Loading…
Development of the Prevention of Suicide Behaviour in Prisons: Enhancing Access to Therapy (PROSPECT) logic model and implementation strategies
This study aimed to develop and articulate a logic model and programme theories for implementing a new cognitive-behavioural suicide prevention intervention for men in prison who are perceived to be at risk of death by suicide. Semi-structured one-to-one interviews with key stakeholders and a combin...
Saved in:
Published in: | BJPsych Bulletin 2024-10, Vol.48 (5), p.285-293 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-9e45c25b41cb3748d74fc3999b418ecd34ca6048f3b13fbf7a30277679d1d163 |
container_end_page | 293 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 285 |
container_title | BJPsych Bulletin |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Crook, Rebecca Lennox, Charlotte Awenat, Yvonne Edge, Dawn Knowles, Sarah Honeywell, David Gooding, Patricia Haddock, Gillian Brooks, Helen Pratt, Daniel |
description | This study aimed to develop and articulate a logic model and programme theories for implementing a new cognitive-behavioural suicide prevention intervention for men in prison who are perceived to be at risk of death by suicide. Semi-structured one-to-one interviews with key stakeholders and a combination of qualitative analysis techniques were used to develop programme theories.
Interviews with 28 stakeholders resulted in five programme theories, focusing on: trust, willingness and engagement; readiness and ability; assessment and formulation; practitioner delivering the 'change work' stage of the intervention face-to-face in a prison environment; and practitioner training, integrating the intervention and onward care. Each theory provides details of what contextual factors need to be considered at each stage, and what activities can facilitate achieving the intended outcomes of the intervention, both intermediate and long term.
The PROSPECT implementation strategy developed from the five theories can be adapted to different situations and environments. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1192/bjb.2024.22 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b0b29e12a1d04d268e223b59762dbd40</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1192_bjb_2024_22</cupid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_b0b29e12a1d04d268e223b59762dbd40</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3051424420</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-9e45c25b41cb3748d74fc3999b418ecd34ca6048f3b13fbf7a30277679d1d163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkktvEzEUhUcIRKvSFXtkiU0RSvBrPDNsUAkBKlVqRLO3_LgzcTRjB3sSqb-Cv4zTpIUiVrauj77jY5-ieE3wlJCGftBrPaWY8imlz4pTiksx4RWunz_sRcNPivOU1hhjIkouSPOyOGF11pSiPi1-fYEd9GEzgB9RaNG4ArSIeeZHF_x-crt1xllAn2Gldi5sI3I-S1wKPn1Ec79S3jjfoUtjICU0BrRcQVSbO3Sx-HFzu5jPlu9QHzpn0BAs9Eh5i9yw6WHvqe5t0hjVCJ2D9Kp40ao-wflxPSuWX-fL2ffJ9c23q9nl9cTwio6TBnhpaKk5MZpVvLYVbw1rmiZPajCWcaME5nXLNGGtbivFMK0qUTWWWCLYWXF1wNqg1nIT3aDinQzKyftBiJ1UcXSmB6mxpg0QqojF3FJRA6VMl00lqNWW48z6dGBttnoAa3KqqPon0Kcn3q1kF3aSEMEbJkgmXBwJMfzcQhrl4JKBvlcewjZJhkvCKed0b_b2H-k6f4nPTyUZ4WWuAsb7eO8PKhNDShHax9sQLPe9kbk3ct8bmcOcFW_-DvCofWhJFkyOODXo6GwHf1z_B_wNHnrNIg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3145202006</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development of the Prevention of Suicide Behaviour in Prisons: Enhancing Access to Therapy (PROSPECT) logic model and implementation strategies</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Crook, Rebecca ; Lennox, Charlotte ; Awenat, Yvonne ; Edge, Dawn ; Knowles, Sarah ; Honeywell, David ; Gooding, Patricia ; Haddock, Gillian ; Brooks, Helen ; Pratt, Daniel</creator><creatorcontrib>Crook, Rebecca ; Lennox, Charlotte ; Awenat, Yvonne ; Edge, Dawn ; Knowles, Sarah ; Honeywell, David ; Gooding, Patricia ; Haddock, Gillian ; Brooks, Helen ; Pratt, Daniel</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to develop and articulate a logic model and programme theories for implementing a new cognitive-behavioural suicide prevention intervention for men in prison who are perceived to be at risk of death by suicide. Semi-structured one-to-one interviews with key stakeholders and a combination of qualitative analysis techniques were used to develop programme theories.
