Loading…

Development of the Prevention of Suicide Behaviour in Prisons: Enhancing Access to Therapy (PROSPECT) logic model and implementation strategies

This study aimed to develop and articulate a logic model and programme theories for implementing a new cognitive-behavioural suicide prevention intervention for men in prison who are perceived to be at risk of death by suicide. Semi-structured one-to-one interviews with key stakeholders and a combin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BJPsych Bulletin 2024-10, Vol.48 (5), p.285-293
Main Authors: Crook, Rebecca, Lennox, Charlotte, Awenat, Yvonne, Edge, Dawn, Knowles, Sarah, Honeywell, David, Gooding, Patricia, Haddock, Gillian, Brooks, Helen, Pratt, Daniel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-9e45c25b41cb3748d74fc3999b418ecd34ca6048f3b13fbf7a30277679d1d163
container_end_page 293
container_issue 5
container_start_page 285
container_title BJPsych Bulletin
container_volume 48
creator Crook, Rebecca
Lennox, Charlotte
Awenat, Yvonne
Edge, Dawn
Knowles, Sarah
Honeywell, David
Gooding, Patricia
Haddock, Gillian
Brooks, Helen
Pratt, Daniel
description This study aimed to develop and articulate a logic model and programme theories for implementing a new cognitive-behavioural suicide prevention intervention for men in prison who are perceived to be at risk of death by suicide. Semi-structured one-to-one interviews with key stakeholders and a combination of qualitative analysis techniques were used to develop programme theories. Interviews with 28 stakeholders resulted in five programme theories, focusing on: trust, willingness and engagement; readiness and ability; assessment and formulation; practitioner delivering the 'change work' stage of the intervention face-to-face in a prison environment; and practitioner training, integrating the intervention and onward care. Each theory provides details of what contextual factors need to be considered at each stage, and what activities can facilitate achieving the intended outcomes of the intervention, both intermediate and long term. The PROSPECT implementation strategy developed from the five theories can be adapted to different situations and environments.
doi_str_mv 10.1192/bjb.2024.22
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b0b29e12a1d04d268e223b59762dbd40</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1192_bjb_2024_22</cupid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_b0b29e12a1d04d268e223b59762dbd40</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3051424420</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-9e45c25b41cb3748d74fc3999b418ecd34ca6048f3b13fbf7a30277679d1d163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkktvEzEUhUcIRKvSFXtkiU0RSvBrPDNsUAkBKlVqRLO3_LgzcTRjB3sSqb-Cv4zTpIUiVrauj77jY5-ieE3wlJCGftBrPaWY8imlz4pTiksx4RWunz_sRcNPivOU1hhjIkouSPOyOGF11pSiPi1-fYEd9GEzgB9RaNG4ArSIeeZHF_x-crt1xllAn2Gldi5sI3I-S1wKPn1Ec79S3jjfoUtjICU0BrRcQVSbO3Sx-HFzu5jPlu9QHzpn0BAs9Eh5i9yw6WHvqe5t0hjVCJ2D9Kp40ao-wflxPSuWX-fL2ffJ9c23q9nl9cTwio6TBnhpaKk5MZpVvLYVbw1rmiZPajCWcaME5nXLNGGtbivFMK0qUTWWWCLYWXF1wNqg1nIT3aDinQzKyftBiJ1UcXSmB6mxpg0QqojF3FJRA6VMl00lqNWW48z6dGBttnoAa3KqqPon0Kcn3q1kF3aSEMEbJkgmXBwJMfzcQhrl4JKBvlcewjZJhkvCKed0b_b2H-k6f4nPTyUZ4WWuAsb7eO8PKhNDShHax9sQLPe9kbk3ct8bmcOcFW_-DvCofWhJFkyOODXo6GwHf1z_B_wNHnrNIg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3145202006</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development of the Prevention of Suicide Behaviour in Prisons: Enhancing Access to Therapy (PROSPECT) logic model and implementation strategies</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Crook, Rebecca ; Lennox, Charlotte ; Awenat, Yvonne ; Edge, Dawn ; Knowles, Sarah ; Honeywell, David ; Gooding, Patricia ; Haddock, Gillian ; Brooks, Helen ; Pratt, Daniel</creator><creatorcontrib>Crook, Rebecca ; Lennox, Charlotte ; Awenat, Yvonne ; Edge, Dawn ; Knowles, Sarah ; Honeywell, David ; Gooding, Patricia ; Haddock, Gillian ; Brooks, Helen ; Pratt, Daniel</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to develop and articulate a logic model and programme theories for implementing a new cognitive-behavioural suicide prevention intervention for men in prison who are perceived to be at risk of death by suicide. Semi-structured one-to-one interviews with key stakeholders and a combination of qualitative analysis techniques were used to develop programme theories. Interviews with 28 stakeholders resulted in five programme theories, focusing on: trust, willingness and engagement; readiness and ability; assessment and formulation; practitioner delivering the 'change work' stage of the intervention face-to-face in a prison environment; and practitioner training, integrating the intervention and onward care. Each theory provides details of what contextual factors need to be considered at each stage, and what activities can facilitate achieving the intended outcomes of the intervention, both intermediate and long term. The PROSPECT implementation strategy developed from the five theories can be adapted to different situations and environments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2056-4694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2056-4708</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2053-4868</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1192/bjb.2024.22</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38708568</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Cognitive-behavioral