Loading…

A mixed distribution approach for low-flow frequency analysis – Part 2: Comparative assessment of a mixed probability vs. copula-based dependence framework

In climates with a warm and a cold season, low flows are generated by different processes, which violates the homogeneity assumption of extreme value statistics. In this second part of a two-part series, we extend the mixed probability estimator of the companion paper (Laaha, 2023) to deal with depe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Hydrology and earth system sciences 2023-05, Vol.27 (10), p.2019-2034
Main Author: Laaha, Gregor
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-78e959d8c73b899f5c961e6b0dff67bab52bf378855b6f59776a3414695213df3
container_end_page 2034
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2019
container_title Hydrology and earth system sciences
container_volume 27
creator Laaha, Gregor
description In climates with a warm and a cold season, low flows are generated by different processes, which violates the homogeneity assumption of extreme value statistics. In this second part of a two-part series, we extend the mixed probability estimator of the companion paper (Laaha, 2023) to deal with dependency of seasonal events. We formulate a copula-based estimator for seasonal minima series and examine it in a hydrological context. The estimator is a valid generalization of the annual probability estimator and provides a consistent framework for estimating return periods of summer, winter, and annual events. Using archetypal examples we show that differences in the mixed estimator are always observed in the upper part of the distribution, which is less relevant for low-flow frequency analysis. The differences decrease as the return period increases so that both models coincide for the severest events. In a quantitative evaluation, we test the performance of the copula estimator on a pan-European data set. We find a large gain of both mixed distribution approaches over the annual estimator, making these approaches highly relevant for Europe as a whole. We then examine the relative performance gain of the mixed copula versus the mixed distribution approach in more detail. The analysis shows that the differences in the 100-year event are actually minimal. However, the differences in 2-year events are considerable in some of the catchments, with a relative deviation of −15 % to −25 % in the most affected regions. This points to a prediction bias of the mixed probability estimator that can be corrected using the copula approach. Using multiple regression models, we show that the performance gain can be well explained on hydrological grounds, with weak seasonality leading to a high potential for corrections and strong seasonal correlation reinforcing the need to take this potential into account. Accordingly, the greatest differences can be observed in mid-mountain regions in cold and temperate climates, where rivers have a strongly mixed low-flow regime. This finding is of particular relevance for event mapping, where regional severity can be misinterpreted when the seasonal correlation is neglected. We conclude that the two mixed probability estimators are quite similar, and both are conceptually more adequate than the annual minima approach for mixed summer and winter low-flow regimes. In regions with strong seasonal correlation the mixed copula estimator appear
doi_str_mv 10.5194/hess-27-2019-2023
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b0bfcfbb45344d63a04f9ec4e13af7f4</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A750813689</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_b0bfcfbb45344d63a04f9ec4e13af7f4</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A750813689</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-78e959d8c73b899f5c961e6b0dff67bab52bf378855b6f59776a3414695213df3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUktuFDEQbSGQCIEDsLPEikUP_rbb7EYRn5EigfisrbLbnnjobjd2T5LZcQcOQM6So3ASPEwEjIQslUulV-9VlV5VPSV4IYjiLy5czjWVNcVElUDZveqENFjWUrH2_j_5w-pRzhuMads29KT6sURDuHYd6kKeUzDbOcQRwTSlCPYC-ZhQH69qXwLyyX3dutHuEIzQ73LI6Oe37-g9pPn2hr5EZ3GYIMEcLh2CnMtEgxtnFD2CO5HCasCEPsw7dJkXtzc2TtseagN5P4Kb3NgVAVekYHBXMX15XD3w0Gf35O4_rT6_fvXp7G19_u7N6mx5XlvOxFzL1imhutZKZlqlvLCqIa4xuPO-kUVTUOOZbFshTOOFkrIBxglvlKCEdZ6dVqsDbxdho6cUBkg7HSHo34WY1rqsGWzvtMHGW28MF4zzrmGAuVfOckcYeOl54Xp24CrrloPlWW_iNpWTZU1boiihXOK_qDUU0jD6OCewQ8hWL6XALWFNqwpq8R9UeZ0bgo2j86HUjxqeHzUUzOyu5zVsc9arjx-OseSAtSnmnJz_szjBem8rvbeVplLvbaX3tmK_AGigxFM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2819212470</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A mixed distribution approach for low-flow frequency analysis – Part 2: Comparative assessment of a mixed probability vs. copula-based dependence framework</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>Laaha, Gregor</creator><creatorcontrib>Laaha, Gregor</creatorcontrib><description>In climates with a warm and a cold season, low flows are generated by different processes, which violates the homogeneity assumption of extreme