Interviews with 28 stakeholders resulted in five programme theories, focusing on: trust, willingness and engagement; readiness and ability; assessment and formulation; practitioner delivering the 'change work' stage of the intervention face-to-face in a prison environment; and practitioner training, integrating the intervention and onward care. Each theory provides details of what contextual factors need to be considered at each stage, and what activities can facilitate achieving the intended outcomes of the intervention, both intermediate and long term.
The PROSPECT implementation strategy developed from the five theories can be adapted to different situations and environments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2056-4694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2056-4708</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2053-4868</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1192/bjb.2024.22</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38708568</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Cognitive-behavioral factors ; Data collection ; Forensic ; Health services ; Implementation ; Intervention ; Interviews ; logic model ; Medical personnel ; Original Papers ; Prevention ; Prevention programs ; prisoners ; Prisons ; Professional ethics ; Professionals ; psychological intervention ; Qualitative research ; Stakeholders ; Suicide ; Suicides & suicide attempts</subject><ispartof>BJPsych Bulletin, 2024-10, Vol.48 (5), p.285-293</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists</rights><rights>Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024 2024 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-9e45c25b41cb3748d74fc3999b418ecd34ca6048f3b13fbf7a30277679d1d163</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8843-1224</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11649361/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2056469424000226/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,30999,53791,53793,72832</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38708568$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Crook, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lennox, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Awenat, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edge, Dawn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knowles, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honeywell, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gooding, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haddock, Gillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brooks, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pratt, Daniel</creatorcontrib><title>Development of the Prevention of Suicide Behaviour in Prisons: Enhancing Access to Therapy (PROSPECT) logic model and implementation strategies</title><title>BJPsych Bulletin</title><addtitle>BJPsych Bull</addtitle><description>This study aimed to develop and articulate a logic model and programme theories for implementing a new cognitive-behavioural suicide prevention intervention for men in prison who are perceived to be at risk of death by suicide. Semi-structured one-to-one interviews with key stakeholders and a combination of qualitative analysis techniques were used to develop programme theories.
Interviews with 28 stakeholders resulted in five programme theories, focusing on: trust, willingness and engagement; readiness and ability; assessment and formulation; practitioner delivering the 'change work' stage of the intervention face-to-face in a prison environment; and practitioner training, integrating the intervention and onward care. Each theory provides details of what contextual factors need to be considered at each stage, and what activities can facilitate achieving the intended outcomes of the intervention, both intermediate and long term.
The PROSPECT implementation strategy developed from the five theories can be adapted to different situations and environments.</description><subject>Cognitive-behavioral factors</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Forensic</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Implementation</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>logic model</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Original Papers</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Prevention programs</subject><subject>prisoners</subject><subject>Prisons</subject><subject>Professional ethics</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>psychological intervention</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Suicide</subject><subject>Suicides & suicide attempts</subject><issn>2056-4694</issn><issn>2056-4708</issn><issn>2053-4868</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkktvEzEUhUcIRKvSFXtkiU0RSvBrPDNsUAkBKlVqRLO3_LgzcTRjB3sSqb-Cv4zTpIUiVrauj77jY5-ieE3wlJCGftBrPaWY8imlz4pTiksx4RWunz_sRcNPivOU1hhjIkouSPOyOGF11pSiPi1-fYEd9GEzgB9RaNG4ArSIeeZHF_x-crt1xllAn2Gldi5sI3I-S1wKPn1Ec79S3jjfoUtjICU0BrRcQVSbO3Sx-HFzu5jPlu9QHzpn0BAs9Eh5i9yw6WHvqe5t0hjVCJ2D9Kp40ao-wflxPSuWX-fL2ffJ9c23q9nl9cTwio6TBnhpaKk5MZpVvLYVbw1rmiZPajCWcaME5nXLNGGtbivFMK0qUTWWWCLYWXF1wNqg1nIT3aDinQzKyftBiJ1UcXSmB6mxpg0QqojF3FJRA6VMl00lqNWW48z6dGBttnoAa3KqqPon0Kcn3q1kF3aSEMEbJkgmXBwJMfzcQhrl4JKBvlcewjZJhkvCKed0b_b2H-k6f4nPTyUZ4WWuAsb7eO8PKhNDShHax9sQLPe9kbk3ct8bmcOcFW_-DvCofWhJFkyOODXo6GwHf1z_B_wNHnrNIg</recordid><startdate>20241001</startdate><enddate>20241001</enddate><creator>Crook, Rebecca</creator><creator>Lennox, Charlotte</creator><creator>Awenat, Yvonne</creator><creator>Edge, Dawn</creator><creator>Knowles, Sarah</creator><creator>Honeywell, David</creator><creator>Gooding, Patricia</creator><creator>Haddock, Gillian</creator><creator>Brooks, Helen</creator><creator>Pratt, Daniel</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>IKXGN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8843-1224</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241001</creationdate><title>Development