Loading…
Does external assurance on CSR reporting contribute to its higher quality? Empirical evidence from China
This paper examines the difference that the assurance brings to the quality of CSR reports in the Chinese institutional setting, in particular, the difference in quality (proxy – RKS ranking) of assured and unassured CSR reports, as well as whether the high ownership concentration and corresponding...
Saved in:
Published in: | Investment management & financial innovations 2021, Vol.18 (4), p.309-325 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3016-2fc35e956e4ff9cb3620c535bd2435439b3eb160940a98f94883ed60281519523 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3016-2fc35e956e4ff9cb3620c535bd2435439b3eb160940a98f94883ed60281519523 |
container_end_page | 325 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 309 |
container_title | Investment management & financial innovations |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Pasko, Oleh Zhang, Li Bezverkhyi, Kostiantyn Nikytenko, Dmytro Khromushyna, Lyudmyla |
description | This paper examines the difference that the assurance brings to the quality of CSR reports in the Chinese institutional setting, in particular, the difference in quality (proxy – RKS ranking) of assured and unassured CSR reports, as well as whether the high ownership concentration and corresponding to it “entrenchment effect” obstruct the positive impact the assurance exerts on the quality of CSR reports. The paper examines CSR reports on 2,292 firm-year observations of large Chinese companies over three years (2015–2018). The hypothesis development process predicates on the signaling and stakeholder theories, whilst this study applies regression analysis to test the hypotheses. Consistent with the predictions of signaling and stakeholder theories, the paper finds that assurance contributes to the higher quality of CSR reports. Moreover, the study finds that assured CSR reports have higher sub-scores in all four aspects of RKS ranking. However, as ownership concentration exceeds 50 per cent and reaches the majority, it thwarts the advancement in the quality of CSR reports through its assurance. The paper provides an initial empirical account of the role of assurance in the emerging CSR reporting practice in China. The paper contributes to the modest body of empirical research on the function of external assurance in the CSR area by explicating the role played both by the accounting (external assurance) and corporate governance (ownership concentration) infrastructure to ensure high quality of CSR reporting. The paper briefs local, international regulatory authorities and the business community about the importance of external assurance for the CSR reporting quality. |
doi_str_mv | 10.21511/imfi.18(4).2021.26 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ad0fbbdd55924cf58fec535956d284d6</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_ad0fbbdd55924cf58fec535956d284d6</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3102482751</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3016-2fc35e956e4ff9cb3620c535bd2435439b3eb160940a98f94883ed60281519523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kUtLAzEUhQdRUNRf4CbgRhdT826yEqlPEAQf65BJbtqUdlKTGdF_70wrru7lcvgO95yqOiN4Qokg5CquQ5wQdcEvJxRTMqFyrzoiitBaM6H2tzuuuZbTw-q0lCXGmOApw2x6VC1uExQE3x3k1q6QLaXPtnWAUotmb68owyblLrZz5FLb5dj0HaAuodgVtIjzBWT02dtV7H6u0d16E3N0Awa-ooeREnJao9kitvakOgh2VeD0bx5XH_d377PH-vnl4Wl281w7homsaXBMgBYSeAjaNUxS7AQTjaecCc50w6AhEmuOrVZBc6UYeImpGqLQgrLj6mnH9ckuzSbHtc0_JtlotoeU58YOD7kVGOtxaBrvhdCUuyBUgNFqMPdUcS8H1vmOtcnps4fSmWXqx5yKYQRTruhUkEHFdiqXUykZwr8rwWbbkBkbMkQZbszYkKGS_QIGDoQc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3102482751</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does external assurance on CSR reporting contribute to its higher quality? Empirical evidence from China</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Pasko, Oleh ; Zhang, Li ; Bezverkhyi, Kostiantyn ; Nikytenko, Dmytro ; Khromushyna, Lyudmyla</creator><creatorcontrib>Pasko, Oleh ; Zhang, Li ; Bezverkhyi, Kostiantyn ; Nikytenko, Dmytro ; Khromushyna, Lyudmyla</creatorcontrib><description>This paper examines the difference that the assurance brings to the quality of CSR reports in the Chinese institutional setting, in particular, the difference in quality (proxy – RKS ranking) of assured and unassured CSR reports, as well as whether the high ownership concentration and corresponding to it “entrenchment effect” obstruct the positive impact the assurance exerts on the quality of CSR reports. The paper examines CSR reports on 2,292 firm-year observations of large Chinese companies over three years (2015–2018). The hypothesis development process predicates on the signaling and stakeholder theories, whilst this study applies regression analysis to test the hypotheses. Consistent with the predictions of signaling and stakeholder theories, the paper finds that assurance contributes to the higher quality of CSR reports. Moreover, the study finds that assured CSR reports have higher sub-scores in all four aspects of RKS ranking. However, as ownership concentration exceeds 50 per cent and reaches the majority, it thwarts the advancement in the quality of CSR reports through its assurance. The paper provides an initial empirical account of the role of assurance in the emerging CSR reporting practice in China. The paper contributes to the modest body of empirical research on the function of external assurance in the CSR area by explicating the role played both by the accounting (external assurance) and corporate governance (ownership concentration) infrastructure to ensure high quality of CSR reporting. The paper briefs local, international regulatory