value statistics. In this second part of a two-part series, we extend the mixed probability estimator of the companion paper (Laaha, 2023) to deal with dependency of seasonal events. We formulate a copula-based estimator for seasonal minima series and examine it in a hydrological context. The estimator is a valid generalization of the annual probability estimator and provides a consistent framework for estimating return periods of summer, winter, and annual events. Using archetypal examples we show that differences in the mixed estimator are always observed in the upper part of the distribution, which is less relevant for low-flow frequency analysis. The differences decrease as the return period increases so that both models coincide for the severest events. In a quantitative evaluation, we test the performance of the copula estimator on a pan-European data set. We find a large gain of both mixed distribution approaches over the annual estimator, making these approaches highly relevant for Europe as a whole. We then examine the relative performance gain of the mixed copula versus the mixed distribution approach in more detail. The analysis shows that the differences in the 100-year event are actually minimal. However, the differences in 2-year events are considerable in some of the catchments, with a relative deviation of −15 % to −25 % in the most affected regions. This points to a prediction bias of the mixed probability estimator that can be corrected using the copula approach. Using multiple regression models, we show that the performance gain can be well explained on hydrological grounds, with weak seasonality leading to a high potential for corrections and strong seasonal correlation reinforcing the need to take this potential into account. Accordingly, the greatest differences can be observed in mid-mountain regions in cold and temperate climates, where rivers have a strongly mixed low-flow regime. This finding is of particular relevance for event mapping, where regional severity can be misinterpreted when the seasonal correlation is neglected. We conclude that the two mixed probability estimators are quite similar, and both are conceptually more adequate than the annual minima approach for mixed summer and winter low-flow regimes. In regions with strong seasonal correlation the mixed copula estimator appears most appropriate and should be preferred over the mixed distribution approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1607-7938</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1027-5606</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1607-7938</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5194/hess-27-2019-2023</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Katlenburg-Lindau: Copernicus GmbH</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Annual ; Catchment area ; Catchments ; Cold flow ; Cold season ; Corrections ; Correlation ; Dams ; Distribution ; Extreme values ; Frequency analysis ; Homogeneity ; Hydrology ; Low flow ; Mountain regions ; Multiple regression models ; Probability ; Probability theory ; Random variables ; Regression analysis ; Regression models ; Rivers ; Seasonal variations ; Seasonality ; Seasons ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical methods ; Summer ; Temperate climates ; Winter</subject><ispartof>Hydrology and earth system sciences, 2023-05, Vol.27 (10), p.2019-2034</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Copernicus GmbH</rights><rights>2023. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-78e959d8c73b899f5c961e6b0dff67bab52bf378855b6f59776a3414695213df3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6793-9640</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2819212470/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2819212470?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,2102,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Laaha, Gregor</creatorcontrib><title>A mixed distribution approach for low-flow frequency analysis – Part 2: Comparative assessment of a mixed probability vs. copula-based dependence framework</title><title>Hydrology and earth system sciences</title><description>In climates with a warm and a cold season, low flows are generated by different processes, which violates the homogeneity assumption of extreme value statistics. In this second part of a two-part series, we extend the mixed probability estimator of the companion paper (Laaha, 2023) to deal with dependency of seasonal events. We formulate a copula-based estimator for seasonal minima series and examine it in a hydrological context. The estimator is a valid generalization of the annual probability estimator and provides a consistent framework for estimating return periods of summer, winter, and annual events. Using archetypal examples we show that differences in the mixed estimator are always observed in the upper part of the distribution, which is less relevant for low-flow frequency analysis. The differences decrease as the return period increases so that both models