An inventory of ethnoveterinary knowledge for chicken disease control in Soroti district, Uganda

• Published in: Journal of Medicinal Plants for Economic Development 2024, Vol.8 (1), p.e1-e12
• Main Authors: Zirintunda, Gerald, Kateregga, John, Nalule, Sarah, Vudriko, Patrick, Biryomumaisho, Savino, Acai, James O.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adverse effects; Antimicrobial resistance; Coccidiosis; Coronaviruses; COVID-19; Disease control; Diseases; Drug development; Drug resistance; Drugs; Farmers; Focus groups; Health literacy; Herbal; Herbal medicine; Households; Knowledge; Medicinal plants; Medicine, Botanic; Medicine, Herbal; Newcastle disease; Poultry; Preparation; Questionnaires; Surveys; Traditional knowledge; Veterinary medicine
• ISSN: 2519-559X; 2616-4809
• DOI: 10.4102/jomped.v8i1.248

\r\nBackground\r\nKnowledge regarding the use of ethnoveterinary products in the control of chicken diseases in Uganda is hardly documented.\r\n\r\n\r\nAim\r\nThe study documented the ideas of controlling chicken diseases using herbal remedies as shared by chicken owners.\r\n\r\n\r\nSetting\r\nThe study was conducted among backyard and free-ranging chicken owners.\r\n\r\n\r\nMethods\r\nMixed methods of focus group discussions (FGDs) and farmer questionnaires were used.\r\n\r\n\r\nResults\r\nMost respondents, 91% (71/78), were using ethnoveterinary medicine (EVM) and 96.2% (75/78) knew others who were also using them. Of the respondents, 82% (64/78) were convinced that EVMs are effective alternative to conventional treatments. Ethnoveterinary medicines are acceptable and promoted during informal and formal training. The sources of EVM were home gardens, wild sources and markets. Most respondents had their planted EVM materials and acquired knowledge from neighbours and friends. About 37.2% (29/78) of the respondents affirmed that they could not freely share their EVM knowledge with others.\r\n\r\n\r\nConclusion\r\nThe participants of the FGDs and the respondents of the questionnaires knew the acceptable opportunities of alternative drugs of unproven efficacy and safety. The practices pose risks to chickens and the possible development of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in chickens and humans. The study shows the need for claim validations to guide the safe use of EVM in chicken.\r\n\r\n\r\nContribution\r\nThe study documents plant materials for treating various chicken diseases. The information is essential in the era of AMR and among communities that cannot afford drugs.\r\n