Loading…
Quantification of liver fat in mice: comparing dual-echo Dixon imaging, chemical shift imaging, and 1H-MR spectroscopy
We evaluated dual-echo Dixon in-phase and out-of-phase (IP-OP), chemical shift imaging (CSI), and 1H MRS (hydrogen MR spectroscopy) in estimating fat content (FC) in phantoms and in livers of mice. Phantoms were made according to the volume percentage of fat ranging from 0% to 100%. The three MR met...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of lipid research 2011-10, Vol.52 (10), p.1847-1855 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-3505f4800a61e006a0c416d3a81c47f9a5a3cd121952e0b513b699fcb30663533 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-3505f4800a61e006a0c416d3a81c47f9a5a3cd121952e0b513b699fcb30663533 |
container_end_page | 1855 |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1847 |
container_title | Journal of lipid research |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | Peng, Xin-Gui Ju, Shenghong Qin, Yujiao Fang, Fang Cui, Xin Liu, George Ni, Yicheng Teng, Gao-Jun |
description | We evaluated dual-echo Dixon in-phase and out-of-phase (IP-OP), chemical shift imaging (CSI), and 1H MRS (hydrogen MR spectroscopy) in estimating fat content (FC) in phantoms and in livers of mice. Phantoms were made according to the volume percentage of fat ranging from 0% to 100%. The three MR methods were performed to measure FC in phantoms and in livers of obese leptin-deficient (ob/ob), human BSCL2/seipin gene knockout (SKO), and wild-type (WT) mice. The results were compared with known FC in phantoms and to a reference standard from mice by histological semiautomatic vacuole segmentation (HIS-S) procedure and liver lipid (LL) chemical analysis. In phantoms, CSI underestimated FC from 50% to 100%, to a lesser extent than IP-OP. In vivo, liver FC in ob/ob and SKO mice measured by the three MR methods were all significantly higher than that in WT mice. Liver FC measured by IP-OP were significantly lower than that measured by CSI and MRS, with no significant difference between CSI and MRS. CSI and MRS showed a linear correlation with LL analysis and with each other. IP-OP underestimated FC, whereas CSI and MRS were more accurate for quantifying FC in both phantoms and liver. CSI and MRS have the potential to replace HIS-S and LL analysis in longitudinal studies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1194/jlr.D016691 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b0722d442b73498c9e800bd980a6ebed</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022227520408491</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_b0722d442b73498c9e800bd980a6ebed</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>900624213</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-3505f4800a61e006a0c416d3a81c47f9a5a3cd121952e0b513b699fcb30663533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkUtv1DAURi0EotPCij3yjgVN8TsxCyTUAq1UhECwthz7ZsajJE7tZET_PS4zFCqxsnR9dO7jQ-gFJWeUavFm26ezC0KV0vQRWlHJdVUzxR6jFSGMVYzV8ggd57wlhAqh6FN0xGjN61qKFdp9Xew4hy44O4c44tjhPuwg4c7OOIx4CA7eYheHyaYwrrFfbF-B20R8EX4WPgx2Xeqn2G2gsLbHeRO6-W_djh7Ty-rzN5wncHOK2cXp9hl60tk-w_PDe4J-fPzw_fyyuv7y6er8_XXlpGzmiksiO9EQYhUFQpQlTlDluW2oE3WnrbTcecqolgxIKylvldadazlRikvOT9DV3uuj3ZoplbHSrYk2mN-FmNbGpjm4HkxLasa8EKytudCN01D6tl43pTm04Ivr3d41Le0A3sE4J9s_kD78GcPGrOPOcFozrXURvDoIUrxZIM9mCNlB39sR4pKNLhsywejd2K_3pCv3ygm6-y6UmLvQTQndHEIv9Mt_B7tn_6RcALkHoJx6FyCZ7AKMDnxIJZNyi_Bf8S-Babpc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>900624213</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantification of liver fat in mice: comparing dual-echo Dixon imaging, chemical shift imaging, and 1H-MR spectroscopy</title><source>PubMed Central(OpenAccess)</source><source>ScienceDirect (Online service)</source><creator>Peng, Xin-Gui ; Ju, Shenghong ; Qin, Yujiao ; Fang, Fang ; Cui, Xin ; Liu, George ; Ni, Yicheng ; Teng, Gao-Jun</creator><creatorcontrib>Peng, Xin-Gui ; Ju, Shenghong ; Qin, Yujiao ; Fang, Fang ; Cui, Xin ; Liu, George ; Ni, Yicheng ; Teng, Gao-Jun</creatorcontrib><description>We evaluated dual-echo Dixon in-phase and out-of-phase (IP-OP), chemical shift imaging (CSI), and 1H MRS (hydrogen MR spectroscopy) in