Loading…

Protocol for a randomised controlled trial to compare postoperative complications between minimally invasive and open DIStal PAnCreaTectomy (DISPACT-2 trial)

IntroductionIn recent years, minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) has been used with increasing frequency to accelerate patient recovery. Distal pancreatectomy has an overall morbidity rate of 30%–40%. The known advantages of minimally invasive techniques must be rigorously compared with...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMJ open 2021-02, Vol.11 (2), p.e047867-e047867
Main Authors: Probst, Pascal, Schuh, Fabian, Dörr-Harim, Colette, Sander, Anja, Bruckner, Thomas, Klose, Christina, Rossion, Inga, Nickel, Felix, Müller-Stich, Beat Peter, Mehrabi, Arianeb, Hackert, Thilo, Büchler, Markus W., Diener, Markus K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b578t-f2e48b13e3e47a4586194eb6112c057adf5c290d0a921096e13e305e326e35273
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b578t-f2e48b13e3e47a4586194eb6112c057adf5c290d0a921096e13e305e326e35273
container_end_page e047867
container_issue 2
container_start_page e047867
container_title BMJ open
container_volume 11
creator Probst, Pascal
Schuh, Fabian
Dörr-Harim, Colette
Sander, Anja
Bruckner, Thomas
Klose, Christina
Rossion, Inga
Nickel, Felix
Müller-Stich, Beat Peter
Mehrabi, Arianeb
Hackert, Thilo
Büchler, Markus W.
Diener, Markus K.
description IntroductionIn recent years, minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) has been used with increasing frequency to accelerate patient recovery. Distal pancreatectomy has an overall morbidity rate of 30%–40%. The known advantages of minimally invasive techniques must be rigorously compared with those of open surgery before they can be completely implemented into clinical practice.Methods and analysisDISPACT-2 is a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing minimally invasive (conventional laparoscopic or robotic assisted) with open distal pancreatic resection in patients undergoing elective surgery for benign as well as malign diseases of the pancreatic body and tail. After screening for eligibility and obtaining informed consent, a total of 294 adult patients will be preoperatively randomised in a 1:1 ratio. The primary hypothesis is that MIDP is non-inferior to open distal pancreatectomy in terms of postoperative mortality and morbidity expressed as the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) within 3 months after index operation, with a non-inferiority margin of 7.5 CCI points. Secondary endpoints include pancreas-specific complications, oncological safety and patient reported outcomes. Follow-up for each individual patient will be 2 years.Ethics and disseminationThe DISPACT-2 trial has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the medical faculty of Heidelberg University (S-693/2017). Results of the primary endpoint will be available in 2024 and will be published at national and international meetings. Full results will be made available in an open access, peer-reviewed journal. The website www.dispact.de contains up-to-date information regarding the trial.Trial registration numberDRKS00014011
doi_str_mv 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047867
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b09804ab369640d587cf21ef722f2725</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_b09804ab369640d587cf21ef722f2725</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2492658364</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b578t-f2e48b13e3e47a4586194eb6112c057adf5c290d0a921096e13e305e326e35273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks2O0zAUhSMEYkbDPAESssRmWGTG_0k2SKPyV2kkKlHWluPcDKkcu9huUR-Gd8VtSplhgcjG9vV3jq-dUxQvCb4mhMmbdlz5NbiSYopLzKtaVk-Kc4o5LyUW4umD-VlxGeMK54-LRgj6vDhjTJImA-fFz0XwyRtvUe8D0iho1_lxiNAh410K3to8TWHQFiWfa-NaB0BrH1M-P-g0bOFQtYPJC-8iaiH9AHBoHNwwamt3aHBbHfdgNkf7ttG7-ZeUHRe3bhZAL8EkP-7QVS4vbmfLkk4nvnlRPOu1jXB5HC-Krx_eL2efyrvPH-ez27uyFVWdyp4Cr1vCgAGvNBd1vh2HVhJCDRaV7nphaIM7rBtKcCNhj2IBjEpgglbsophPvp3XK7UOue-wU14P6lDw4V7pkAZjQbW4qTHXLZON5LgTdWV6SqCvKO1pRUX2ejt5rTftCJ2B_IraPjJ9vOOGb-reb1XVYIYbkg2ujgbBf99ATCr_DwPWagd-ExXlDZWiZpJn9PVf6MpvgstPdaCIpJjgTLGJMsHHGKA_NUOw2qdJHdOk9mlSU5qy6tXDe5w0v7OTgesJyOr_dLz5Izg1-i_FL3Vv5ew</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2492162010</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Protocol for a randomised controlled trial to compare postoperative complications between minimally invasive and open DIStal PAnCreaTectomy (DISPACT-2 trial)</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>BMJ</source><source>BMJ Journals (Open Access)</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Probst, Pascal ; Schuh, Fabian ; Dörr-Harim, Colette ; Sander, Anja ; Bruckner, Thomas ; Klose, Christina ; Rossion, Inga ; Nickel, Felix ; Müller-Stich, Beat Peter ; Mehrabi, Arianeb ; Hackert, Thilo ; Büchler, Markus W. ; Diener, Markus K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Probst, Pascal ; Schuh, Fabian ; Dörr-Harim, Colette ; Sander, Anja ; Bruckner, Thomas ; Klose, Christina ; Rossion, Inga ; Nickel, Felix ; Müller-Stich, Beat Peter ; Mehrabi, Arianeb ; Hackert, Thilo ; Büchler, Markus W. ; Diener, Markus K.