factors ; Data collection ; Forensic ; Health services ; Implementation ; Intervention ; Interviews ; logic model ; Medical personnel ; Original Papers ; Prevention ; Prevention programs ; prisoners ; Prisons ; Professional ethics ; Professionals ; psychological intervention ; Qualitative research ; Stakeholders ; Suicide ; Suicides &amp; suicide attempts</subject><ispartof>BJPsych Bulletin, 2024-10, Vol.48 (5), p.285-293</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists</rights><rights>Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024 2024 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-9e45c25b41cb3748d74fc3999b418ecd34ca6048f3b13fbf7a30277679d1d163</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8843-1224</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11649361/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2056469424000226/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,30999,53791,53793,72832</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38708568$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Crook, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lennox, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Awenat, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edge, Dawn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knowles, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honeywell, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gooding, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haddock, Gillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brooks, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pratt, Daniel</creatorcontrib><title>Development of the Prevention of Suicide Behaviour in Prisons: Enhancing Access to Therapy (PROSPECT) logic model and implementation strategies</title><title>BJPsych Bulletin</title><addtitle>BJPsych Bull</addtitle><description>This study aimed to develop and articulate a logic model and programme theories for implementing a new cognitive-behavioural suicide prevention intervention for men in prison who are perceived to be at risk of death by suicide. Semi-structured one-to-one interviews with key stakeholders and a combination of qualitative analysis techniques were used to develop programme theories. Interviews with 28 stakeholders resulted in five programme theories, focusing on: trust, willingness and engagement; readiness and ability; assessment and formulation; practitioner delivering the 'change work' stage of the intervention face-to-face in a prison environment; and practitioner training, integrating the intervention and onward care. Each theory provides details of what contextual factors need to be considered at each stage, and what activities can facilitate achieving the intended outcomes of the intervention, both intermediate and long term. The PROSPECT implementation strategy developed from the five theories can be adapted to different situations and environments.</description><subject>Cognitive-behavioral factors</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Forensic</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Implementation</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>logic model</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Original Papers</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Prevention programs</subject><subject>prisoners</subject><subject>Prisons</subject><subject>Professional ethics</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>psychological intervention</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Suicide</subject><subject>Suicides &amp; suicide attempts</subject><issn>2056-4694</issn><issn>2056-4708</issn><issn>2053-4868</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkktvEzEUhUcIRKvSFXtkiU0RSvBrPDNsUAkBKlVqRLO3_LgzcTRjB3sSqb-Cv4zTpIUiVrauj77jY5-ieE3wlJCGftBrPaWY8imlz4pTiksx4RWunz_sRcNPivOU1hhjIkouSPOyOGF11pSiPi1-fYEd9GEzgB9RaNG4ArSIeeZHF_x-crt1xllAn2Gldi5sI3I-S1wKPn1Ec79S3jjfoUtjICU0BrRcQVSbO3Sx-HFzu5jPlu9QHzpn0BAs9Eh5i9yw6WHvqe5t0hjVCJ2D9Kp40ao-wflxPSuWX-fL2ffJ9c23q9nl9cTwio6TBnhpaKk5MZpVvLYVbw1rmiZPajCWcaME5nXLNGGtbivFMK0qUTWWWCLYWXF1wNqg1nIT3aDinQzKyftBiJ1UcXSmB6mxpg0QqojF3FJRA6VMl00lqNWW48z6dGBttnoAa3KqqPon0Kcn3q1kF3aSEMEbJkgmXBwJMfzcQhrl4JKBvlcewjZJhkvCKed0b_b2H-k6f4nPTyUZ4WWuAsb7eO8PKhNDShHax9sQLPe9kbk3ct8bmcOcFW_-DvCofWhJFkyOODXo6GwHf1z_B_wNHnrNIg</recordid><startdate>20241001</startdate><enddate>20241001</enddate><creator>Crook, Rebecca</creator><creator>Lennox, Charlotte</creator><creator>Awenat, Yvonne</creator><creator>Edge, Dawn</creator><creator>Knowles, Sarah</creator><creator>Honeywell, David</creator><creator>Gooding, Patricia</creator><creator>Haddock, Gillian</creator><creator>Brooks, Helen</creator><creator>Pratt, Daniel</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>IKXGN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8843-1224</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241001</creationdate><title>Development of the Prevention of Suicide Behaviour in Prisons: Enhancing Access to Therapy (PROSPECT) logic model and implementation strategies</title><author>Crook, Rebecca ; Lennox, Charlotte ; Awenat, Yvonne ; Edge, Dawn ; Knowles, Sarah ; Honeywell, David ; Gooding, Patricia ; Haddock, Gillian ; Brooks, Helen ; Pratt, Daniel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-9e45c25b41cb3748d74fc3999b418ecd34ca6048f3b13fbf7a30277679d1d163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Cognitive-behavioral factors</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Forensic</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Implementation</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>logic model</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Original Papers</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Prevention programs</topic><topic>prisoners</topic><topic>Prisons</topic><topic>Professional ethics</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>psychological intervention</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Suicide</topic><topic>Suicides &amp; suicide attempts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Crook, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lennox, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Awenat, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edge, Dawn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knowles, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honeywell, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gooding, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haddock, Gillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brooks, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pratt, Daniel</creatorcontrib><collection>Cambridge Open Access Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BJPsych Bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Crook, Rebecca</au><au>Lennox, Charlotte</au><au>Awenat, Yvonne</au><au>Edge, Dawn</au><au>Knowles, Sarah</au><au>Honeywell, David</au><au>Gooding, Patricia</au><au>Haddock, Gillian</au><au>Brooks, Helen</au><au>Pratt, Daniel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development of the Prevention of Suicide Behaviour in Prisons: Enhancing Access to Therapy (PROSPECT) logic model and implementation strategies</atitle><jtitle>BJPsych Bulletin</jtitle><addtitle>BJPsych Bull</addtitle><date>2024-10-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>285</spage><epage>293</epage><pages>285-293</pages><issn>2056-4694</issn><eissn>2056-4708</eissn><eissn>2053-4868</eissn><abstract>This study aimed to develop and articulate a logic model and programme theories for implementing a new cognitive-behavioural suicide prevention intervention for men in prison who are perceived to be at risk of death by suicide. Semi-structured one-to-one interviews with key stakeholders and a combination of qualitative analysis techniques were used to develop programme theories. Interviews with 28 stakeholders resulted in five programme theories, focusing on: trust, willingness and engagement; readiness and ability; assessment and formulation; practitioner delivering the 'change work' stage of the intervention face-to-face in a prison environment; and practitioner training, integrating the intervention and onward care. Each theory provides details of what contextual factors need to be considered at each stage, and what activities can facilitate achieving the intended outcomes of the intervention, both intermediate and long term. The PROSPECT implementation strategy developed from the five theories can be adapted to different situations and environments.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>38708568</pmid><doi>10.1192/bjb.2024.22</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8843-1224</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2056-4694
ispartof BJPsych Bulletin, 2024-10, Vol.48 (5), p.285-293
issn 2056-4694
2056-4708
2053-4868
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b0b29e12a1d04d268e223b59762dbd40
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Cambridge Journals Online; PubMed Central
subjects Cognitive-behavioral factors
Data collection
Forensic
Health services
Implementation
Intervention
Interviews
logic model
Medical personnel
Original Papers
Prevention
Prevention programs
prisoners
Prisons
Professional ethics
Professionals
psychological intervention
Qualitative research
Stakeholders
Suicide
Suicides & suicide attempts
title Development of the Prevention of Suicide Behaviour in Prisons: Enhancing Access to Therapy (PROSPECT) logic model and implementation strategies
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A16%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20of%20the%20Prevention%20of%20Suicide%20Behaviour%20in%20Prisons:%20Enhancing%20Access%20to%20Therapy%20(PROSPECT)%20logic%20model%20and%20implementation%20strategies&rft.jtitle=BJPsych%20Bulletin&rft.au=Crook,%20Rebecca&rft.date=2024-10-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=285&rft.epage=293&rft.pages=285-293&rft.issn=2056-4694&rft.eissn=2056-4708&rft_id=info:doi/10.1192/bjb.2024.22&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3051424420%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-9e45c25b41cb3748d74fc3999b418ecd34ca6048f3b13fbf7a30277679d1d163%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3145202006&rft_id=info:pmid/38708568&rft_cupid=10_1192_bjb_2024_22&rfr_iscdi=true