estimating fat content (FC) in phantoms and in livers of mice. Phantoms were made according to the volume percentage of fat ranging from 0% to 100%. The three MR methods were performed to measure FC in phantoms and in livers of obese leptin-deficient (ob/ob), human BSCL2/seipin gene knockout (SKO), and wild-type (WT) mice. The results were compared with known FC in phantoms and to a reference standard from mice by histological semiautomatic vacuole segmentation (HIS-S) procedure and liver lipid (LL) chemical analysis. In phantoms, CSI underestimated FC from 50% to 100%, to a lesser extent than IP-OP. In vivo, liver FC in ob/ob and SKO mice measured by the three MR methods were all significantly higher than that in WT mice. Liver FC measured by IP-OP were significantly lower than that measured by CSI and MRS, with no significant difference between CSI and MRS. CSI and MRS showed a linear correlation with LL analysis and with each other. IP-OP underestimated FC, whereas CSI and MRS were more accurate for quantifying FC in both phantoms and liver. CSI and MRS have the potential to replace HIS-S and LL analysis in longitudinal studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2275</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-7262</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1194/jlr.D016691</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21737754</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Echo-Planar Imaging - methods ; Fats - analysis ; Fats - chemistry ; Fats - metabolism ; Fatty Liver - metabolism ; Fatty Liver - pathology ; Humans ; hydrogen magnetic resonance ; in vivo ; Liver - chemistry ; Liver - diagnostic imaging ; Liver - metabolism ; Liver - pathology ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy - methods ; Methods ; Mice ; Mice, Inbred C57BL ; Mice, Knockout ; Models, Animal ; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease ; obesity ; Obesity - metabolism ; Obesity - pathology ; Radiography ; spin-spin relaxation time T2 ; triglyceride</subject><ispartof>Journal of lipid research, 2011-10, Vol.52 (10), p.1847-1855</ispartof><rights>2011 © 2011 ASBMB. Currently published by Elsevier Inc; originally published by American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc. 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-3505f4800a61e006a0c416d3a81c47f9a5a3cd121952e0b513b699fcb30663533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-3505f4800a61e006a0c416d3a81c47f9a5a3cd121952e0b513b699fcb30663533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3172999/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022227520408491$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,3549,27924,27925,45780,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21737754$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peng, Xin-Gui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ju, Shenghong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qin, Yujiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fang, Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cui, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ni, Yicheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teng, Gao-Jun</creatorcontrib><title>Quantification of liver fat in mice: comparing dual-echo Dixon imaging, chemical shift imaging, and 1H-MR spectroscopy</title><title>Journal of lipid research</title><addtitle>J Lipid Res</addtitle><description>We evaluated dual-echo Dixon in-phase and out-of-phase (IP-OP), chemical shift imaging (CSI), and 1H MRS (hydrogen MR spectroscopy) in estimating fat content (FC) in phantoms and in livers of mice. Phantoms were made according to the volume percentage of fat ranging from 0% to 100%. The three MR methods were performed to measure FC in phantoms and in livers of obese leptin-deficient (ob/ob), human BSCL2/seipin gene knockout (SKO), and wild-type (WT) mice. The results were compared with known FC in phantoms and to a reference standard from mice by histological semiautomatic vacuole segmentation (HIS-S) procedure and liver lipid (LL) chemical analysis. In phantoms, CSI underestimated FC from 50% to 100%, to a lesser extent than IP-OP. In vivo, liver FC in ob/ob and SKO mice measured by the three MR methods were all significantly higher than that in WT mice. Liver FC measured by IP-OP were significantly lower than that measured by CSI and MRS, with no significant difference between CSI and MRS. CSI and MRS showed a linear correlation with LL analysis and with each other. IP-OP underestimated FC, whereas CSI and MRS were more accurate for quantifying FC in both phantoms and liver. CSI and MRS have the potential to replace HIS-S and LL analysis in longitudinal studies.