Loading…

Reincarnating the Identity Theory

The mind/brain identity theory is often thought to be of historical interest only, as it has allegedly been swept away by functionalism. After clarifying why and how the notion of identity implies that there is no genuine problem of explaining how the mental derives from something else, we point out...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in psychology 2018-10, Vol.9, p.2044-2044
Main Authors: Myin, Erik, Zahnoun, Farid
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-6de9e463a4569a1fa4d40cbc348238feaed188084f2c2187ef92cb20a1b502f93
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-6de9e463a4569a1fa4d40cbc348238feaed188084f2c2187ef92cb20a1b502f93
container_end_page 2044
container_issue
container_start_page 2044
container_title Frontiers in psychology
container_volume 9
creator Myin, Erik
Zahnoun, Farid
description The mind/brain identity theory is often thought to be of historical interest only, as it has allegedly been swept away by functionalism. After clarifying why and how the notion of identity implies that there is no genuine problem of explaining how the mental derives from something else, we point out that the identity theory is not necessarily a mind/brain identity theory. In fact, we propose an updated form of identity theory, or embodied identity theory, in which the identities concern not experiences and brain phenomena, but experiences and organism-environment interactions. Such an embodied identity theory retains the main ontological insight of its parent theory, and by invoking organism-environment interactions, it has powerful resources to motivate why the relevant identities hold, without posing further unsolvable problems. We argue that the classical multiple realization argument against identity theory is built on not recognizing that the main claim of the identity theory concerns the relation between experience and descriptions of experience, instead of being about relations between different descriptions of experience and we show how an embodied identity theory provides an appropriate platform for making this argument. We emphasize that the embodied identity theory we propose is not ontologically reductive, and does not disregard experience.
doi_str_mv 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02044
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b04e1cfffb5f4a91bb73636805ab5e47</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_b04e1cfffb5f4a91bb73636805ab5e47</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2131234874</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-6de9e463a4569a1fa4d40cbc348238feaed188084f2c2187ef92cb20a1b502f93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1LAzEQhoMoKtq7J6k3L1snH5vNXgQpfhQEQeo5JNlJu2W7W5OtsP_e2KpoLhmSd55JeAi5oDDhXJU3fhOHxYQBVRNgIMQBOaVSioxCoQ7_1CdkFOMK0hIpB-yYnPBU5jkUp-TqFevWmdCavm4X436J41mFbV_3w3i-xC4M5-TImybi6Hs_I28P9_PpU_b88jib3j1nTkjWZ7LCEoXkRuSyNNQbUQlw1nGhGFceDVZUKVDCM8eoKtCXzFkGhtocmC_5GZntuVVnVnoT6rUJg-5MrXcHXVhoE_raNagtCKTOe29zL0xJrS245FJBbmyOokis2z1rs7VrrFz6UDDNP-j_m7Ze6kX3oSWDQlKWANffgNC9bzH2el1Hh01jWuy2UTPKU0qoQqQo7KMudDEG9L9jKOgvUXonSn-J0jtRqeXy7_N-G3608E9FAI8G</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2131234874</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reincarnating the Identity Theory</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Myin, Erik ; Zahnoun, Farid</creator><creatorcontrib>Myin, Erik ; Zahnoun, Farid</creatorcontrib><description>The mind/brain identity theory is often thought to be of historical interest only, as it has allegedly been swept away by functionalism. After clarifying why and how the notion of identity implies that there is no genuine problem of explaining how the mental derives from something else, we point out that the identity theory is not necessarily a mind/brain identity theory. In fact, we propose an updated form of identity theory, or embodied identity theory, in which the identities concern not experiences and brain phenomena, but experiences and organism-environment interactions. Such an embodied identity theory retains the main ontological insight of its parent theory, and by invoking organism-environment interactions, it has powerful resources to motivate why the relevant identities hold, without posing further unsolvable problems. We argue that the classical multiple realization argument against identity theory is built on not recognizing that the main claim of the identity theory concerns the relation between experience and descriptions of experience, instead of being about relations between different descriptions of experience and we show how an embodied identity theory provides an appropriate platform for making this argument. We emphasize that the embodied identity theory we propose is not ontologically reductive, and does not disregard experience.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1664-1078</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1664-1078</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02044</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30405507</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Frontiers Media S.A</publisher><subject>embodied cognition ; experience ; identity theory ; mind/body ; multiple realization ; Psychology</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in psychology, 2018-10, Vol.9, p.2044-2044</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 Myin and Zahnoun. 