Loading…
A comparative and economic study of the extraction of oil from Baru (Dipteryx alata) seeds by supercritical CO2 with and without mechanical pressing
The present study evaluated the effect of supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) assisted by cold pressing (SFEAP) on the overall yield, extraction kinetics, composition of baru seed oil and manufacturing cost (COM). The best extraction conditions were determined in extraction assays combining differe...
Saved in:
Published in: | Heliyon 2021-01, Vol.7 (1), p.e05971-e05971, Article e05971 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-dc17740a244d115524a8c188fc11b8ff55d5953b7691d5495deacfdbbcdf8c523 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-dc17740a244d115524a8c188fc11b8ff55d5953b7691d5495deacfdbbcdf8c523 |
container_end_page | e05971 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | e05971 |
container_title | Heliyon |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Chañi-Paucar, Larry Oscar Osorio-Tobón, J. Felipe Johner, Júlio C.F. Meireles, Maria Angela A. |
description | The present study evaluated the effect of supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) assisted by cold pressing (SFEAP) on the overall yield, extraction kinetics, composition of baru seed oil and manufacturing cost (COM). The best extraction conditions were determined in extraction assays combining different pressures (150–350 bar) and temperatures (35 and 45 °C). The extraction yield by SFEAP (28.6 g oil/100 g baru seed) was approximately 31% higher than that obtained by SFE (21.9 g oil/100 g baru seed), according to the kinetic study with the best extraction conditions (350 bar and 45 °C). The extraction yield observed under this condition allowed us to obtain a lower COM for both techniques (SFE was US$ 118.32/kg baru oil and SFEAP was US$ 87.03/kg baru oil) compared to lower pressures and temperatures. The oil obtained under all extraction conditions was rich in unsaturated fatty acids and other bioactive compounds. The extraction of baru seed oil by SFEAP resulted in a higher yield and lower manufacturing cost than SFE.
Economic evaluation; Supercritical fluid extraction assisted by pressing; baru seed oil; supercritical CO2. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e05971 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b050b571e2f74fd4b49a7dc96c7e3d17</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2405844021000761</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_b050b571e2f74fd4b49a7dc96c7e3d17</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2486466702</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-dc17740a244d115524a8c188fc11b8ff55d5953b7691d5495deacfdbbcdf8c523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkktv1DAQxyMEolXpR0DysRx2sRM7Ti6gsrwqVeoFzpYzHm-8SuJgO9vme_CByT6E6InTjObxm4f-WfaW0TWjrHy_W7fYudkP65zmbI1U1JK9yC5zTsWq4py-_Me_yK5j3FFKmajKWhavs4uiEIXkkl5mv28J-H7UQSe3R6IHQxD84HsHJKbJzMRbklok-JSChuT8cIh41xEbfE8-6TCRm89uTBjmJ6I7nfQ7EhFNJM1M4jRigOCSA92RzUNOHl1qj2MOjp8S6RFaPRzzY8AY3bB9k72yuot4fbZX2c-vX35svq_uH77dbW7vVyAYTSsDTEpOdc65YUyInOsKWFVZYKyprBXCiFoUjSxrZgSvhUEN1jQNGFuByIur7O7ENV7v1Bhcr8OsvHbqGPBhq3RYVu9QNVTQRkiGuZXcGt7wWksDdQkSC8PkwvpwYo1T06MBHJZ_dc-gzzODa9XW75WsOCvyYgHcnAHB_5owJtW7CNh1ekA_RZXzquRlKelhb3EqheBjDGj_jmFUHQSiduosEHUQiDoJZOn7eOrD5al7h0FFcDgAGhcQ0nK1-w_hD7RiyQA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2486466702</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparative and economic study of the extraction of oil from Baru (Dipteryx alata) seeds by supercritical CO2 with and without mechanical pressing</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Chañi-Paucar, Larry Oscar ; Osorio-Tobón, J. Felipe ; Johner, Júlio C.F. ; Meireles, Maria Angela A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chañi-Paucar, Larry Oscar ; Osorio-Tobón, J. Felipe ; Johner, Júlio C.F. ; Meireles, Maria Angela A.</creatorcontrib><description>The present study evaluated the effect of supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) assisted by cold pressing (SFEAP) on the overall yield, extraction kinetics, composition of baru seed oil and manufacturing cost (COM). The best extraction conditions were determined in extraction assays combining different pressures (150–350 bar) and temperatures (35 and 45 °C). The extraction yield by SFEAP (28.6 g oil/100 g baru seed) was approximately 31% higher than that obtained by SFE (21.9 g oil/100 g baru seed), according to the kinetic study with the best extraction conditions (350 bar and 45 °C). The extraction yield observed under this condition allowed us to obtain a lower COM for both techniques (SFE was US$ 118.32/kg baru oil and SFEAP was US$ 87.03/kg baru oil) compared to lower pressures and temperatures. The oil obtained under all extraction conditions was rich in unsaturated fatty acids and other bioactive compounds. The extraction of baru seed oil by SFEAP resulted in a higher yield and lower manufacturing cost than SFE.