</creatorcontrib><description>IntroductionIn recent years, minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) has been used with increasing frequency to accelerate patient recovery. Distal pancreatectomy has an overall morbidity rate of 30%–40%. The known advantages of minimally invasive techniques must be rigorously compared with those of open surgery before they can be completely implemented into clinical practice.Methods and analysisDISPACT-2 is a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing minimally invasive (conventional laparoscopic or robotic assisted) with open distal pancreatic resection in patients undergoing elective surgery for benign as well as malign diseases of the pancreatic body and tail. After screening for eligibility and obtaining informed consent, a total of 294 adult patients will be preoperatively randomised in a 1:1 ratio. The primary hypothesis is that MIDP is non-inferior to open distal pancreatectomy in terms of postoperative mortality and morbidity expressed as the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) within 3 months after index operation, with a non-inferiority margin of 7.5 CCI points. Secondary endpoints include pancreas-specific complications, oncological safety and patient reported outcomes. Follow-up for each individual patient will be 2 years.Ethics and disseminationThe DISPACT-2 trial has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the medical faculty of Heidelberg University (S-693/2017). Results of the primary endpoint will be available in 2024 and will be published at national and international meetings. Full results will be made available in an open access, peer-reviewed journal. The website www.dispact.de contains up-to-date information regarding the trial.Trial registration numberDRKS00014011</description><identifier>ISSN: 2044-6055</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-6055</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047867</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33619204</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: British Medical Journal Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Abdomen ; Abdominal surgery ; Fistula ; Humans ; Hypotheses ; Laparoscopy ; Metastasis ; minimally invasive surgery ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures ; Morbidity ; Mortality ; Multicenter Studies as Topic ; Pancreatectomy ; Pancreatectomy - adverse effects ; pancreatic disease ; Pancreatic Neoplasms - surgery ; pancreatic surgery ; Patients ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Recovery (Medical) ; Robotics ; Surgery ; Surgical outcomes ; Treatment Outcome ; Veins &amp; arteries</subject><ispartof>BMJ open, 2021-02, Vol.11 (2), p.e047867-e047867</ispartof><rights>Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><rights>2021 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ . Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b578t-f2e48b13e3e47a4586194eb6112c057adf5c290d0a921096e13e305e326e35273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b578t-f2e48b13e3e47a4586194eb6112c057adf5c290d0a921096e13e305e326e35273</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6163-1525 ; 0000-0002-0895-4015</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2492162010/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2492162010?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>112,113,230,314,727,780,784,885,3185,25744,27540,27541,27915,27916,37003,37004,44581,53782,53784,55332,55341,74887,77355,77356,77357,77358,77362,77393,77421,77447</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33619204$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Probst, Pascal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuh, Fabian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dörr-Harim, Colette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sander, Anja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruckner, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klose, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossion, Inga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nickel, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller-Stich, Beat Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehrabi, Arianeb</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hackert, Thilo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Büchler, Markus W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diener, Markus K.