Loading…

A comparative and economic study of the extraction of oil from Baru (Dipteryx alata) seeds by supercritical CO2 with and without mechanical pressing

The present study evaluated the effect of supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) assisted by cold pressing (SFEAP) on the overall yield, extraction kinetics, composition of baru seed oil and manufacturing cost (COM). The best extraction conditions were determined in extraction assays combining differe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Heliyon 2021-01, Vol.7 (1), p.e05971-e05971, Article e05971
Main Authors: Chañi-Paucar, Larry Oscar, Osorio-Tobón, J. Felipe, Johner, Júlio C.F., Meireles, Maria Angela A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-dc17740a244d115524a8c188fc11b8ff55d5953b7691d5495deacfdbbcdf8c523
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-dc17740a244d115524a8c188fc11b8ff55d5953b7691d5495deacfdbbcdf8c523
container_end_page e05971
container_issue 1
container_start_page e05971
container_title Heliyon
container_volume 7
creator Chañi-Paucar, Larry Oscar
Osorio-Tobón, J. Felipe
Johner, Júlio C.F.
Meireles, Maria Angela A.
description The present study evaluated the effect of supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) assisted by cold pressing (SFEAP) on the overall yield, extraction kinetics, composition of baru seed oil and manufacturing cost (COM). The best extraction conditions were determined in extraction assays combining different pressures (150–350 bar) and temperatures (35 and 45 °C). The extraction yield by SFEAP (28.6 g oil/100 g baru seed) was approximately 31% higher than that obtained by SFE (21.9 g oil/100 g baru seed), according to the kinetic study with the best extraction conditions (350 bar and 45 °C). The extraction yield observed under this condition allowed us to obtain a lower COM for both techniques (SFE was US$ 118.32/kg baru oil and SFEAP was US$ 87.03/kg baru oil) compared to lower pressures and temperatures. The oil obtained under all extraction conditions was rich in unsaturated fatty acids and other bioactive compounds. The extraction of baru seed oil by SFEAP resulted in a higher yield and lower manufacturing cost than SFE. Economic evaluation; Supercritical fluid extraction assisted by pressing; baru seed oil; supercritical CO2.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e05971
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b050b571e2f74fd4b49a7dc96c7e3d17</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2405844021000761</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_b050b571e2f74fd4b49a7dc96c7e3d17</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2486466702</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-dc17740a244d115524a8c188fc11b8ff55d5953b7691d5495deacfdbbcdf8c523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkktv1DAQxyMEolXpR0DysRx2sRM7Ti6gsrwqVeoFzpYzHm-8SuJgO9vme_CByT6E6InTjObxm4f-WfaW0TWjrHy_W7fYudkP65zmbI1U1JK9yC5zTsWq4py-_Me_yK5j3FFKmajKWhavs4uiEIXkkl5mv28J-H7UQSe3R6IHQxD84HsHJKbJzMRbklok-JSChuT8cIh41xEbfE8-6TCRm89uTBjmJ6I7nfQ7EhFNJM1M4jRigOCSA92RzUNOHl1qj2MOjp8S6RFaPRzzY8AY3bB9k72yuot4fbZX2c-vX35svq_uH77dbW7vVyAYTSsDTEpOdc65YUyInOsKWFVZYKyprBXCiFoUjSxrZgSvhUEN1jQNGFuByIur7O7ENV7v1Bhcr8OsvHbqGPBhq3RYVu9QNVTQRkiGuZXcGt7wWksDdQkSC8PkwvpwYo1T06MBHJZ_dc-gzzODa9XW75WsOCvyYgHcnAHB_5owJtW7CNh1ekA_RZXzquRlKelhb3EqheBjDGj_jmFUHQSiduosEHUQiDoJZOn7eOrD5al7h0FFcDgAGhcQ0nK1-w_hD7RiyQA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2486466702</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparative and economic study of the extraction of oil from Baru (Dipteryx alata) seeds by supercritical CO2 with and without mechanical pressing</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Chañi-Paucar, Larry Oscar ; Osorio-Tobón, J. Felipe ; Johner, Júlio C.F. ; Meireles, Maria Angela A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chañi-Paucar, Larry Oscar ; Osorio-Tobón, J. Felipe ; Johner, Júlio C.F. ; Meireles, Maria Angela A.