Optimising sampling of fish assemblages on intertidal reefs using remote underwater video

Assessing fish assemblages in subtidal and intertidal habitats is challenging due to the structural complexity of many of these systems. Trapping and collecting are regarded as optimal ways to sample these assemblages, but this method is costly and destructive, so researchers also use video techniqu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PeerJ (San Francisco, CA) CA), 2023-05, Vol.11, p.e15426-e15426, Article e15426
Main Authors: Erickson, Katherine R, Bugnot, Ana B, Figueira, Will F
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Animals
Aquaculture, Fisheries and Fish Science
Censuses
Coral Reefs
Cryptic fish
Ecology
Ecosystem
Fishes
Intertidal reef
Marine Biology
Sampling effort
Unbaited underwater camera
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Assessing fish assemblages in subtidal and intertidal habitats is challenging due to the structural complexity of many of these systems. Trapping and collecting are regarded as optimal ways to sample these assemblages, but this method is costly and destructive, so researchers also use video techniques. Underwater visual census and baited remote underwater video stations are commonly used to characterise fish communities in these systems. More passive techniques such as remote underwater video (RUV) may be more appropriate for behavioural studies, or for comparing proximal habitats where the broad attraction caused by bait plumes could be an issue. However, data processing for RUVs can be time consuming and create processing bottlenecks. Here, we identified the optimal subsampling method to assess fish assemblages on intertidal oyster reefs using RUV footage and bootstrapping techniques. We quantified how video subsampling effort and method (systematic random) affect the accuracy and precision of three different fish assemblage metrics; species richness and two proxies for the total abundance of fish, MaxN and MeanCount , which have not been evaluated previously for complex intertidal habitats. Results suggest that MaxN and species richness should be recorded in real time, whereas optimal sampling for MeanCount is every 60 s. Systematic sampling proved to be more accurate and precise than random sampling. This study provides valuable methodology recommendations which are relevant for the use of RUV to assess fish assemblages in a variety of shallow intertidal habitats.
ISSN:2167-8359
2167-8359
DOI:10.7717/peerj.15426