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Echo-Planar Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Fats - analysis</subject><subject>Fats - chemistry</subject><subject>Fats - metabolism</subject><subject>Fatty Liver - metabolism</subject><subject>Fatty Liver - pathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>hydrogen magnetic resonance</subject><subject>in vivo</subject><subject>Liver - chemistry</subject><subject>Liver - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Liver - metabolism</subject><subject>Liver - pathology</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy - methods</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Mice, Inbred C57BL</subject><subject>Mice, Knockout</subject><subject>Models, Animal</subject><subject>Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease</subject><subject>obesity</subject><subject>Obesity - metabolism</subject><subject>Obesity - pathology</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>spin-spin relaxation time T2</subject><subject>triglyceride</subject><issn>0022-2275</issn><issn>1539-7262</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkUtv1DAURi0EotPCij3yjgVN8TsxCyTUAq1UhECwthz7ZsajJE7tZET_PS4zFCqxsnR9dO7jQ-gFJWeUavFm26ezC0KV0vQRWlHJdVUzxR6jFSGMVYzV8ggd57wlhAqh6FN0xGjN61qKFdp9Xew4hy44O4c44tjhPuwg4c7OOIx4CA7eYheHyaYwrrFfbF-B20R8EX4WPgx2Xeqn2G2gsLbHeRO6-W_djh7Ty-rzN5wncHOK2cXp9hl60tk-w_PDe4J-fPzw_fyyuv7y6er8_XXlpGzmiksiO9EQYhUFQpQlTlDluW2oE3WnrbTcecqolgxIKylvldadazlRikvOT9DV3uuj3ZoplbHSrYk2mN-FmNbGpjm4HkxLasa8EKytudCN01D6tl43pTm04Ivr3d41Le0A3sE4J9s_kD78GcPGrOPOcFozrXURvDoIUrxZIM9mCNlB39sR4pKNLhsywejd2K_3pCv3ygm6-y6UmLvQTQndHEIv9Mt_B7tn_6RcALkHoJx6FyCZ7AKMDnxIJZNyi_Bf8S-Babpc</recordid><startdate>201110</startdate><enddate>201110</enddate><creator>Peng, Xin-Gui</creator><creator>Ju, Shenghong</creator><creator>Qin, Yujiao</creator><creator>Fang, Fang</creator><creator>Cui, Xin</creator><creator>Liu, George</creator><creator>Ni, Yicheng</creator><creator>Teng, Gao-Jun</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201110</creationdate><title>Quantification of liver fat in mice: comparing dual-echo Dixon imaging, chemical shift imaging, and 1H-MR spectroscopy</title><author>Peng, Xin-Gui ; Ju, Shenghong ; Qin, Yujiao ; Fang, Fang ; Cui, Xin ; Liu, George ; Ni, Yicheng ; Teng, Gao-Jun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-3505f4800a61e006a0c416d3a81c47f9a5a3cd121952e0b513b699fcb30663533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Echo-Planar Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Fats - analysis</topic><topic>Fats - chemistry</topic><topic>Fats - metabolism</topic><topic>Fatty Liver - metabolism</topic><topic>Fatty Liver - pathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>hydrogen magnetic resonance</topic><topic>in vivo</topic><topic>Liver - chemistry</topic><topic>Liver - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Liver - metabolism</topic><topic>Liver - pathology</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy - methods</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Mice, Inbred C57BL</topic><topic>Mice, Knockout</topic><topic>Models, Animal</topic><topic>Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease</topic><topic>obesity</topic><topic>Obesity - metabolism</topic><topic>Obesity - pathology</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>spin-spin relaxation time