Loading…

Does external assurance on CSR reporting contribute to its higher quality? Empirical evidence from China

This paper examines the difference that the assurance brings to the quality of CSR reports in the Chinese institutional setting, in particular, the difference in quality (proxy – RKS ranking) of assured and unassured CSR reports, as well as whether the high ownership concentration and corresponding...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Investment management & financial innovations 2021, Vol.18 (4), p.309-325
Main Authors: Pasko, Oleh, Zhang, Li, Bezverkhyi, Kostiantyn, Nikytenko, Dmytro, Khromushyna, Lyudmyla
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3016-2fc35e956e4ff9cb3620c535bd2435439b3eb160940a98f94883ed60281519523
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3016-2fc35e956e4ff9cb3620c535bd2435439b3eb160940a98f94883ed60281519523
container_end_page 325
container_issue 4
container_start_page 309
container_title Investment management & financial innovations
container_volume 18
creator Pasko, Oleh
Zhang, Li
Bezverkhyi, Kostiantyn
Nikytenko, Dmytro
Khromushyna, Lyudmyla
description This paper examines the difference that the assurance brings to the quality of CSR reports in the Chinese institutional setting, in particular, the difference in quality (proxy – RKS ranking) of assured and unassured CSR reports, as well as whether the high ownership concentration and corresponding to it “entrenchment effect” obstruct the positive impact the assurance exerts on the quality of CSR reports. The paper examines CSR reports on 2,292 firm-year observations of large Chinese companies over three years (2015–2018). The hypothesis development process predicates on the signaling and stakeholder theories, whilst this study applies regression analysis to test the hypotheses. Consistent with the predictions of signaling and stakeholder theories, the paper finds that assurance contributes to the higher quality of CSR reports. Moreover, the study finds that assured CSR reports have higher sub-scores in all four aspects of RKS ranking. However, as ownership concentration exceeds 50 per cent and reaches the majority, it thwarts the advancement in the quality of CSR reports through its assurance. The paper provides an initial empirical account of the role of assurance in the emerging CSR reporting practice in China. The paper contributes to the modest body of empirical research on the function of external assurance in the CSR area by explicating the role played both by the accounting (external assurance) and corporate governance (ownership concentration) infrastructure to ensure high quality of CSR reporting. The paper briefs local, international regulatory authorities and the business community about the importance of external assurance for the CSR reporting quality.
doi_str_mv 10.21511/imfi.18(4).2021.26
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ad0fbbdd55924cf58fec535956d284d6</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_ad0fbbdd55924cf58fec535956d284d6</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3102482751</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3016-2fc35e956e4ff9cb3620c535bd2435439b3eb160940a98f94883ed60281519523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kUtLAzEUhQdRUNRf4CbgRhdT826yEqlPEAQf65BJbtqUdlKTGdF_70wrru7lcvgO95yqOiN4Qokg5CquQ5wQdcEvJxRTMqFyrzoiitBaM6H2tzuuuZbTw-q0lCXGmOApw2x6VC1uExQE3x3k1q6QLaXPtnWAUotmb68owyblLrZz5FLb5dj0HaAuodgVtIjzBWT02dtV7H6u0d16E3N0Awa-ooeREnJao9kitvakOgh2VeD0bx5XH_d377PH-vnl4Wl281w7homsaXBMgBYSeAjaNUxS7AQTjaecCc50w6AhEmuOrVZBc6UYeImpGqLQgrLj6mnH9ckuzSbHtc0_JtlotoeU58YOD7kVGOtxaBrvhdCUuyBUgNFqMPdUcS8H1vmOtcnps4fSmWXqx5yKYQRTruhUkEHFdiqXUykZwr8rwWbbkBkbMkQZbszYkKGS_QIGDoQc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3102482751</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does external assurance on CSR reporting contribute to its higher quality? Empirical evidence from China</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Pasko, Oleh ; Zhang, Li ; Bezverkhyi, Kostiantyn ; Nikytenko, Dmytro ; Khromushyna, Lyudmyla</creator><creatorcontrib>Pasko, Oleh ; Zhang, Li ; Bezverkhyi, Kostiantyn ; Nikytenko, Dmytro ; Khromushyna, Lyudmyla</creatorcontrib><description>This paper examines the difference that the assurance brings to the quality of CSR reports in the Chinese institutional setting, in particular, the difference in quality (proxy – RKS ranking) of assured and unassured CSR reports, as well as whether the high ownership concentration and corresponding to it “entrenchment effect” obstruct the positive impact the assurance exerts on the quality of CSR reports. The paper examines CSR reports on 2,292 firm-year observations of large Chinese companies over three years (2015–2018). The hypothesis development process predicates on the signaling and stakeholder theories, whilst this study applies regression analysis to test the hypotheses. Consistent with the predictions of signaling and stakeholder theories, the paper finds that assurance contributes to the higher quality of CSR reports. Moreover, the study finds that assured CSR reports have higher sub-scores in all four aspects of RKS ranking. However, as ownership concentration exceeds 50 per cent and reaches the majority, it thwarts the advancement in the quality of CSR reports through its assurance. The paper provides an initial empirical account of the role of assurance in the emerging CSR reporting practice in China. The paper contributes to the modest body of empirical research on the function of external assurance in the CSR area by explicating the role played both by the accounting (external assurance) and corporate governance (ownership concentration) infrastructure to ensure high quality of CSR reporting. The