We discuss challenges in maintaining achievable fieldwork goals for participants, and examine Hessequa's project structure and participant motivations to provide recommendations for future project management.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Ubiquity Press Ltd</pub><doi>10.5334/cstp.578</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8758-1527</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4190-0411</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2057-4991
ispartof Citizen science : theory and practice, 2023-06, Vol.8 (1), p.31-31
issn 2057-4991
2057-4991
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_aad936a204ab42d6aefb1ad9a79c25e3
source Publicly Available Content Database; Coronavirus Research Database
subjects Bibliography
Biodiversity
biodiversity monitoring
Biological diversity
Birds
Collective action
Crowdsourcing
Data collection
Data entry
data quality
Field study
Information management
Participation
Scientists
Social aspects
social impact
Statistical analysis
Sustainable development
systematic fieldwork
temporal proximity
Trends
title Temporal Dimensions of Data Quality in Bird Atlases: the Case of the Second Southern African Bird Atlas Project
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T18%3A11%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Temporal%20Dimensions%20of%20Data%20Quality%20in%20Bird%20Atlases:%20the%20Case%20of%20the%20Second%20Southern%20African%20Bird%20Atlas%20Project&rft.jtitle=Citizen%20science%20:%20theory%20and%20practice&rft.au=Daniel,%20Karis%20A&rft.date=2023-06-27&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=31&rft.epage=31&rft.pages=31-31&rft.issn=2057-4991&rft.eissn=2057-4991&rft_id=info:doi/10.5334/cstp.578&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA761629464%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3718-1230086ba4d0fcb55faca64290762aac2a545ab5f34f83307224a708740cbf843%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3093607064&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A761629464&rfr_iscdi=true