T2</topic><topic>triglyceride</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peng, Xin-Gui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ju, Shenghong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qin, Yujiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fang, Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cui, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ni, Yicheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teng, Gao-Jun</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Open Access: DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of lipid research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peng, Xin-Gui</au><au>Ju, Shenghong</au><au>Qin, Yujiao</au><au>Fang, Fang</au><au>Cui, Xin</au><au>Liu, George</au><au>Ni, Yicheng</au><au>Teng, Gao-Jun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantification of liver fat in mice: comparing dual-echo Dixon imaging, chemical shift imaging, and 1H-MR spectroscopy</atitle><jtitle>Journal of lipid research</jtitle><addtitle>J Lipid Res</addtitle><date>2011-10</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1847</spage><epage>1855</epage><pages>1847-1855</pages><issn>0022-2275</issn><eissn>1539-7262</eissn><abstract>We evaluated dual-echo Dixon in-phase and out-of-phase (IP-OP), chemical shift imaging (CSI), and 1H MRS (hydrogen MR spectroscopy) in estimating fat content (FC) in phantoms and in livers of mice. Phantoms were made according to the volume percentage of fat ranging from 0% to 100%. The three MR methods were performed to measure FC in phantoms and in livers of obese leptin-deficient (ob/ob), human BSCL2/seipin gene knockout (SKO), and wild-type (WT) mice. The results were compared with known FC in phantoms and to a reference standard from mice by histological semiautomatic vacuole segmentation (HIS-S) procedure and liver lipid (LL) chemical analysis. In phantoms, CSI underestimated FC from 50% to 100%, to a lesser extent than IP-OP. In vivo, liver FC in ob/ob and SKO mice measured by the three MR methods were all significantly higher than that in WT mice. Liver FC measured by IP-OP were significantly lower than that measured by CSI and MRS, with no significant difference between CSI and MRS. CSI and MRS showed a linear correlation with LL analysis and with each other. IP-OP underestimated FC, whereas CSI and MRS were more accurate for quantifying FC in both phantoms and liver. CSI and MRS have the potential to replace HIS-S and LL analysis in longitudinal studies.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>21737754</pmid><doi>10.1194/jlr.D016691</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-2275 |
ispartof | Journal of lipid research, 2011-10, Vol.52 (10), p.1847-1855 |
issn | 0022-2275 1539-7262 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b0722d442b73498c9e800bd980a6ebed |
source | PubMed Central(OpenAccess); ScienceDirect (Online service) |
subjects | Animals Echo-Planar Imaging - methods Fats - analysis Fats - chemistry Fats - metabolism Fatty Liver - metabolism Fatty Liver - pathology Humans hydrogen magnetic resonance in vivo Liver - chemistry Liver - diagnostic imaging Liver - metabolism Liver - pathology Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy - methods Methods Mice Mice, Inbred C57BL Mice, Knockout Models, Animal Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease obesity Obesity - metabolism Obesity - pathology Radiography spin-spin relaxation time T2 triglyceride |
title | Quantification of liver fat in mice: comparing dual-echo Dixon imaging, chemical shift imaging, and 1H-MR spectroscopy |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T05%3A44%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantification%20of%20liver%20fat%20in%20mice:%20comparing%20dual-echo%20Dixon%20imaging,%20chemical%20shift%20imaging,%20and%201H-MR%20spectroscopy&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20lipid%20research&rft.au=Peng,%20Xin-Gui&rft.date=2011-10&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1847&rft.epage=1855&rft.pages=1847-1855&rft.issn=0022-2275&rft.eissn=1539-7262&rft_id=info:doi/10.1194/jlr.D016691&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E900624213%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-3505f4800a61e006a0c416d3a81c47f9a5a3cd121952e0b513b699fcb30663533%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=900624213&rft_id=info:pmid/21737754&rfr_iscdi=true |