coincide for the severest events. In a quantitative evaluation, we test the performance of the copula estimator on a pan-European data set. We find a large gain of both mixed distribution approaches over the annual estimator, making these approaches highly relevant for Europe as a whole. We then examine the relative performance gain of the mixed copula versus the mixed distribution approach in more detail. The analysis shows that the differences in the 100-year event are actually minimal. However, the differences in 2-year events are considerable in some of the catchments, with a relative deviation of −15 % to −25 % in the most affected regions. This points to a prediction bias of the mixed probability estimator that can be corrected using the copula approach. Using multiple regression models, we show that the performance gain can be well explained on hydrological grounds, with weak seasonality leading to a high potential for corrections and strong seasonal correlation reinforcing the need to take this potential into account. Accordingly, the greatest differences can be observed in mid-mountain regions in cold and temperate climates, where rivers have a strongly mixed low-flow regime. This finding is of particular relevance for event mapping, where regional severity can be misinterpreted when the seasonal correlation is neglected. We conclude that the two mixed probability estimators are quite similar, and both are conceptually more adequate than the annual minima approach for mixed summer and winter low-flow regimes. In regions with strong seasonal correlation the mixed copula estimator appears most appropriate and should be preferred over the mixed distribution approach.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Annual</subject><subject>Catchment area</subject><subject>Catchments</subject><subject>Cold flow</subject><subject>Cold season</subject><subject>Corrections</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Dams</subject><subject>Distribution</subject><subject>Extreme values</subject><subject>Frequency analysis</subject><subject>Homogeneity</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Low flow</subject><subject>Mountain regions</subject><subject>Multiple regression models</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Probability theory</subject><subject>Random variables</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Seasonal variations</subject><subject>Seasonality</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Summer</subject><subject>Temperate climates</subject><subject>Winter</subject><issn>1607-7938</issn><issn>1027-5606</issn><issn>1607-7938</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUktuFDEQbSGQCIEDsLPEikUP_rbb7EYRn5EigfisrbLbnnjobjd2T5LZcQcOQM6So3ASPEwEjIQslUulV-9VlV5VPSV4IYjiLy5czjWVNcVElUDZveqENFjWUrH2_j_5w-pRzhuMads29KT6sURDuHYd6kKeUzDbOcQRwTSlCPYC-ZhQH69qXwLyyX3dutHuEIzQ73LI6Oe37-g9pPn2hr5EZ3GYIMEcLh2CnMtEgxtnFD2CO5HCasCEPsw7dJkXtzc2TtseagN5P4Kb3NgVAVekYHBXMX15XD3w0Gf35O4_rT6_fvXp7G19_u7N6mx5XlvOxFzL1imhutZKZlqlvLCqIa4xuPO-kUVTUOOZbFshTOOFkrIBxglvlKCEdZ6dVqsDbxdho6cUBkg7HSHo34WY1rqsGWzvtMHGW28MF4zzrmGAuVfOckcYeOl54Xp24CrrloPlWW_iNpWTZU1boiihXOK_qDUU0jD6OCewQ8hWL6XALWFNqwpq8R9UeZ0bgo2j86HUjxqeHzUUzOyu5zVsc9arjx-OseSAtSnmnJz_szjBem8rvbeVplLvbaX3tmK_AGigxFM</recordid><startdate>20230526</startdate><enddate>20230526</enddate><creator>Laaha, Gregor</creator><general>Copernicus GmbH</general><general>Copernicus Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BFMQW</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6793-9640</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230526</creationdate><title>A mixed distribution approach for low-flow frequency analysis – Part 2: Comparative assessment of a mixed probability vs. copula-based dependence framework</title><author>Laaha, Gregor</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-78e959d8c73b899f5c961e6b0dff67bab52bf378855b6f59776a3414695213df3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Annual</topic><topic>Catchment area</topic><topic>Catchments</topic><topic>Cold flow</topic><topic>Cold season</topic><topic>Corrections</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Dams</topic><topic>Distribution</topic><topic>Extreme values</topic><topic>Frequency analysis</topic><topic>Homogeneity</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Low flow</topic><topic>Mountain regions</topic><topic>Multiple regression models</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Probability theory</topic><topic>Random variables</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Seasonal variations</topic><topic>Seasonality</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Summer</topic><topic>Temperate climates</topic><topic>Winter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Laaha, Gregor</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Continental Europe Database</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Hydrology and earth system sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Laaha, Gregor</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A