Specific hysteroscopic findings can efficiently distinguish the differences between malignant and benign endometrial polyps

• Published in: Taiwanese journal of obstetrics & gynecology 2020-01, Vol.59 (1), p.85-90
• Main Authors: Ngo, Yeh Giin, Fu, Hung-Chun, Chu, Li-Ching, Tseng, Chih-Wen, Chen, Chao-Yu, Lee, Chung-Yuan, Ou, Yu-Che
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Differential diagnoses; Endometrial cancer; Hysteroscopy; Polyps
• ISSN: 1028-4559
• DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2019.11.013

To evaluate differences in hysteroscopic findings between benign endometrial polyps and endometrial cancer. From January 2012 to December 2016, we extracted 179 cases with endometrial polyps from 3066 women who underwent hysteroscopy followed by dilatation and curettage or transcervical resection, with 154 and 25 cases of benign and malignant endometrial polyps, respectively. Clinical characteristics, histopathological and hysteroscopic findings of the women were evaluated retrospectively. The hysteroscopic findings of malignant polyps were hyper-vascular (72%, 18/25), ulcerative (64%, 16/25) and polyps with irregular surfaces (24%, 6/25). In contrast, pedunculate small growths with smooth surfaces were usually seen in the benign endometrial polyps (38.3%, 59/154). Hyper-vascular (OR: 142.6, 95% CI: 25.98–783.4) and polyps with irregular surfaces (OR: 12.02, 95% CI: 1.765–81.83) in hysteroscopic findings were significant strong predictors of endometrial polyps with endometrial cancer. Hysteroscopic findings of ulcerative changes were most strongly associated with a diagnosis of malignant polyps, with sensitivity, specificity, negative (NPV) and positive (PPV) predictive values of 64.0%, 100%, 94.5%, and 100%, respectively. Women with hysteroscopic findings of endometrial polyps with hyper-vascular, ulcerative, and polyps with irregular surfaces had a high likelihood of endometrial cancer. A target biopsy of the polyps with these specific appearances should be performed to exclude malignant lesions.