</creatorcontrib><title>Protocol for a randomised controlled trial to compare postoperative complications between minimally invasive and open DIStal PAnCreaTectomy (DISPACT-2 trial)</title><title>BMJ open</title><addtitle>BMJ Open</addtitle><addtitle>BMJ Open</addtitle><description>IntroductionIn recent years, minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) has been used with increasing frequency to accelerate patient recovery. Distal pancreatectomy has an overall morbidity rate of 30%–40%. The known advantages of minimally invasive techniques must be rigorously compared with those of open surgery before they can be completely implemented into clinical practice.Methods and analysisDISPACT-2 is a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing minimally invasive (conventional laparoscopic or robotic assisted) with open distal pancreatic resection in patients undergoing elective surgery for benign as well as malign diseases of the pancreatic body and tail. After screening for eligibility and obtaining informed consent, a total of 294 adult patients will be preoperatively randomised in a 1:1 ratio. The primary hypothesis is that MIDP is non-inferior to open distal pancreatectomy in terms of postoperative mortality and morbidity expressed as the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) within 3 months after index operation, with a non-inferiority margin of 7.5 CCI points. Secondary endpoints include pancreas-specific complications, oncological safety and patient reported outcomes. Follow-up for each individual patient will be 2 years.Ethics and disseminationThe DISPACT-2 trial has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the medical faculty of Heidelberg University (S-693/2017). Results of the primary endpoint will be available in 2024 and will be published at national and international meetings. Full results will be made available in an open access, peer-reviewed journal. The website www.dispact.de contains up-to-date information regarding the trial.Trial registration numberDRKS00014011</description><subject>Abdomen</subject><subject>Abdominal surgery</subject><subject>Fistula</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>minimally invasive surgery</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Multicenter Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Pancreatectomy</subject><subject>Pancreatectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>pancreatic disease</subject><subject>Pancreatic Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>pancreatic surgery</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Recovery (Medical)</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Veins &amp; arteries</subject><issn>2044-6055</issn><issn>2044-6055</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>9YT</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks2O0zAUhSMEYkbDPAESssRmWGTG_0k2SKPyV2kkKlHWluPcDKkcu9huUR-Gd8VtSplhgcjG9vV3jq-dUxQvCb4mhMmbdlz5NbiSYopLzKtaVk-Kc4o5LyUW4umD-VlxGeMK54-LRgj6vDhjTJImA-fFz0XwyRtvUe8D0iho1_lxiNAh410K3to8TWHQFiWfa-NaB0BrH1M-P-g0bOFQtYPJC-8iaiH9AHBoHNwwamt3aHBbHfdgNkf7ttG7-ZeUHRe3bhZAL8EkP-7QVS4vbmfLkk4nvnlRPOu1jXB5HC-Krx_eL2efyrvPH-ez27uyFVWdyp4Cr1vCgAGvNBd1vh2HVhJCDRaV7nphaIM7rBtKcCNhj2IBjEpgglbsophPvp3XK7UOue-wU14P6lDw4V7pkAZjQbW4qTHXLZON5LgTdWV6SqCvKO1pRUX2ejt5rTftCJ2B_IraPjJ9vOOGb-reb1XVYIYbkg2ujgbBf99ATCr_DwPWagd-ExXlDZWiZpJn9PVf6MpvgstPdaCIpJjgTLGJMsHHGKA_NUOw2qdJHdOk9mlSU5qy6tXDe5w0v7OTgesJyOr_dLz5Izg1-i_FL3Vv5ew</recordid><startdate>20210222</startdate><enddate>20210222</enddate><creator>Probst, Pascal</creator><creator>Schuh, Fabian</creator><creator>Dörr-Harim, Colette</creator><creator>Sander, Anja</creator><creator>Bruckner, Thomas</creator><creator>Klose, Christina</creator><creator>Rossion, Inga</creator><creator>Nickel, Felix</creator><creator>Müller-Stich, Beat Peter</creator><creator>Mehrabi, Arianeb</creator><creator>Hackert, Thilo</creator><creator>Büchler, Markus W.</creator><creator>Diener, Markus K.</creator><general>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><scope>9YT</scope><scope>ACMMV</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6163-1525</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0895-4015</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210222</creationdate><title>Protocol for a randomised controlled trial to compare postoperative complications between minimally invasive and open DIStal PAnCreaTectomy (DISPACT-2 trial)</title><author>Probst, Pascal ; Schuh, Fabian ; Dörr-Harim, Colette ; Sander, Anja ; Bruckner, Thomas ; Klose, Christina ; Rossion, Inga ; Nickel, Felix ; Müller-Stich, Beat Peter ; Mehrabi, Arianeb ; Hackert, Thilo ; Büchler, Markus W. ; Diener, Markus K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b578t-f2e48b13e3e47a4586194eb6112c057adf5c290d0a921096e13e305e326e35273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Abdomen</topic><topic>Abdominal surgery</topic><topic>Fistula</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>minimally invasive surgery</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Multicenter Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Pancreatectomy</topic><topic>Pancreatectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>pancreatic disease</topic><topic>Pancreatic Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>pancreatic surgery</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Recovery (Medical)</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Veins &amp; arteries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Probst, Pascal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuh, Fabian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dörr-Harim, Colette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sander, Anja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruckner, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klose, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossion, Inga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nickel, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller-Stich, Beat Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehrabi, Arianeb</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hackert, Thilo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Büchler, Markus W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diener, Markus K.