2018 Myin and Zahnoun</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-6de9e463a4569a1fa4d40cbc348238feaed188084f2c2187ef92cb20a1b502f93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-6de9e463a4569a1fa4d40cbc348238feaed188084f2c2187ef92cb20a1b502f93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6207612/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6207612/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30405507$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Myin, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zahnoun, Farid</creatorcontrib><title>Reincarnating the Identity Theory</title><title>Frontiers in psychology</title><addtitle>Front Psychol</addtitle><description>The mind/brain identity theory is often thought to be of historical interest only, as it has allegedly been swept away by functionalism. After clarifying why and how the notion of identity implies that there is no genuine problem of explaining how the mental derives from something else, we point out that the identity theory is not necessarily a mind/brain identity theory. In fact, we propose an updated form of identity theory, or embodied identity theory, in which the identities concern not experiences and brain phenomena, but experiences and organism-environment interactions. Such an embodied identity theory retains the main ontological insight of its parent theory, and by invoking organism-environment interactions, it has powerful resources to motivate why the relevant identities hold, without posing further unsolvable problems. We argue that the classical multiple realization argument against identity theory is built on not recognizing that the main claim of the identity theory concerns the relation between experience and descriptions of experience, instead of being about relations between different descriptions of experience and we show how an embodied identity theory provides an appropriate platform for making this argument. We emphasize that the embodied identity theory we propose is not ontologically reductive, and does not disregard experience.</description><subject>embodied cognition</subject><subject>experience</subject><subject>identity theory</subject><subject>mind/body</subject><subject>multiple realization</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><issn>1664-1078</issn><issn>1664-1078</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU1LAzEQhoMoKtq7J6k3L1snH5vNXgQpfhQEQeo5JNlJu2W7W5OtsP_e2KpoLhmSd55JeAi5oDDhXJU3fhOHxYQBVRNgIMQBOaVSioxCoQ7_1CdkFOMK0hIpB-yYnPBU5jkUp-TqFevWmdCavm4X436J41mFbV_3w3i-xC4M5-TImybi6Hs_I28P9_PpU_b88jib3j1nTkjWZ7LCEoXkRuSyNNQbUQlw1nGhGFceDVZUKVDCM8eoKtCXzFkGhtocmC_5GZntuVVnVnoT6rUJg-5MrXcHXVhoE_raNagtCKTOe29zL0xJrS245FJBbmyOokis2z1rs7VrrFz6UDDNP-j_m7Ze6kX3oSWDQlKWANffgNC9bzH2el1Hh01jWuy2UTPKU0qoQqQo7KMudDEG9L9jKOgvUXonSn-J0jtRqeXy7_N-G3608E9FAI8G</recordid><startdate>20181024</startdate><enddate>20181024</enddate><creator>Myin, Erik</creator><creator>Zahnoun, Farid</creator><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181024</creationdate><title>Reincarnating the Identity Theory</title><author>Myin, Erik ; Zahnoun, Farid</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-6de9e463a4569a1fa4d40cbc348238feaed188084f2c2187ef92cb20a1b502f93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>embodied cognition</topic><topic>experience</topic><topic>identity theory</topic><topic>mind/body</topic><topic>multiple realization</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Myin, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zahnoun, Farid</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Myin, Erik</au><au>Zahnoun, Farid</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reincarnating the Identity Theory</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Front Psychol</addtitle><date>2018-10-24</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>9</volume><spage>2044</spage><epage>2044</epage><pages>2044-2044</pages><issn>1664-1078</issn><eissn>1664-1078</eissn><abstract>The mind/brain identity theory is often thought to be of historical interest only, as it has allegedly been swept away by functionalism. After clarifying why and how the notion of identity implies that there is no genuine problem of explaining how the mental derives from something else, we point out that the identity theory is not necessarily a mind/brain identity theory. In fact, we propose an updated form of identity theory, or embodied identity theory, in which the identities concern not experiences and brain phenomena, but experiences and organism-environment interactions. Such an embodied identity theory retains the main ontological insight of its parent theory, and by invoking organism-environment interactions, it has powerful resources to motivate why the relevant identities hold, without posing further unsolvable problems. We argue that the classical multiple realization argument against identity theory is built on not recognizing that the main claim of the identity theory concerns the relation between experience and descriptions of experience, instead of being about relations between different descriptions of experience and we show how an embodied identity theory provides an appropriate platform for making this argument. We emphasize that the embodied identity theory we propose is not ontologically reductive, and does not disregard experience.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Frontiers Media S.A</pub><pmid>30405507</pmid><doi>10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02044</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1664-1078
ispartof Frontiers in psychology, 2018-10, Vol.9, p.2044-2044
issn 1664-1078
1664-1078
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b04e1cfffb5f4a91bb73636805ab5e47
source PubMed Central
subjects embodied cognition
experience
identity theory
mind/body
multiple realization
Psychology
title Reincarnating the Identity Theory
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T12%3A59%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reincarnating%20the%20Identity%20Theory&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20psychology&rft.au=Myin,%20Erik&rft.date=2018-10-24&rft.volume=9&rft.spage=2044&rft.epage=2044&rft.pages=2044-2044&rft.issn=1664-1078&rft.eissn=1664-1078&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02044&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2131234874%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-6de9e463a4569a1fa4d40cbc348238feaed188084f2c2187ef92cb20a1b502f93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2131234874&rft_id=info:pmid/30405507&rfr_iscdi=true