paper briefs local, international regulatory authorities and the business community about the importance of external assurance for the CSR reporting quality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1810-4967</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1812-9358</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.21511/imfi.18(4).2021.26</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sumy: Business Perspectives Ltd</publisher><subject>Accounting ; China ; College professors ; Conflicts of interest ; corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports ; Credibility ; Economics ; entrenchment effect ; external assurance ; Financial analysis ; Hypotheses ; Investment advisors ; Literature reviews ; ownership concentration ; Social responsibility ; Stakeholders ; Taxation</subject><ispartof>Investment management &amp; financial innovations, 2021, Vol.18 (4), p.309-325</ispartof><rights>2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3016-2fc35e956e4ff9cb3620c535bd2435439b3eb160940a98f94883ed60281519523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3016-2fc35e956e4ff9cb3620c535bd2435439b3eb160940a98f94883ed60281519523</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6275-5885 ; 0000-0003-4989-0879 ; 0000-0001-8785-1147 ; 0000-0002-4837-8630 ; 0000-0001-9134-9010</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3102482751?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,11669,25733,27902,27903,27904,36039,36991,44342,44569</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pasko, Oleh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bezverkhyi, Kostiantyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nikytenko, Dmytro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khromushyna, Lyudmyla</creatorcontrib><title>Does external assurance on CSR reporting contribute to its higher quality? Empirical evidence from China</title><title>Investment management &amp; financial innovations</title><description>This paper examines the difference that the assurance brings to the quality of CSR reports in the Chinese institutional setting, in particular, the difference in quality (proxy – RKS ranking) of assured and unassured CSR reports, as well as whether the high ownership concentration and corresponding to it “entrenchment effect” obstruct the positive impact the assurance exerts on the quality of CSR reports. The paper examines CSR reports on 2,292 firm-year observations of large Chinese companies over three years (2015–2018). The hypothesis development process predicates on the signaling and stakeholder theories, whilst this study applies regression analysis to test the hypotheses. Consistent with the predictions of signaling and stakeholder theories, the paper finds that assurance contributes to the higher quality of CSR reports. Moreover, the study finds that assured CSR reports have higher sub-scores in all four aspects of RKS ranking. However, as ownership concentration exceeds 50 per cent and reaches the majority, it thwarts the advancement in the quality of CSR reports through its assurance. The paper provides an initial empirical account of the role of assurance in the emerging CSR reporting practice in China. The paper contributes to the modest body of empirical research on the function of external assurance in the CSR area by explicating the role played both by the accounting (external assurance) and corporate governance (ownership concentration) infrastructure to ensure high quality of CSR reporting. The paper briefs local, international regulatory authorities and the business community about the importance of external assurance for the CSR reporting quality.</description><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>College professors</subject><subject>Conflicts of interest</subject><subject>corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports</subject><subject>Credibility</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>entrenchment effect</subject><subject>external assurance</subject><subject>Financial analysis</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Investment advisors</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>ownership concentration</subject><subject>Social responsibility</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><issn>1810-4967</issn><issn>1812-9358</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kUtLAzEUhQdRUNRf4CbgRhdT826yEqlPEAQf65BJbtqUdlKTGdF_70wrru7lcvgO95yqOiN4Qokg5CquQ5wQdcEvJxRTMqFyrzoiitBaM6H2tzuuuZbTw-q0lCXGmOApw2x6VC1uExQE3x3k1q6QLaXPtnWAUotmb68owyblLrZz5FLb5dj0HaAuodgVtIjzBWT02dtV7H6u0d16E3N0Awa-ooeREnJao9kitvakOgh2VeD0bx5XH_d377PH-vnl4Wl281w7homsaXBMgBYSeAjaNUxS7AQTjaecCc50w6AhEmuOrVZBc6UYeImpGqLQgrLj6mnH9ckuzSbHtc0_JtlotoeU58YOD7kVGOtxaBrvhdCUuyBUgNFqMPdUcS8H1vmOtcnps4fSmWXqx5yKYQRTruhUkEHFdiqXUykZwr8rwWbbkBkbMkQZbszYkKGS_QIGDoQc</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Pasko, Oleh</creator><creator>Zhang, Li</creator><creator>Bezverkhyi, Kostiantyn</creator><creator>Nikytenko, Dmytro</creator><creator>Khromushyna, Lyudmyla</creator><general>Business Perspectives Ltd</general><general>LLC "CPC "Business Perspectives</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X5</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>885</scope><scope>8A3</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1F</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6275-5885</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4989-0879</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8785-1147</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4837-8630</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9134-9010</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>Does external assurance on CSR reporting