authorities and the business community about the importance of external assurance for the CSR reporting quality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1810-4967</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1812-9358</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.21511/imfi.18(4).2021.26</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sumy: Business Perspectives Ltd</publisher><subject>Accounting ; China ; College professors ; Conflicts of interest ; corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports ; Credibility ; Economics ; entrenchment effect ; external assurance ; Financial analysis ; Hypotheses ; Investment advisors ; Literature reviews ; ownership concentration ; Social responsibility ; Stakeholders ; Taxation</subject><ispartof>Investment management & financial innovations, 2021, Vol.18 (4), p.309-325</ispartof><rights>2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3016-2fc35e956e4ff9cb3620c535bd2435439b3eb160940a98f94883ed60281519523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3016-2fc35e956e4ff9cb3620c535bd2435439b3eb160940a98f94883ed60281519523</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6275-5885 ; 0000-0003-4989-0879 ; 0000-0001-8785-1147 ; 0000-0002-4837-8630 ; 0000-0001-9134-9010</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3102482751?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,11669,25733,27902,27903,27904,36039,36991,44342,44569</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pasko, Oleh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bezverkhyi, Kostiantyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nikytenko, Dmytro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khromushyna, Lyudmyla</creatorcontrib><title>Does external assurance on CSR reporting contribute to its higher quality? Empirical evidence from China</title><title>Investment management & financial innovations</title><description>This paper examines the difference that the assurance brings to the quality of CSR reports in the Chinese institutional setting, in particular, the difference in quality (proxy – RKS ranking) of assured and unassured CSR reports, as well as whether the high ownership concentration and corresponding to it “entrenchment effect” obstruct the positive impact the assurance exerts on the quality of CSR reports. The paper examines CSR reports on 2,292 firm-year observations of large Chinese companies over three years (2015–2018). The hypothesis development process predicates on the signaling and stakeholder theories, whilst this study applies regression analysis to test the hypotheses. Consistent with the predictions of signaling and stakeholder theories, the paper finds that assurance contributes to the higher quality of CSR reports. Moreover, the study finds that assured CSR reports have higher sub-scores in all four aspects of RKS ranking. However, as ownership concentration exceeds 50 per cent and reaches the majority, it thwarts the advancement in the quality of CSR reports through its assurance. The paper provides an initial empirical account of the role of assurance in the emerging CSR reporting practice in China. The paper contributes to the modest body of empirical research on the function of external assurance in the CSR area by explicating the role played both by the accounting (external assurance) and corporate governance (ownership concentration) infrastructure to ensure high quality of CSR reporting. The paper briefs local, international regulatory authorities and the business community about the importance of external assurance for the CSR reporting quality.</description><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>College professors</subject><subject>Conflicts of interest</subject><subject>corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports</subject><subject>Credibility</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>entrenchment effect</subject><subject>external assurance</subject><subject>Financial analysis</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Investment advisors</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>ownership concentration</subject><subject>Social responsibility</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><issn>1810-4967</issn><issn>1812-9358</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kUtLAzEUhQdRUNRf4CbgRhdT826yEqlPEAQf65BJbtqUdlKTGdF_70wrru7lcvgO95yqOiN4Qokg5CquQ5wQdcEvJxRTMqFyrzoiitBaM6H2tzuuuZbTw-q0lCXGmOApw2x6VC1uExQE3x3k1q6QLaXPtnWAUotmb68owyblLrZz5FLb5dj0HaAuodgVtIjzBWT02dtV7H6u0d16E3N0Awa-ooeREnJao9kitvakOgh2VeD0bx5XH_d377PH-vnl4Wl281w7homsaXBMgBYSeAjaNUxS7AQTjaecCc50w6AhEmuOrVZBc6UYeImpGqLQgrLj6mnH9ckuzSbHtc0_JtlotoeU58YOD7kVGOtxaBrvhdCUuyBUgNFqMPdUcS8H1vmOtcnps4fSmWXqx5yKYQRTruhUkEHFdiqXUykZwr8rwWbbkBkbMkQZbszYkKGS_QIGDoQc</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Pasko, Oleh</creator><creator>Zhang, Li</creator><creator>Bezverkhyi, Kostiantyn</creator><creator>Nikytenko, Dmytro</creator><creator>Khromushyna, Lyudmyla</creator><general>Business Perspectives Ltd</general><general>LLC "CPC "Business Perspectives</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X5</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>885</scope><scope>8A3</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1F</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6275-5885</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4989-0879</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8785-1147</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4837-8630</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9134-9010</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>Does external assurance on CSR reporting contribute to its higher