mixed distribution approach for low-flow frequency analysis – Part 2: Comparative assessment of a mixed probability vs. copula-based dependence framework</atitle><jtitle>Hydrology and earth system sciences</jtitle><date>2023-05-26</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2019</spage><epage>2034</epage><pages>2019-2034</pages><issn>1607-7938</issn><issn>1027-5606</issn><eissn>1607-7938</eissn><abstract>In climates with a warm and a cold season, low flows are generated by different processes, which violates the homogeneity assumption of extreme value statistics. In this second part of a two-part series, we extend the mixed probability estimator of the companion paper (Laaha, 2023) to deal with dependency of seasonal events. We formulate a copula-based estimator for seasonal minima series and examine it in a hydrological context. The estimator is a valid generalization of the annual probability estimator and provides a consistent framework for estimating return periods of summer, winter, and annual events. Using archetypal examples we show that differences in the mixed estimator are always observed in the upper part of the distribution, which is less relevant for low-flow frequency analysis. The differences decrease as the return period increases so that both models coincide for the severest events. In a quantitative evaluation, we test the performance of the copula estimator on a pan-European data set. We find a large gain of both mixed distribution approaches over the annual estimator, making these approaches highly relevant for Europe as a whole. We then examine the relative performance gain of the mixed copula versus the mixed distribution approach in more detail. The analysis shows that the differences in the 100-year event are actually minimal. However, the differences in 2-year events are considerable in some of the catchments, with a relative deviation of −15 % to −25 % in the most affected regions. This points to a prediction bias of the mixed probability estimator that can be corrected using the copula approach. Using multiple regression models, we show that the performance gain can be well explained on hydrological grounds, with weak seasonality leading to a high potential for corrections and strong seasonal correlation reinforcing the need to take this potential into account. Accordingly, the greatest differences can be observed in mid-mountain regions in cold and temperate climates, where rivers have a strongly mixed low-flow regime. This finding is of particular relevance for event mapping, where regional severity can be misinterpreted when the seasonal correlation is neglected. We conclude that the two mixed probability estimators are quite similar, and both are conceptually more adequate than the annual minima approach for mixed summer and winter low-flow regimes. In regions with strong seasonal correlation the mixed copula estimator appears most appropriate and should be preferred over the mixed distribution approach.</abstract><cop>Katlenburg-Lindau</cop><pub>Copernicus GmbH</pub><doi>10.5194/hess-27-2019-2023</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6793-9640</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1607-7938
ispartof Hydrology and earth system sciences, 2023-05, Vol.27 (10), p.2019-2034
issn 1607-7938
1027-5606
1607-7938
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b0bfcfbb45344d63a04f9ec4e13af7f4
source Publicly Available Content Database; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
subjects Analysis
Annual
Catchment area
Catchments
Cold flow
Cold season
Corrections
Correlation
Dams
Distribution
Extreme values
Frequency analysis
Homogeneity
Hydrology
Low flow
Mountain regions
Multiple regression models
Probability
Probability theory
Random variables
Regression analysis
Regression models
Rivers
Seasonal variations
Seasonality
Seasons
Statistical analysis
Statistical methods
Summer
Temperate climates
Winter
title A mixed distribution approach for low-flow frequency analysis – Part 2: Comparative assessment of a mixed probability vs. copula-based dependence framework
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T03%3A34%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20mixed%20distribution%20approach%20for%20low-flow%20frequency%20analysis%20%E2%80%93%20Part%C2%A02:%20Comparative%20assessment%20of%20a%20mixed%20probability%20vs.%C2%A0copula-based%20dependence%20framework&rft.jtitle=Hydrology%20and%20earth%20system%20sciences&rft.au=Laaha,%20Gregor&rft.date=2023-05-26&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2019&rft.epage=2034&rft.pages=2019-2034&rft.issn=1607-7938&rft.eissn=1607-7938&rft_id=info:doi/10.5194/hess-27-2019-2023&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA750813689%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-78e959d8c73b899f5c961e6b0dff67bab52bf378855b6f59776a3414695213df3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2819212470&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A750813689&rfr_iscdi=true