Economic evaluation; Supercritical fluid extraction assisted by pressing; baru seed oil; supercritical CO2.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2405-8440</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2405-8440</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e05971</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33537470</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Baru seed oil ; Economic evaluation ; Supercritical CO2 ; Supercritical fluid extraction assisted by pressing</subject><ispartof>Heliyon, 2021-01, Vol.7 (1), p.e05971-e05971, Article e05971</ispartof><rights>2021</rights><rights>2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-dc17740a244d115524a8c188fc11b8ff55d5953b7691d5495deacfdbbcdf8c523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-dc17740a244d115524a8c188fc11b8ff55d5953b7691d5495deacfdbbcdf8c523</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7841323/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844021000761$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,3549,27924,27925,45780,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chañi-Paucar, Larry Oscar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osorio-Tobón, J. Felipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johner, Júlio C.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meireles, Maria Angela A.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparative and economic study of the extraction of oil from Baru (Dipteryx alata) seeds by supercritical CO2 with and without mechanical pressing</title><title>Heliyon</title><description>The present study evaluated the effect of supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) assisted by cold pressing (SFEAP) on the overall yield, extraction kinetics, composition of baru seed oil and manufacturing cost (COM). The best extraction conditions were determined in extraction assays combining different pressures (150–350 bar) and temperatures (35 and 45 °C). The extraction yield by SFEAP (28.6 g oil/100 g baru seed) was approximately 31% higher than that obtained by SFE (21.9 g oil/100 g baru seed), according to the kinetic study with the best extraction conditions (350 bar and 45 °C). The extraction yield observed under this condition allowed us to obtain a lower COM for both techniques (SFE was US$ 118.32/kg baru oil and SFEAP was US$ 87.03/kg baru oil) compared to lower pressures and temperatures. The oil obtained under all extraction conditions was rich in unsaturated fatty acids and other bioactive compounds. The extraction of baru seed oil by SFEAP resulted in a higher yield and lower manufacturing cost than SFE.
Economic evaluation; Supercritical fluid extraction assisted by pressing; baru seed oil; supercritical CO2.</description><subject>Baru seed oil</subject><subject>Economic evaluation</subject><subject>Supercritical CO2</subject><subject>Supercritical fluid extraction assisted by pressing</subject><issn>2405-8440</issn><issn>2405-8440</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkktv1DAQxyMEolXpR0DysRx2sRM7Ti6gsrwqVeoFzpYzHm-8SuJgO9vme_CByT6E6InTjObxm4f-WfaW0TWjrHy_W7fYudkP65zmbI1U1JK9yC5zTsWq4py-_Me_yK5j3FFKmajKWhavs4uiEIXkkl5mv28J-H7UQSe3R6IHQxD84HsHJKbJzMRbklok-JSChuT8cIh41xEbfE8-6TCRm89uTBjmJ6I7nfQ7EhFNJM1M4jRigOCSA92RzUNOHl1qj2MOjp8S6RFaPRzzY8AY3bB9k72yuot4fbZX2c-vX35svq_uH77dbW7vVyAYTSsDTEpOdc65YUyInOsKWFVZYKyprBXCiFoUjSxrZgSvhUEN1jQNGFuByIur7O7ENV7v1Bhcr8OsvHbqGPBhq3RYVu9QNVTQRkiGuZXcGt7wWksDdQkSC8PkwvpwYo1T06MBHJZ_dc-gzzODa9XW75WsOCvyYgHcnAHB_5owJtW7CNh1ekA_RZXzquRlKelhb3EqheBjDGj_jmFUHQSiduosEHUQiDoJZOn7eOrD5al7h0FFcDgAGhcQ0nK1-w_hD7RiyQA</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Chañi-Paucar, Larry Oscar</creator><creator>Osorio-Tobón, J. Felipe</creator><creator>Johner, Júlio C.F.