quality? Empirical evidence from China</title><author>Pasko, Oleh ; Zhang, Li ; Bezverkhyi, Kostiantyn ; Nikytenko, Dmytro ; Khromushyna, Lyudmyla</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3016-2fc35e956e4ff9cb3620c535bd2435439b3eb160940a98f94883ed60281519523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>College professors</topic><topic>Conflicts of interest</topic><topic>corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports</topic><topic>Credibility</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>entrenchment effect</topic><topic>external assurance</topic><topic>Financial analysis</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Investment advisors</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>ownership concentration</topic><topic>Social responsibility</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pasko, Oleh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bezverkhyi, Kostiantyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nikytenko, Dmytro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khromushyna, Lyudmyla</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest_ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Banking Information Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Banking Information Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals - May need to register for free articles</collection><jtitle>Investment management & financial innovations</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pasko, Oleh</au><au>Zhang, Li</au><au>Bezverkhyi, Kostiantyn</au><au>Nikytenko, Dmytro</au><au>Khromushyna, Lyudmyla</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does external assurance on CSR reporting contribute to its higher quality? Empirical evidence from China</atitle><jtitle>Investment management & financial innovations</jtitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>309</spage><epage>325</epage><pages>309-325</pages><issn>1810-4967</issn><eissn>1812-9358</eissn><abstract>This paper examines the difference that the assurance brings to the quality of CSR reports in the Chinese institutional setting, in particular, the difference in quality (proxy – RKS ranking) of assured and unassured CSR reports, as well as whether the high ownership concentration and corresponding to it “entrenchment effect” obstruct the positive impact the assurance exerts on the quality of CSR reports. The paper examines CSR reports on 2,292 firm-year observations of large Chinese companies over three years (2015–2018). The hypothesis development process predicates on the signaling and stakeholder theories, whilst this study applies regression analysis to test the hypotheses. Consistent with the predictions of signaling and stakeholder theories, the paper finds that assurance contributes to the higher quality of CSR reports. Moreover, the study finds that assured CSR reports have higher sub-scores in all four aspects of RKS ranking. However, as ownership concentration exceeds 50 per cent and reaches the majority, it thwarts the advancement in the quality of CSR reports through its assurance. The paper provides an initial empirical account of the role of assurance in the emerging CSR reporting practice in China. The paper contributes to the modest body of empirical research on the function of external assurance in the CSR area by explicating the role played both by the accounting (external assurance) and corporate governance (ownership concentration) infrastructure to ensure high quality of CSR reporting. The paper briefs local, international regulatory authorities and the business community about the importance of external assurance for the CSR reporting quality.</abstract><cop>Sumy</cop><pub>Business Perspectives Ltd</pub><doi>10.21511/imfi.18(4).2021.26</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6275-5885</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4989-0879</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8785-1147</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4837-8630</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9134-9010</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1810-4967 |
ispartof | Investment management & financial innovations, 2021, Vol.18 (4), p.309-325 |
issn | 1810-4967 1812-9358 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ad0fbbdd55924cf58fec535956d284d6 |
source | ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest); Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
subjects | Accounting China College professors Conflicts of interest corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports Credibility Economics entrenchment effect external assurance Financial analysis Hypotheses Investment advisors Literature reviews ownership concentration Social responsibility Stakeholders Taxation |
title | Does external assurance on CSR reporting contribute to its higher quality? Empirical evidence from China |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T14%3A11%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20external%20assurance%20on%20CSR%20reporting%20contribute%20to%20its%20higher%20quality?%20Empirical%20evidence%20from%20China&rft.jtitle=Investment%20management%20&%20financial%20innovations&rft.au=Pasko,%20Oleh&rft.date=2021&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=309&rft.epage=325&rft.pages=309-325&rft.issn=1810-4967&rft.eissn=1812-9358&rft_id=info:doi/10.21511/imfi.18(4).2021.26&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3102482751%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3016-2fc35e956e4ff9cb3620c535bd2435439b3eb160940a98f94883ed60281519523%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3102482751&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |