Loading…

Quantification of liver fat in mice: comparing dual-echo Dixon imaging, chemical shift imaging, and 1H-MR spectroscopy

We evaluated dual-echo Dixon in-phase and out-of-phase (IP-OP), chemical shift imaging (CSI), and 1H MRS (hydrogen MR spectroscopy) in estimating fat content (FC) in phantoms and in livers of mice. Phantoms were made according to the volume percentage of fat ranging from 0% to 100%. The three MR met...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of lipid research 2011-10, Vol.52 (10), p.1847-1855
Main Authors: Peng, Xin-Gui, Ju, Shenghong, Qin, Yujiao, Fang, Fang, Cui, Xin, Liu, George, Ni, Yicheng, Teng, Gao-Jun
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-3505f4800a61e006a0c416d3a81c47f9a5a3cd121952e0b513b699fcb30663533
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-3505f4800a61e006a0c416d3a81c47f9a5a3cd121952e0b513b699fcb30663533
container_end_page 1855
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1847
container_title Journal of lipid research
container_volume 52
creator Peng, Xin-Gui
Ju, Shenghong
Qin, Yujiao
Fang, Fang
Cui, Xin
Liu, George
Ni, Yicheng
Teng, Gao-Jun
description We evaluated dual-echo Dixon in-phase and out-of-phase (IP-OP), chemical shift imaging (CSI), and 1H MRS (hydrogen MR spectroscopy) in estimating fat content (FC) in phantoms and in livers of mice. Phantoms were made according to the volume percentage of fat ranging from 0% to 100%. The three MR methods were performed to measure FC in phantoms and in livers of obese leptin-deficient (ob/ob), human BSCL2/seipin gene knockout (SKO), and wild-type (WT) mice. The results were compared with known FC in phantoms and to a reference standard from mice by histological semiautomatic vacuole segmentation (HIS-S) procedure and liver lipid (LL) chemical analysis. In phantoms, CSI underestimated FC from 50% to 100%, to a lesser extent than IP-OP. In vivo, liver FC in ob/ob and SKO mice measured by the three MR methods were all significantly higher than that in WT mice. Liver FC measured by IP-OP were significantly lower than that measured by CSI and MRS, with no significant difference between CSI and MRS. CSI and MRS showed a linear correlation with LL analysis and with each other. IP-OP underestimated FC, whereas CSI and MRS were more accurate for quantifying FC in both phantoms and liver. CSI and MRS have the potential to replace HIS-S and LL analysis in longitudinal studies.
doi_str_mv 10.1194/jlr.D016691
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b0722d442b73498c9e800bd980a6ebed</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022227520408491</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_b0722d442b73498c9e800bd980a6ebed</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>900624213</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-3505f4800a61e006a0c416d3a81c47f9a5a3cd121952e0b513b699fcb30663533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkUtv1DAURi0EotPCij3yjgVN8TsxCyTUAq1UhECwthz7ZsajJE7tZET_PS4zFCqxsnR9dO7jQ-gFJWeUavFm26ezC0KV0vQRWlHJdVUzxR6jFSGMVYzV8ggd57wlhAqh6FN0xGjN61qKFdp9Xew4hy44O4c44tjhPuwg4c7OOIx4CA7eYheHyaYwrrFfbF-B20R8EX4WPgx2Xeqn2G2gsLbHeRO6-W_djh7Ty-rzN5wncHOK2cXp9hl60tk-w_PDe4J-fPzw_fyyuv7y6er8_XXlpGzmiksiO9EQYhUFQpQlTlDluW2oE3WnrbTcecqolgxIKylvldadazlRikvOT9DV3uuj3ZoplbHSrYk2mN-FmNbGpjm4HkxLasa8EKytudCN01D6tl43pTm04Ivr3d41Le0A3sE4J9s_kD78GcPGrOPOcFozrXURvDoIUrxZIM9mCNlB39sR4pKNLhsywejd2K_3pCv3ygm6-y6UmLvQTQndHEIv9Mt_B7tn_6RcALkHoJx6FyCZ7AKMDnxIJZNyi_Bf8S-Babpc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>900624213</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantification of liver fat in mice: comparing dual-echo Dixon imaging, chemical shift imaging, and 1H-MR spectroscopy</title><source>PubMed Central(OpenAccess)</source><source>ScienceDirect (Online service)</source><creator>Peng, Xin-Gui ; Ju, Shenghong ; Qin, Yujiao ; Fang, Fang ; Cui, Xin ; Liu, George ; Ni, Yicheng ; Teng, Gao-Jun</creator><creatorcontrib>Peng, Xin-Gui ; Ju, Shenghong ; Qin, Yujiao ; Fang, Fang ; Cui, Xin ; Liu, George ; Ni, Yicheng ; Teng, Gao-Jun</creatorcontrib><description>We evaluated dual-echo Dixon in-phase and out-of-phase (IP-OP), chemical shift imaging (CSI), and 1H MRS (hydrogen MR spectroscopy) in estimating fat content (FC) in phantoms and in livers of mice. Phantoms were made according to the volume percentage of fat ranging from 0% to 100%. The three MR methods were performed to measure FC in phantoms and in livers of obese leptin-deficient (ob/ob), human BSCL2/seipin gene knockout (SKO), and wild-type (WT) mice. The results were compared with known FC in phantoms and to a reference standard from mice by histological semiautomatic vacuole segmentation (HIS-S) procedure and liver lipid (LL) chemical analysis. In phantoms, CSI underestimated FC from 50% to 100%, to a lesser extent than IP-OP. In vivo, liver FC in ob/ob and SKO mice measured by the three MR methods were all significantly higher than that in WT mice. Liver FC measured by IP-OP were significantly lower than that measured by CSI and MRS, with no significant difference between CSI and MRS. CSI and MRS showed a linear correlation with LL analysis and with each other. IP-OP underestimated FC, whereas CSI and MRS were more accurate for quantifying FC in both phantoms and liver. CSI and MRS have the potential to replace HIS-S and LL analysis in longitudinal studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2275</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-7262</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1194/jlr.D016691</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21737754</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Echo-Planar Imaging - methods ; Fats - analysis ; Fats - chemistry ; Fats - metabolism ; Fatty Liver - metabolism ; Fatty Liver - pathology ; Humans ; hydrogen magnetic resonance ; in vivo ; Liver - chemistry ; Liver - diagnostic imaging ; Liver - metabolism ; Liver - pathology ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy - methods ; Methods ; Mice ; Mice, Inbred C57BL ; Mice, Knockout ; Models, Animal ; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease ; obesity ; Obesity - metabolism ; Obesity - pathology ; Radiography ; spin-spin relaxation time T2 ; triglyceride</subject><ispartof>Journal of lipid research, 2011-10, Vol.52 (10), p.1847-1855</ispartof><rights>2011 © 2011 ASBMB. Currently published by Elsevier Inc; originally published by American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc. 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-3505f4800a61e006a0c416d3a81c47f9a5a3cd121952e0b513b699fcb30663533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-3505f4800a61e006a0c416d3a81c47f9a5a3cd121952e0b513b699fcb30663533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3172999/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022227520408491$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,3549,27924,27925,45780,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21737754$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peng, Xin-Gui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ju, Shenghong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qin, Yujiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fang, Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cui, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ni, Yicheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teng, Gao-Jun</creatorcontrib><title>Quantification of liver fat in mice: comparing dual-echo Dixon imaging, chemical shift imaging, and 1H-MR spectroscopy</title><title>Journal of lipid research</title><addtitle>J Lipid Res</addtitle><description>We evaluated dual-echo Dixon in-phase and out-of-phase (IP-OP), chemical shift imaging (CSI), and 1H MRS (hydrogen MR spectroscopy) in estimating fat content (FC) in phantoms and in livers of mice. Phantoms were made according to the volume percentage of fat ranging from 0% to 100%. The three MR methods were performed to measure FC in phantoms and in livers of obese leptin-deficient (ob/ob), human BSCL2/seipin gene knockout (SKO), and wild-type (WT) mice. The results were compared with known FC in phantoms and to a reference standard from mice by histological semiautomatic vacuole segmentation (HIS-S) procedure and liver lipid (LL) chemical analysis. In phantoms, CSI underestimated FC from 50% to 100%, to a lesser extent than IP-OP. In vivo, liver FC in ob/ob and SKO mice measured by the three MR methods were all significantly higher than that in WT mice. Liver FC measured by IP-OP were significantly lower than that measured by CSI and MRS, with no significant difference between CSI and MRS. CSI and MRS showed a linear correlation with LL analysis and with each other. IP-OP underestimated FC, whereas CSI and MRS were more accurate for quantifying FC in both phantoms and liver. CSI and MRS have the potential to replace HIS-S and LL analysis in longitudinal studies.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Echo-Planar Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Fats - analysis</subject><subject>Fats - chemistry</subject><subject>Fats - metabolism</subject><subject>Fatty Liver - metabolism</subject><subject>Fatty Liver - pathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>hydrogen magnetic resonance</subject><subject>in vivo</subject><subject>Liver - chemistry</subject><subject>Liver - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Liver - metabolism</subject><subject>Liver - pathology</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy - methods</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Mice, Inbred C57BL</subject><subject>Mice, Knockout</subject><subject>Models, Animal</subject><subject>Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease</subject><subject>obesity</subject><subject>Obesity - metabolism</subject><subject>Obesity - pathology</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>spin-spin relaxation time T2</subject><subject>triglyceride</subject><issn>0022-2275</issn><issn>1539-7262</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkUtv1DAURi0EotPCij3yjgVN8TsxCyTUAq1UhECwthz7ZsajJE7tZET_PS4zFCqxsnR9dO7jQ-gFJWeUavFm26ezC0KV0vQRWlHJdVUzxR6jFSGMVYzV8ggd57wlhAqh6FN0xGjN61qKFdp9Xew4hy44O4c44tjhPuwg4c7OOIx4CA7eYheHyaYwrrFfbF-B20R8EX4WPgx2Xeqn2G2gsLbHeRO6-W_djh7Ty-rzN5wncHOK2cXp9hl60tk-w_PDe4J-fPzw_fyyuv7y6er8_XXlpGzmiksiO9EQYhUFQpQlTlDluW2oE3WnrbTcecqolgxIKylvldadazlRikvOT9DV3uuj3ZoplbHSrYk2mN-FmNbGpjm4HkxLasa8EKytudCN01D6tl43pTm04Ivr3d41Le0A3sE4J9s_kD78GcPGrOPOcFozrXURvDoIUrxZIM9mCNlB39sR4pKNLhsywejd2K_3pCv3ygm6-y6UmLvQTQndHEIv9Mt_B7tn_6RcALkHoJx6FyCZ7AKMDnxIJZNyi_Bf8S-Babpc</recordid><startdate>201110</startdate><enddate>201110</enddate><creator>Peng, Xin-Gui</creator><creator>Ju, Shenghong</creator><creator>Qin, Yujiao</creator><creator>Fang, Fang</creator><creator>Cui, Xin</creator><creator>Liu, George</creator><creator>Ni, Yicheng</creator><creator>Teng, Gao-Jun</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201110</creationdate><title>Quantification of liver fat in mice: comparing dual-echo Dixon imaging, chemical shift imaging, and 1H-MR spectroscopy</title><author>Peng, Xin-Gui ; Ju, Shenghong ; Qin, Yujiao ; Fang, Fang ; Cui, Xin ; Liu, George ; Ni, Yicheng ; Teng, Gao-Jun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-3505f4800a61e006a0c416d3a81c47f9a5a3cd121952e0b513b699fcb30663533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Echo-Planar Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Fats - analysis</topic><topic>Fats - chemistry</topic><topic>Fats - metabolism</topic><topic>Fatty Liver - metabolism</topic><topic>Fatty Liver - pathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>hydrogen magnetic resonance</topic><topic>in vivo</topic><topic>Liver - chemistry</topic><topic>Liver - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Liver - metabolism</topic><topic>Liver - pathology</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy - methods</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Mice, Inbred C57BL</topic><topic>Mice, Knockout</topic><topic>Models, Animal</topic><topic>Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease</topic><topic>obesity</topic><topic>Obesity - metabolism</topic><topic>Obesity - pathology</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>spin-spin relaxation time T2</topic><topic>triglyceride</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peng, Xin-Gui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ju, Shenghong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qin, Yujiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fang, Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cui, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ni, Yicheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teng, Gao-Jun</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Open Access: DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of lipid research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peng, Xin-Gui</au><au>Ju, Shenghong</au><au>Qin, Yujiao</au><au>Fang, Fang</au><au>Cui, Xin</au><au>Liu, George</au><au>Ni, Yicheng</au><au>Teng, Gao-Jun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantification of liver fat in mice: comparing dual-echo Dixon imaging, chemical shift imaging, and 1H-MR spectroscopy</atitle><jtitle>Journal of lipid research</jtitle><addtitle>J Lipid Res</addtitle><date>2011-10</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1847</spage><epage>1855</epage><pages>1847-1855</pages><issn>0022-2275</issn><eissn>1539-7262</eissn><abstract>We evaluated dual-echo Dixon in-phase and out-of-phase (IP-OP), chemical shift imaging (CSI), and 1H MRS (hydrogen MR spectroscopy) in estimating fat content (FC) in phantoms and in livers of mice. Phantoms were made according to the volume percentage of fat ranging from 0% to 100%. The three MR methods were performed to measure FC in phantoms and in livers of obese leptin-deficient (ob/ob), human BSCL2/seipin gene knockout (SKO), and wild-type (WT) mice. The results were compared with known FC in phantoms and to a reference standard from mice by histological semiautomatic vacuole segmentation (HIS-S) procedure and liver lipid (LL) chemical analysis. In phantoms, CSI underestimated FC from 50% to 100%, to a lesser extent than IP-OP. In vivo, liver FC in ob/ob and SKO mice measured by the three MR methods were all significantly higher than that in WT mice. Liver FC measured by IP-OP were significantly lower than that measured by CSI and MRS, with no significant difference between CSI and MRS. CSI and MRS showed a linear correlation with LL analysis and with each other. IP-OP underestimated FC, whereas CSI and MRS were more accurate for quantifying FC in both phantoms and liver. CSI and MRS have the potential to replace HIS-S and LL analysis in longitudinal studies.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>21737754</pmid><doi>10.1194/jlr.D016691</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-2275
ispartof Journal of lipid research, 2011-10, Vol.52 (10), p.1847-1855
issn 0022-2275
1539-7262
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b0722d442b73498c9e800bd980a6ebed
source PubMed Central(OpenAccess); ScienceDirect (Online service)
subjects Animals
Echo-Planar Imaging - methods
Fats - analysis
Fats - chemistry
Fats - metabolism
Fatty Liver - metabolism
Fatty Liver - pathology
Humans
hydrogen magnetic resonance
in vivo
Liver - chemistry
Liver - diagnostic imaging
Liver - metabolism
Liver - pathology
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy - methods
Methods
Mice
Mice, Inbred C57BL
Mice, Knockout
Models, Animal
Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
obesity
Obesity - metabolism
Obesity - pathology
Radiography
spin-spin relaxation time T2
triglyceride
title Quantification of liver fat in mice: comparing dual-echo Dixon imaging, chemical shift imaging, and 1H-MR spectroscopy
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T05%3A44%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantification%20of%20liver%20fat%20in%20mice:%20comparing%20dual-echo%20Dixon%20imaging,%20chemical%20shift%20imaging,%20and%201H-MR%20spectroscopy&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20lipid%20research&rft.au=Peng,%20Xin-Gui&rft.date=2011-10&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1847&rft.epage=1855&rft.pages=1847-1855&rft.issn=0022-2275&rft.eissn=1539-7262&rft_id=info:doi/10.1194/jlr.D016691&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E900624213%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-3505f4800a61e006a0c416d3a81c47f9a5a3cd121952e0b513b699fcb30663533%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=900624213&rft_id=info:pmid/21737754&rfr_iscdi=true