</creator><creator>Meireles, Maria Angela A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>A comparative and economic study of the extraction of oil from Baru (Dipteryx alata) seeds by supercritical CO2 with and without mechanical pressing</title><author>Chañi-Paucar, Larry Oscar ; Osorio-Tobón, J. Felipe ; Johner, Júlio C.F. ; Meireles, Maria Angela A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-dc17740a244d115524a8c188fc11b8ff55d5953b7691d5495deacfdbbcdf8c523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Baru seed oil</topic><topic>Economic evaluation</topic><topic>Supercritical CO2</topic><topic>Supercritical fluid extraction assisted by pressing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chañi-Paucar, Larry Oscar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osorio-Tobón, J. Felipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johner, Júlio C.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meireles, Maria Angela A.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Heliyon</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chañi-Paucar, Larry Oscar</au><au>Osorio-Tobón, J. Felipe</au><au>Johner, Júlio C.F.</au><au>Meireles, Maria Angela A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparative and economic study of the extraction of oil from Baru (Dipteryx alata) seeds by supercritical CO2 with and without mechanical pressing</atitle><jtitle>Heliyon</jtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e05971</spage><epage>e05971</epage><pages>e05971-e05971</pages><artnum>e05971</artnum><issn>2405-8440</issn><eissn>2405-8440</eissn><abstract>The present study evaluated the effect of supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) assisted by cold pressing (SFEAP) on the overall yield, extraction kinetics, composition of baru seed oil and manufacturing cost (COM). The best extraction conditions were determined in extraction assays combining different pressures (150–350 bar) and temperatures (35 and 45 °C). The extraction yield by SFEAP (28.6 g oil/100 g baru seed) was approximately 31% higher than that obtained by SFE (21.9 g oil/100 g baru seed), according to the kinetic study with the best extraction conditions (350 bar and 45 °C). The extraction yield observed under this condition allowed us to obtain a lower COM for both techniques (SFE was US$ 118.32/kg baru oil and SFEAP was US$ 87.03/kg baru oil) compared to lower pressures and temperatures. The oil obtained under all extraction conditions was rich in unsaturated fatty acids and other bioactive compounds. The extraction of baru seed oil by SFEAP resulted in a higher yield and lower manufacturing cost than SFE.
Economic evaluation; Supercritical fluid extraction assisted by pressing; baru seed oil; supercritical CO2.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>33537470</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e05971</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2405-8440 |
ispartof | Heliyon, 2021-01, Vol.7 (1), p.e05971-e05971, Article e05971 |
issn | 2405-8440 2405-8440 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b050b571e2f74fd4b49a7dc96c7e3d17 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Baru seed oil Economic evaluation Supercritical CO2 Supercritical fluid extraction assisted by pressing |
title | A comparative and economic study of the extraction of oil from Baru (Dipteryx alata) seeds by supercritical CO2 with and without mechanical pressing |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T18%3A55%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparative%20and%20economic%20study%20of%20the%20extraction%20of%20oil%20from%20Baru%20(Dipteryx%20alata)%20seeds%20by%20supercritical%20CO2%20with%20and%20without%20mechanical%20pressing&rft.jtitle=Heliyon&rft.au=Cha%C3%B1i-Paucar,%20Larry%20Oscar&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e05971&rft.epage=e05971&rft.pages=e05971-e05971&rft.artnum=e05971&rft.issn=2405-8440&rft.eissn=2405-8440&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e05971&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2486466702%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-dc17740a244d115524a8c188fc11b8ff55d5953b7691d5495deacfdbbcdf8c523%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2486466702&rft_id=info:pmid/33537470&rfr_iscdi=true |