Loading…

Comparison of Midline and Off-midline specimen extraction following laparoscopic left-sided colorectal resections: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Aims: This study aims to evaluate comparative outcomes following midline versus off-midline specimen extractions following laparoscopic left-sided colorectal resections. Methods: A systematic search of electronic information sources was conducted. Studies comparing 'midline' versus 'o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of minimal access surgery 2023-04, Vol.19 (2), p.183-192
Main Authors: Bhattacharya, Pratik, Hussain, Mohammad, Zaman, Shafquat, Mohamedahmed, Ali, Faiz, Nameer, Mashar, Ruchir, Sarma, Diwakar, Peravali, Rajeev
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c531s-d2701e4bb429fad4cbfb3afabecd2c60c89bb97f25928751a28891349ffbb2143
container_end_page 192
container_issue 2
container_start_page 183
container_title Journal of minimal access surgery
container_volume 19
creator Bhattacharya, Pratik
Hussain, Mohammad
Zaman, Shafquat
Mohamedahmed, Ali
Faiz, Nameer
Mashar, Ruchir
Sarma, Diwakar
Peravali, Rajeev
description Aims: This study aims to evaluate comparative outcomes following midline versus off-midline specimen extractions following laparoscopic left-sided colorectal resections. Methods: A systematic search of electronic information sources was conducted. Studies comparing 'midline' versus 'off midline' specimen extraction following laparoscopic left-sided colorectal resections performed for malignancies were included. The rate of incisional hernia formation, surgical site infection (SSI), total operative time and blood loss, anastomotic leak (AL) and length of hospital stay (LOS) was the evaluated outcome parameters. Results: Five comparative observational studies reporting a total of 1187 patients comparing midline (n = 701) and off-midline (n = 486) approaches for specimen extraction were identified. Specimen extraction performed through an off-midline incision was not associated with a significantly reduced rate of SSI (odds ratio [OR]: 0.71; P = 0.68), the occurrence of AL (OR: 0.76; P = 0.66) and future development of incisional hernias (OR: 0.65; P = 0.64) compared to the conventional midline approach. No statistically significant difference was observed in total operative time (mean difference [MD]: 0.13; P = 0.99), intraoperative blood loss (MD: 2.31; P = 0.91) and LOS (MD: 0.78; P = 0.18) between the two groups. Conclusions: Off-midline specimen extraction following minimally invasive left-sided colorectal cancer surgery is associated with similar rates of SSI and incisional hernia formation compared to the vertical midline incision. Furthermore, there were no statistically significant differences observed between the two groups for evaluated outcomes such as total operative time, intra-operative blood loss, AL rate and LOS. As such, we did not find any advantage of one approach over the other. Future high-quality well-designed trials are required to make robust conclusions.
doi_str_mv 10.4103/jmas.jmas_309_22
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ac8f902ad44449cdac922349a74b30f4</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A748337691</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_ac8f902ad44449cdac922349a74b30f4</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A748337691</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c531s-d2701e4bb429fad4cbfb3afabecd2c60c89bb97f25928751a28891349ffbb2143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kkuP0zAUhSMEYkphzwpFYsMmxY88bHalYmCkQbOBtXXjXFfuOHGxU0r_CT933McMDxUcyVGs75x7b3yy7CUls5IS_nbVQ5ztN8WJVIw9yiZUSlFwyejjbEJkwwopS3qRPYtxRUhVsZo-zS54LWpa8WqS_Vz4fg3BRj_k3uSfbefsgDkMXX5jTNGfvuMate1xyPHHGECPNuHGO-e3dljmDpKFj9qvrc4dmrGItsMu1975gHoElweMeJDFd_k8j7s4Yg9jwgN-t7g9FOxxhAIGcLto4_PsiQEX8cXpPc2-Xn74svhUXN98vFrMrwtdcRqLjjWEYtm2JZMGulK3puVgoEXdMV0TLWTbysawSjLRVBSYEJLyUhrTtoyWfJpdHX07Dyu1DraHsFMerDoc-LBUEFKjDhVoYSRhqUpaUnegJWPJCpqy5cTsvd4cvdbBf9tgHFVvo0bnYEC_iYoJQmVTCUYS-vovdOU3Ic2erpKWJW8E_z-VvCRndU3YL2oJqUs7GL-_o31pNW9KwXlTp5GnWXGGWuKAAZwf0Nh0_Ac_O8Onp8Pe6rMCchTolIUY0Dz8TUrUPq7qkNTf4pokr07zbdoeuwfBfT4T8P4IbL0bMcRbt9liUIm9Hfz2n8aKCq7uk83vAKawACM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2809326602</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Midline and Off-midline specimen extraction following laparoscopic left-sided colorectal