</creatorcontrib><collection>BMJ Journals (Open Access)</collection><collection>BMJ Journals:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMJ open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Probst, Pascal</au><au>Schuh, Fabian</au><au>Dörr-Harim, Colette</au><au>Sander, Anja</au><au>Bruckner, Thomas</au><au>Klose, Christina</au><au>Rossion, Inga</au><au>Nickel, Felix</au><au>Müller-Stich, Beat Peter</au><au>Mehrabi, Arianeb</au><au>Hackert, Thilo</au><au>Büchler, Markus W.</au><au>Diener, Markus K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Protocol for a randomised controlled trial to compare postoperative complications between minimally invasive and open DIStal PAnCreaTectomy (DISPACT-2 trial)</atitle><jtitle>BMJ open</jtitle><stitle>BMJ Open</stitle><addtitle>BMJ Open</addtitle><date>2021-02-22</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e047867</spage><epage>e047867</epage><pages>e047867-e047867</pages><issn>2044-6055</issn><eissn>2044-6055</eissn><abstract>IntroductionIn recent years, minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) has been used with increasing frequency to accelerate patient recovery. Distal pancreatectomy has an overall morbidity rate of 30%–40%. The known advantages of minimally invasive techniques must be rigorously compared with those of open surgery before they can be completely implemented into clinical practice.Methods and analysisDISPACT-2 is a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing minimally invasive (conventional laparoscopic or robotic assisted) with open distal pancreatic resection in patients undergoing elective surgery for benign as well as malign diseases of the pancreatic body and tail. After screening for eligibility and obtaining informed consent, a total of 294 adult patients will be preoperatively randomised in a 1:1 ratio. The primary hypothesis is that MIDP is non-inferior to open distal pancreatectomy in terms of postoperative mortality and morbidity expressed as the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) within 3 months after index operation, with a non-inferiority margin of 7.5 CCI points. Secondary endpoints include pancreas-specific complications, oncological safety and patient reported outcomes. Follow-up for each individual patient will be 2 years.Ethics and disseminationThe DISPACT-2 trial has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the medical faculty of Heidelberg University (S-693/2017). Results of the primary endpoint will be available in 2024 and will be published at national and international meetings. Full results will be made available in an open access, peer-reviewed journal. The website www.dispact.de contains up-to-date information regarding the trial.Trial registration numberDRKS00014011</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</pub><pmid>33619204</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047867</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6163-1525</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0895-4015</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2044-6055
ispartof BMJ open, 2021-02, Vol.11 (2), p.e047867-e047867
issn 2044-6055
2044-6055
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b09804ab369640d587cf21ef722f2725
source PubMed (Medline); BMJ; BMJ Journals (Open Access); Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)
subjects Abdomen
Abdominal surgery
Fistula
Humans
Hypotheses
Laparoscopy
Metastasis
minimally invasive surgery
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Morbidity
Mortality
Multicenter Studies as Topic
Pancreatectomy
Pancreatectomy - adverse effects
pancreatic disease
Pancreatic Neoplasms - surgery
pancreatic surgery
Patients
Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Recovery (Medical)
Robotics
Surgery
Surgical outcomes
Treatment Outcome
Veins & arteries
title Protocol for a randomised controlled trial to compare postoperative complications between minimally invasive and open DIStal PAnCreaTectomy (DISPACT-2 trial)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T00%3A27%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Protocol%20for%20a%20randomised%20controlled%20trial%20to%20compare%20postoperative%20complications%20between%20minimally%20invasive%20and%20open%20DIStal%20PAnCreaTectomy%20(DISPACT-2%20trial)&rft.jtitle=BMJ%20open&rft.au=Probst,%20Pascal&rft.date=2021-02-22&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e047867&rft.epage=e047867&rft.pages=e047867-e047867&rft.issn=2044-6055&rft.eissn=2044-6055&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047867&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2492658364%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b578t-f2e48b13e3e47a4586194eb6112c057adf5c290d0a921096e13e305e326e35273%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2492162010&rft_id=info:pmid/33619204&rfr_iscdi=true