of the Prevention of Suicide Behaviour in Prisons: Enhancing Access to Therapy (PROSPECT) logic model and implementation strategies</title><author>Crook, Rebecca ; Lennox, Charlotte ; Awenat, Yvonne ; Edge, Dawn ; Knowles, Sarah ; Honeywell, David ; Gooding, Patricia ; Haddock, Gillian ; Brooks, Helen ; Pratt, Daniel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-9e45c25b41cb3748d74fc3999b418ecd34ca6048f3b13fbf7a30277679d1d163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Cognitive-behavioral factors</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Forensic</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Implementation</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>logic model</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Original Papers</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Prevention programs</topic><topic>prisoners</topic><topic>Prisons</topic><topic>Professional ethics</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>psychological intervention</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Suicide</topic><topic>Suicides & suicide attempts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Crook, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lennox, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Awenat, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edge, Dawn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knowles, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honeywell, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gooding, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haddock, Gillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brooks, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pratt, Daniel</creatorcontrib><collection>Cambridge Open Access Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BJPsych Bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Crook, Rebecca</au><au>Lennox, Charlotte</au><au>Awenat, Yvonne</au><au>Edge, Dawn</au><au>Knowles, Sarah</au><au>Honeywell, David</au><au>Gooding, Patricia</au><au>Haddock, Gillian</au><au>Brooks, Helen</au><au>Pratt, Daniel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development of the Prevention of Suicide Behaviour in Prisons: Enhancing Access to Therapy (PROSPECT) logic model and implementation strategies</atitle><jtitle>BJPsych Bulletin</jtitle><addtitle>BJPsych Bull</addtitle><date>2024-10-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>285</spage><epage>293</epage><pages>285-293</pages><issn>2056-4694</issn><eissn>2056-4708</eissn><eissn>2053-4868</eissn><abstract>This study aimed to develop and articulate a logic model and programme theories for implementing a new cognitive-behavioural suicide prevention intervention for men in prison who are perceived to be at risk of death by suicide. Semi-structured one-to-one interviews with key stakeholders and a combination of qualitative analysis techniques were used to develop programme theories.
Interviews with 28 stakeholders resulted in five programme theories, focusing on: trust, willingness and engagement; readiness and ability; assessment and formulation; practitioner delivering the 'change work' stage of the intervention face-to-face in a prison environment; and practitioner training, integrating the intervention and onward care. Each theory provides details of what contextual factors need to be considered at each stage, and what activities can facilitate achieving the intended outcomes of the intervention, both intermediate and long term.
The PROSPECT implementation strategy developed from the five theories can be adapted to different situations and environments.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>38708568</pmid><doi>10.1192/bjb.2024.22</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8843-1224</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2056-4694 |
ispartof | BJPsych Bulletin, 2024-10, Vol.48 (5), p.285-293 |
issn | 2056-4694 2056-4708 2053-4868 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b0b29e12a1d04d268e223b59762dbd40 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Cambridge Journals Online; PubMed Central |
subjects | Cognitive-behavioral factors Data collection Forensic Health services Implementation Intervention Interviews logic model Medical personnel Original Papers Prevention Prevention programs prisoners Prisons Professional ethics Professionals psychological intervention Qualitative research Stakeholders Suicide Suicides & suicide attempts |
title | Development of the Prevention of Suicide Behaviour in Prisons: Enhancing Access to Therapy (PROSPECT) logic model and implementation strategies |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A16%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20of%20the%20Prevention%20of%20Suicide%20Behaviour%20in%20Prisons:%20Enhancing%20Access%20to%20Therapy%20(PROSPECT)%20logic%20model%20and%20implementation%20strategies&rft.jtitle=BJPsych%20Bulletin&rft.au=Crook,%20Rebecca&rft.date=2024-10-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=285&rft.epage=293&rft.pages=285-293&rft.issn=2056-4694&rft.eissn=2056-4708&rft_id=info:doi/10.1192/bjb.2024.22&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3051424420%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-9e45c25b41cb3748d74fc3999b418ecd34ca6048f3b13fbf7a30277679d1d163%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3145202006&rft_id=info:pmid/38708568&rft_cupid=10_1192_bjb_2024_22&rfr_iscdi=true |