resections: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Bhattacharya, Pratik ; Hussain, Mohammad ; Zaman, Shafquat ; Mohamedahmed, Ali ; Faiz, Nameer ; Mashar, Ruchir ; Sarma, Diwakar ; Peravali, Rajeev</creator><creatorcontrib>Bhattacharya, Pratik ; Hussain, Mohammad ; Zaman, Shafquat ; Mohamedahmed, Ali ; Faiz, Nameer ; Mashar, Ruchir ; Sarma, Diwakar ; Peravali, Rajeev</creatorcontrib><description>Aims: This study aims to evaluate comparative outcomes following midline versus off-midline specimen extractions following laparoscopic left-sided colorectal resections. Methods: A systematic search of electronic information sources was conducted. Studies comparing 'midline' versus 'off midline' specimen extraction following laparoscopic left-sided colorectal resections performed for malignancies were included. The rate of incisional hernia formation, surgical site infection (SSI), total operative time and blood loss, anastomotic leak (AL) and length of hospital stay (LOS) was the evaluated outcome parameters. Results: Five comparative observational studies reporting a total of 1187 patients comparing midline (n = 701) and off-midline (n = 486) approaches for specimen extraction were identified. Specimen extraction performed through an off-midline incision was not associated with a significantly reduced rate of SSI (odds ratio [OR]: 0.71; P = 0.68), the occurrence of AL (OR: 0.76; P = 0.66) and future development of incisional hernias (OR: 0.65; P = 0.64) compared to the conventional midline approach. No statistically significant difference was observed in total operative time (mean difference [MD]: 0.13; P = 0.99), intraoperative blood loss (MD: 2.31; P = 0.91) and LOS (MD: 0.78; P = 0.18) between the two groups. Conclusions: Off-midline specimen extraction following minimally invasive left-sided colorectal cancer surgery is associated with similar rates of SSI and incisional hernia formation compared to the vertical midline incision. Furthermore, there were no statistically significant differences observed between the two groups for evaluated outcomes such as total operative time, intra-operative blood loss, AL rate and LOS. As such, we did not find any advantage of one approach over the other. Future high-quality well-designed trials are required to make robust conclusions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0972-9941</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1998-3921</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_309_22</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36861535</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>colorectal resections ; Comparative analysis ; extraction site ; Health aspects ; Hernia ; Hernias ; Laparoscopic surgery ; Laparoscopy ; Meta-analysis ; midline extraction ; off-midline extraction ; Surgical anastomosis ; surgical incisions</subject><ispartof>Journal of minimal access surgery, 2023-04, Vol.19 (2), p.183-192</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c531s-d2701e4bb429fad4cbfb3afabecd2c60c89bb97f25928751a28891349ffbb2143</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2809326602?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36861535$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bhattacharya, Pratik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussain, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaman, Shafquat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohamedahmed, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faiz, Nameer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mashar, Ruchir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarma, Diwakar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peravali, Rajeev</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Midline and Off-midline specimen extraction following laparoscopic left-sided colorectal resections: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>Journal of minimal access surgery</title><addtitle>J Minim Access Surg</addtitle><description>Aims: This study aims to evaluate comparative outcomes following midline versus off-midline specimen extractions following laparoscopic left-sided colorectal resections. Methods: A systematic search of electronic information sources was conducted. Studies comparing 'midline' versus 'off midline' specimen extraction following laparoscopic left-sided colorectal resections performed for malignancies were included. The rate of incisional hernia