Retrieving Crop Leaf Chlorophyll Content Using an Improved Look-Up-Table Approach by Combining Multiple Canopy Structures and Soil Backgrounds

• Published in: Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2020-07, Vol.12 (13), p.2139
• Main Authors: Qian, Xiaojin, Liu, Liangyun
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Algorithms; Canopies; canopy structure; Carbon cycle; Chlorophyll; Computer simulation; Field of view; Ill posed problems; Imagery; Irrigation; Laboratories; leaf chlorophyll content; Leaves; Machine learning; MERIS; Methods; Monitoring; Physiology; PROSAIL; Radiative transfer; Rain; Remote sensing; Response functions; Retrieval; Satellites; Sentinel-3 OLCI; soil background; Soil structure; Soil types; Soils; Soybeans; Spectra; Spectral bands; Spectral sensitivity; Statistical analysis; Vegetation; Wheat
• ISSN: 2072-4292; 2072-4292
• DOI: 10.3390/rs12132139

Leaf chlorophyll content (LCC) is a pivotal parameter in the monitoring of agriculture and carbon cycle modeling at regional and global scales. ENVISAT MERIS and Sentinel-3 OLCI data are suitable for use in the global monitoring of LCC because of their spectral specifications (covering red-edge bands), wide field of view and short revisit times. Generally, remote sensing approaches for LCC retrieval consist of statistically- and physically-based models. The physical approaches for LCC estimation require the use of radiative transfer models (RTMs), which are more robust and transferrable than empirical models. However, the operational retrieval of LCC at large scales is affected by the large variability in canopy structures and soil backgrounds. In this study, we proposed an improved look-up-table (LUT) approach to retrieve LCC by combining multiple canopy structures and soil backgrounds to deal with the ill-posed inversion problem caused by the lack of prior knowledge on canopy structure and soil-background reflectance. Firstly, the PROSAIL-D model was used to simulate canopy spectra with diverse imaging gometrics, canopy structures, soil backgrounds and leaf biochemical contents, and the canopy spectra were resampled according to the spectral response functions of ENVISAT MERIS and Sentinel-3 OLCI instruments. Then, an LUT that included 25 sub-LUTs corresponding to five types of canopy structure and five types of soil background was generated for LCC estimation. The mean of the best eight solutions, rather than the single best solution with the smallest RMSE value, was selected as the retrieval of each sub-LUT. The final inversion result was obtained by calculating the mean value of the 25 sub-LUTs. Finally, the improved LUT approach was tested using simulations, field measurements and ENVISAT MERIS satellite data. A simulation using spectral bands from the MERIS and Sentinel-3 OLCI simulation datasets yielded an R2 value of 0.81 and an RMSE value of 10.1 μg cm−2. Validation performed well with field-measured canopy spectra and MERIS imagery giving RMSE values of 9.9 μg cm−2 for wheat and 9.6 μg cm−2 for soybean using canopy spectra and 8.6 μg cm−2 for soybean using MERIS data. The comparison with traditional chlorophyll-sensitive indices showed that our improved LUT approach gave the best performance for all cases. Therefore, these promising results are directly applicable to the use of ENVISAT MERIS and Sentinel-3 OLCI data for monitoring of crop LCC at