Cervical Joint Position Sense and Its Correlations with Postural Stability in Subjects with Fibromyalgia Syndrome

• Published in: Life (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2022-11, Vol.12 (11), p.1817
• Main Authors: Reddy, Ravi Shankar, Tedla, Jaya Shanker, Dixit, Snehil, Raizah, Abdullah, Al-Otaibi, Mohammed Lafi, Gular, Kumar, Ahmad, Irshad, Sirajudeen, Mohamed Sherif
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: balance; Care and treatment; Chronic pain; Correlation coefficient; Correlation coefficients; Diagnosis; Errors; Falls (Accidents); Fibromyalgia; Force plates; Health aspects; Health services; Joints; Medical research; Medicine, Experimental; Motion stability; Muscle fatigue; Muscle strength; Neck pain; Patients; Physical therapists; Physiological aspects; position sense; postural control; Posture; Prevention; Proprioception; Range of motion; Risk factors; Stability analysis; Stability tests; Statistical analysis; Vertebrae, Cervical
• ISSN: 2075-1729; 2075-1729
• DOI: 10.3390/life12111817

Cervical joint position sense (JPS) and postural stability are vital to maintaining balance and preventing falls in fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS). Impaired cervical JPS may influence postural stability, and understanding the relationship between them can aid in formulating treatment strategies in individuals with FMS. This study aims to (1) assess cervical JPS and postural stability between FMS and control group and (2) determine the correlation between cervical JPS and postural stability in the FMS group. This cross-sectional study recruited 92 FMS patients (mean age: 51.52 ± 7.7 yrs.) and 92 healthy controls (mean age: 49.36 ± 6.9 yrs.). A cervical range of motion (CROM) unit was utilized to assess cervical JPS. The postural stability was assessed using an IsoFree force platform, and anterior-posterior (A/P) and medial-lateral (M/L) directions of sway and ellipse area were measured. Cervical JPS and postural stability tests were assessed and compared between FMS and control groups. Cervical JPS was significantly impaired in FMS compared to the control group (p < 0.001). The JPS errors in FMS group were larger in flexion (FMS = 5.5°, control = 2.4°), extension (FMS = 6.4°, control = 3.0°), and rotation in left (FMS = 5.4°, control = 2.2°) and right directions (FMS = 5.1°, control = 2.8°). FMS individuals demonstrated statistically significant impaired postural stability compared to control in both the dominant and non-dominant legs tested (p < 0.001). The cervical JPS test showed moderate to strong positive correlations with postural stability variables. Statistically significant correlations were observed in all the JPS directions tested with all the postural stability variables (A/P and M/L sway and ellipse area). The correlation coefficients ranged between r = 0.37 (moderate) to 0.75 (strong). Cervical JPS and postural stability are impaired in FMS individuals. A moderate to strong relationship existed between JPS and postural stability. Individuals with FMS who had a greater magnitude of cervical JPS errors exhibited more severe postural control deficits. Therefore, cervical JPS and postural stability tests should be incorporated into routine clinical practice when assessing or formulating treatment strategies for patients with FMS.