formation, surgical site infection (SSI), total operative time and blood loss, anastomotic leak (AL) and length of hospital stay (LOS) was the evaluated outcome parameters. Results: Five comparative observational studies reporting a total of 1187 patients comparing midline (n = 701) and off-midline (n = 486) approaches for specimen extraction were identified. Specimen extraction performed through an off-midline incision was not associated with a significantly reduced rate of SSI (odds ratio [OR]: 0.71; P = 0.68), the occurrence of AL (OR: 0.76; P = 0.66) and future development of incisional hernias (OR: 0.65; P = 0.64) compared to the conventional midline approach. No statistically significant difference was observed in total operative time (mean difference [MD]: 0.13; P = 0.99), intraoperative blood loss (MD: 2.31; P = 0.91) and LOS (MD: 0.78; P = 0.18) between the two groups. Conclusions: Off-midline specimen extraction following minimally invasive left-sided colorectal cancer surgery is associated with similar rates of SSI and incisional hernia formation compared to the vertical midline incision. Furthermore, there were no statistically significant differences observed between the two groups for evaluated outcomes such as total operative time, intra-operative blood loss, AL rate and LOS. As such, we did not find any advantage of one approach over the other. Future high-quality well-designed trials are required to make robust conclusions.</description><subject>colorectal resections</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>extraction site</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Hernia</subject><subject>Hernias</subject><subject>Laparoscopic surgery</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>midline extraction</subject><subject>off-midline extraction</subject><subject>Surgical anastomosis</subject><subject>surgical incisions</subject><issn>0972-9941</issn><issn>1998-3921</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kkuP0zAUhSMEYkphzwpFYsMmxY88bHalYmCkQbOBtXXjXFfuOHGxU0r_CT933McMDxUcyVGs75x7b3yy7CUls5IS_nbVQ5ztN8WJVIw9yiZUSlFwyejjbEJkwwopS3qRPYtxRUhVsZo-zS54LWpa8WqS_Vz4fg3BRj_k3uSfbefsgDkMXX5jTNGfvuMate1xyPHHGECPNuHGO-e3dljmDpKFj9qvrc4dmrGItsMu1975gHoElweMeJDFd_k8j7s4Yg9jwgN-t7g9FOxxhAIGcLto4_PsiQEX8cXpPc2-Xn74svhUXN98vFrMrwtdcRqLjjWEYtm2JZMGulK3puVgoEXdMV0TLWTbysawSjLRVBSYEJLyUhrTtoyWfJpdHX07Dyu1DraHsFMerDoc-LBUEFKjDhVoYSRhqUpaUnegJWPJCpqy5cTsvd4cvdbBf9tgHFVvo0bnYEC_iYoJQmVTCUYS-vovdOU3Ic2erpKWJW8E_z-VvCRndU3YL2oJqUs7GL-_o31pNW9KwXlTp5GnWXGGWuKAAZwf0Nh0_Ac_O8Onp8Pe6rMCchTolIUY0Dz8TUrUPq7qkNTf4pokr07zbdoeuwfBfT4T8P4IbL0bMcRbt9liUIm9Hfz2n8aKCq7uk83vAKawACM</recordid><startdate>20230401</startdate><enddate>20230401</enddate><creator>Bhattacharya, Pratik</creator><creator>Hussain, Mohammad</creator><creator>Zaman, Shafquat</creator><creator>Mohamedahmed, Ali</creator><creator>Faiz, Nameer</creator><creator>Mashar, Ruchir</creator><creator>Sarma, Diwakar</creator><creator>Peravali, Rajeev</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230401</creationdate><title>Comparison of Midline and Off-midline specimen extraction following laparoscopic left-sided colorectal resections: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Bhattacharya, Pratik ; Hussain, Mohammad ; Zaman, Shafquat ; Mohamedahmed, Ali ; Faiz, Nameer ; Mashar, Ruchir ; Sarma, Diwakar ; Peravali, Rajeev</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c531s-d2701e4bb429fad4cbfb3afabecd2c60c89bb97f25928751a28891349ffbb2143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>colorectal resections</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>extraction site</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Hernia</topic><topic>Hernias</topic><topic>Laparoscopic surgery</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>midline extraction</topic><topic>off-midline extraction</topic><topic>Surgical anastomosis</topic><topic>surgical incisions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bhattacharya, Pratik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussain, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaman, Shafquat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohamedahmed, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faiz, Nameer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mashar, Ruchir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarma, Diwakar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peravali, Rajeev</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest - Health &amp; Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of minimal access surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bhattacharya, Pratik</au><au>Hussain, Mohammad</au><au>Zaman, Shafquat</au><au>Mohamedahmed, Ali</au><au>Faiz, Nameer</au><au>Mashar, Ruchir</au><au>Sarma, Diwakar</au><au>Peravali, Rajeev</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Midline and Off-midline specimen extraction following laparoscopic left-sided colorectal resections: A systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of minimal access surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Minim Access Surg</addtitle><date>2023-04-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>183</spage><epage>192</epage><pages>183-192</pages><issn>0972-9941</issn><eissn>1998-3921</eissn><abstract>Aims: This study aims to evaluate comparative outcomes following midline versus off-midline specimen extractions following laparoscopic left-sided colorectal resections. Methods: A systematic search of electronic information sources was conducted. Studies comparing 'midline' versus 'off midline' specimen extraction following laparoscopic left-sided colorectal resections performed for malignancies were included. The rate of incisional hernia formation, surgical site infection (SSI), total operative time and blood loss, anastomotic leak (AL) and length of hospital stay (LOS) was the evaluated outcome parameters. Results: Five comparative observational studies reporting a total of 1187 patients comparing midline (n = 701) and off-midline (n = 486) approaches for specimen extraction were identified. Specimen extraction performed through an off-midline incision was not associated with a significantly reduced rate of SSI (odds ratio [OR]: 0.71; P = 0.68), the occurrence of AL (OR: 0.76; P = 0.66) and future development of incisional hernias (OR: 0.65; P = 0.64) compared to the conventional midline approach. No statistically significant difference was observed in total operative time (mean difference [MD]: 0.13; P = 0.99), intraoperative blood loss (MD: 2.31; P = 0.91) and LOS (MD: 0.78; P = 0.18) between the two groups. Conclusions: Off-midline specimen extraction following minimally invasive left-sided colorectal cancer surgery is associated with similar rates of SSI and incisional hernia formation compared to the vertical midline incision. Furthermore, there were no statistically significant differences observed between the two groups for evaluated outcomes such as total operative time, intra-operative blood loss, AL rate and LOS. As such, we did not find any advantage of one approach over the other. Future high-quality well-designed trials are required to make robust conclusions.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>36861535</pmid><doi>10.4103/jmas.jmas_309_22</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0972-9941
ispartof Journal of minimal access surgery, 2023-04, Vol.19 (2), p.183-192
issn 0972-9941
1998-3921
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ac8f902ad44449cdac922349a74b30f4
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects colorectal resections
Comparative analysis
extraction site
Health aspects
Hernia
Hernias
Laparoscopic surgery
Laparoscopy
Meta-analysis
midline extraction
off-midline extraction
Surgical anastomosis
surgical incisions
title Comparison of Midline and Off-midline specimen extraction following laparoscopic left-sided colorectal resections: A systematic review and meta-analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T13%3A33%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Midline%20and%20Off-midline%20specimen%20extraction%20following%20laparoscopic%20left-sided%20colorectal%20resections:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20minimal%20access%20surgery&rft.au=Bhattacharya,%20Pratik&rft.date=2023-04-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=183&rft.epage=192&rft.pages=183-192&rft.issn=0972-9941&rft.eissn=1998-3921&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/jmas.jmas_309_22&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA748337691%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c531s-d2701e4bb429fad4cbfb3afabecd2c60c89bb97f25928751a28891349ffbb2143%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2809326602&rft_id=info:pmid/36861535&rft_galeid=A748337691&rfr_iscdi=true