</creatorcontrib><description>The present study evaluated the effect of supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) assisted by cold pressing (SFEAP) on the overall yield, extraction kinetics, composition of baru seed oil and manufacturing cost (COM). The best extraction conditions were determined in extraction assays combining different pressures (150–350 bar) and temperatures (35 and 45 °C). The extraction yield by SFEAP (28.6 g oil/100 g baru seed) was approximately 31% higher than that obtained by SFE (21.9 g oil/100 g baru seed), according to the kinetic study with the best extraction conditions (350 bar and 45 °C). The extraction yield observed under this condition allowed us to obtain a lower COM for both techniques (SFE was US$ 118.32/kg baru oil and SFEAP was US$ 87.03/kg baru oil) compared to lower pressures and temperatures. The oil obtained under all extraction conditions was rich in unsaturated fatty acids and other bioactive compounds. The extraction of baru seed oil by SFEAP resulted in a higher yield and lower manufacturing cost than SFE. Economic evaluation; Supercritical fluid extraction assisted by pressing; baru seed oil; supercritical CO2.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2405-8440</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2405-8440</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e05971</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33537470</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Baru seed oil ; Economic evaluation ; Supercritical CO2 ; Supercritical fluid extraction assisted by pressing</subject><ispartof>Heliyon, 2021-01, Vol.7 (1), p.e05971-e05971, Article e05971</ispartof><rights>2021</rights><rights>2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-dc17740a244d115524a8c188fc11b8ff55d5953b7691d5495deacfdbbcdf8c523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-dc17740a244d115524a8c188fc11b8ff55d5953b7691d5495deacfdbbcdf8c523</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7841323/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844021000761$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,3549,27924,27925,45780,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chañi-Paucar, Larry Oscar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osorio-Tobón, J. Felipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johner, Júlio C.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meireles, Maria Angela A.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparative and economic study of the extraction of oil from Baru (Dipteryx alata) seeds by supercritical CO2 with and without mechanical pressing</title><title>Heliyon</title><description>The present study evaluated the effect of supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) assisted by cold pressing (SFEAP) on the overall yield, extraction kinetics, composition of baru seed oil and manufacturing cost (COM). The best extraction conditions were determined in extraction assays combining different pressures (150–350 bar) and temperatures (35 and 45 °C). The extraction yield by SFEAP (28.6 g oil/100 g baru seed) was approximately 31% higher than that obtained by SFE (21.9 g oil/100 g baru seed), according to the kinetic study with the best extraction conditions (350 bar and 45 °C). The extraction yield observed under this condition allowed us to obtain a lower COM for both techniques (SFE was US$ 118.32/kg baru oil and SFEAP was US$ 87.03/kg baru oil) compared to lower pressures and temperatures. The oil obtained under all extraction conditions was rich in unsaturated fatty acids and other bioactive compounds. The extraction of baru seed oil by SFEAP resulted in a higher yield and lower manufacturing cost than SFE. Economic evaluation; Supercritical fluid extraction assisted by pressing; baru seed oil; supercritical CO2.</description><subject>Baru seed oil</subject><subject>Economic evaluation</subject><subject>Supercritical CO2</subject><subject>Supercritical fluid extraction assisted by pressing</subject><issn>2405-8440</issn><issn>2405-8440</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkktv1DAQxyMEolXpR0DysRx2sRM7Ti6gsrwqVeoFzpYzHm-8SuJgO9vme_CByT6E6InTjObxm4f-WfaW0TWjrHy_W7fYudkP65zmbI1U1JK9yC5zTsWq4py-_Me_yK5j3FFKmajKWhavs4uiEIXkkl5mv28J-H7UQSe3R6IHQxD84HsHJKbJzMRbklok-JSChuT8cIh41xEbfE8-6TCRm89uTBjmJ6I7nfQ7EhFNJM1M4jRigOCSA92RzUNOHl1qj2MOjp8S6RFaPRzzY8AY3bB9k72yuot4fbZX2c-vX35svq_uH77dbW7vVyAYTSsDTEpOdc65YUyInOsKWFVZYKyprBXCiFoUjSxrZgSvhUEN1jQNGFuByIur7O7ENV7v1Bhcr8OsvHbqGPBhq3RYVu9QNVTQRkiGuZXcGt7wWksDdQkSC8PkwvpwYo1T06MBHJZ_dc-gzzODa9XW75WsOCvyYgHcnAHB_5owJtW7CNh1ekA_RZXzquRlKelhb3EqheBjDGj_jmFUHQSiduosEHUQiDoJZOn7eOrD5al7h0FFcDgAGhcQ0nK1-w_hD7RiyQA</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Chañi-Paucar, Larry Oscar</creator><creator>Osorio-Tobón, J. Felipe</creator><creator>Johner, Júlio C.F.