contribute to its higher quality? Empirical evidence from China</title><author>Pasko, Oleh ; Zhang, Li ; Bezverkhyi, Kostiantyn ; Nikytenko, Dmytro ; Khromushyna, Lyudmyla</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3016-2fc35e956e4ff9cb3620c535bd2435439b3eb160940a98f94883ed60281519523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>College professors</topic><topic>Conflicts of interest</topic><topic>corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports</topic><topic>Credibility</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>entrenchment effect</topic><topic>external assurance</topic><topic>Financial analysis</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Investment advisors</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>ownership concentration</topic><topic>Social responsibility</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pasko, Oleh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bezverkhyi, Kostiantyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nikytenko, Dmytro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khromushyna, Lyudmyla</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest_ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Banking Information Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Banking Information Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals - May need to register for free articles</collection><jtitle>Investment management &amp; financial innovations</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pasko, Oleh</au><au>Zhang, Li</au><au>Bezverkhyi, Kostiantyn</au><au>Nikytenko, Dmytro</au><au>Khromushyna, Lyudmyla</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does external assurance on CSR reporting contribute to its higher quality? Empirical evidence from China</atitle><jtitle>Investment management &amp; financial innovations</jtitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>309</spage><epage>325</epage><pages>309-325</pages><issn>1810-4967</issn><eissn>1812-9358</eissn><abstract>This paper examines the difference that the assurance brings to the quality of CSR reports in the Chinese institutional setting, in particular, the difference in quality (proxy – RKS ranking) of assured and unassured CSR reports, as well as whether the high ownership concentration and corresponding to it “entrenchment effect” obstruct the positive impact the assurance exerts on the quality of CSR reports. The paper examines CSR reports on 2,292 firm-year observations of large Chinese companies over three years (2015–2018). The hypothesis development process predicates on the signaling and stakeholder theories, whilst this study applies regression analysis to test the hypotheses. Consistent with the predictions of signaling and stakeholder theories, the paper finds that assurance contributes to the higher quality of CSR reports. Moreover, the study finds that assured CSR reports have higher sub-scores in all four aspects of RKS ranking. However, as ownership concentration exceeds 50 per cent and reaches the majority, it thwarts the advancement in the quality of CSR reports through its assurance. The paper provides an initial empirical account of the role of assurance in the emerging CSR reporting practice in China. The paper contributes to the modest body of empirical research on the function of external assurance in the CSR area by explicating the role played both by the accounting (external assurance) and corporate governance (ownership concentration) infrastructure to ensure high quality of CSR reporting. The paper briefs local, international regulatory authorities and the business community about the importance of external assurance for the CSR reporting quality.</abstract><cop>Sumy</cop><pub>Business Perspectives Ltd</pub><doi>10.21511/imfi.18(4).2021.26</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6275-5885</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4989-0879</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8785-1147</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4837-8630</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9134-9010</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1810-4967
ispartof Investment management & financial innovations, 2021, Vol.18 (4), p.309-325
issn 1810-4967
1812-9358
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ad0fbbdd55924cf58fec535956d284d6
source ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest); Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)
subjects Accounting
China
College professors
Conflicts of interest
corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports
Credibility
Economics
entrenchment effect
external assurance
Financial analysis
Hypotheses
Investment advisors
Literature reviews
ownership concentration
Social responsibility
Stakeholders
Taxation
title Does external assurance on CSR reporting contribute to its higher quality? Empirical evidence from China
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T14%3A11%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20external%20assurance%20on%20CSR%20reporting%20contribute%20to%20its%20higher%20quality?%20Empirical%20evidence%20from%20China&rft.jtitle=Investment%20management%20&%20financial%20innovations&rft.au=Pasko,%20Oleh&rft.date=2021&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=309&rft.epage=325&rft.pages=309-325&rft.issn=1810-4967&rft.eissn=1812-9358&rft_id=info:doi/10.21511/imfi.18(4).2021.26&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3102482751%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3016-2fc35e956e4ff9cb3620c535bd2435439b3eb160940a98f94883ed60281519523%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3102482751&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true