</creator><creator>Meireles, Maria Angela A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>A comparative and economic study of the extraction of oil from Baru (Dipteryx alata) seeds by supercritical CO2 with and without mechanical pressing</title><author>Chañi-Paucar, Larry Oscar ; Osorio-Tobón, J. Felipe ; Johner, Júlio C.F. ; Meireles, Maria Angela A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-dc17740a244d115524a8c188fc11b8ff55d5953b7691d5495deacfdbbcdf8c523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Baru seed oil</topic><topic>Economic evaluation</topic><topic>Supercritical CO2</topic><topic>Supercritical fluid extraction assisted by pressing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chañi-Paucar, Larry Oscar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osorio-Tobón, J. Felipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johner, Júlio C.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meireles, Maria Angela A.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Heliyon</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chañi-Paucar, Larry Oscar</au><au>Osorio-Tobón, J. Felipe</au><au>Johner, Júlio C.F.</au><au>Meireles, Maria Angela A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparative and economic study of the extraction of oil from Baru (Dipteryx alata) seeds by supercritical CO2 with and without mechanical pressing</atitle><jtitle>Heliyon</jtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e05971</spage><epage>e05971</epage><pages>e05971-e05971</pages><artnum>e05971</artnum><issn>2405-8440</issn><eissn>2405-8440</eissn><abstract>The present study evaluated the effect of supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) assisted by cold pressing (SFEAP) on the overall yield, extraction kinetics, composition of baru seed oil and manufacturing cost (COM). The best extraction conditions were determined in extraction assays combining different pressures (150–350 bar) and temperatures (35 and 45 °C). The extraction yield by SFEAP (28.6 g oil/100 g baru seed) was approximately 31% higher than that obtained by SFE (21.9 g oil/100 g baru seed), according to the kinetic study with the best extraction conditions (350 bar and 45 °C). The extraction yield observed under this condition allowed us to obtain a lower COM for both techniques (SFE was US$ 118.32/kg baru oil and SFEAP was US$ 87.03/kg baru oil) compared to lower pressures and temperatures. The oil obtained under all extraction conditions was rich in unsaturated fatty acids and other bioactive compounds. The extraction of baru seed oil by SFEAP resulted in a higher yield and lower manufacturing cost than SFE. Economic evaluation; Supercritical fluid extraction assisted by pressing; baru seed oil; supercritical CO2.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>33537470</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e05971</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2405-8440
ispartof Heliyon, 2021-01, Vol.7 (1), p.e05971-e05971, Article e05971
issn 2405-8440
2405-8440
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b050b571e2f74fd4b49a7dc96c7e3d17
source ScienceDirect Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Baru seed oil
Economic evaluation
Supercritical CO2
Supercritical fluid extraction assisted by pressing
title A comparative and economic study of the extraction of oil from Baru (Dipteryx alata) seeds by supercritical CO2 with and without mechanical pressing
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T18%3A55%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparative%20and%20economic%20study%20of%20the%20extraction%20of%20oil%20from%20Baru%20(Dipteryx%20alata)%20seeds%20by%20supercritical%20CO2%20with%20and%20without%20mechanical%20pressing&rft.jtitle=Heliyon&rft.au=Cha%C3%B1i-Paucar,%20Larry%20Oscar&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e05971&rft.epage=e05971&rft.pages=e05971-e05971&rft.artnum=e05971&rft.issn=2405-8440&rft.eissn=2405-8440&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e05971&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2486466702%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-dc17740a244d115524a8c188fc11b8ff55d5953b7691d5495deacfdbbcdf8c523%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2486466702&rft_id=info:pmid/33537470&rfr_iscdi=true